File: communist propaganda!.swf-(83 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1958135

File: phpsV.swf-(83 KB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1949744 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 1949760 Please fuck off. Seriously. No one cares about your retarded movement of stupid. Go away. Honestly kill yourself
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949763 >># make me fuck off, SERIOUSLY
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949765 look dude i know no one likes me but i really want some friends on my website. i mean we can really change the world you guys. just please pay attention to me.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949768 >># thanks zeitgeist
>> [_] Anon 1949770 >># I understand, but no one wants to help your movement. You're almost as bad as Scientologyfags. Also if "make me" is the best argument you have you really should kill yourself.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949772 >># oh yeah your cool pretending to be me
>> [_] Zeitgeist is propaganda sage 1949773 MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS
>> [_] Anon 1949775 lol no one will ever like zeitfag
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949777 >># The argument is already in the .swf file you're commenting on, if you want me to leave make me. want me dead? murder me :D
>> [_] Anon 1949779 >># No one will ever read it. Someone clicks it, sees "THE ZEI" and closes it. That's your whole movement
>> [_] Anon 1949785 OP WHY U POST THIS IN FLASH? WE HAVE /pol/ FOR POLITICS. WE ALSO HAVE /b/ FOR RANDOM /f/ IS NOT FOR .pdf
>> [_] Anon 1949786 >># He already said why. He's busy being notslim
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949789 >># TL;DR is not an argument against the zeitgeist movement, it avoids it period. Scientology critics actually have the balls to read Scientology content and rightfully debunk it. the Zeitgeist critic websites however cannot escape from ignoring certain arguments zeitgeist makes, scientific facts, and logical fallacies like ad hominem and appeal to authority.
>> [_] Anon 1949792 >># Actually it is, No one reads this shit isn't an argument, it's just a fact. Sky is blue, zeitgeist is retarded and no one cares about it. World spins madly on
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949793 >># Zeitgeist arguments are heavily censored, deleted on 4chan, I'm running through a proxy of course and verification I haven't found works through proxies.
>> [_] Anon 1949795 >># >guy sages own thing on /f/ >wants people to take him seriously >mawwige
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949797 >># censorship and mindless slander or ad hominem still isn't an argument anonymous
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949798 >># ad hominem still isn't an argument anonymous
>> [_] Anon 1949799 >># Yeah it is.
>> [_] Anon 1949800 >># I doubt they are censored anywhere other than /f/ and even then its only censored because its a .pdf Spend the time to make a zeitgeist game that teaches you zeigeistism as you play though the levels trying to defeat the evil lord xenu. Then post it on /f/
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949801 >># that's like defending scientology as they censor the term Xenu.net in their net-nanny. great argument Scientology, censoring xenu and all. I guess xenu.net is TL;DR for scientologists.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949805 >># generally zeitgeist will not be wanted by the status quo on any board on including /f/ of course. Anti-politics Anti-random. so it won't belong on /b/ or /pol/ and a science board would call a natural law economy which we define as the scientific method applied to social concern as pseudoscience. you get people saying "a resource based economy has never been tested" yet they don't know that they're saying, Science has never been tested.
>> [_] Anon 1949807 >># Nigger what the fuck are you babbling about? Why haven't you killed yourself yet?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949810 >># ad hominem still isn't an argument anonymous want me dead? murder me.
>> [_] Anon 1949814 >># Murder yourself! Go headbutt a bullet. Get creative! No one will miss you, remember you or mourn you! blah blah blah ad hominem whatever. Just kill yourself!
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949820 >># It seems like you don't have the balls to murder me. No such luck, I'm still going to be spreading zeitgeist spam.
>> [_] Anon 1949821 >># feel free to make zeitgeist posts wherever you want on 4chan. i promise they won't be deleted. they will, however, be ignored, because what you're pushing is pure crap
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949825 >># slander: communism with robots, zeit-cult, and the list goes on STILL isn't an argument against the zeitgeist movement. Along with with the ad hominem fallacies of course. You are FAILING to discourage me as have the anonymous in /q/.
>> [_] Anon 1949826 >># Dah dats ad homonim again!
>> [_] Anon 1949831 I remember tolerating to read zeitgeist for the sake of it once a few years ago. The ideas were boring and tired, hardly leaving a mark. I remember at the surface the argument was almost half way sound and then it quickly devolved into a joke. Perhaps you should actually make a political ideology that isn't crap before spamming it everywhere?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949832 >># slander: it's shit, communism with robots, zeit-cult, and the list goes on STILL isn't an argument against the zeitgeist movement.
>> [_] Ren 1949838 >># More like the ZeitFAG movement. HAHAHAHAHAAH No seriously, just die.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949840 >># you're going to have to better than flaming to defeat zeitgeist.
>> [_] Anon 1949841 >># >implying /f/ is the right place to disabuse you of your shitty ideas >implying zeitgeist needs to be argued against
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949842 >># baseless slander oh yes if you're religious then you don't believe god needs to be argued against.
