File: 3scientology-scam.swf-(613 KB, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)19:30 No.1919920
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)19:46 No.1919948
Thanks for Saying it. Getting really tired about /f/, posting like 5000+ videos daily about that
bullshit.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)20:30 No.1920001
Everything is a troll. Trust no one. The truth is out there.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)20:33 No.1920004
>>1920001
If I should trust no-one, doesn't that mean I shouldn't trust you, which means I shouldn't trust
no-one because I can't trust you, which means I can trust you because I can trust someone, which
means I can't trust you because I trust your saying that you should trust no-one ad infinitum?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)20:35 No.1920008
>>1920004
No, because trusting no one does not exclude trusting someone.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)20:42 No.1920017
pretty little thing -- spiritualized
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)20:52 No.1920044
I don't care either way, I just want to see this stuff stop being spammed
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)21:04 No.1920067
Let me define this semi-formally.
Universe of Discourse: Things that can or cannot be trusted.
Ax: x is a person.
Bx: x can be trusted.
∀x(Ax -> ~Bx): For all x, if x is a person, then x can not be trusted. Original claim.
∃x(Ax & Bx): There is some x which is both a person and can be trusted. Your claim.
∀x(Ax -> ~Bx) => ~∃x(Ax & Bx)
See? Contradictory by the very nature of logic.
Yes, I'm autistic as fuck, but for your information I had a great deal of fun typing this whole
thing out and I know slightly more about predicate logic than I did a little while ago. Also it
inflates muh ego.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/20/13(Wed)21:48 No.1920111
i think it's hillairous that people are equating Scientologists (who are fucktarded jagoffs who
want all your money and lively hood) to Zeitgeisters (who want to see the world improve and
learn, and give the world a version update with new technology).
it makes me sad that people dont know what the fuck they are talking about.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/21/13(Thu)00:19 No.1920204
>>1920111
I think it's hilarious these guys posting this shit apparently find this board an appropriate
medium for their message.
Do you know how many times I've heard 'Where the Hood at' in midi here?
