File: NEONATAL CIRCUMCISION.swf-(7.74 MB, 240x160, Porn)
[_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:11 No.2272193
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:13 No.2272195
GTFO /pol/
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:13 No.2272198
>>2272195
How the fuck is genital mutilation /pol/?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:19 No.2272203
pretty educational if you ask me. not sure how you can consider circumcision to be genital
mutilation, but fucking keep that stupid shit to yourself cocksucker.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:25 No.2272212
It hurts
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:27 No.2272217
>>2272193
Americans are fucking insane.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:29 No.2272218
truly beautiful
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:30 No.2272219
>>2272203
>cocksucker
jeez, did a foreskin kill your parents or something?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:30 No.2272221
>>2272203
>not sure how you can consider circumcision to be genital mutilation
did you even watch the fucking video?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:31 No.2272224
>>2272203
Gee i wonder who is behind this post..
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:33 No.2272228
Christ, you can tell from all that movement that the baby is screaming his head off...
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:35 No.2272230
>>2272203
JEW DETECTED
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:37 No.2272233
>genital mutilation, wake up sheeple jew are animals1!!!
>proceed to defend rape and call it a minor problem
Got to love /pol/ double standards
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:38 No.2272234
>>2272233
No one said anything about Jews or rape.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:42 No.2272240
>>2272221
Yeah I agree, and removing balls filled with cancer is also genital mutilation, along with
orchiopexy. god intended for it to be like that.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:43 No.2272242
>>2272240
Are you actually comparing the removal of a diseased body part to the removal of a perfectly
healthy one?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:44 No.2272244
>>2272240
>comparing protective tissue to fucking cancer
are you actually retarded?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:44 No.2272245
>>2272240
>foreskin
>balls with cancer in it
>the same thing
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:48 No.2272247
>>2272242
>>2272244
Perfectly healthy, protective, i.e. leads to disease susceptibility.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:49 No.2272248
>>2272247
There is no supported evidence for that being the case.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:50 No.2272249
>>2272233
Circumcision is almost always an unnecessary procedure and if all kinds of female circumcision is
considered genital mutilation, the same should go for male circumcision.
Also, rape is bad.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:50 No.2272250
>>2272240
now I agree to cut it off when it is not able to stretch properly for your penis to come out
but at this age? give me a break
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:52 No.2272251
>>2272247
Removing the foreskin because it might get diseased is like removing the windshield wipers from a
car because they might stop working one day.
It's fucking stupid.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:52 No.2272252
>>2272248
I'm really glad you brought that up. several studies suggest uncircumcised people are at a
greater risk for contracting HIV. Check out the CDC http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/prevention.html
also the benefits listed on this site seem to be intriguing http://www.circinfo.c
om/benefits/bmc.html
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:54 No.2272257
>>2272252
>no citations
I'd like to see some sources for their claims.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:56 No.2272258
>>2272252
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07369.x/abstract;jsessio
nid=175EC822FE228F4ADDB7214A1FC3C747.f04t03?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=fa
lse
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:57 No.2272259
>>2272252
Oh are we playing this game shlomo?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2530755/Jewish-Rabbi-sued-accidentally-SEVER
ING-newborn-baby-boys-penis-Bris-Ceremony.html
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:57 No.2272260
>>2272257
some citations are on CDC, http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/prevention/research/malecircumcision/index.html
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/prevention/research/malecircumcision/bibliography.html#ref1
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)17:59 No.2272263
>>2272259
Right, cuz rabbis are surgeons.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:00 No.2272266
>>2272263
Circumcision is a surgical procedure, retard.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:02 No.2272267
>>2272263
Fine then.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/16/dean-cochrun-sues-hospita_n_1429588.html
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:03 No.2272269
>>2272266
your point? i'm just sayin, circumcision by a rabbi does not seem like a good idea if you ask me
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:03 No.2272270
>>2272193
only a savage would do this to a children
african niggers do this shit when they are twelve
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:03 No.2272271
>>2272269
If someone performs a surgical procedure they are a surgeon.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:04 No.2272272
>>2272267
i'm not reading the huffington post
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:04 No.2272273
Circumcision takes away pleasure and makes the glans dry like a raisin, I you want to get
mutilated it's your decision but I find it incredibly stupid, It's like cutting part of your ear,
fucking nonsense.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:05 No.2272275
America and Canada are fine with this. Israel is fine with this. Most of Europe is fine with
this. South Korea is fine with this.
The female equivalent is lambasted as a horrible crime.
Sound like a nice arrangement to you?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:05 No.2272276
>>2272271
so lets say I give an emergency tracheotomy, or maybe a remove a splinter, I'm a surgeon now?
