File: Beta White Knight.swf-(9.01 MB, 432x240, Other)
[_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)14:49 No.2545175
!!! Rage Warning !!!
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)15:11 No.2545192
>>2545175
In his defense, he did call out some bullshit.
>but that confirmation bias at the end
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)15:13 No.2545193
>>2545175
>points out no specific data
>he has no data himself to point out
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)15:28 No.2545203
>i dont know who's trolling who anymore
Dude has some valid points.
Doesn't change the fact that he's a faggot, but he has some valid points.
Doesn't change the fact that I'm still going to call him a faggot.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)16:01 No.2545224
why the fuck cant everyone just shut up & play video games
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)16:10 No.2545230
*rubs temples* can we please get someone smart to defend video games for once... extra credits
can't do it alone
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)16:12 No.2545231
I'm so confused by this, I thought it was going in a totally different direction.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)16:15 No.2545233
>Says she's cherry picking, herself.
>cherry picks twitter posts to make all gamers look violent and sexist
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)16:15 No.2545234
>>2545175
>that hairline
I can taste the beta.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)16:15 No.2545235
Her video is actually fair. She actually quite clearly says that video games are not sexist.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)16:18 No.2545237
>>2545175
It always amazes me that people can live to their late 20s and still act like children.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)16:44 No.2545256
Wow...what a fag.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)16:48 No.2545262
Her video argues that video games as an entertainment medium does not affect society like some
feminists say it does.
She does this successfully by pointing out how the violence in video games debate was bullshit
too.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)16:49 No.2545263
>>2545256
I know.. in the beginning I thought he would bash the Feminazi bitch, turns out the femanizi
bitch is a down to Earth person that might just not understand gaming so well. and the dude is a
femanazi.
Wow, this flash fucked with me
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)16:55 No.2545269
"Trigger Warning"
aka immediately disregard everything I say because I'm a giant faggot
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:01 No.2545275
>>2545263
This
>> [_] Raving Raven 09/28/14(Sun)17:02 No.2545277
"stand down"
how about... uhhh.... oooh... ummm
NO!
now shut your faggot cunt eatin', dildo lovin', no man havin', queef inhalin', diarrhea of the
mouth havin', no sense of "let sleeping lions lie", no mommy or daddy huggin' you enough being,
so goddamn hungry for attention havin', no one loves me enough or at ALL, amazon wannabe, needs
to just the fuck up & read the fifty shades of grey for that man of never-to-come fantasy havin'
only, piece of satan's feces infested mouth of yours & play some GODDAMN Tomb Raider from the
first one to now. & understand that games ALWAYS been for a male thing.... mostly... damn if only
I was fat to do that weird breathing grunt.....
ANNNND I'm a bisexual female that love's how most guys play the hero! because most females that
play hero are lame.... except for Tomb Raider Lara's pretty fuckin' boss, I just pray they don't
do the none needed
*raises fist for equal rights*
*ahem.... RAAAAGE! ok I'm done
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:06 No.2545282
>>2545277
ur a faget
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:07 No.2545284
>>2545175
if he'd not been a faggot he'd have been a bearable human being and I might have taken him
seriously
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:07 No.2545285
>>2545277
bait.jpg
>> [_] Raving Raven 09/28/14(Sun)17:12 No.2545290
>>2545282
no, I'm a prick!
>>2545285
damn right! come at yo!
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:16 No.2545296
Why is it that suddenly everyone wants to target sexism in video games when we were already
making an effort to make more gender equal games in the first place? (more choices for gender in
games)
I mean, if they're going to target video games why is it that there isn't the same controversy on
sports like wrestling and football?
Sexism is everywhere, and it is an issue in some places. But video games were already making the
effort, and there is a dramatic change from 5 to 10 years ago.
Also this guy is a fag.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:19 No.2545300
>>2545296
It's suddenly an issue because there's a large female representation in the video game playing
demographic, which means that gender bias (or sexism or whatever the fuck they're calling it
currently) suddenly applies.
>The survey/study noted that there were more women playing vidya then there were men, what they
didn't mention was that 90% of the women in the study were playing Peggle.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:22 No.2545303
>>2545296
>why is it that there isn't the same controversy on sports like wrestling and football?
