File: to_build_a_better_mousetrap.swf-(2.2 MB, 960x640, Other)
[_] CAPITALISM Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:00 No.2388605
captcha
>classes wwwwla
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:17 No.2388612
>>2388605
Fucking animals.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:29 No.2388620
>>2388605
So I ran out of money somehow, because for whatever reason your mice build stuff and then it
doesn't get converted to money. So instead I decided to automate and all the mice rebelled. Can
you actually win this?
>> [_] friendly-neighbourhood-rapeman 05/19/14(Mon)03:32 No.2388623
>>2388620
if your mice want more food and get pissed they delibretly ruin the product, same goes for
research
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:33 No.2388625
Fuck you and your Communism, it bankrupts the company and then ends with everyone miserable.
> http://i.gyazo.com/f0d7994b4c90c3afbe967622728b5fed.png
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:37 No.2388628
>>2388625
>2010+1+1+1+1+1-1
>not using 4chan X
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:37 No.2388629
>>2388625
The thing is that everyone is miserable but there is some faggets that bring the illusion of
happiness to the rats but it still an illusion and when the rats realize it they blame the "cat"
for all their suffering but the thing is that there was never a cat and neither was the
progress...all just was an illusion... a dream.
You have lost the game.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:38 No.2388630
>>2388623
Yeah I got that, I'm giving them max food, but it feeds them so infrequently that they still get
mad and ruin the research.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:39 No.2388632
>>2388630
Congratulations, you are now Britain in the 1970s.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:39 No.2388633
>>2388625
Yes because everyone is so incredibly happy with capitalism right?
>> [_] friendly-neighbourhood-rapeman 05/19/14(Mon)03:40 No.2388634
>>2388625
http://s.4cdn.org/image/title/255.png
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:40 No.2388635
>>2388632
The game should just have an option to feed them more frequently. As the leader of the company I
don't understand why I don't get to choose what I do with my money. If I want to feed my poor as
well as the jobless mice at the bottom and I have enough robots producing good to be able to do
it I don't see why I can't.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:41 No.2388636
>>2388633
Hoho, let me guess you are that kind of fucker who thing everyone can be "happy"?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:42 No.2388637
>>2388636
no, but I'm also not someone who is blindly indoctrinated to think communism is bad and that
capitalism is good.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:44 No.2388641
>>2388635
Pretty sure most companies don't just go "well, we've got ten employees, no point expanding
beyond that, let's just sit back and wait for the inevitable communist revolution" either.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:45 No.2388643
>>2388637
>Believing any kind of -ism
No wonder why oafs overthrow they hate and impotence towards the ones who dare to do.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:46 No.2388644
>>2388641
bad game is bad.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:47 No.2388646
>>2388637
Communism isn't bad just because it's bad. It's bad because it stifles progress. Countries
running under a communist system progress much slower than countries running under a capitalist
system, which is why the United States is a business giant while Russia is barely getting by
financially.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:47 No.2388647
>>2388643
>No wonder why oafs overthrow they hate and impotence towards the ones who dare to do.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:48 No.2388649
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6l_v1ORmLfQ
this.
Everybody who gets pissed off at this game is actually mad at the logic of capital.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:49 No.2388650
>>2388646
>progress
The idea that creating more technology and wealth is progress is part of the problem.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:50 No.2388651
>>2388649
No what we are mad at is how retarded it is that you can't feed your employees or the poor with
your wealth. You just kind of sit on it doing nothing like an idiot.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:51 No.2388653
>>2388637
The problem with COMMUNISM is that we still live in a scarcity-based world. Bottom line is that
there does not exist enough stuff for everyone. Period. That is a hard fact you cannot change
without murdering a good 25-50% of the global population outright. If we all had molecular
printers and could create new resources out of raw materials at will using them, then Communism
(or some form of it) could work. Emphasis could.
