File: nigger.swf-(5.43 MB, 480x272, Other)
[_] :^) Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)10:32 No.2406487
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)10:37 No.2406490
'merica, land of the "free"
>> [_] Faggot 06/05/14(Thu)10:38 No.2406491
lolamericans
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)10:43 No.2406494
i dont even understand why that woman is so mad, like, what did that nignog do to her kids
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)10:45 No.2406497
>>2406494
Looked at them whilst being a nigger
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)10:48 No.2406500
Turns out employees don't like it when public faces of the company spew hate speech, especially
while being KNOWINGLY RECORDED. She got her ass fired. The state is also looking into her fitness
as a parent.
>>2406494
He started his car, which accidentally startled her kids. She says he almost hit her kids with
her car, but given that he's parked...
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)10:48 No.2406501
>>2406487
Damn that bitch got FUCKING REKT... oh it feels good not to be a racist like most of 4chan
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)10:49 No.2406503
>>2406500
>employees
*employers
>with her car
*with his car
i'm dumb
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)10:51 No.2406504
>>2406494
she has some mental issue like most women
>>2406500
>hate speech
>The state is also looking into her fitness as a parent.
thanks obamba
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)10:52 No.2406505
i dont know whether i should cry or laugh.
her stupidity and amount of double standards exceeds my imaginations by far
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)10:53 No.2406507
>>2406500
Yeah I'm sure you know all that. Fuck the Nigger and fuck you.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)10:53 No.2406508
>>2406505
see near the end she gets she is losing control and says almost involuntary "just because I
called him a racist"
She mixes rascist with nigger, and then proceeds to say "a racist fucking nigger"
It's a joke really
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)10:54 No.2406510
>>2406504
Well, if you want to ignore the race thing, there's also
>Concerned that someone "almost ran over her kids"
>keeps then out of sight behind her as they dick around in a parking lot
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)10:56 No.2406511
>>2406508
I'm not sure if it's a joke or a statement
i mean she obviously displays how uneducated she is.
Which is not suprising since the educational system of the USA works to breed military
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)10:58 No.2406513
Whats the source of the video?
This shit hilarious. Just look at getting so upset over nothing and the dude is just sitting
there laughing at her.
#rektd
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)10:58 No.2406515
One of her excuses for calling someone a nigger is "I have a black cousin"
Lady, that is the COMPLETE OPPOSITE of that logic should work.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)10:58 No.2406516
>>2406511
I mean, the whole situation is a joke.
>> [_] King !!Ho8YFUnx18C 06/05/14(Thu)10:59 No.2406518
>>2406487
i would of shot her on general principal
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)10:59 No.2406519
>>2406513
look at her*
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)11:00 No.2406520
>>2406515
Also it looks like she has some amount of nigger blood. So it's definitely not "racial cleansing
mindset". She's just calling the nigger a nigger and that's it, I think.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)11:02 No.2406523
>>2406513
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqdCWpUmP-Y
also:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACrQHGxxM_I
Worth watching
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:03 No.2406525
>>2406520
You're right. And she should be allowed to call a nigger a nigger. We don't know what happened
before the video cam... so the nigger probably did something niggerish so she is calling the
nigger a nigger. I myself love niggers and think that every whitey should own at least 10 niggers.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:04 No.2406526
Awwwwwwwww ye, Illmatic - Half time 1994 playing
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:06 No.2406528
Is that Lisa Ann?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:07 No.2406530
>>2406523
wow 4m views and no comments?
i expected shitstorm
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)11:09 No.2406532
>>2406530
I believe it didn't reach some layers of internet users. I just came in contact with it after
watching the second video.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:09 No.2406533
Stay mad white people
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:09 No.2406534
>>2406523
No really... it wasn't worth watching fag!
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)11:10 No.2406536
>>2406533
see
>>2406499
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:10 No.2406537
Stop stealin shit if you don't want to give your people a bad name
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)11:11 No.2406538
>>2406534
sorry m8 :^(
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:12 No.2406540
both sides are bitching around and getting upset because they want to
listen to sime black rap and count how often they call themselves niggas. but white people are
not allowed to call black people niggas ? that's just as racist as that woman
though of course there are always different opinions, some black people dont even call themselves
niggas amongst themselves but there are also not racist white people.
so this whole incident is about whether people give a fuck or not ... fucking bullshit
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:12 No.2406542
>>2406537
This is le ruse
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:14 No.2406544
>>2406540
>nigga=/=nigger
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:16 No.2406546
>>2406500
> She says he almost hit her kids with her car
> with her car
So... he stole her car? IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:17 No.2406547
>>2406540
only the dumb black people use the word nigga don't feel jealous
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)11:18 No.2406548
>>2406546
Yeah, and she appears to have no car in what is clearly a parking lot!
