File: water molecules.swf-(9.54 MB, 320x240, Other)
[_] zj 12/11/14(Thu)10:40 No.2626949
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 12/11/14(Thu)10:54 No.2626954
This might just be the most retarded and autistic thing I've seen for months.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/11/14(Thu)10:56 No.2626956
Disproven.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masaru_Emoto#Scientific_criticism
>> [_] Anonymous 12/11/14(Thu)11:48 No.2626982
What kind of retard thinks that different words are the cause for different snowflakes?
>> [_] Anonymous 12/11/14(Thu)12:10 No.2626990
Gay
>> [_] Anonymous 12/11/14(Thu)12:12 No.2626992
Water doesn't crystallize.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/11/14(Thu)12:34 No.2627001
ar-tonelico is real.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/11/14(Thu)12:52 No.2627006
>>2626992
ಠ_ಠ
>> [_] Anonymous 12/11/14(Thu)13:57 No.2627029
Man freezes water. Is surprised when it turns into ice!
>> [_] Anonymous 12/11/14(Thu)15:08 No.2627056
Truly inspirational.
Too bad there's a lot of people in this thread who don't appreciate just how powerful human
thought is. Even when evidence is presented, you simply ignore it.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/11/14(Thu)15:10 No.2627058
because "nigger" and "hate" wont produce similar results
>> [_] Anonymous 12/11/14(Thu)15:20 No.2627065
>>2627056
Thing is, as demonstrated by the Wikipedia link, the evidence is against this. The basic idea of
science is that a theory is repeatable no matter how many times it is done and who does it. This
isn't. Even when offered a million dollars, the person who performed this experiment refused to
demonstrate its validity in a neutral setting.
It may be true that humans can be modified by the emotional influences from others. This,
however, is a load of bunk. Water doesn't react to emotions. It is an inert substance with no
capacity for thought. Its behavior is bound by well-established mechanics that have been proven
through intense scientific scrutiny. It doesn't form crystals because it feels good, it does so
because of the composition and arrangement of its atoms.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/11/14(Thu)15:25 No.2627071
>>2627065
Everything you're describing is bias in science to discriminate towards alternative theories of
healing, headed by corporate conglomerations in the pill-pushing industry.
Also:
>Wikipedia