The problem with CAPITALISM is the snowball effect. We're seeing the result of the snowball
effect these days especially, where people either hit a 'critical mass' point with their money
that means they will never be without that ludicrous amount of money again, or they never hit
that point and are subject to the boom-bust cycle of the economy, potentially meeting financial
ruin every nth year just because the world said so.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:51 No.2388654
>>2388628
>>2388634
I had to reformat my hard drive about an hour ago and haven't gotten around to it yet
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:51 No.2388655
>>2388651
Welcome to the world of the 1%.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:51 No.2388656
>>2388647
Yes.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:56 No.2388658
>>2388650
Again you look at it the wrong way. It's not that the US is making technology and wealth; it's
that during the whole communism vs. capitalism era, the US just made shit to make life easier
and/or more enjoyable. If other people were willing to generate "wealth" to give it to us in
trade for these fun things that we were making, then who are we to stop them? We can always make
more for ourselves, and what they give us in trade can be traded for other things we want.
Other parties could have just made the things they wanted as well instead of buying shit from the
one party that did take the time.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:57 No.2388659
>>2388653
Both have their advantages and disadvantages. Communism is a fantastic system for small groups of
people dedicated to it, as they CAN have enough for all of them. True it can't work on a mass
scale but that doesn't make it badwrongevil the way capitalists seem to think it is.
Capitalism on the other hand produces ultra wealthy assholes who horde their wealth instead of
putting it to use while others get trampled underfoot barely able to get by each day until they
eventually die of exhaustion of starvation.
It's not like a system has to be applicable to the entire fucking planet right now to be worth
something.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:58 No.2388661
>>2388658
>Other parties could have just made the things they wanted as well instead of buying shit from
the one party that did take the time.
Right, those other places that the US and other western powers sucked dry during the colonial
age, yeah they totally could have just made the things they wanted. Definitely.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)03:59 No.2388662
>>2388658
Now your economic/political system is fighting against the spoiled generation that gave birth and
dealing with the results of "spending what you don't have" also that the US empire is collapsing.
US it is already in the transition btw being the whore of babylon to the downfall of the empire.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:02 No.2388666
>>2388661
Maybe not Africa or Mexico, but certainly Russia or China could have. The option was on the table
for them, but they both chose the option that drove them into the ground.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:04 No.2388670
>>2388666
Worst get.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:10 No.2388675
>>2388666
The option was never on the table for China. Empress Cixi had anyone who was in favor of
industrialization and modernization exiled or executed while the western powers exploited China
for all it was worth. Immediately following was WW1 in which China was exploited some more, then
WW2 in which Japan jumped in on the exploitation train. Eventually Mao was able to win their
civil war, but only by beating Chang who was a brutal fascist. So no, China never really had the
option of becoming a productive capitalistic country until very recently
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:14 No.2388679
>>2388675
China could have adopted capitalism; they chose to act arrogantly and try to boss the West
around, and got fucking wrecked because the world had moved on from gunpowder and rockets. They
then half-heartedly and retardedly tried to adopt capitalism without destroying their shitty
social structure and risking the people at the top losing out, and continued getting fucking
wrecked. Then they adopted communism, and starved 45 million people to death in 4 years.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:14 No.2388680
Just finish the game, in the end everyone is happy
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:17 No.2388682
>>2388679
What part of psychotic dictator murders reformers leaves you still thinking they had a choice?
One loony cunt saw what they wanted and murdered them for it because it didn't involve her at the
top anymore.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:20 No.2388684
>>2388675
Even if Cixi took the option of capitalism off the table, that doesn't mean it wasn't there. She
could have chosen to embrace the idea.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:23 No.2388686
> heavy research
>research computerization
>replace researchers one by one
>research automation (yellow machinery)
>replace workers one by one
drag vandal ex-employees to jail, where they belong (left of police cat)
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:27 No.2388692
>>2388684
One person does not an entire country making a choice make. Empress Cixi decided to be a selfish
cunt, that doesn't mean China chose not to embrace capitalism, it means one dictator chose not to
and slaughtered anyone who tried to.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:28 No.2388693
>>2388682
What part of "Empress Cixi comes to power in the fucking 1860s, by which time Britain had already
tried twice to bludgeon China into the global world trade network instead of shutting itself off
from the rest of civilisation, and supported reforms until the 1890s" are you not clear on?
