File: Instant Karma in Brazil.swf-(6.45 MB, 848x480, Other)
[_] nigga stole my bike = 10/22/14(Wed)05:32 No.2571641
but then got huelocaust'd
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] = 10/22/14(Wed)05:49 No.2571651
Related.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKPN_9l73Ow
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)05:56 No.2571655
Love it !
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)05:56 No.2571656
If guns were outlawed in Brazil it wouldn't have happened in the first place
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)05:58 No.2571658
dindu nuffin
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)06:05 No.2571659
>>2571656
MURICA !
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)06:35 No.2571670
>>2571659
FUCK YEAH
>> [_] John Moses Browning 10/22/14(Wed)07:17 No.2571684
>>2571656
Hah, nice joke!
>this is what liberals believe
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)07:19 No.2571686
It would be really funny if these guys were filming an action scene for their home-made movie and
a stranger thought they are in trouble and shot the shit out of those two guys.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)08:35 No.2571747
>>2571684
>america
>filled with totally reasonable, sane people.
Yeah, na, yer a cunt.
There is a reason all openly gun-supporting states around the world have the highest crime of any
places.
There are very few places without them that have higher places than those with guns, and that is
because they literally have no legal systems or police forces.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)08:53 No.2571757
>>2571747
Logical fallacy: bare assertion.
No evidence presented to support your statement.
Logical falacy: informal fallacy.
Taking away guns won't stop crime. Criminals will just switch to knives, blackjacks,
increased-voltage tasers, shanks and clubs.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)08:56 No.2571760
>>2571757
implying gun control is a possibility. hahaha,
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)09:00 No.2571765
>>2571747
Also, logical fallacy: informal fallacy.
Making guns illegal will not get them out of the hands of criminals, only law-abiding citizens.
>>2571760
Any and all implications are in your own deluded mind, friend. "Gun control" only applies to
honest folks who do the right thing, not the criminal scum of the world.
In that scenario, if guns were outlawed, the kid with the gun would still have his gun, but the
bystander would not. The crime would've been completed and nothing would've happened to the
criminal due to a lack of police.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)09:18 No.2571779
>>2571765
Amen brother
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)09:46 No.2571805
>>2571765
I agree
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)09:54 No.2571811
>>2571747
>BTFO
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)10:01 No.2571816
>>2571656
Troll detected.
Troll pls go.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)10:06 No.2571821
I thought the instant karma was referring to the guy getting his bike stolen after running a red
light at first.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)10:20 No.2571830
>>2571757
The fucking numbers prove it.
Do some research, you triple nigger.
The majority of gun crime happens by huge margins in all countries that have easy gun access.
Even non-gun crime is lesser in the countries with no guns.
Guns make crime EASIER by a HUGE margin.
Take them away and the majority of those cowardice cunts would never do a bit of crime in their
life because they'd fear being stabbed or beaten to death with a baseball bat.
The ONLY way guns can work is if every single person is required to have a gun on them at all
times. Good fucking luck enforcing that.
Less crime is better than more crime.
Nobody said there will be no crime, stop pulling shit out your ass to defend your shitty
arguments like you always do.
Get the fuck rid of guns.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)10:21 No.2571831
>>2571830
>Take them away
how do you plan on doing that
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)10:24 No.2571834
>>2571831
The best way. The eventual civil war.
These delusional guncunts think they can defend against fucking tanks with their shitty little
guns. Show them how wrong they are.
But more to the point, get rid of small guns.
Small guns are where most crime happens.
Large guns are considerably harder to conceal.
Large guns are even legal in the UK, see huge gun crime there? Do you fuck.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)10:26 No.2571835
>>2571834
>get rid of small guns.
how do you plan on doing that
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)10:26 No.2571837
>>2571835
See first sentence >>2571834
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)10:35 No.2571842
>>2571837
>See first sentence >>2571834
how do you plan on doing that
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)10:47 No.2571850
>>2571842
It is already happening.
The whole south of America is already pre-collapse.
It is only a matter of time before shit hits the fan. hard.
The only places preparing for a shittastic future is Cali and Florida.
5-10 years time, America will be (more) hostile territory.
>> [_] John Moses Browning 10/22/14(Wed)10:47 No.2571851
>>2571747
>all openly gun-supporting states around the world have the highest crime of any places
>not giving source
Now I can say that japan has the highest gun criminality rate and pretend to be right.
But instead of being retarded and unhelpful, I will tell you that in Brazil are guns restricted
like in europe. And thugs can still rob people on the streets with their guns.
>>2571830
>gun crime is high
It's like I'm talking with an uneducated retard
http://www.itstactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/how_are_guns_used_by_citizensv
ia-infothread-dot-org.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyS3CEIbpJo
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)10:51 No.2571853
>>2571830
I like how you say 'do some research' while providing none of them to back up your assertion.
Stay classy.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:07 No.2571865
>>2571834
>The best way. The eventual civil war.
>These delusional guncunts think they can defend against fucking tanks with their shitty little
guns. Show them how wrong they are.
Yeah, because fuck people who want to be able to protect themselves without getting anally probed
by governments, right?
We already have a civil war in america, the vanguard is the police force, and the victims are
innocent civilians. This is what happens when you trust a fucking ruling class to be responsible
with a disarmed populace - it turns into a surveillance/police state.
