File: phpPy.swf-(91 KB, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)19:54 No.1945507
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)19:57 No.1945510
MODS
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)19:59 No.1945514
>>1945507
fuck the fuck off
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)20:04 No.1945516
>>1945514
New fresh proxy today, responding to the thread on /q/:
when I said there's no proof that it's spam Anonymous avoids the meaning of the word "spam".
It's unwanted yes, but there's no proof that it's junk. Calling something, propaganda, shit,
communist, junk, satanism, is not proof of anything except of labelling, like religious people
calling some blasphemy.
When I say only religious people disagree with me, I'm talking about 4chan's users are turning
4chan into an ochlocracy or "mob rule" or ""tyranny of the majority" considering all the ad
hominem fallacies.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:11 No.1945523
>>1945516
You don't consider it spam, but you call yourself the "zeitgeist spammer". Right.
I don't know what you're hoping to achieve by posting these day after day. No one is receptive to
spam. You'll probably have better luck preaching on the sidewalk.
>> [_] zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)20:16 No.1945528
>>1945523
I don't consider it spam because there's proof it's unwanted, yet there's NO PROOF IT'S JUNK.
Until I see some something critical against zeitgeist and not some mindless slandering, why
should I leave?
I earned the name zeitgeist spammer from others on 4chan :)
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:26 No.1945532
>>1945528
Why don't you check the second definition here?
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spam
>disruptive messages, especially commercial messages posted on a computer network
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)20:28 No.1945535
Why don't you check the wikipedia definition here?
unwanted electronic JUNK.
So where's the proof zeitgeist is JUNK.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:29 No.1945537
i find this article inaccurate due to the fact that i believe that there is corruption due to
greed in human nature and thus causes some people to have more money and some people less money
but hey thats just me :p
>> [_] sage zeitgeist 04/16/13(Tue)20:30 No.1945539
>>1945532
if you're arguing zeitgeist is commercial, Proof zeitgeist is commercial then.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:32 No.1945542
>>1945539
I'm not arguing that it is commercial, the main part of the definition is "disruptive messages".
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:33 No.1945543
>>1945535
You said it yourself. It's unwanted. Therefore junk. Unless you have some sort of mental problem
which involves hoarding. Normal people don't keep shit they don't want.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)20:34 No.1945545
>>1945537
Take note of what you're saying: you believe there is corruption due to greed in "human nature".
The is no scientific evidence to support the concept of human nature, some humans are not greedy
by nature that's a social myth.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)20:37 No.1945549
>>1945543
Now that's an appeal to ochlocracy or "mob rule" again.
it would be ignorant to say that because something is wanted, therefore it's junk.
for example christians flag critical atheist videos as hate speech on youtube, much in the same
manner you describe zeitgeist as spam just because it's unwanted.
Completely avoiding the burden of proof which SHOULD be with you to proof that zeitgeist is JUNK.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:40 No.1945551
ahhh see now thats semantics lol every statistic in the world has outliers which is why there is
such things as the normal distribution but when i say human nature i mean the mean of society has
a base pattern therefor a grounds for human nature which supports the term human nature oh btw
you say "tyranny of the majority" in one of your earlier arguments, and i was woundering if you
mean capatalism or democracy?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:42 No.1945552
>>1945528
If you want to persuade people to join your case, half of your burden is to post this shit, but
the other half is to make them accept your argument. That's what being a communicator is, and
you're not a very good one.
The second you have provided a good enough argument as to why you're right rather than spamming
and saying 'prove me wrong' is the second you convince someone you're right.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:43 No.1945555
>>1945549
Sorry, meant to click
>>1945528
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:45 No.1945556
>>1945528
Seriously, kill yourself. Like not that whole 'lel go kill urself' bullshit, but honestly end
your own life. No one loves you, your ideals are silly and mocked, and you're probably fat as fuck
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)20:45 No.1945557
>>1945551
society has a "base pattern" for greed because this new religion called consumerism makes it very
much seem like the nature of the human being is corrupt, greedy evil and so forth. And just like
the idea the "man is born with sin" there no evidence to support the idea that man is born
greedy, man is born with humans needs, not greed.