Plenty of opportunity there.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:29 No.2388694
>>2388693
By tried to bludgeon china into the global world trade network I hope you mean tried to turn them
into a colony so as to drain them of all their resources.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:33 No.2388695
>>2388612
>>2388620
>>2388623
>>2388625
>>2388628
>>2388629
>>2388630
>>2388632
>>2388633
>>2388634
>>2388635
>3
>>2388636
>>2388637
>>2388641
>>2388643
>>2388644
>>2388646
>>2388647
>>2388649
>>2388650
>>2388651
>>2388653
>>2388654
>>2388655
>>2388656
>>2388658
>>2388659
>>2388661
>>2388662
>>2388666
>>2388670
>>2388675
>>2388679
>>2388680
>>2388682
>>2388684
>>2388686
>>2388692
>>2388693
>>2388694
You guys realize, that when they hit the ceiling when they are on the bottom floor, you can drag
them to the left of that same floor to suspend them, making them incapable of causing a riot?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:35 No.2388697
>>2388695
i was going to tell them the same shit but they have their heads crammed to far up their own
asses to remember its just a fuckin game by a guy with an opinion.
btw the goal is to make it to retirement
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:38 No.2388698
>>2388695
>>2388697
We realize that, we just have a different idea of fun that people like you who can't fathom the
enjoyment of a good discussion of history, politics, and economics.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:40 No.2388700
>retirement
>only achievable by sending all of the poorfags to jail
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:41 No.2388701
>>2388700
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owI7DOeO_yg
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:42 No.2388702
>>2388694
No, I mean "being allowed to go into China and see if the people want to buy any British goods".
If the British are trying to turn China into a colony it seems odd that the peace treaties after
two successive military humiliations of China all focus on the right to trade and travel rather
than, say, annexing territory.
>> [_] wow wise man 05/19/14(Mon)04:43 No.2388703
so much ignorance in this post; do some of you occasionally switch to the business channel and
memorise all the crap you hear? although the economy is artificial, man does not have control
over it. many of the things you guys state as fact with no basis are just theories. for example,
that there is a poorest percentile is almost certain, but that this percentile must be deprived
is not.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:44 No.2388704
>>2388698
> people like you who can't fathom the enjoyment of a good discussion of history, politics, and
economics.
your on 4chan you want a real honest dicussion go somewhere else thats not populated by people
who jerk off to mlp, cripples and have moved out of their mothers basement.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:48 No.2388707
>>2388704
not as fun without those exact people. And to be fair, saying those people won't know about
history, politics, and economics because they jerk off to X or Y or because they are cripples or
because they still live in their parent's basements has no basis in reality and is a pathetic ad
hominem attack.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:49 No.2388709
>>2388605
the hell. i had NO machines working, paying 4 pieces per employee, and the faggots i had no room
to hire staged an insurrection? the fuck is that about?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:53 No.2388711
>>2388709
It's about the creator of the game making a very poor attempt to make capitalism look bad by
artificially limiting the actions you can take.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)04:57 No.2388713
>>2388707
im not going to get into this with you. i know you read that logical fallacy poster so you think
your a master debater but i never said because they are cripples i said they beat off to cripples
2nd certain sexual deveations are a product of social isolation as is the basement part and
social isolation is kinda detrimental to politics isnt it. granted you could get your political
dick wet via the internet but lets be honest most of everyone here wouldnt spend more than 1
minute on a news site unless it had some violent shit on it. 4chan isnt known to breed or house
scholars and for good reason dont bullshit yourself into thinking otherwise with 1st year college
bullshit philsophy and film/book quotes that any asshole could read at their local library.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:03 No.2388716
>>2388713
For starters, thank you for the laugh. Secondly, learn your English grammar, you did indeed say
they were cripples. Third, social isolation is not detrimental to politics, it is detrimental to
social skills. Someone who reads a lot of political theory will be well versed in politics
regardless of whether they are capable of communicating with another living creature without
being hidden behind a screen or not. Fourth, no one said 4chan breeds or houses scholars, except
you, but at this point I'm doubting you are really even aware of what is spewing out of your
mouth at (or really your fingers, as we are on computers here.) and finally, I don't recall ever
taking any "first year college bullshit philsophy" classes, but I can assure you if a college
near me ever did offer "bullshit philsophy" as a class, I would be right there to take it.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:09 No.2388719
>>2388716
trying to save face is a bitch aint it.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:12 No.2388721
I've actually beat it, in two different ways
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:13 No.2388722
>>2388719