>> [_] John Moses Browning 10/22/14(Wed)11:12 No.2571872
>>2571834
>can defend against fucking tanks with their shitty little guns
You can own bombs but you must at first register it to the ATF
Besides that, over 100 million US gun owners vs 2 million soldiers
>not considering guerilla warfare
I also want to add that people have the right to own the same weaponary and arms like the army.
The second amendment actually protects this right
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:14 No.2571874
>>2571872
>implying any government ever has any political incentives to give a shit about constitutional
rights of citizens
well there's your problem.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:18 No.2571877
>>2571853
Prove him wrong then,with some actual proof.
>protip: you can't
>> [_] John Moses Browning 10/22/14(Wed)11:19 No.2571878
>>2571874
Welp...
Time to overthrow the government? At first we must make the citizens of a state angry at their
government
>> [_] John Moses Browning 10/22/14(Wed)11:20 No.2571879
>>2571877
>I don't need any proofs for my retarded statements
>but you do
Fuck off, child and educate yourself
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:22 No.2571881
>>2571879
No need to insult me for being unable to provide any proof. Being wrong sucks,doesn't it? :^)
>> [_] John Moses Browning 10/22/14(Wed)11:24 No.2571884
>>2571881
Well, does it?
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:26 No.2571886
>>2571878
>Welp...
>Time to overthrow the government?
That's inefficient and nearly impossible. While social and political movements are quaint, I
don't think that it's a good course of action towards improvement. Better to simply try to float
around the system and circumvent the regulatory power of the state.
Society will naturally gravitate towards this because, at the end of the day, nobody likes
dealing with laws and regulations which inhibit their quality of life.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:28 No.2571887
Since guns seems to get people all hot and bothered, don't you think the firearm related deaths
would decrease if you restricted them?
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:29 No.2571888
>>2571656
They fight with fucking pipes in the streets because they cant afford guns.
Think about that for a second.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:29 No.2571889
>>2571872
>Besides that, over 100 million US gun owners vs 2 million soldiers
Reminds me of...
>You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass
Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:30 No.2571891
>>2571887
It doesn't matter if the deaths are firearm related. Killing is killing. Gun regulation doesn't
diminish murder rates. This focus on weapons instead of murder is absurd in the first damned
place.
>> [_] John Moses Browning 10/22/14(Wed)11:32 No.2571893
>>2571891
Besides that suicide is also a gun related death.
And I'm pretty sure that many people would prefer shooting them self instead of slicing yourself
with a dull kitchen knife
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:33 No.2571894
>>2571893
Indeed. Suicide is a grim topic but if somebody wants to kill themselves, using a gun is the most
painless and humane option possible.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:34 No.2571895
>>2571891
>Gun regulation doesn't diminish murder rates.
Because it's just as easy to kill off people with a pointed stick, right?
>And I'm pretty sure that many people would prefer shooting them self instead of slicing yourself
with a dull kitchen knife
I doubt people would slice themselves open when there's one gigillion ways of overdosing,
suffocating and poisoning yourself.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:37 No.2571899
>>2571895
>Because it's just as easy to kill off people with a pointed stick, right?
There are these things called knives. People use them for murder when there are no guns
available. You can't outlaw knives. Plenty of societies where guns are outlawed still have very
high murder rates, usually committed with knives or other improvised implements.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:38 No.2571900
>>2571834
>he thinks that the average soldier will obey orders to kill U.S. citizens.
Is this really how delusional typical liberals are?
>> [_] John Moses Browning 10/22/14(Wed)11:39 No.2571901
>>2571900
Yes, they are
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:39 No.2571902
>>2571899
Do you think these countries would be better off having guns available for everyone then?
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:40 No.2571905
>>2571900
not the average soldier, no. The police are the ones who are trained to fight against members of
their own society. That's why the militarization of the police is, in some ways, much more
terrifying than the militarization of the military...
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:44 No.2571911
>>2571902
>Do you think these countries would be better off having guns available for everyone then?
Slightly, but not by much. The guns are just tools.
One reason I would support a lack of gun prohibition/regulation is because I don't want
governments to have a monopoly over the use of these tools. It gives them way too much abusive
power over their societies.
Another reason would be that enforcing regulation/prohibition would require making credible
threats of force (in the name of the law) against people who essentially haven't harmed anybody
(or made any credible threats of doing so).
But ultimately it comes down to culture and economic propserity. If you live in a society filled
with depression, economic strife, and a cultural acceptance of violence, then the situation won't
change much whether you have guns or not.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:52 No.2571915
>>2571911
>Slightly, but not by much. The guns are just tools.
You mean weapons right? You know, a tool which doesn't have much practical use besides harming
and killing other creatures?
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)11:58 No.2571919
>>2571915
>You mean weapons right? You know, a tool which doesn't have much practical use besides harming
and killing other creatures?
It has plenty of use besides that. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge this fact is not
anyone else's problem but your own.
I may value a gun for shooting targets, I may want an assault rifle for this purpose because I
think assault rifles are cool - it shouldn't be anyone else's business.
I may want a shotgun for home defense in order to deter burglars. Most of them will run away and
I'll never have to use the gun. If I want to do that, it shouldn't be anyone else's business.
Maybe I just want to conduct scientific experiments with the weapons in order to learn more about
how they perform, or how their firepower impacts certain material surfaces. It shouldn't be
anyone else's business.
People have many different values and needs, and tools can bear utility in ways that are
unexpected. That includes weapons.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/22/14(Wed)12:01 No.2571923
>>2571894
is it fuck, you uneducated cunt.
You can kill yourself trivially and absolutely pain free with nitrogen or helium.
