File: phpog.swf-(91 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1969639

File: phpKP.swf-(91 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1965591

File: phpXA.swf-(91 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1960764

File: zeitgeist-poster.swf-(91 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1955797
>> [_] Xorauguynappfdk Demaemiainrievl 1955821 Wenpagundenue <a href="http://vikawieier.com">xaikalitag< /a> Prawgella http://uillumaror.com - iziananatt sciepache http://gusannghor.com Acconiaassild
>> [_] Zeitgeist 1955860 >># what?

File: phptG.swf-(91 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1951162
>> [_] Anon 1951174 Oh no, not this again. Do you honestly need to post three at once?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951177 >># Four at once, I am in the zeitgeist cult communist movement that believes science is religion and science is communism. So Yes.

File: phpPy.swf-(91 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1945507
>> [_] Anon 1945510 MODS
>> [_] Anon 1945514 >># fuck the fuck off
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945516 >># New fresh proxy today, responding to the thread on /q/: when I said there's no proof that it's spam Anon avoids the meaning of the word "spam". It's unwanted yes, but there's no proof that it's junk. Calling something, propaganda, shit, communist, junk, satanism, is not proof of anything except of labelling, like religious people calling some blasphemy. When I say only religious people disagree with me, I'm talking about 4chan's users are turning 4chan into an ochlocracy or "mob rule" or ""tyranny of the majority" considering all the ad hominem fallacies.
>> [_] Anon 1945523 >># You don't consider it spam, but you call yourself the "zeitgeist spammer". Right. I don't know what you're hoping to achieve by posting these day after day. No one is receptive to spam. You'll probably have better luck preaching on the sidewalk.
>> [_] zeitgeist spammer 1945528 >># I don't consider it spam because there's proof it's unwanted, yet there's NO PROOF IT'S JUNK. Until I see some something critical against zeitgeist and not some mindless slandering, why should I leave? I earned the name zeitgeist spammer from others on 4chan :)
>> [_] Anon 1945532 >># Why don't you check the second definition here? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/s pam >disruptive messages, especially commercial messages posted on a computer network
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945535 Why don't you check the wikipedia definition here? unwanted electronic JUNK. So where's the proof zeitgeist is JUNK.
>> [_] Anon 1945537 i find this article inaccurate due to the fact that i believe that there is corruption due to greed in human nature and thus causes some people to have more money and some people less money but hey thats just me :p
>> [_] sage zeitgeist 1945539 >># if you're arguing zeitgeist is commercial, Proof zeitgeist is commercial then.
>> [_] Anon 1945542 >># I'm not arguing that it is commercial, the main part of the definition is "disruptive messages".
>> [_] Anon 1945543 >># You said it yourself. It's unwanted. Therefore junk. Unless you have some sort of mental problem which involves hoarding. Normal people don't keep shit they don't want.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945545 >># Take note of what you're saying: you believe there is corruption due to greed in "human nature". The is no scientific evidence to support the concept of human nature, some humans are not greedy by nature that's a social myth.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945549 >># Now that's an appeal to ochlocracy or "mob rule" again. it would be ignorant to say that because something is wanted, therefore it's junk. for example christians flag critical atheist videos as hate speech on youtube, much in the same manner you describe zeitgeist as spam just because it's unwanted. Completely avoiding the burden of proof which SHOULD be with you to proof that zeitgeist is JUNK.
>> [_] Anon 1945551 ahhh see now thats semantics lol every statistic in the world has outliers which is why there is such things as the normal distribution but when i say human nature i mean the mean of society has a base pattern therefor a grounds for human nature which supports the term human nature oh btw you say "tyranny of the majority" in one of your earlier arguments, and i was woundering if you mean capatalism or democracy?
>> [_] Anon 1945552 >># If you want to persuade people to join your case, half of your burden is to post this shit, but the other half is to make them accept your argument. That's what being a communicator is, and you're not a very good one. The second you have provided a good enough argument as to why you're right rather than spamming and saying 'prove me wrong' is the second you convince someone you're right.
>> [_] Anon 1945555 >># Sorry, meant to click >>#
>> [_] Anon 1945556 >># Seriously, kill yourself. Like not that whole 'lel go kill urself' bullshit, but honestly end your own life. No one loves you, your ideals are silly and mocked, and you're probably fat as fuck
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945557 >># society has a "base pattern" for greed because this new religion called consumerism makes it very much seem like the nature of the human being is corrupt, greedy evil and so forth. And just like the idea the "man is born with sin" there no evidence to support the idea that man is born greedy, man is born with humans needs, not greed. capatalism or democracy? I would argue the "tyranny of the majority", ochlocracy or "mob rule" describes both capatalism and democracy.
>> [_] Anon 1945558 do not want
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945560 >># murder sounds like your business, not mine
>> [_] Anon 1945562 so by saying captialism and democracy majority of the world should just burn....also go to college get a degree in pyschology and understand if you hand someone absolute power they will go mad and abuse it there have been random studies that support this thesis thus supporting human nature which includes greed
>> [_] Anon 1945563 >># There is a difference between hate speech and posting shit no one fucking cares about. You're not offending anyone, you're just posting stupid shit. To compare it to Youtube you're the 9 year old who posts blogs about people slamming Beiber. No one cares.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945564 >># I stopped believing in "human nature" once I saw "Dog Girl" on youtube. Girl brought up by dogs? hey she acts like a dog and not a human. Hey man who's greedy and corrupt? must have been brought up by corporate america.
>> [_] Anon 1945568 How do I post a flash? I keep trying to post one, but it won't let me even though I have all of the required fields filled in.
>> [_] Anon 1945569 >># Probably because that flash already exists on 4chan's servers. Are you getting a duplicate file message?
>> [_] Anon 1945571 >># Oh hey, a spammer, must've been brought up by telemarketers and door to Jehovah's witnesses. How's that line of thinking working out?
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945572 >># Again, you're still with mindless slander and labelling, "stupid shit", "spam", "communism", "cult propaganda", "lies", "zombies", "retarded", and so on. filtering the ad hominem fallacies and mindless slander, there's been no critical argument against zeitgeist on 4chan that I've seen. I've seen threads of just the same, basically saying "zeitgeist is spam", without any explanation. and moot ignorantly banned me when he was provided ZERO evidence against what I submit to 4chan.
>> [_] Anon 1945573 >># Nope.
>> [_] Anon 1945574 >># I'm also very certain that there is no duplicate.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945575 >># more ad hominem fallacies, try again.
>> [_] Anon 1945576 >># That girl has a mental disorder. Find a well-known example of a person brought up by dogs that does not have a mental disorder.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945579 >># http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feral_child they probably explan the phenomena of feral children better than me.
>> [_] Anon 1945580 so with my arguement regarding human nature, and statistical value i used the phrases '"stupid shit", "spam", "communism", "cult propaganda", "lies", "zombies", "retarded" ' even though, in your opinion, it is not a critical arguement, some others may disagree and see it that way
>> [_] Anon 1945582 >># >makes it very much seem like the nature of the human being is corrupt, greedy evil >Implying we aren't We didn't become the dominant species by being nice. champ.
>> [_] Anon 1945583 >># Dude, I think that being a feral child would be cool, having all of those senses from living in the wild, and not caring about killing people.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945584 >># people who like to seriously debate, know that mindless slandering is not a critical argument. The ones who would agree with you are scientologists as they baselessly slander and refuse to debate. "are you a scientologist?" "oh get away from me you're a child molester!" -Real anti-scientology video.
>> [_] Anon 1945585 also on a side note, if this is as it seems to be from your point of view, the answer to society, why has it not started or been talked about by the world? it might be because it might not work?
>> [_] Anon 1945587 >># Fine, i'll word it better to make it even easier to understand. >># Following that line of thinking, I could just as easily say, "Hey, man who's spamming? must have been brought up by telemarketers and door to door jehova's witnesses" See, just like you, I can pull declarative statements that points the finger at something. Jesus christ.
>> [_] Anon 1945588 10/10, OP.
>> [_] Anon 1945590 >># Not all people brought up in corporate America become greedy and corrupt.
>> [_] Anon 1945592 TL;DR
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945593 >># more ad hominem fallacies >># I agree with you, a society based on science instead of a society based on religion (consumerism) would not work. >># we're not the dominant species, the market is destroying the planet like a cancer and you call that dominant? lol
>> [_] Anon 1945594 >># Trolls trolling trolls.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945595 >># ah yes those egalitarian societies are so greedy.
>> [_] Anon 1945597 >># Last time I checked, communism failed miserably.
>> [_] Anon 1945598 >># Do you know why my flash isn't getting posted when I've filled out the required slots.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist spammer 1945599 >># science is communism, I agree with you.