save face? what would anyone need to save face for on an anonymous message board? No one here has
a face to save. Are you really that retarded?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:16 No.2388723
>>2388722
name calling is a sign of anger. if your feelings are hurt we can talk about it.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:16 No.2388724
So theres bankruptcy, insurrection and retirement. Anything else? I can't get retirement without
getting machines because the boxes just don't want to get processed for no reason.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:18 No.2388726
>>2388723
I thought we were talking about it.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:24 No.2388729
>>2388726
sometimes i play with my dick in public
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:27 No.2388733
>>2388662
>people actually believe this
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:27 No.2388734
seems like max wages are able to support 3 mice comfortably, I instantly blasted anyone who
bitched too much and eventually maxed out the jail which stopped new workers, had a 50/50 split
of machines, achieved retirements
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:30 No.2388735
ok hold on. why all of a sudden do i HAVE to keep hiring workers as if im in charge of feeding
the whole human race? when a businessman has enough people he just stops hiring. why does this
have to lead to riots?? its not like it ever gave me the option to buy a bigger warehouse.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:30 No.2388736
>>2388698
absolutely euphoric
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:31 No.2388737
>>2388735
because the game is bad
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:32 No.2388738
>>2388737
welp...
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:32 No.2388739
Game is skewed as fuck.
Even when you have all workforce working correctly, you can't win.
Income is enought to maintain everything until for no reason the chain stops selling shit and
stock is piling up. Then they get sold but you don't get the income.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:33 No.2388740
>>2388739
its the idea that consumers eventually get "bored" of the product or something.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:33 No.2388741
>>2388735
Like this?
Fuckers complain to you not hiring them.
Go fuck yourself and be a street cleaner instead.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:35 No.2388742
>>2388741
>tried to upload picture on /f/
derp
here it is
http://imgur.com/U4fXxQ1
>>2388740
But then you have to make research faster and use a computer, which implies firing a mouse who
will fuck shit up.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:36 No.2388744
>>2388739
>>2388740
shit i never got this effect
arent your mice sad? they fuck up the product on purpose when they are sad
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:37 No.2388745
>>2388739
>>2388740
The grey part on histogram are demand previsions. You have to get a new product before the old
one stops selling.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:37 No.2388746
>>2388744
it's not the production being messed up, it's perfectly salable goods just piling up on your
production line.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:39 No.2388747
>>2388742
well actually, i managed to finally beat the game with a full reaserch team of humans. 100%
research and production, 50% wages to be paid. and hell, i paid them the max.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 05/19/14(Mon)05:43 No.2388748
>>2388735
There you go. State regulations over companies.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:50 No.2388752
Oh yeah, anyone else get to retirement?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)05:58 No.2388755
>>2388752
120 units sold, with fully automated factory and full prison
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)06:00 No.2388756
>>2388752
It's trivially easy once you get the hang of it. Done it with around 75 units sold once. Could
probably manage with less.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)06:13 No.2388763
>>2388605
PLEASE TUTORIAL HOW THE FUCK DO YOU GET RID OF THEM.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)06:13 No.2388764
I don't get this game.
You auto-win almost no matter how bad you might run shit. How the fuck do you people actually
lose?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)06:16 No.2388767
>>2388764
Most people don't twig to the fact that you can whack the rioting mice in jail by dragging them
to the left of the police cat when they cause trouble. Like this guy:
>>2388763
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)06:23 No.2388769
>>2388767
I didn't even know you could do that.
I just build machines, and basically autowin before the bottom row even has a chance of filling
up.
I've tried now, and aside from overpaying/researching nothing but blocks, you can't lose.
Hell, someone complaining about wages? Throw him out of the job, and chances are he'll be
offering to work for 1 or 2 within SECONDS.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)06:25 No.2388771
>This many replies
INB4 marked for deletion
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)06:34 No.2388775
wats the difference between this and the mac donalds game??
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)06:36 No.2388776
>>2388756
I just won with 26 units sold.
>>2388763
Put both mice on research, research a computer.
Put third mouse on research, until computer finished.
Fire them before paying a second paycheck.
Use single computer to research additional computers.
Use max computers to research new boxes until you hit maximum worth on each box (6 value per box).