>>2406544
seriously nigger
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:22 No.2406552
Think of the poor black people
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:23 No.2406553
>>2406544
It's the same thing you fucking retard; "nigga" is just nigger with a ghetto accent the same way
whito is just white with an asian accent.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:23 No.2406554
>no one notices that she says "oh you think you know cops, do you know how many cops I stripped
for? you ain't getting far bitch"
So she's an old lady stripper with kids? Gross.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:24 No.2406555
>>2406554
trips get
>> [_] King !!Ho8YFUnx18C 06/05/14(Thu)11:26 No.2406558
>>2406555
WTF
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:28 No.2406561
>>2406560
Um, ok then?
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)11:29 No.2406563
>>2406555
>>2406554
s-trips m8
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:32 No.2406564
>>2406504
>>The state is also looking into her fitness as a parent.
She's a shitter, but that's some 1984 shit right there
>say something we don't like?
>we'll take your kids away and arrest you for "hate speech"
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)11:33 No.2406566
>>2406564
Yep,
LONG LIVE THE ALMIGHTY STATE
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:40 No.2406569
>>2406564
>unafraid to release unbridled rage and seething hate over the smallest accidents (the guy
accidentally startled her children by starting his car)
>role model for the kids swearing and dropping racial slurs and all-around raging in public
Clearly this woman has issues, and if she has no inhibitions about being a screaming harpy bitch
in public just because someone started their car and it startled her, imagine what she does to
her kids if they ever make mistakes? There's definitely a lot of verbal abuse because she's a
foul-mouthed shrieking bitch who seems incapable of reasoning and tolerance which are foundations
for a person's ability to love.
cont.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:43 No.2406574
>>2406569
>inb4 hurr durr she was mad at him because of her kids-- she's a good mama bear!
She couldn't give two fucks about the welfare of her children, her back was turned towards them
for 90% of the video IN A PARKING LOT WITH MOVING CARS. She's mad that her children were scared
by a car starting, how about a car running the hyperactive little fucks over? She's just using
them as an excuse for everything--
>HE SCARED MY CHILDREN
Except they seemed just fine and dandy about it. Maybe they were startled for two seconds
earlier, but obviously they're not scared or traumatized if they're dancing around in the
background.
>STOP FILMING MY CHILDREN
she only says that at the end even though she knows full damn well that he's filming her
unjustified psycho freakout-- she's a manipulative bitch who is trying to make him look like a
pedo to avoid getting her psychotic behavior exposed.
cont
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)11:43 No.2406575
>>2406569
Yeah, this point of view. But clearly the state has nothing to do with it. See, she isn't very
old and she's a stripper. She obviously comes from a generation that was already affected by the
state intervening in family affairs.
State's intervention creates the necessity for itself. If what happened was that the rest of the
family tried to intervene with the situation, what would we get? Kids living with their
grandparents or with their father, or even with the mother with way more family contact.
See, our society is a large experiment with no expected outcome
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:44 No.2406577
>>2406574
That is why she fails as a mother. Would you honestly trust a psycho bitch like this to babysit
your kids? Racism aside, because I know you all hate niggers anyway, she's fucking nuts. No one
that crazy in public deserves custody rights-- even if they can feed and clothe their children,
they WILL still lead by example and make their children in to crazy fucks. Do you really want to
deal with a generation of little fucking rage-filled brats to deal with in public? Then a
generation of psycho adults too?
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)11:46 No.2406579
>>2406575
*our statal society
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:47 No.2406580
>>2406553
You're a special type of idiot :)
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:50 No.2406585
>'cause he's a RACIST FUCKING NIGGER
That's fucking hilarious
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:53 No.2406588
>>2406577
>Racism aside, because I know you all hate niggers anyway
I think most people on the decent boards of 4chan just hate ghetto culture and degeneracy. Being
black isn't an automatic qualifier, but statistically it puts you into the "at risk of being a
nigger" territory more than other races. The black guy in the OP is fine, and there's nobody in
this thread saying she was justified. I think you're just seeing what you want to see.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:54 No.2406589
Why is someone calling someone else a Nigger considered national news?
