File: 4chan.vs.zeitgeist.swf-(613 KB, Loop)
[_] sail on, so long Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)18:36 No.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)19:09 No.

  this is just as much propaganda as anything the zeitgeist movement has put out.

  Still hate them for ruining that word.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)19:11 No.

  Where does the Theosophists come from?

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)19:26 No.

  I really need to investigate on why zeitgeist is so much hated around here, all I've seen from
  them totally stuck to what I know, what I've learned about nowadays society. The solutions they
  put forward might be discussable, but I don't see why they would be pointed out as propaganda etc.

  Sorry for my frenchfag expression.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)19:31 No.

  >>1896083
  Zeitgeist was spammed hard by one guy. He even said, he did not care if he got banned over and
  over, he did not care if the entire board disagreed with him, he would just continue spamming
  indefinitely. He was range banned, which basically means he was such a pain in the ass that the
  mods -banned the fuck out of him forever-.

  Furthermore there are no "solutions" in TZM. It's pure conjecture. Based on technology we don't
  have. It's comparable to saying you want to start a Star Trek party, and the party line is "the
  world would be better if everyone had replicators!"

  which is a nice sentiment, but ultimately meaningless

  not unlike TZM

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)19:34 No.

  >>1896083
  Because Americas get butthurt when confronted with anything but neoconservativism.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)19:36 No.

  >>1896087
  Actually there is a solution, but it may involve a fascist government and extermination of all
  Jews, Christians and Muslims.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)19:40 No.

  Why did anyone bother making this?

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)19:45 No.

  >>1896087
  Ok now I see, thanks. I'm currently trying to guess what the spammer had in his head, I assume he
  felt so bad about society that that bit of hope overwhelmed him, then I realise we might not give
  a fuck.

  Actually TZM does propose solutions, resource based economy etc, I didn't get in their shit for a
  long time and I'm not here to debate, but I guess one does not simply says that they don't have
  solutions to offer.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)20:10 No.

  >>1896099

  You want to see what a resource based economy is?

  Look at Tribal Afghanistan, anywhere in China that isn't a city, any island culture that trades
  in chickens and goats for dowries.

  Nothing comes from that. It's where the human imagination goes to die.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)20:15 No.

  >>1896088
  no, we get butthurt having to constantly fight against the communist bullshit that's killed 100
  million people in the last century

  fucking idiot children still believing this puerile shit

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)20:29 No.

  >>1896125
  Yessss, anyone anti-capitalist is a Stalinist, and capitalism and imperialism never killed anyone
  amirite?

  <- socialist
  <- still thing zeitgeist is puerile bullshit though

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)20:30 No.

  >>1896118
  barter systems resemble capital markets more than they do resource-credit economies

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)21:24 No.

  >>1896144

  The term resource-based economy is applied by the Venus Project to a hypothetical economic system
  in which goods, services and information are free. This use of the term is found in information
  from Jacque Fresco

  It's made up meaningless word. Like true communism.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/24/13(Sun)21:42 No.

  >>1896198
  Venus project are wack, but the idea of the resource-based credit economy as a way of
  "harnessing" the market goes back roughly 100 years.

  "True communism" is a misconception trotted out by both uneducated communists and anti-communists
  who haven't bothered to understand their opponent beyond a cursory skimming of Marx, because
  communism and socialism are such broad areas of ideology.

  The USSR, China under Mao, etc. were absolutely communist by the Stalinist definition, but
  neither the methods nor the end goals of the Bolsheviks are anywhere near the political programs
  of, say, anarchism, social democracy, christian socialism, or the various left
  communist/anti-state communist tendencies that sprung up in the late 20th century, all of which
  still claim the names of socialism or communism.