File: Global_Economic_Collapse.swf-(8.12 MB, Loop)
[_] uncle sam has a lot of bills to pay Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)18:49 No.1813135
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)18:54 No.1813140
oh joy, the economics spammer is back
>> [_] sage 11/20/12(Tue)19:00 No.1813145
>>1813140
As always, no explanation as to how it's junk.
"Spam is most often considered to be electronic junk mail"
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)19:02 No.1813147
>>1813145
I'm not going to attempt to further define spam, I know it when I see it.
But if you want a rough rule of thumb, ask yourself: is anyone on /f/ at all interested in this
shit?
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)19:03 No.1813149
>>1813145
Because moot himself agreed that it is and told us to email him if you post it again. End of
story, enjoy your incoming ban.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)19:06 No.1813151
>>1813149
>>1813147
Not going to define spam, moot says it's spam. Moot is god.
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)19:10 No.1813157
>>1813151
It seems like you're not going to reply to my parallel between your reporting attitude and
religion.
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)19:15 No.1813162
>>1813147
I don't ask that question because that's not how "spam" is defined. "Spam" is defined as junk. If
it's junk then there needs to be an explanation as to how it's junk, not people FEELING if it is.
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)19:17 No.1813164
>>1813149
Post what? post something that people FEEL is spam without an explanation as to how it is, that
sounds like a religion to me.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)19:27 No.1813176
This is actually interesting and somewhat informed, you know. Not zeitgeist or bullcrap like that
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)19:32 No.1813182
>>1813149
>>1813176
Post anything about economics, thinks it's "it" or "zeitgeist spam" or "bullcrap".
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)19:40 No.1813187
>>1813182
>flash talks about resources as the perfect alternative to money
>OP has the exact same "define spam based on my extremely loaded questions" bullshit as past
zeitgeist threads
Yeah, you're not fooling anyone. [spoiler]Samefag.[/spoiler]
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)19:48 No.1813197
>>1813187
Asking questions is bullshit and to think about the questions is fooling people.
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)19:53 No.1813199
>>1813187
I actually defined "spam" as junk. That's not a loaded question. I said EXPLAIN how is flash this
junk? The burden of proof should be with you, unless you advocate a ban/reporting happy stance. I
saw the thread on /q/, no explanation was given and people were calling it "spam". It sounds like
"Ad Hominem".
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:02 No.1813208
>So nobody really knows how we will eventually get out of it.
I do! I know how the US will settle their debt and thus this "collapse" will be prevented.
Wait a few more years... Increasing the value of gold. Then bam, trade gold with (for example)
China in return of clearing the debts.
The US have so much gold reserves they could easily pay their debt. The only reason why they
haven't is because they either 1) are waiting for the value of gold to go up further, 2) think
they are too powerful to be forced to ever pay or, 3) know that gold is too valuable a resource
to be traded away no matter what.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:03 No.1813209
I think 2 could be true, but I don't think it's real because even if the US can't be attacked by
force, trading can be cut off to the country which will make life there miserable. And the US
can't really force a strong (modern) country to do anything either because they know that, thanks
to nukes, nobody will win. Even if the US would take over a country they know that their losses
would be too great, not to mention the effort it takes to hold power in a resisting nation.
If you think that the US can beat the crap of every country in the world, sure it might be true
that the US will win in the end but rest assured that both you, your family and everybody you
care about WILL die and not enjoy the victory.
So the only real reason I believe is 1, they wait. Note that gold doesn't really have to equal
their debt measured in US dollars. Gold is gold while USD or EUR or GBP is just currency. So
that's how this will end, gold will trade hands.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:04 No.1813214
But, shhhh, it's a secret... No just kidding, spread the word. You heard it here first, straight
from my Swedish brain.
Durp.
Btw if you are wondering why gold is so damn valuable, just imagine how rare it is. Since the
beginning of man kind, ALL gold that has been mined, EVER, can fit inside a 20x20x20 meter cube.
Every crown, every jewellery, every coin... everything. 20 cubic-meters. That's not much.