I fucking hate this country.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:54 No.2406590
>>2406575
>She obviously comes from a generation that was already affected by the state intervening in
family affairs.
[citation needed]
Because obviously people always make good financial decisions on their own and the only time
people fall on hard times is when custody battles are involved right? Every stripper and
drug-addict is actually a brilliant, independent, hard-working individual who is only the scum of
society because the state took them away from their criminal/negligent parents (who are also
actually virtuous, perfect beings, despite the evil state) and put them with screened foster care
families (who are required to be financially, legally, and mentally sound, unlike their previous
parents).
cont.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)11:55 No.2406591
>>2406590
cont.
>State's intervention creates the necessity for itself. If what happened was that the rest of the
family tried to intervene with the situation, what would we get?
This right here is why I know you have no fucking clue how custody works. THE STATE ALWAYS TRIES
TO GET RELIABLE RELATIVES INVOLVED AS THE FIRST OPTION. The state recognizes the emotional value
of keeping families together-- despite what your radical and delusional voices in your head tell
you, the state is run by human beings, not emotionless androids.
You're completely ignorant about how any of the legal matters involving custody, you're trying
way too hard to be edgy and anti-government without knowing any of the basic facts about these
alleged trespasses of the state.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)12:00 No.2406594
>>2406591
No. This right here is the problem. You see the state as an equivalent (if not even more) entity
and not as a tool, a secondary choice. All problems the state has to intervene with nowadays
could be solved by the family and the community. People with this mindset, that the state should
intervene with everything before trying the more natural approach, should really think this
through and see where this is getting our generations as a whole.
>trying way too hard to be edgy and anti-government
no, you're not assessing my point of view with the abrangency that would be necessary for us both
to carry a good discussion.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)12:02 No.2406597
have you seen her attempt in damage control? It's absolutely hilarious!
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)12:03 No.2406599
>>2406487
I think she needs the D.
And not a black one, an asian one would be fine.
>> [_] BismuthVectoring !FRESHtYylA 06/05/14(Thu)12:08 No.2406603
>>2406575
>LIbertarian logic.
The state has no way to affect generations like that, idiot.
Stupid parents have existed since the dawn of time. Caring about how children are raised is a
very modern concept.
And if the state didn't do it, the people themselves would complain.
You have no right to fuck up a kids future because you are a shithead.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)12:10 No.2406604
>>2406594
>no, you're not assessing my point of view with the abrangency that would be necessary for us
both to carry a good discussion.
The reason I made that assessment is because you keep spouting foundation-less claims. Starting
with your assertion that this mother "obviously" was the result of state intervention in her
family. It's extremely arrogant to assert that you know exactly when the state was involved at
any point in a person's life just by watching two minutes of them on video.
cont.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)12:11 No.2406605
>>2406604
cont.
In addition, you not only made an assumption but a complete falsification of facts when you
asserted that the state doesn't allow the "rest of the family" to intervene in the situation.
That is one of the state's main goals when it comes to child custody-- the government KNOWS it
can't raise hundreds of children en mass as effectively as a family could provide individual
focus and love for a child. That is why there are specific laws that allow next-of-kin
(grandmothers, grandfathers, aunts, uncles, etc.) to be the legal guardians and allows the
original parents visiting rights and the potential to regain custody if proven to be a reliable
caregiver.
You make up facts to support your radical arguments, that's why I gave you those (accurate)
labels.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)12:13 No.2406607
>>2406603
>Libertarian
not really m8
>The state has no way to affect generations like that, idiot.
Coudn't it be the case that YOU are not able to see HOW the "cult of the state" affects entire
generations like that? Or you are the politically enlightened one that has everything right and
knows how it's best for the state and the families to act?
>Stupid parents have existed since the dawn of time. Caring about how children are raised is a
very modern concept.
Indeed, it's a very modern concept. And only today we see this kind of situation where it seems
like the state is a necessity. Stupid parents have also always been dealt with by other means.
cont.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)12:14 No.2406608
>>2406605
>>2406603
cont.
>And if the state didn't do it, the people themselves would complain.
Before that, if there wasn't the possibility for the state to intervene, people instead of
complaining would act.
>You have no right to fuck up a kids future because you are a shithead.
Indeed you don't. But how can you possibly know what would be the kid's future with something as
"modern" (as you said it) as the statal family concept?
Just saying, you're trapped inside your own state limited views.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)12:15 No.2406610
>>2406608
>>2406605
wrong reply, replying shortly
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)12:16 No.2406611
>>2406594
>You see the state as an equivalent (if not even more) entity and not as a tool, a secondary
choice.
