STORY   LOOP   FURRY   PORN   GAMES
• C •   SERVICES [?] [R] RND   POPULAR
Archived flashes:
228136
/disc/ · /res/     /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/P0001 · P2561 · P5122

<div style="position:absolute;top:-99px;left:-99px;"><img src="http://swfchan.com:57475/79488069?noj=FRM79488069-17DN" width="1" height="1"></div>

This is resource QE3PSZC, a Archived Thread.
Discovered:6/2 -2013 04:26:56

Ended:6/2 -2013 14:20:26

Checked:6/2 -2013 21:40:15

Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/res/1877863
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 28.
Discovered flash files: 1





File: ron paul supporter simulator.swf-(2.08 MB, Game)
[_] Anonymous 02/05/13(Tue)22:02 No.1877863

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/13(Tue)22:22 No.1877882

  Newgrounds gateway and Newgrounds achievements.

  Lovely.

>> [_] Fuck you, you nigger. 02/05/13(Tue)23:32 No.1877929

  I go on newgrounds every day xDDDDDDD

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/13(Tue)23:32 No.1877930

  you know stack wasn't actually a libertarian or a ron paul supporter, right?

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)00:27 No.1877978

  >>1877930
  Bingo. In his fucking suicide note he sounds like he supports Communism. The asshole who made
  this, and the asshole who posted it, and every asshole who looks upon this with favor doesn't
  know what it means to be a libertarian.

  I'm not saying that these people are intentionally presenting a false message. They're too stupid
  for that.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)01:08 No.1878002

  >>1877978
  Yeah, if the guy was protesting the "Welfare State" while pocketing tax breaks and cashing in his
  social security check as he masterbates to Ayn Rand, THEN he'd be a libertarian.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)01:23 No.1878015

  >>1877978
  Warning warning, paulbot in denial.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)01:31 No.1878019

  >>1877978
  >>1878002

  the "purpose" of this flash was to make you angry. Looks like it worked.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)01:48 No.1878027

  >>1878002
  >implying welfare is not a disincentive for work.
  >implying a "tax break" is somehow morally wrong. (what? you think the government owns 100% of
  your wealth, and then decides how much you get to keep?
  >implying social security wasn't specifically set up to pay money back to those who pay into the
  system (with returns.)
  >implying Ayn Rand's stories or views illustrate something that only a libertarian could identify
  with.
  >implying you actually know FUCK ALL about libertarians.
  This is exactly the kind of knee-jerk bullshit I'm talking about. You're fucking retarded. You've
  crafted some "witty" quip that sounds like the person you're desperately trying to paint as a
  libertarian is a massive hypocrite. But it simply proves that you don't know what you're talking
  about.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)01:49 No.1878028

  >>1878015
  >>1878015
  >implying that one cannot be a libertarian without supporting Ron Paul.
  >implying that Ron Paul's views and beliefs are the basis for comparison when considering
  libertarians.
  Bitch, please. See >>1878027

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)02:02 No.1878033

  dat trollin

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)02:05 No.1878035

  >>1878027

  "Disincentive?" Jesus man, look around you - There's at least thirty million people in the US
  banging down the door for jobs. There is *no such thing* as an open position going unfilled
  because welfare is there as an alternative. Hell, I only just got work myself, and I guarantee
  you it would have taken three times as long if the Welfare Queens were out on the street and
  waiting in line ahead of me.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)02:17 No.1878039

  >>1878027
  >Implying that someone posting on 4chan is actually looking for serious debate and isn't a troll
  >Implying that anyone viewing 4chan gives a flying fuck about what anyone else thinks

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)02:19 No.1878040

  >>1878002
  >>1878027
  >Implying that you can't recognize troll bait when your cock slapped in the face with it

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)02:33 No.1878049

  >>1878035
  Answer the two questions:
  Do you want money?
  Do you want to work for it?

  If you said yes to the first and no to the second, you're exactly the type of person to abuse
  welfare. You can't deny that many people abuse welfare and get undeserved money from the
  government, nobody can. That money ultimately comes from the pockets of all of the working men
  and women in the country.

