STORY   LOOP   FURRY   PORN   GAMES
• C •   SERVICES [?] [R] RND   POPULAR
Archived flashes:
228139
/disc/ · /res/     /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/P0001 · P2561 · P5122

<div style="position:absolute;top:-99px;left:-99px;"><img src="http://swfchan.com:57475/47447827?noj=FRM47447827-19DN" width="1" height="1"></div>

This is the wiki page for Flash #60047
Visit the flash's index page for basic data and a list of seen names.


bb_tm.swf
2,51 MiB, 01:41 | [W] [I]

Threads (1):

[PZF9FHH]F !! http://cgi.4chan.org/f/res/1058609.html
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 27/8 -2009 06:38:48 Ended: 27/8 -2009 18:55:09Flashes: 1 Posts: 33
File[bb_tm.swf] - (2.5 MB)
[_] [?] Anon 1058609 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 1058610 Alarming, but I don't trust the form... >_>
>> [_] Anon 1058613 hmmm I think I should put all of my pesonal info into this flash posted on 4chan, seems legit. But seriously, yes, our country is stupid for having that many nukes.
>> [_] Anon 1058632 >># It is also the strongest because of them.
>> [_] Anon 1058633 >># Yes but do we need that many? 6 would decimate Russia. 100 would decimate most of the world. Do we need 150,000 or more? Its just a waste of money.
>> [_] Anon 1058654 >># The thing is that the Hiroshima bomb was relatively weak. We have about 10,000 warheads last time I saw any figures. The ad is designed to be misleading in that regard. Do we need all of those? Certainly not, but we need to keep some.
>> [_] Anon 1058658 you know what? i was almost interested. but then i heard it was ben from ben and jerrys. ben and jerry are out of the closet, full frontal FAGS.
>> [_] Anon 1058662 >># I'm not sure if his math is right. 90 Hiroshimas doesn't seem enough to blow up all of Russia. After all wasn't the Tunguska incident 1000 times more powerful then Hiroshima? That only effected 830 square miles. Russia is 6,592,800 sq mi, meaning that 7,943+ Tunguskas are needed to level Russia, or nearly 8,000,000 Hiroshimas. 150,000 Hiroshima size bombs would hardly scratch Russia.
>> [_] Anon 1058673 >># It would wipe out most people, land mass is not a concern
>> [_] Anon 1058674 I'd rather have shitty schools than have China roll up on us.
>> [_] Anon 1058692 I think, that, I liked the sound the bbs made when they hit the glass. Was like rain. Very calming. Soooooo... AMERICA NEEDS MORE NUCLEAR WEAPONS SO HE CAN POUR OUT MORE BBS TO MAKE ME FEEL GOOD! GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGO!
>> [_] Anon 1058701 WE HAVE A SHITTON OF NUKES FUCK THE WORLD
>> [_] Anon 1058702 FUCK YOU ICE CREAM MAN
>> [_] Anon 1058737 diabeetus
>> [_] Anon 1058738 fag
>> [_] Anon 1058747 Everyone ITT is an idiot
>> [_] Anon 1058751 >># alarmist more like it, they're overexaggerating and dont even mention the number of treaties we have active that mandate reductions of our stockpiles. i fucking dread the day that the US gets conned into a treaty by all the dirty hippies to dismantle all of our weapons because then we'll be rolled over by china and russia within days
>> [_] Anon 1058754 >># ..you call someone an alarmist then say we will get 'rolled over by china and russia in days' lol wut?
>> [_] Anon 1058755 >># Like I said; everyone in this thread is an idiot
>> [_] Anon 1058757 FUCK YEAH, AMERICA
>> [_] Anon 1058766 >># Seconded
>> [_] Anon 1058768 in soviet russia weapon explode you
>> [_] IWBTVB 1058773 TALK SOFTLY BUT CARRY A BIG STICK DON'T ANY OF YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND THAT?
>> [_] sage sage 1058774 It's not that we have that much more, it's just that they're that much more powerful.
>> [_] Anon 1058792 I say we bomb all of our enemies when they're not paying attention and get rid of the excess nukes.
>> [_] Anon 1058797 usa failed, no point on fixing it now
>> [_] Anon 1058802 >># ...in america too
>> [_] Anon 1058803 >># there's not exactly a shitload of cities in russia, most of it is siberia
>> [_] Anon 1058821 Each time I come to this thread I'm drawn to write up an intelligent commentary on this thread and the content in the flash vid. And every time I delete it and just say Everyone in this thread is a fucking idiot. There's no point. Nothing will change. All your opinions in this meaningless thread are all moot and will all soon be forgotten by the lot of u. With that said: ..... ...fuck it. Doesn't matter. Everyone ITT is an idiot anyway.
>> [_] Anon 1058822 You can't assume that you'll have many of your own nukes still in a usable condition in the event that your targets your launch sites (which is a given). Some large amount of redundancy is expected, and necessary.
>> [_] Anon 1058830 and he couldn't just give he the number and his sources?
>> [_] Anon 1058862 flash should be called: marbles of paranoia
>> [_] Anon 1058872 >># we used 2 nukes to get to where we are, we dont need over 9000



http://swfchan.net/13/60047.shtml
Created: 27/8 -2009 06:41:33 Last modified: 16/4 -2019 12:07:10 Server time: 19/05 -2024 03:08:55