Now that's just a retarded comparison. Men and women are both equally capable of being good at
videogames, they can compete at the same videogames and suchlike. The reason sports are seperated
by gender is because women are physically incapable of competing with men at them.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:24 No.2545307
>>2545263
You don't even know how long it took me to catch on until I watched the actual source video.
He actually manipulated everything to make it look like he was the good guy doing justice. This
is a far-wing feminist.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:24 No.2545308
>>2545303
I wasn't even focusing on that actually. More like, the concept of cheerleading and whatever the
fuck staged wrestling is doing with girls.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:24 No.2545309
>>2545300
They aren't even looking at genres
I doubt many girls have every played many RPGs or Strategy games.
>> [_] Raving Raven 09/28/14(Sun)17:25 No.2545312
>>2545296
Soul is that you? & don't say anything about football..... geez
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:29 No.2545315
>>2545307
I actually feel a bit guilty because I initially assumed that the woman would be the raging
feminazi, but her argument made sense.
>>2545309
The other 10% of women in the study played vidya so that they could be cutesy on twitch
I'm not going to begrudge women playing video games, the more the merrier. Just keep the sexism
argument out of something that was never intended to be sexist to begin with.
>or stop using Duke Nukem as evidence towards your argument because you instantly lose all
credibility when you get offended.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:30 No.2545317
Good criticism, but beta boypussy is still a jew.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:31 No.2545322
This has made my day shit, thanks OP.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:35 No.2545329
sauce?
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:36 No.2545330
>>2545193
Invalidating an opposing argument is still a way to accomplish some sort of win. You may not have
an argument you're trying to prove, but that doesn't mean you can't disprove your opponents.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:37 No.2545333
>>2545329
Nobody link it. Don't give this faggot the page views.
Also, I love how he says he wants more variety while obviously being a faggot. Way to let your
bias sway your opinion. Of course you want homo games catering to your wanting to sexualize men.
Too bad you'll always be the vocal minority. Cry some more.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:38 No.2545335
I love how people complain about NOT ENUFF MALE CHARACTERS as though all videogames are being
made by the same evil, sexist corporation. A man making a videogame about a man is just as sexist
as a woman making a videogame about a woman (as in, not at all). It's just that the vast, VAST
majority of people who play videogames (especially ones that have stories and human characters
rather than being simplistic phone games) are men, and men generally idolize and identify with
male characters more than they do women.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:40 No.2545339
>>2545335
well, fucked that up, meant to say NOT ENUFF FEMALE CHARACTERS. Also meant to say the majority of
people who play *and make* games are men
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:42 No.2545341
Motherfucker still things insults are ad hominems. Complete buffoon. An ad hominem is the
reduction of an argument to an insult. An argument with insults is not an ad hominem, just an
argument with insults.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:42 No.2545342
>>2545335
Not to mention the SJWs attack gamers, who are one of the few crowds who would have maybe
accepted them before all this, because we're still decades from the general populace being okay
with the kinda shit that goes on in their communities. Meanwhile, we could have been friends, and
everyone could have had the games they wanted made by people who wanted to make them. This whole
thing is about GREED though. SJWs want to FORCE developers into making games that cater to THEM,
and stop making games that go AGAINST their ideals. That's why people call them Feminazis, and
that's why gamers won't stop until they're the laughing stocks of the world.
Again, we could have all just been friends playing video games together but no.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:46 No.2545344
>>2545330
The dude invalidates nothing. "But you were talking about sexim first"
Then he does the fag dance. omg
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:47 No.2545345
>>2545341
Ad hominem (to the person) refers to attacking a person to reduce their credibility instead of
attacking their argument in one form or another.
>I think X is a good game because reasons
>Well you're a faggot so your reasons dont count
is ad hominem
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:48 No.2545346
>>2545345
Maybe his being a faggot does affect the argument. If the game caters to faggots and he only
likes it because of such, then it would actually be a legit counterpoint to bring up that he only
likes the game because he's a faggot.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:49 No.2545347
>>2545345
Yes.
However
>your reasoning is flawed because Y, and you're a faggot to boot
is not an ad hominem.
Furthermore it should be noted that ad hominems are not inherently fallacious, an attack on
credibility is perfectly valid.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/28/14(Sun)17:52 No.2545353
>>2545347
No, you're correct and I agree.
It's just a shit tactic to resort to ad hominem straight off the bat instead of actually arguing
like any reasonable person.