Build a single auto-assembly crane.
gg
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)06:36 No.2388777
Best thing I managed to pull off: put everyone on researching and research servers. Once I have 6
servers I research cubes. While doing so I try to fill up my prison, so no additional workers
show up. I keep enjoying cubes changing colors, while I'm neither gaining nor losing money, thus
never going for retirement or bankrupt. And because there are no workers or unemployed on screen,
I don't need to worry about insurrection.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)07:08 No.2388786
>86 replies
Fucking guaranteed replies.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)07:11 No.2388788
>>2388786
i wanna say that the replies came from the holes in the game. not the ensuing political debate.
but hey...
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)07:55 No.2388799
>>2388620
You cannot; I never automated production, fired workers who stopped working (without even
demanding anything; I did actually keep my workers well paid enough to keep even the
most...fussy? volatile?...at 1/2 happiness), promoted good workers, demoted or fired bad R&D
guys, made sure to do worker placement for people imprisoned after they decided to stop trying to
break shit. I was even making a good bit of profit (though it got dicey about halfway through).
but at some point the game arbitrarily decided there was absolute insurrection!
I appreciate the concept, but this game is very much flawed, both as a game and as a political
statement.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)08:12 No.2388805
>>2388799
Ah, okay, I just realized what the deal is; there's inherently a 'kill-screen' because there's
not 100% employment, because there's 0 operations growth by the company while there's basically
infinite population growth over time. I neglected to notice that the fractures are also caused by
unemployment, so you're destined to lose regardless of how ethical or fairly you operate your
business.
Basically if you play the game well enough, the ending is then 5 unemployed guys killing the
research and work forces, automating their positions, imprisoning a small business owner, and
dancing in the streets. I'm going to assume that that's not really what was supposed to happen,
what with the whole 'better mousetrap', cat and mouse angle.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)08:14 No.2388807
>>2388799
I inevitably ended up automating, I would like to keep man power as I enjoy handcrafted products.
But due to machines we don't need people to devote their lives to building a product, what I got
out of it was the eventual mechanization of everything to minimize problems and maximize profits.
Its kind of sadly true.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)08:23 No.2388812
>>2388807
If we could make the entire thing automated then we'd have a way to produce and sell, while the
firm will pay taxes to keep the unemployed not working.
Humanity would be able to focus on something else, more productive like research and improving
but nope, the unemployed will just fuck around while 1-5% will still conduct research.
This would be startrek, too bad it'll never happen.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)08:31 No.2388819
>>2388812
Interesting point. Also you would have to take into account of a population explosion perhaps and
quality of life as well. I just want to see man make a moon base, even if its temporary before i
die
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)08:39 No.2388822
who made this game? chavez?
its definitely made by some butthurt communist
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)08:40 No.2388823
>>2388819
Yeah. Heard somewhere that the star trek system wouldn't be able to hold itself because of
currency not being existent or devalued.
Now that i think about it, it would mean pretty much ideal communism. Still, the amounts of
factors (like you said, quality of life etc) would still tip things over. They tried that in
Romania and it kinda got to bankruptcy and then revolution.
Moonbases would be nice. I hope we'll get to see another lunar landing first with current day
technology.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)08:43 No.2388825
>>2388822
>>2388822
>>2388822
>>2388822
trips and dubs
truth has spoken
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)08:54 No.2388829
aaand today's lesson is: fuck mice, embrace machines.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)08:55 No.2388830
Holy shit this is going to break 100 replys
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)09:00 No.2388832
>>2388830
never saw a 300 replies post here didn't you?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)09:05 No.2388833
100 get
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)09:07 No.2388834
>>2388833
Nice
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)09:09 No.2388836
What's the goal?
Get many units sold until retirement?
or
Get few units sold until retirement?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)09:13 No.2388839
>>2388628
>2010+1+1+1+1+1+1
>2016
wat
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)09:19 No.2388842
toasting in epic bread
>> [_] Anonymous 05/19/14(Mon)09:30 No.2388851
>>2388839
>doesnt know how to read a subtraction sign
>doesnt reread something he thinks might be wrong
>posting in a capitalist thread
and there's the representative for the 95-99% of people who'd be fucking around
>>2388812
