File: timefreeze_blowjob.swf-(7.76 MB, 640x480, Hentai)
[_] /f/ needs more [H] today Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)15:33 No.2001343
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)15:42 No.2001353
I was really looking forward to seeing the result of this action
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)15:46 No.2001355
lol
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)15:50 No.2001356
> xray view edited out
oh its all shit now
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)16:29 No.2001388
pcklfpbphklckfplhkpklt
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)16:37 No.2001401
I wish someone would do this with the school one or the olympic woman one.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)17:00 No.2001419
Is there more? PLEASE POST IF SO
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)17:14 No.2001432
http://g.e-hentai.org/g/524314/1819aa6e93/
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)17:15 No.2001434
http://www.dlsite{DOT}com/maniax/work/=/product_id/RJ112973.html
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)17:32 No.2001446
some of those good days at /f/...
SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE
SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE
SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE
SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE
SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE
SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE
SAUCE SAUCE SACUE SAUCE SAUCE SACUE
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)17:35 No.2001447
Just go to e-hentai and type nighthawk.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)17:40 No.2001454
>No one asking for the copypasta of how much force would be translated into facefucking a loli at
the literal speed of light
It's like you niggaz don't even care about how much time I spent on that.
Protip: It would make the Tzar bomb look like a bitch move.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)17:43 No.2001459
>>2001454
You can't move at the "literal speed of light". So your calculations were wrong.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)17:47 No.2001462
>>2001459
Approaching the speed of light to the point where the kinetic transfer would have been at it's
optimum rate in regards to Eisenstein physics, if you want to be pedantic about it.
Fuck off, I don't expect to encounter physics students on /f/, alright?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)17:49 No.2001464
>>2001462
I'm not a physics student, I just passed the 10th grade.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)17:58 No.2001466
>>2001464
Typical laymen don't get the fact that the speed of light is a limit, so one of the first things
you're taught to say is that approaching the speed of light = the speed of light (because let's
be honest here, in terms of energy transfer it's pretty much the same).
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)18:32 No.2001496
>>2001466
No. An object with mass M moving at 99.9% the speed of the light has insanely less energy than M
moving at 99.999% the speed of light. The amount of energy required to increase speed near this
limit increases exponentially because special relativity causes M to increase in mass.
>> [_] totally out of topic 06/12/13(Wed)18:35 No.2001499
>>2001496
>>2001466
what if two objects are moving towards eachother at 2/3 the speed of light. since everything is
relative you could say that from each of those object's point of view, the other object is moving
roughly at 1.66 times the speed of light
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)18:38 No.2001501
There's a loli getting facefucked in the flash, and you're discussing physics as though you can
assume Einstein was right.
Thanks /f/
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)18:42 No.2001504
>>2001499
Wrong. Learn how to add velocities in special relativity.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/velocity.html
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)18:43 No.2001506
>>2001501
there's always time to discuss physics
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)18:44 No.2001509
>>2001499
not the guy above, but actually no, because time slows down the faster you're going (faster your
acceleration is). To a stationary observer, they would appear to be converging at a combined sped
of 1.66, but each would appear to be moving at 2/3. To them, time would be slowed down. We've
proven this theory in space, by having astronauts fly around with very accurate clocks.
Incidentally, since the affects of gravity and acceleration appear to be the same, time is
slightly slower for people on the fact of the earth than it would be for someone who was
theoretically stationary out in space.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)18:46 No.2001513
>>2001504
So....
((2/3) + (2/3))/(1+(4/9)/1) = 0.92307692307
So instead of 1.66c it would appear to be going 0.92c ?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)18:49 No.2001520
This is not a loli. You use the word but I do not think you know what it means.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)18:51 No.2001525
>>2001504
>>2001509
goddamnit i even read of this before, i just forgot about it. nice science site though, i'm
keeping it saved
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)19:18 No.2001554
http://swfchan.net/22/109441.shtml
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)19:23 No.2001563
We don't need /sci/ now.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)19:43 No.2001585
what the fuck just happened
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)20:06 No.2001602
http://h4suu.blogspot.com/2013/03/bingo-tarte.html
HGAME
>> [_] Anonymous 06/12/13(Wed)20:06 No.2001603
So, what does the copypasta read? Does anyone have it handy?