No, you obviously didn't read my post. The state tries to keep the family together while also
considering the well-being of the child. The state doesn't try to take the children away and
raise them in a government facility-- if they NEED to be taken from unfit parents then attempts
are made to set them up with next-of-kin and, if that fails, foster parents.
The state does not purposely raise children away from families.
>All problems the state has to intervene with nowadays could be solved by the family and the
community.
In a perfect world. You're completely delusional about human beings in general. That's like
saying we should remove prisons and abolish all law enforcement because people should all be
law-abiding citizens without fear of consequences. That will definitely work out, according to
your logic.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)12:20 No.2406615
>>2406605
>>2406604
>The reason I made that assessment is because you keep spouting foundation-less claims
if this discussion were to go down to semantics none of us would have an edge, just saying
I say she was affected by the state simply because everyone that lived in the society after the
insertion of this "state-based thinking" was affected by it, one way or another.
>In addition, you not only made an assumption but a complete falsification of facts when you
asserted that the state doesn't allow the "rest of the family" to intervene in the situation.
I never said that the "state doesn't allow the 'rest of the family' to intervene in the
situation". What I said is, the state is seen as an apparatus that comes naturally first in this
kind of problem solving for regular people nowadays. It, besides neutralizing one natural trait
of our social abilities, inserts one new kind of necessity for itself with it's insertion.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)12:23 No.2406617
>>2406611
>In a perfect world. You're completely delusional about human beings in general. That's like
saying we should remove prisons and abolish all law enforcement because people should all be
law-abiding citizens without fear of consequences. That will definitely work out, according to
your logic.
Scarecrowing. This two issues are completely different. If you are resorting to this kind of shit
I don't see any point in continuing this discussion.
>> [_] BismuthVectoring !FRESHtYylA 06/05/14(Thu)12:25 No.2406618
>>2406607
I live on a country where the state is by all accounts and purposes way too fucking big and even
here we know how badly bad parents can affect children.
>But how can you possibly know what would be the kid's future
Pedagogy and the thousand studies on how children learn behaviour. Shitty parents will pass on
their shitty traits to their children. Hell a great example is my mother that ended up being
damaged goods just like her mother before her.
>>2406608
> people instead of complaining would act.
>Stupid parents have also always been dealt with by other means.
Not at all. The family affairs stayed at the house. Nobody could afford to care about waht the
neighbor was doing. Read about the 50s America a little.
And if it was in the ancient times the people was too busy surviving to give two shits about
their kids or even understand how raising children works. Was the child misbehaving? To the strap
with them.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)12:27 No.2406620
>>2406618
Yeah, this state mindset started around the 50s. A bit before it was like I'm describing.
But yeah, it happened.
>> [_] BismuthVectoring !FRESHtYylA 06/05/14(Thu)12:29 No.2406622
>>2406620
So if you understand that idiots shouldn't have children, why oppose it?
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)12:31 No.2406625
>>2406622
Well, idiots will continue having children, and I believe they should deal with it by their own
means. State-care, in a way will only prolong idiots having children since they have the state
apparatus to feed from. It's really a sort of unnatural selection, like welfare.
>> [_] BismuthVectoring !FRESHtYylA 06/05/14(Thu)12:37 No.2406627
>>2406625
>and I believe they should deal with it by their own means.
What will they even deal with if they don't realize they are idiots?
This phrase sums up why state intervention in this topic is important "Your rights end when
other's rights begin". You can do what you want with your life, but if you have a child you
better be fucking ready to accept the responsibilities. Otherwise don't be surprised when the
state takes the child. Children are not an object you can do what you want with, the persons.
I think you are conflating several other things with raising children just because it involves
the state.
On top of that, state intervention does not mean helping the parents not be idiot. It's about
stopping the parent's idiocy from affecting the children. We don't fix them, we just make sure
they don't hurt anyone else.
(cont.)
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)12:38 No.2406628
>>2406617
>Scarecrowing
You don't understand what scarecrowing is. I didn't say that was your argument, I said that is
following the same premise and outcome that you're arguing.
Your argument is that the family and community, on its own, is always capable of raising children
effectively without any intervention from the state or government. Saying people are perfect on
their own at raising children (with family and community involvement) without state intervention,
that's LIKE saying people are perfect at being law-abiding citizens (with family and community
involvement) so we don't need law enforcement. That's not scarecrowing, here's your words exactly:
> All problems the state has to intervene with nowadays could be solved by the family and the
community.
cont.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)12:40 No.2406630
>>2406628
With that ultimate term, you're asserting that they will have a perfect success rate if the state
were not involved. That's ridiculous, and you are not worth arguing with. You're just too
blatantly ignorant and radical. You don't even understand the terms you use (i.e. scarecrowing).
