File: ShaunOfTheDead.swf-(8.73 MB, 128x54, Other)
[_] SotD in under 10MB AMM !AMM.FiWTOc 04/20/14(Sun)10:42 No.

  I was... intrigued by the Monty Pythons fitted into a 10MB flash, so I tried what I could do!

  Behold! Shaun of the Dead (2004) in:
  - Video: 128 x 54 h.264 @ 4Kbp/s and a whopping 3 frames per second
  - Audio: 32Khz Mono AAC-HE @ 1Kbps (I think? There might be a lot of overhead)
  The video was awfully near 10Mb, but thankfully DEFLATE took care of that (/f/ why no LZMA).

  I added some crude seeking (unless I'm mistaken, there are 250 keyframes) and subs since that was
  easy.
  You can also right-click to save the FLV itself, but at least VLC has some trouble showing
  anything, so use something else OR DOWNLOAD THE BD YOU MANIAC.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)10:45 No.

  This is a very interesting idea, and while it definitely inspires me to question why moot
  shouldn't raise the flash sizes beyond 10MB, it's incredible what kind of things can be created
  despite limitations. Great work!

>> [_] AMM !AMM.FiWTOc 04/20/14(Sun)10:50 No.

  >>2356944
  Thanks! Some credit to the anon who came up with the idea.

  20Mb flashes would be absolutely fantastic.
  While it would increase the amount of straight video-into-swf shit, you could do so much more.
  Even 15Mb would help a lot.

  But on the other hand, limitations give the lovely challenge.

>> [_] The Admiral !a3Xv6FRGN2 04/20/14(Sun)10:56 No.

  Sup AMM!

  Holy shit dood, this is a crazy idea and amazing execution! :D

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)11:02 No.

  Haha, yes, I love you.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)11:03 No.

  The faces they make are great.
  It looks like Shauns eyeballs are falling out every few seconds.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)11:33 No.

  This reminds me of the old videogame design and programming where people had to work with the
  limitations of cartridges.

  Fucking inspiring. Cudos to the guy that came up with the idea, I must've missed the Holy Grail
  flash.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)11:38 No.

  Someone put Tron through this. Holy shit that will be amazing to see. It will be so glitchy
  looking.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)11:39 No.

  >>2356944
  >>Implying moot whats to make /f/ better
  be realistic here.

>> [_] AMM !AMM.FiWTOc 04/20/14(Sun)11:44 No.

  >>2356953
  Thank you, thank you!

  >>2356979
  The first one, I presume? The encoding will take some time, but maybe an hour and a half?
  Most of the stuff is already done.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)11:58 No.

  I'm happy to see my uploads of 'big lebowski' and 'meaning of life' started something.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)12:00 No.

  >>2356996
  >big lebowski
  I must have it

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)12:01 No.

  >>2356996
  also life of brian

  >>2356948
  That would be me =D thank you!

  I just had ffmpeg and wanted to see what all I could do.

  Also, 'swftools', specifically 'swfcombine', can be used to do flash MX compression.

  swfcombine -dz <uncompressed file input> -o <output compressed file>

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)12:02 No.

  >>2356998
  http://swfchan.com/31/151359/?lebowski.swf

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)12:06 No.

  What exactly did you use to make a progress bar and everything? I was just using ffmpeg and
  really wanted these.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)12:06 No.

  Spectacularly interesting concept, OP.
  I can dig it

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)12:06 No.

  >>2357002
  ohohohohoho, thank you. Didn't even think of looking for it on swfchan for some odd reason (sloth)

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)12:13 No.

  >>2357008
  np :D I just couldn't find it on my HD, so i re-downloaded it from there.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)12:16 No.

  Subtitles are a nice touch.
  Have you considered maybe doing the video as a series of images updated every few seconds,
  instead of "5 Jagerbomb-O-Vision" ?

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)12:17 No.

  >>2356941
  Seriously, what tool did you use for the seeking and the subtitles? I really want to know.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)12:18 No.

  >>2357014
  well at that point you might as well turn it into an audiobook

>> [_] AMM !AMM.FiWTOc 04/20/14(Sun)12:23 No.

  >>2357005
  >>2357015
  I coded them myself! The subs are parsed from real .srt subs which I timeshifted to fit the cut
  movie.
  Seeking the embedded bytearray (this is not your basic VP6 FLV on a timeline, you know) was a tad
  harder since ffmpeg doesn't add the keyframe metadata by default.

  >>2357014
  I could drop the FPS down to 2, 1, or even less, but I'd rather drop the video altogether and
  have proper audio since the quality won't be that great. And hey, fits the movie?

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)12:28 No.

  >>2357018
  Yeah, I did add keyframes when I did my rick roll and with 'big lebowski'. But I've found if you
  don't need the scrolling, the keyframes just add size. But how did you LZMA them? swftools
  doesn't do that.

>> [_] AMM !AMM.FiWTOc 04/20/14(Sun)12:34 No.

  >>2357020
  Flash itself has DEFLATE or LZMA as the compression, but the LZMA compressed swf was rejected as
  corrupted.
  It's not the video keyframes I added (of course h.264 has those!) but the metadata where they
  are; time and byte position. Seeking in the middle of a frame doesn't work; you have to land at
  the keyframe.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)12:42 No.

  >right click - quality - low
  now we're talking

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)12:48 No.

  >>2357028
  >delicious pixels
  Some men just want to see the world burn

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)13:08 No.

  So whats the point?

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)13:13 No.

  >>2357052
  we do it because we can. that's the point.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)13:14 No.

  >>2357052
  because they can/because they want to see the world burn like I do/4 teh ebig lulz/it's got
  potential to become something more

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)13:17 No.

  >>2357059
  >potential to become something more

  I approve this message. This should be a tradition or something.

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)13:18 No.

  >>2357065
  0x40 hues of megumi is a perfect example I think

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)13:44 No.

  >>2356941
  I'm actually amazed that you could get just the audio down to 8.73 mb

>> [_] Anonymous 04/20/14(Sun)13:54 No.

  >>2357086
  lern 2 ffmpeg
  also, it's cool and all. How did you get h.264 into the .swf? my build of FFmpeg doesn't allow
  h.264 in a swf file.

>> [_] AMM !AMM.FiWTOc 04/20/14(Sun)14:03 No.

  >>2357092
  Trade secret ; )
  It did take some time before I figured it out, but check out [Embed()], Video and
  NetStream.appendBytes.

>> [_] leemcardholder !XIxc6BpKnU 04/20/14(Sun)14:30 No.

  brilliant work