>> [_] so much hate in here 01/28/14(Tue)18:05 No.2272277
>>2272273
this man.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:06 No.2272278
>>2272276
Yes, you are.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:07 No.2272279
>>2272278
sweet
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:07 No.2272280
>>2272260
How about getting some sources that are unbiased and are from studies that aren't flawed?
http://www.publichealthinafrica.org/index.php/jphia/article/view/jphia.2011.e4/html_9
>>2272275
At least it isn't nearly as common in Europe. That's something.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:11 No.2272287
Yo, dizz stupid as hell.
Also who else is having problems typing the captchas?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:13 No.2272288
>>2272280
flawed? and you're suggesting this review article isn't biased? the author cites his own papers!
I'm not saying there is anything wrong with that, but it is at the very least a little biased.
also, their only preventative alternative is condoms, and they suggest ART is a secondary
preventative measure, which is basically like saying they treat the patients who are incurable so
that they can have sex with the general population!
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:13 No.2272289
>>2272287
Yeah, what the fuck is up with the captchas?
I'm even signed into Google, which makes them easier, but I'm still failing them left and right
right now.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:14 No.2272290
Jesus Christ why?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:15 No.2272293
>>2272289
>I'm even signed into Google, which makes them easier
wait, what?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:15 No.2272294
>>2272240
If God intended us to not have foreskins then why are we born with them?
Whites: 1
Jews: 0
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:15 No.2272295
>>2272290
He was circimsised also, btw
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:20 No.2272300
this made me feel like throwing up, this is the first thing on flash ive been forced to close
that isnt a jumpscare.... kind of glad im uncut after seeing this, though as a child it wouldnt
have any affect of you as you wouldnt remember i suppose
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:20 No.2272301
>>2272288
There is no such thing as no bias, but there is such a thing as an acceptable degree of bias.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:22 No.2272304
>>2272293
There's a rumor going around that being signed in makes the captchas easier.
Someone here on 4chan posted a picture, but there's no guarantee that it's true.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:22 No.2272305
>>2272301
right, so you agree then, thanks
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:24 No.2272307
>>2272305
Yes, and the papers that cdc cite are heavily biased and use flawed presumptions for their
statistics, and not to mention outdated.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:24 No.2272309
>>2272203
> not sure how you can consider circumcision to be genital mutilation
How can you not?
Mutilate: To cause a disfiguring injury.
Genitals: External reproductive organs.
Thats not one of those matter of opinion things.
Now explain to me why you'd be surprised someone could consider circumcision to be that. Because
all i can think is maybe someone didnt know what circumcision actually was.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:29 No.2272315
>>2272307
where's your defense for heavy bias and out dated stats?
>>2272309
Injury? I'm pretty sure that is the subject of debate here. So I guess at this point it is an
opinion.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:32 No.2272317
>>2272315
>
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:36 No.2272321
>>2272315
Here, have a more recent paper.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417349/
>There was no evidence of vaccine efficacy (VE); the hazard ratio adjusted for gender was 1.25
(95% CI: 0.76, 2.05). VE did not differ by Ad5 titre, gender, age, HSV-2 status, or circumcision.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:37 No.2272322
>>2272275
The "female equivalent" is nothing like "equivalent". If male circumcision was about chopping the
glans off, then we'd be talking.
And I'd like to hear your definition of "most of europe" that is fine with this.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:38 No.2272323
>>2272322
There are several forms of female circumcision, one which is directly comparable to male
circumcision, but is still banned in most Western countries.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:40 No.2272325
>>2272321
did you read it? I kinda doubt you did, or maybe you just didn't understand. This paper looks at
vaccine efficacy, basically how effective was the vaccine in different patients. dumbass
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:42 No.2272328
>>2272315
http://journals.lww.com/aidsonline/Abstract/2009/11130/Circumcision_and_risk_of_HIV_
infection_in.12.aspx
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:45 No.2272331
>>2272328
Interesting paper, seems to support circumcision for those in the insertive role.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:47 No.2272333
>>2272328
>Conclusions: Overall, circumcision did not significantly reduce the risk of HIV infection in the
HIM cohort. However, it was associated with a significant reduction in HIV incidence among those
participants who reported a preference for the insertive role in anal intercourse. Circumcision
may have a role as an HIV prevention intervention in this subset of homosexual men.
Haha, take that faggots.
>>2272331
Yeah, but only in that particular case, so for the rest of us who aren't gay and are smart enough
to use condoms anyway, there's no reason to get circumcised for that reason.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:48 No.2272334
I haven't been this nauseous since seeing my first beheading video. What a terrible custom.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:49 No.2272336
jesus christ who cares
who
cares
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:50 No.2272338
>>2272336
Apparently, a lot of people.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:51 No.2272340
Fucking barbaric
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:52 No.2272343
>>2272333
this study did not look at heterosexual males, so I guess you're gonna have to rely on other
papers that suggest a similar phenomenon. and tha'ts one of several reasons. And condoms are
definitely a much better preventative measure
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:53 No.2272344
>>2272338
i don't care
shut up about the optimal dick
every day, arguing dicks
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:54 No.2272347
>>2272344
If you don't care, why did you post here?
