File: gardevoir_20paizuri.swf-(651 KB, 375x384, Hentai)
[_] Ren and stimpy Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)19:23 No.2449863
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)19:24 No.2449866
reported for terrorism
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)19:38 No.2449889
You sick fuck
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)20:20 No.2449922
dude what the fuck misleading title
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)20:21 No.2449925
The cock is backwards, also shitty flash version of Mystical's good art is shit
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)20:24 No.2449927
>>2449925
How the hell is the cock backwards?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:03 No.2450011
>>2449927
The cock is pointing towards us and the balls are hanging downwards. Figure it out.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:16 No.2450032
>>2450011
What the fuck? The cock is pointing to her chin, and there are no balls at all. What in the fuck
are you even looking at?
It's a hovering ghostcock typical in hentai.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:17 No.2450036
>>2450032
The balls are hanging right there, blindy. They're the same color as the cock.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:19 No.2450042
>>2450032
http://puu.sh/a8TRw/ddb66b71e0.PNG
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:19 No.2450043
>>2450036
I am looking at this frame by frame (there's only 6) and I see absolutely no structure resembling
testicles.
The base of the shaft fades into nothingness just above her vulva.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:20 No.2450044
>>2450043
If you think anything in that flash is a vulva you need your eyes checked.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:20 No.2450045
>>2450042
That's the base of the shaft, evaporating into the aether. His cock would be disproportionally
short for its width if that was intended to be his balls.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:21 No.2450047
>>2450044
Mound of venus, groin, whatever. It has the cleft in the first and second frames.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:22 No.2450048
>>2450045
> His cock would be disproportionally short for its width if that was intended to be his balls.
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. If those are the balls, which they are, that
cock would be a good 8 to 10 inches.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:23 No.2450050
>>2450047
The cleft is the ballsack, you dingus
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:24 No.2450053
>>2450048
Compare the length and width of the glans to what I claim is the base of the shaft. It is in
perfect proportion.
If that were his balls, which they aren't, his cock ends up short and ridiculously fat.
I'm talking proportion, not overall size which would be impossible to gauge.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:26 No.2450058
>>2450050
Then how in the fuck does it move every single frame when the cock stays stable? That can only be
the Gardevoir.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:27 No.2450061
>>2450053
The proportion is fine, though. And the cock is clearly uncut, which is why the glans looks weird.
I take it you've never seen a penis before.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:28 No.2450064
>>2450058
Because the cock is being held by the breasts? It's not rocket science, dude.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:28 No.2450065
Damn, you guys take your tit wanks seriously.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:28 No.2450067
>>2450061
I take it you've only seen impossibly fat ones.
The proportion is perfectly fine only if the dark portion is the base of his shaft, and no
testicles are represented. Otherwise, the length is shortened by a good 25% and becomes
ridiculously fat.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:30 No.2450070
>>2450064
The cock is utterly immobile, it's enveloped, not moving. Any structure moving in the loop is
part of the Gardevoir.
Hell, the colors don't even match because that part is the same milky white as her.
>>2450065
You're goddamn right I do.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:31 No.2450073
>>2450067
You really have no idea what you're talking about. Really. The proportion is perfectly fine.
>>2450070
>Hell, the colors don't even match because that part is the same milky white as her.
It isn't.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:33 No.2450077
>>2450073
I'm just going to assume I'm being trolled at this point, but there's no valid interpretation of
this image that involves testicles.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:34 No.2450079
>>2450067
>caring about cocks being impossibly proportioned
>when the flash is of a Gardevoir which canoncally does not have tits and is flat as a board
Retard
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:35 No.2450080
>>2450079
>canon
>in pokeymans
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:35 No.2450081
>>2450077
>get proven wrong
>"ur a troll!!!!11"
When did reddit get here?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:36 No.2450084
>>2450081
Except there's no proof. What proof? Do I have to go highlight the entire outline of his shaft?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:38 No.2450087
>>2450036
you dumb fuck, that's gardevoir's stomach
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)21:38 No.2450088
I second the motion that there is no balls.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)22:00 No.2450108
>>2450032
>Ghostcock
2spook4me
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)22:01 No.2450109
>>2449925
>Mystical's art
>good
hahhahaahahahaha
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)23:07 No.2450175
>>2450079
You're taking issue with the tits?
Not the fact that instead of tits, Gardevoirs have a fucking BLADE sticking out of their chests?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)23:09 No.2450177
>>2450175
I love how people seem to forget about that.