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)20:07 No.1813219
>>1813208
The concept of money is corrupt or morally perverse since money only requires confidence to
exist, according to modern money mechanics. The concept of "trade" is corrupt because an
atmosphere of indifference, and cruelty is created because of the competitive nature of the
market. There is no paying back of the debt because every since dollar has interest attached to
the debt. If you were to pay back all the money in circulation right now, there would be no money
in circulation and you'd still owe the bank interest.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:09 No.1813223
>>1813219
no1curr zeitfag
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:11 No.1813224
>>1813214
That's actually 8001 cubic metres
And i don't think that whatever gold US has is enough to clear the debt...
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)20:12 No.1813228
>>1813219
"Ad Hominem" fallacy, banning, censorship, reporting, is not a counter argument.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:13 No.1813231
>>1813228
never said it was
what I did say is no1curr
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)20:14 No.1813233
>>1813231
You're lying.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:19 No.1813238
>>1813219
wat
>>1813224
>That's actually 8001 cubic metres
20x20x20 metres is in fact 20 cubic metres
>i don't think that whatever gold US has is enough to clear the debt...
I believe it is, time will tell. Gold is more valuable than how much USD it is worth.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:22 No.1813244
>>1813238
>20x20x20=20
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)20:22 No.1813246
>>1813238
Quote: "What, then, makes these instruments — checks, paper money, and coins — acceptable at face
value in payment of all debts and for other monetary uses? Mainly, it is the CONFIDENCE people
have that they will be able to exchange such money for other financial assets and for real goods
and services whenever they choose to do so." -Modern Money Mechanics
Money is a religion, unless confidence and faith are different and unless it's not corrupt to
consider natural systems are externalities.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:26 No.1813249
>>1813238
It is 8001.
>20m times 20m
>400m²
>400m² times 20m
>8001m³
Metres are just variables
>>1813246
Leave zeitfag
Money is just another trading good, and it shall always be so
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:27 No.1813251
It's over 8 thouSAAAAANNNDDD!!!!
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)20:27 No.1813254
>>1813249
"Ad Hominem" fallacy, banning, censorship, reporting, isn't a counter argument. When you
encounter your limits to debate do you then think the "Ad Hominem" fallacy is okay?
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:28 No.1813256
>>1813254
"Fallacy" fallacy. Ignoring one's arguments because a fallacy was included somewhere, isn't a
counter argument. When you encounter your limits to debate do you then think the "Fallacy"
fallacy is okay?
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)20:30 No.1813257
>>1813249
Trade is corrupt because sharing is nicer than propety. It enables people to have a casual
disregard for others. If you don't like sharing then don't share your thoughts on the internet
consider your thoughts as your own intellectual property(TM).
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)20:33 No.1813259
>>1813256
You don't counter my argument you give a throwaway line: "Money is just another trading good, and
it shall always be so" ignoring the fact that money and trade is corrupt because of the social
atmoshphere of indifference and cruetly that is generated because of the free market. Unless
being uncaring is good and you can prove this with science.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:37 No.1813262
>>1813257
Yes, but we can't trust someone else with the products of our hard work, even if they trust us
with theirs, because they might just take their products and ours away at any given time, for
personal gain.
This thought, idea and/or thesis is property of anon(TM)(R)(C). Feel free to duplicate and
distribute, as long as credit is given to the author.
>> [_] sage sage 11/20/12(Tue)20:38 No.1813264
>>1813259
What do you suggest? Communism? We've all seen how that turned out...
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:40 No.1813266
>>1813249
>>1813244
What? 1 cubic metre is per definition 1 metre in height, 1 metre in width and 1 metre in depth.
And how you get 400*20 to 8001 I don't have a clue.
fort knox in the us holds 4581 tonnes of gold. in mid-2012 that much is valued at about 234923
millions USD
the value of gold has increased by 600% since the year 2000. since less and less is being mined
it is not unreasonable to think its value will continue to rise
its funny since gold was worth about the same for like 50 years before that
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:43 No.1813267
if you're gonna get banned and evade, at lease make it less obvious, same loaded questions with
weak defense of arguements, exact same method of ripping videos, down to the quality even
>tl;dr: enjoy your ban
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:43 No.1813268
>>1813266
>1 x 1 x 1 = 1
>Therefore 20 x 20 x 20 = 20
orly?
Also, 8001 because lol
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:45 No.1813270
>>1813268
ah you are just pulling my leg, i thought you was confusing cubic meters for something else there
for a second.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/12(Tue)20:50 No.1813273
>>1813254
>"fuck off"
>OMG FALLACY
lol fuck off