File: zeitgeist-poster.swf-(91 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1937765
>> [_] Anon 1937775 Remember when Op would get B&'ed for posting this Shit? Pepperidge Farm remembers P.s. Reported!
>> [_] Anon 1937782 >># if I get banned from this proxy, I'll just use another one. Anon contradicts itself, they say they're for free speech yet they censor zeitgeist like religious dogs.
>> [_] Anon 1937784 >># because you (fucktard) don't seem to realize that you're spamming the board and that's why this shit gets taken down/you get banned. Even if that weren't the case what makes you think ANYONE actually wants to look at this shit? saged and reported. Idiot.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist 1937789 >># Just like a religious person, your madness totally blinds you of your censoring attitude. I don't care what you THINK I'm doing because I know what you're doing, I've seen the threads on /q/ and they amount to people screaming blasphemy when zeitgeist is talked about with ZERO critical discussion at all.
>> [_] sage sage 1937800 >># that's what you're failing to realize. No one wants to talk critically about it. You can talk about it, no one's stopping you from doing that, but good luck finding anyone on 4chan to actually discuss it. The fact that you spam /f/ constantly with this shit isn't helping either. You are being reported for spamming. Nothing else. You can cry censorship all you want, it's just going to make people hate you even more. Your inability to accept criticism is telling of your personality. This is why you refuse to accept that Zeitgeist is a sham. You are beyond hopeless. Enjoy your ignorance.
>> [_] sage zeitgeist 1937804 >># The burden of proof SHOULD be with you to prove that what I'm submitting is spam, yet take note that you actually can't spam /f/. you contradict yourself, you say no one wants to critically talk about it yet I'm unable to accept criticism about zeitgeist, I can't obtain any criticism of zeitgeist if no one speaks critically about it on 4chan. I refuse to accept zeitgeist is a sham? Again burden of proof that zeitgeist is a sham SHOULD be with you, yet on the 4chan with the religious cry babies they simply think shouting that zeitgeist is a sham makes it into one.
>> [_] sage sage 1937817 >># We get upwards of 15 and sometimes 20 posts about zeitgeist every day. That counts as spam. Hoods and porn combined have become less common than zeitgeist spam. A big reason you can't obtain criticism is because it's been talked about SO MUCH to other people (hell, maybe just you) that keep posting about it and everyone's tired of explaining to people such as yourself that refuse to listen.
>> [_] sage sage 1937818 >># You're going to need to come up with an argument instead of crying about religious zealots trying to silence you. You want a critical point made? A resource based economy is impossible. There must be a universal system to assign value to the resources being traded. Society would collapse if it were to lack that most basic level of structure. And lets not forget that even if it were to work, it would not work for certain sizes of population, meaning fascist-like population control would be vital to ensure resource distribution is adequate. People not living in resource rich areas would be starved because they lack trading materials. Society would stagnate because it would lack the same drive towards innovation, massive sections of the population would simply refuse to cooperate and would either force abandonment of the project or necessitate their own execution to prevent further interference. now will you please PLEASE fuck off?
>> [_] sage sage 1937852 >># stop posting shittons of zeitgayst shit. We all saw the other five frakking flashes. I, and (I'm going to assume) everyone else, give zero shits about it. For the love of your God, STOP posting this cancer everywhere. Once is fine. Let everyone look at it and immediately close it because it's a seventeen page .pdf document. You don't need more than one.
>> [_] SAGE SAGE 1937881 IN ALL FIELDS WHAT IS THIS "ANONYMOUS", I DON'T EVEN UNDERSTAND RULE SEVEN BITCHES
>> [_] zeitgeist is communism / cult 1937904 Zeitgay is just stupid in general, the one guy who keeps posting this is probably the most retarded person on the planet if he thinks anyone cares about his ignorant little essays. i wonder if he thinks he's going to change people's views or something. rofl. >cult as fuck