I've proven my points and you have nothing left but being easily offended and arguing in circles
based on made-up facts. You're just a misinformed tryhard 2edgy anarchist and this argument is
over.
>> [_] BismuthVectoring !FRESHtYylA 06/05/14(Thu)12:40 No.2406631
>>2406627
You've clearly been indoctrinated into an ideology, but if it's not libertarianism I don't know
what it is. But alas, it doens't matter. Ideology in general is shit.
Stop giving value to concepts and ideas and start to care care about the outcomes. Just because
the state is involved it doesn't mean it's bad.
But anyways, I gotta go, uni calls me.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)12:42 No.2406635
>>2406630
>>2406628
Thanks
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)12:43 No.2406636
>>2406628
>>2406630
rekt.
that's one tripfag i wouldn't mind leaving /f/ forever.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)12:46 No.2406638
>>2406631
>>2406627
>What will they even deal with if they don't realize they are idiots?
They don't need to. Dealing by your own means is that. You fuck up, you fuck up.
>You've clearly been indoctrinated into an ideology
Haven't us all?
>Stop giving value to concepts and ideas and start to care care about the outcomes.
That's what I'm trying to do.
>Just because the state is involved it doesn't mean it's bad.
Yes, it doesn't mean it. But what does it mean?
>But anyways, I gotta go, uni calls me.
bye
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)12:46 No.2406639
>>2406635
Damn man I thought you were cool but you just got fucking sautéed.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)12:51 No.2406641
>>2406636
>>2406639
Not really. This one anon uses what's clearly demoralizing and sensationalism to convey his
points. Even though he doesn't believe what he did is scarecrowing, it is. You grab your
opponents line of thought and put it in practice in a completely different context, like it's
what I would think. Attacking the image of the person instead of responding to arguments.
He tries to go down to semantics even when clear points are stated with context defining
scenarios. Indeed, not worth to continue arguing.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)12:55 No.2406647
>>2406641
You're not wrong, he just warped your point of view until it was convenient for him in that it
made you seem off your rocker
I feel your notion that people should have a chance to solve their own problems before the state
gets involved is both with merit and not always applicable
Unfortunately it's not easy to gauge how dangerously bonkers a lady is from a racist sperg-out
like this
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)12:56 No.2406648
>>2406603
>Caring about how children are raised is a very modern concept.
>Raise your child in the way he should go, and when he is old he shall not part from it.
>laughing prophets.jpg
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)12:57 No.2406650
>>2406641
Nope, he just made you point out how your own argument was completely fucking stupid, which it is.
You got turbowned son.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)12:58 No.2406652
>>2406650
Well, it depends on the viewer too. If your methods are more like his, you'll go with his point.
have a good life
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)13:00 No.2406654
>>2406647
Thanks. Clearly demoralizing tatics, like when kids are arguing.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)13:03 No.2406657
Usually posts on /f/ have 0-3 comments and this one going over 70 already, people be mad.
Honestly though, putting the nigger-word aside, the way she acts does indicate she should not be
allowed to take care of kids... ever. Poor kids
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)13:04 No.2406659
This lady gives us racists with reason a bad name.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)13:10 No.2406665
>>2406654
Why argue seriously when you are quite open to ripping your own hilarious argument to pieces?
That is called "people don't even fully understand their own reasoning", not childish.
Of course, you are so ignorant that even them pointing out how stupid your argument is, even YOU,
you still ignore that fact.
Hilarious.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)13:11 No.2406666
>>2406665
>proving my point
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)13:14 No.2406667
>>2406666
You're a special kind of delusional.
You should write stories. Seriously.
Make a blogspot and write down rants, I'd seriously read them.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)13:15 No.2406668
>>2406667
Quit the point proving m8
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)13:40 No.2406677
when did /f/ become /pol/
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)13:47 No.2406683
>>2406526
mah nigga
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)13:48 No.2406684
>>2406603
Nah, my uncle is literally a ward of the state.
He don't have a job and he forty something.
The government needs to stop helping people like him, he keeps getting government money because
his whole life has been a sting of depressive episodes.