Why did you bother to reply?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:55 No.2272349
>>2272347
because you've all gone gaga for penis skin
go outside
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:56 No.2272351
>>2272349
I was outside a couple of hours ago. Now it's past midnight and I see no reason to go outside.
Why don't you just not reply to stuff like this if you don't care?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:57 No.2272354
>>2272351
i want to change lives
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)18:59 No.2272358
>>2272354
Then you do care.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:00 No.2272359
>>2272278
>This fucking retarded
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:01 No.2272362
>>2272295
>guaranteed replies
>> [_] friendsofsandwiches 01/28/14(Tue)19:01 No.2272364
Dear diary,
today a troll was very successful on /f.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:01 No.2272365
>>2272358
not about dickskin
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:02 No.2272367
>>2272364
>wanting to talk about an important issue
>troll
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:03 No.2272368
>>2272367
>dick skin
>important issue
Choose one.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:04 No.2272369
>>2272368
genital mutilation IS an important issue.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:04 No.2272370
>>2272368
>circumcision
>not an important issue
Choose one.
OH LOOK I CAN DO THAT TOO.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:05 No.2272373
>>2272369
explain yourself
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:07 No.2272374
Well, at least it's not knishes.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:07 No.2272375
>>2272369
>>2272370
You fucking faggots are arguing about a pointless little flap of skin on someone's penis. Why do
you even care? Were you circumcised? Fine, be as indignant as you want that you didn't have any
choice.
If you're not, shut the fuck up and stop bitching about something that has 0 impact on you. Some
of us are circumcised and we don't give a flying fuck. Quit concerning yourselves with other
dudes' cocks.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:07 No.2272376
>>2272373
It is very psychologically damaging for a baby, and is shown to dramatically alter pain responses
and change the baby's personality in some cases.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:08 No.2272378
>>2272376
ok so what mother theresa
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:08 No.2272379
>>2272375
You do realize that you don't have to enter the thread if you don't care?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:09 No.2272381
>>2272369
Still no evidence to suggest that it is genital mutilation.
>>2272336
>>2272338
>>2272344
>>2272347
>>2272349
>>2272351
>>2272354
>>2272358
>>2272365
what an incredible battle of whits
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:11 No.2272385
>>2272376
where's the citation? and can you prove that it has a negative impact?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:13 No.2272388
>>2272379
>hurr durr I was asked to explain myself and I can't so I'm going to imply they get out of the
thread
You're a fucking retard. I asked you a question, so answer it instead of being an aspie. I never
said I didn't care about this thread, I said the issue isn't important. I'm demanding you explain
why it's so pressing to argue about it. Just for lols? Because as I stated previously there sure
isn't a fucking good reason I've seen for why you care.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:14 No.2272390
>>2272385
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9057731
http://www.mensstudies.com/content/2772r13175400432/?p=a7068101fbdd48819f10dd04dc1e19fb&pi=4
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:15 No.2272392
>>2272388
The issue is important because it damages babies physically and psychologically
>>2272376
>>2272390
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:17 No.2272393
What the fuck is going on here.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:18 No.2272395
This is a bit complicated for cutting off a fucking circle of skin.
>Just cutting
Lel no. We gotta CRUSH IT ALL first.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:18 No.2272396
>>2272392
do you plan to vote against it or what
will you do anything
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:21 No.2272402
>>2272233
/pol/ is against false rape reports.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:24 No.2272405
>>2272396
He won't because he's from /pol/ and they don't do shit other than argue about everything.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:31 No.2272412
Ninety. Eight. Fucking. Replys.
Im sure the 100th with be somebody calling me JIDF.
All over shit that does not matter.
>Protip: Sex is mostly a brain exercise. There is nothing substantial to say sex is "better"
either way. There is nothing substantial to say that its damaging psychologically (i mean fucking
really?). Its not disfiguring, as most porn cocks are cut.
As a femanon, i really could give 2 fucking shits.
Jesus christ.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:33 No.2272414
>>2272412
>Replys
Also, im a gril btw
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:36 No.2272418
>>2272396
How are you supposed to vote against it when you can only vote for the jew?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:38 No.2272419
>>2272412
As a femanon, you can't really speak for how sex feel like for a man.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/28/14(Tue)19:39 No.2272421
>>2272412
>As a femanon, i really could give 2 fucking shits.
Of course you wouldn't care you vapid cunt, so stay true to your statement and stay away from
this thread.