File: phpPp.swf-(91 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1927044

File: phplG.swf-(91 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1923266

File: zeitgeist-..swf-(91 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1919135
>> [_] Anon 1919162 >the zeitgeist movement >just another name for communism >even though communism directly lead to over 100 million deaths, not including wars fought no thanks idiots, how about we maybe realize communism DOESN'T FUCKING WORK and you stop posting this bullshit
>> [_] Anon 1919169 >># communism A form of socialism that abolishes private ownership A political theory favoring collectivism in a classless society zeitgeist's natural law economy: The scientific method for social concern. access instead of "property". oh yes they're the same alright.
>> [_] Anon 1919217 Oh mother fuck. Zeitshit is back.
>> [_] Anon 1919225 >># zeitgeist here: I've been back for awhile, I post using proxies or internet connections that haven't been banned. The religious nutters that got me banned provided no evidence that zeitgeist is shit or spam on the thread on /q/. None. It was heated labelling and then moot assumed the people in the thread weren't bullshitting him or something so one of my IP addresses got banned.
>> [_] Anon 1919232 >># You have three of your shitty propaganda pdfs (which are not flashes) on /f/ right now that are nothing but >BURRR WAAAHH THE ECONOMY IS BAD >so how do you propose we fix it? >BURRR WAAAHH THE ECONOMY IS BAD Shut the fuck up and get the fuck out. We're tired of your shit.
>> [_] Anon 1919234 >># >># Bitches don't know how the fractional reserve system be.
>> [_] Anon 1919238 >># The zeitgeist movement isn't interested with repairing the current social system. It's interested in humanity giving up the concept of trade for a new social system called a natural law economy which we define as the scientific method for social concern. Trade and property are corrupt concepts and are forms of violence since they are religiously based. Money or trade only needs confidence in such a concept for it to be thought as real. When in fact it is social cooperation that brings about productivity not market competition.

File: phpJn.swf-(91 KB, Other)
[_] Anon 1912170

File: zeitgeist-poster.swf-(91 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1776646