>> [_] Anon 1949843 >># Defeat what? Zeitgeist isn't even big enough to be worth arguing about, it's the simple matter of you killing yourself because your ideals are shitty, the end.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949845 >># k I'm dead now ;) I'll never be posting zeitgeist again.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949846 >># Why won't you die? beneath this mask there is more than flesh, beneath this mask there is an idea Mr. Creedy and ideas are bulletproof.
>> [_] Anon 1949847 >># it doesn't need to be argued against because nobody except you and a few other kooks believe in it. why bother?
>> [_] Anon 1949849 This is quite interesting! My good sir
>> [_] Anon 1949851 >># There are no other kooks. Just one guy with a stolen name
>> [_] Anon 1949853 all you have to do is ignore the spammers, /f/ this shouldnt be so hard
>> [_] Anon 1949854 >># >># Totally not same guy
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949856 >># refusing to argue against zeitgeist means there is absoltely no basis to call zeitgeist, spam, communist shit among all the other slanderous labels. Scientology is a cult because there's evidence that backs up that statement. There are no arguments ANYWHERE which prove that zeitgeist is spam, shit communist propaganda among the other labels it's given.
>> [_] Anon 1949859 >># No there is proof that it's shit. You're all the proof it needs to be called shit.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949860 >># ad hominem IS STILL not an argument.
>> [_] Anon 1949861 >># Actually in that case it is. You said there isn't proof it's a shit theory. But you're all the proof it needs that it's shit, if 100% of it's followers are the kind of scum that you are, then it is. A+B=C
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949862 >># actually it wasn't.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949863 >># ad hominem IS STILL not an argument, and it never will be.
>> [_] Anon 1949864 >># You can say 'it wasn't' all you want, but you know as well as everyone else that in that case, it was a valid argument and not a fallacy. Do you even lift basic language skills mo'fucka
>> [_] Anon 1949866 >># in b4 it wasn't
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949868 >># google: ad hominem examples
>> [_] Anon 1949869 >># No need. I know the definition. it means "against the person" instead of the idea. That, while insulting the idea, also insulted your dumb ass. Two tards one stone. At me bro come.
>> [_] Anon 1949870 >># >refusing to argue against zeitgeist means there is absoltely no basis to call zeitgeist, spam, communist shit among all the other slanderous labels. zeitgeist is spam because it is pdfs on a flash board. /f/ is not for pdf dumps on the same topic. it is also spam because it is repeatedly advertising for an obscure ideology nobody cares about, and is annoyed by. >There are no arguments ANYWHERE which prove that zeitgeist is spam, shit communist propaganda among the other labels it's given. HE WANTS PROOF, SCIENTIFIC PROOF THAT ZEITGEIST IS SPAM AND PROPAGANDA!!!1 even stupider is that you seem to expect to find it on /f/.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949871 >># Zeitgeist is still on 4chan /f/
>> [_] Anon 1949872 >># But you were only attacking him, and didn't even engaged in the argument, that's ad hominem
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949874 >># again, you're ignoring the meaning of spam: "Electronic Junk Messages" -Wikipedia not completed defined as "unwanted messages" ad hominem still isn't an argument.
>> [_] Anon 1949878 >># >"Electronic Junk Messages" i went to the wikipedia article, and that definition wasn't there. that aside: are zeitgeist pdfs electronic? yes. is it junk? yes. is it a message? yes. >ad hominem still isn't an argument. again: >implying zeitgeist needs to be argued against
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949882 lol guys jk my fucking ideology is shit i am master ruseman of all times
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949885 >># Actually it is there: "Spamming had been practiced as a prank by participants in multi-user dungeon games, to fill their rivals' accounts with unwanted electronic junk.[20]" Saying zeitgeist is spam, doesn't make zeitgeist spam. you can't call something spam, communist, shit, propaganda etc, WITHOUT proof of your claims otherwise it is baseless slander (appeal to religion or "mob rule")
>> [_] moot ## admin 1949886 >># Shut up
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949888 >># censorship is not an argument.
>> [_] moot ## Admin 1949890 >># problem?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949891 >># Trolling is not a valid argument.
>> [_] moot ## Admin 1949894 >># your mom is not a valid argument
>> [_] Anon 1949896 zeitgeist pls go kill yourself, because that is what weak people do.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949897 >># ad hominem I won't take seriously.
>> [_] Anon 1949898 >># >Actually it is there: and then you proceed to quote a passage that doesn't include the phrase "Electronic Junk Messages," confirming it isn't there. >Saying zeitgeist is spam, doesn't make zeitgeist spam. actually it does. if zeitgeist pdfs are unwanted by the vast majority of /f/ users, and they are posted electronically, in bulk, they qualify as spam
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949899 >># that's not a nice thing to say, and therefore is fraud.
>> [_] moot ## Admin 1949900 >># more like... you MAD homo-man
>> [_] Anon 1949903 >># Excuse me, but why don't you go to those 'shoutdawhoop' flash to argue? Do you not consider it spam? Because like you said, I do not consider this zeitgeist things as spam.