capatalism or democracy? I would argue the "tyranny of the majority", ochlocracy or "mob rule"
describes both capatalism and democracy.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:45 No.1945558
do not want
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)20:47 No.1945560
>>1945556
murder sounds like your business, not mine
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:51 No.1945562
so by saying captialism and democracy majority of the world should just burn....also go to
college get a degree in pyschology and understand if you hand someone absolute power they will go
mad and abuse it there have been random studies that support this thesis thus supporting human
nature which includes greed
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:53 No.1945563
>>1945549
There is a difference between hate speech and posting shit no one fucking cares about. You're not
offending anyone, you're just posting stupid shit. To compare it to Youtube you're the 9 year old
who posts blogs about people slamming Beiber. No one cares.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)20:54 No.1945564
>>1945562
I stopped believing in "human nature" once I saw "Dog Girl" on youtube. Girl brought up by dogs?
hey she acts like a dog and not a human. Hey man who's greedy and corrupt? must have been brought
up by corporate america.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:55 No.1945568
How do I post a flash? I keep trying to post one, but it won't let me even though I have all of
the required fields filled in.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:56 No.1945569
>>1945568
Probably because that flash already exists on 4chan's servers. Are you getting a duplicate file
message?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:57 No.1945571
>>1945564
Oh hey, a spammer, must've been brought up by telemarketers and door to Jehovah's witnesses.
How's that line of thinking working out?
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)20:58 No.1945572
>>1945563
Again, you're still with mindless slander and labelling, "stupid shit", "spam", "communism",
"cult propaganda", "lies", "zombies", "retarded", and so on.
filtering the ad hominem fallacies and mindless slander, there's been no critical argument
against zeitgeist on 4chan that I've seen. I've seen threads of just the same, basically saying
"zeitgeist is spam", without any explanation. and moot ignorantly banned me when he was provided
ZERO evidence against what I submit to 4chan.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:58 No.1945573
>>1945569
Nope.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)20:59 No.1945574
>>1945573
I'm also very certain that there is no duplicate.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)20:59 No.1945575
>>1945571
more ad hominem fallacies, try again.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)21:00 No.1945576
>>1945564
That girl has a mental disorder. Find a well-known example of a person brought up by dogs that
does not have a mental disorder.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)21:03 No.1945579
>>1945576
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feral_child
they probably explan the phenomena of feral children better than me.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)21:03 No.1945580
so with my arguement regarding human nature, and statistical value i used the phrases '"stupid
shit", "spam", "communism", "cult propaganda", "lies", "zombies", "retarded" ' even though, in
your opinion, it is not a critical arguement, some others may disagree and see it that way
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)21:04 No.1945582
>>1945557
>makes it very much seem like the nature of the human being is corrupt, greedy evil
>Implying we aren't
We didn't become the dominant species by being nice. champ.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)21:05 No.1945583
>>1945579
Dude, I think that being a feral child would be cool, having all of those senses from living in
the wild, and not caring about killing people.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)21:06 No.1945584
>>1945580
people who like to seriously debate, know that mindless slandering is not a critical argument.
The ones who would agree with you are scientologists as they baselessly slander and refuse to
debate.
"are you a scientologist?"
"oh get away from me you're a child molester!" -Real anti-scientology video.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)21:06 No.1945585
also on a side note, if this is as it seems to be from your point of view, the answer to society,
why has it not started or been talked about by the world? it might be because it might not work?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)21:06 No.1945587
>>1945575
Fine, i'll word it better to make it even easier to understand.
>>1945564
Following that line of thinking, I could just as easily say, "Hey, man who's spamming? must have
been brought up by telemarketers and door to door jehova's witnesses"
See, just like you, I can pull declarative statements that points the finger at something.
Jesus christ.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)21:07 No.1945588
10/10, OP.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)21:08 No.1945590
>>1945564
Not all people brought up in corporate America become greedy and corrupt.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)21:08 No.1945592
TL;DR
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)21:09 No.1945593
>>1945587
more ad hominem fallacies
>>1945585
I agree with you, a society based on science instead of a society based on religion (consumerism)
would not work.
>>1945582
we're not the dominant species, the market is destroying the planet like a cancer and you call
that dominant? lol
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)21:10 No.1945594
>>1945592
Trolls trolling trolls.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)21:11 No.1945595
>>1945590
ah yes those egalitarian societies are so greedy.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)21:12 No.1945597
>>1945595
Last time I checked, communism failed miserably.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/16/13(Tue)21:13 No.1945598
>>1945595
Do you know why my flash isn't getting posted when I've filled out the required slots.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 04/16/13(Tue)21:14 No.1945599
>>1945597
science is communism, I agree with you.
