File :[foil.swf] - (472 KB)
[_] [H] Fucking hot. Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)17:05 No.

Marked for deletion (old).

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)17:06 No.

  Ah ha ha ha

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)17:07 No.

  At what point did it seem like putting foil on his dick and putting into a electrical socket seem
  like a good idea?

>> [_] NameFag 04/13/09(Mon)17:11 No.

  Looks like House is gettin' high at home too.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)17:20 No.

  >>951669
  When the gene pool kicked in.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)17:20 No.

  >>951669
  How is it not?!

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)17:28 No.

  in all fairness his mangled genitals means he will never produce offspring. just as well.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)17:56 No.

  >>951692
  Every time I see someone mangling their genitals in some stupid fashion, I always feel consoled
  knowing that they've made themselves unable to reproduce.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)17:59 No.

  >>951754
  My sentiments exactly. Thank god for the fragility of the human reproductive system.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)18:31 No.

  >>951692
  >>951754
  >>951759

  Agreed. It's too bad more people don't do this.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)18:35 No.

  After I took part in the pain olympics I had my dick surgically re-attached and then I
  impregnated my bitch.

>> [_] Guodzilla 04/13/09(Mon)18:38 No.

  (Picks up telephone)
  Hello, Operator? Could you get me the headquarters for the Darwin Awards? I have a real LULU for
  them. X-p

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)18:43 No.

  >>951802
  I was thinking the same thing in a less gay way.

>> [_] Guodzilla 04/13/09(Mon)18:44 No.

  >>951807
  X-D

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)18:46 No.

  >>951807
  :DS<

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)19:08 No.

  In before Actually It Should Be Ok Since The Foil Detracts Most Of The Current From His Wang As
  It Is Much More Conductive kthxbye

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)19:40 No.

  He's so sexy, why must he go and ruin a perfectly good wang?

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)19:42 No.

  >>951835
  Why Are You Capitalizing Every Word?

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)20:20 No.

  >>951875
  I capitalised all words in that wich "in before" refers to in my post to indicate it being so old
  it does not merely warrant an "in before..." but deserves being treated as a proper name. Or
  something.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)20:22 No.

  >>951931
  I think a more plausible explanation is that you're dumb.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/13/09(Mon)20:44 No.

  i lold agian