The whole reason he stays depressed is because he doesn't do shit with his life.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)13:49 No.2406685
>>2406684
Holy shit I typed too fast,
*doesn't
*hes
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)14:04 No.2406691
When Keeping It Real Goes Wrong
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)14:11 No.2406694
Lockwert your posts almost always seem to be provoking unwanted debate, please stop. I
specifically come here to avoid current events, cant you just post normal things like everyone
else? John Moses Browning is cool, be like him.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)14:16 No.2406699
>>2406694
post anime :^)
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)14:17 No.2406700
>>2406694
Sorry mate, this is what I like to do. Sometimes I post only songs and other shit. It's fun really
>> [_] (ID: Heaven) 06/05/14(Thu)14:21 No.2406702
>100 replies
srsly /f/?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)14:23 No.2406703
So, what's the deal with those retarded christians?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)14:34 No.2406708
>>2406702
is this a first? I feel like it is
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)14:35 No.2406709
>>2406708
there was a game of thrones swf not even 2 hours ago with 100+ replies
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)14:40 No.2406712
>Female /pol/
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)14:41 No.2406713
>100 posts
Holy fucking shit is this tumblr?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)14:46 No.2406716
>>2406702
that's what happens when you get trip fags filling the comments with inane garbage
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 06/05/14(Thu)14:48 No.2406718
>>2406716
:¬)
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)14:52 No.2406722
>>2406718
Nana nana nana nana batmaaaaaaaaaaan
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)14:58 No.2406726
Fuck niggers
>> [_] John Moses Browning 06/05/14(Thu)15:06 No.2406733
>All this happened in New York
A pretty shitty state but I tought people would be at least a little more tolerant there. But
that black man was pretty boss. Just sitting there calmly.. very nice
>>2406553
>ITT: white people trying to teach me the difference between a nigger and a nigga
Go fuck yourself, cracker
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)15:09 No.2406736
Is it just me or did she sound like Cartman or any other Southpark character when she shouted
"GET THE CAMERA OFF MY KIDS!"?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)15:19 No.2406738
>>2406733
>niggers with personality disorders calling sjw racial slurs
Whoever loses the jews still win.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)15:20 No.2406739
>How many cops have I *slur* stripped for?
Wow, this is hilarious.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)15:22 No.2406742
>>2406530
It's probably on 'approval mode', where a comment has to be moderated before it can be posted.
>> [_] Tomo the /co/nadian porn bro !TOMO/mraQk 06/05/14(Thu)15:24 No.2406743
>>2406588
It sounded like he was just qualifying it more, not that he was assuming the thread was claiming
the woman as in the wrong.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)15:30 No.2406748
>>2406709
>>2406708
And flashes with spoken word poetry about bullying seem to get 100+ replies pretty consistently
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)15:32 No.2406751
Oh great, it's another Lockderp thread. Alright, check it:
>Just saying, you're trapped inside your own state limited views.
>"state-based thinking"
First, gotta love the delicious irony here. Not even a few days ago he was on some rant about how
feminism is exclusively left-wing. And now he is mirroring their own logic, dismissing arguments
by labelling it with the libertarian equivalent of "patriarchy" or "mansplaining." And despite
being critical of others' debate tactics, he has no problem ignoring his own standards, even in
the very same thread. This whole discussion derailed because this armchair libertarian
immediately assumed to know her entire sitution - as many conservatives do - because of some
anecdotal experience, and uses it as a substitute for factual statistics to bolster his charge
against the state in some weird cycle of circular reasoning.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)15:33 No.2406752
Hey guys can I post in this thread too?
Thanks
So how bout that flash huh?
Pretty wild!
I know right?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)15:33 No.2406754
>>2406751
The icing on the cake is when it all falls apart when you examine the claim
>All problems the state has to intervene with nowadays could be solved by the family and the
community.
Nevermind that if such organizations provided a valid alternative, there would be no need for
state intervention.. The conditioning and upbringing of the racist mother is the responsibility
of the family and community by default. And by default, this is what it has produced. No state
bungling necessary
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)15:35 No.2406757
>You think you know cops?
>Do you know how many cops I've stripped for?
What the fuck
>> [_] Fagmaster 06/05/14(Thu)15:41 No.2406760
why
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)15:41 No.2406762
Needs moar jpeg.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)15:42 No.2406763
fuck yeah 120 comments
it reminds me of the papers please flash
good times
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)15:44 No.2406767
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqdIvVLr6wU
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/14(Thu)15:46 No.2406769
>>2406767
10/10 best thing of the day