  The worst part about welfare? The number of people using it is growing. Welfare spending had
  jumped by 32% since Obama's presidency as of October last year. Src: http://www.washington
  times.com/news/2012/oct/18/welfare-spending-jumps-32-percent-four-years/?page=a
  ll

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)02:35 No.1878051

  >>1878049
  If welfare spending continues to grow (read: more people start using the service) then,
  eventually, the number of people on welfare plus the number of people working for the government
  will outnumber people working in the private sector. What that basically means is: over half of
  the population will rely on the rest to pay their check. Does that sound sustainable to you?

  Short answer: It's not. I know I personally am not going to work if the government is taking half
  my check, pocketing some and giving the rest away to some lazy asshole. Some people on welfare
  can't work due to severe disability, that's fair. But do you really think the number of people
  disabled like this jumped 32% in four years? No, it didn't, more people are abusing the system
  now. That's the problem with welfare.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)03:41 No.1878081

  The point of this is to replay and keep smashing the building. Allahakbar

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)03:55 No.1878085

  I like that the car still crashes into the IRS building even if you don't hit it.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)04:28 No.1878095

  It smells like the YouTube comments section in here.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)04:46 No.1878109

  >post flash game renamed to mock Ron Paul
  >"BEHEAD THOSE WHO INSULT RON PAUL"
  >mission accomplished

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)04:48 No.1878111

  BEEP BOOP BEEP BOOO ULTIMATE AWESOME, KNOW YR CONSTETUTION!

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)04:56 No.1878115

  FUCK YOU CRY BABIES. 2% goes to poor people look at WAR if you want money back you faggots.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)05:21 No.1878133

  >>1878051

  This thread clearly must be delusional dipshit simulator 2013, where the world is run by rich
  people but the poorest people are somehow the problem.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)05:22 No.1878134

  >>1878133
  Let's just ignore the fact that many welfare recipients are families that have working parents
  that work dead-end jobs that don't make enough to support all their kids, and that another large
  portion is the physically and mentally disabled. I'll even say that there certainly are a few
  welfare queens out there. Do you HONESTLY believe that this is the biggest economic issue in this
  country? Do you HONESTLY believe a single individual can earn, let alone deserve, to have a
  billion dollars when millions are starving? Social Security, Medicare and National Defense are by
  far the biggest governmental expenses, yet I hear much a lot more screaming at the entitlement of
  people living in fucking poverty. People, making millions of dollars a year to voice their
  opinions on television are calling some white trash working at a gas station entitled. In what
  fucking bizarro universe does this shit make sense?

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)05:23 No.1878136

  >>1878134
  You could argue social Darwinism, and in some way, I can accept that. It just seems to me, that
  the only real proponents of Social Darwinism are the ones already living in comfort and with
  superiority complexes that lead them to believe they're at the top of the food chain. I can
  understand not wanting to part with some of your paycheck to help people you don't like, but how
  about acknowledging the roads paved for you, 18 years of being clothed and fed, public education,
  potentially healthcare if you were poor, protection via police and all the shit you've been given
  for free and most likely taken for granted. I like a lot of libertarian ideas, but ultimately I
  don't see a pure free market as a possibility nor a great idea, given the horrid labor conditions
  of the early 20th century prior to labor laws.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)05:26 No.1878138

  >>1878136
  Recognize that corruption and hierarchy are part of any system and that oligarchy has ALWAYS been
  the rule of human society, and it becomes clear that the goal ought not be equality or even fair
  opportunity, but rather livable conditions for as many of the citizens as realistically feasible.

  This rant got a bit out of hand, but whatever.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)06:39 No.1878163

  DEYY TOOK OUR JORRRRRRRRRBBBBBBBBBBSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

>> [_] Anonymous 02/06/13(Wed)07:28 No.1878180

  I find it amusing that people make fun of the last human being with conscience in congress. But
  that's the way of the future, hail the psychopaths.



http://swfchan.net/14/QE3PSZC.shtml
Created: 6/2 -2013 04:26:56 Last modified: 6/2 -2013 21:40:17 Server time: 17/05 -2024 11:36:16