>> [_] Anon 1949904 >># I'm pretty serious on what i said.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949905 >># I've seen multiple definitions of spam which appeal to JUNK and UNWANTED. Your argument is still fallacious as it is appealing to an Ochlocracy or "mob rule". Not reason or facts.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949906 >># not being nice is still fraud.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949907 >># I still haven't taken anything said on this thread seriously considering the ad hominem fallacies and dodging even thinking about the zeitgeist movement at every turn.
>> [_] Anon 1949909 >># Do you have so much time to kill? Why you do lead importance to the stubborn ones? I sugest to not to care
>> [_] Anon 1949911 >># nobody cares what you're going to say. it's not hard to filter out your zeitgeist spam. And yes it is a bannable offense according to 4chan administrators. You claim to be using proxies to avoid banning therefore trying to force this upon the users, justifying this is spam, and treated as such as any spambot on any other boards.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949912 >># zeitgeist is my business as what I'm submitting is being censored as "spam" when the meaning of spam is rigorously ignored: Unwanted Junk, not simply Unwanted.
>> [_] Anon 1949913 >># >Do you not consider it spam? no, why would i? >Because like you said, I do not consider this zeitgeist things as spam. you are a minority, or more likely, the zeitgeist troll samefagging
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949914 >># >># ad hominem and mindless slander, still is not an argument. In case you want to forget spam is defined as: Unwanted junk, NOT simply unwanted.
>> [_] Anon 1949915 >># I understand you, and keep doing your job. Even if it is just me the one who reads the texts. Maybe i'm the 99th monkey
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949917 >># I can take you seriously, thanks Anonymous.
>> [_] Anon 1949918 >># >Not reason or facts. zeitgeist pdfs are unwanted. that is a fact. they are electronic. that is a fact. they are posted in bulk (four at a time on a site that gets thousands of visitors). that is a fact. therefore they are spam. that is reason
>> [_] Anon 1949919 The one time I go into a flash thread and I miss moot
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949920 >># appealing to ochlocracy or "mob rule" is STILL FRAUD.
>> [_] Anon 1949923 >># Because the 'shouthawhoop' flashes do not give anything more than that. The Z posts eventually lead to thinking, at a minimum.
>> [_] friendsofsandwiches 1949925 Hay guyz! whuts going on in this... *does an xbox 360 and leaves the room*
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949926 >># again you still want to miss what I've seen spam defined as if you do some digging: Spam Send unwanted or junk e-mail
>> [_] Anon 1949927 >># Doesn't matter what the fuck your definition of spam is. 4chan has an owner and operator and he can as he sees fit. If he and/or his administrative team views your shit as unwanted it is unwanted, if they view it as junk it is junk and therefor falls under spam.
>> [_] Anon 1949928 >># >Unwanted junk, NOT simply unwanted. what is junk is subjective. that said, almost everyone agrees they are junk. why do you think you get so many "ad hominems" as you call them? because they are junk, and therefore annoy people
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949930 Anyway I'm going now, see you next time!
>> [_] zeitgeist 1949933 >># junk is figured out OBJECTIVELY not SUBJECTIVELY. k, i'm going now see ya No you can't argue against zeitgeist. I tried and I became a member of zeitgeist.
>> [_] Anon 1949934 >># >Because the 'shouthawhoop' flashes do not give anything more than that. why should they have to? >The Z posts eventually lead to thinking, at a minimum. what led you to believe the purpose of /f/ is to provoke thought?
>> [_] Anon 1949935 >># junk is objectively defined by the one who owns 4chan. Shit is junk yo' Later bruv
>> [_] Anon 1949937 https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fal lacy-fallacy this is OP right now
>> [_] Anon 1949939 >># Don't have to, we'll just smear you. Make you ideology have a offensive taste in people's mind, make them apathetic to your movement. Shift the focus towards controversy of your values, instead of the messages of your values. It's easy to win, welcome to psyops.
>> [_] Anon 1949941 >># >Make you ideology have a offensive taste in people's mind, make them apathetic to your movement. he's already doing that all on his own.
>> [_] Anon 1949950 >># well you are here just to talk shit or you want OP to think about what his doin'? aren't you trying to provoke tough?
>> [_] Anon 1949951 >># >well you are here just to talk shit or you want OP to think about what his doin'? OP is a troll. i don't care what he thinks >aren't you trying to provoke tough? not really. i'm just entertaining myself by sparring with an idiot. and even if i was trying to provoke thought, that wouldn't mean that's the purpose of /f/.
>> [_] Anon 1949952 These faggots, Homestuck, and MLP is what makes /f/ shit.
>> [_] Anon 1949959 can't we they just call it something else? How about something creating like furry no one likes furry but they still look at it. Or how bout pedophilia people like pedophilia don't they? Fuck call your damn cult something else. the name you have now makes no sense.
>> [_] Anon 1949960 Just stopping by from >>>/q/ to see how buttmad y'all are. Solid 8/10
>> [_] Anon 1949963 >># You have no idea how much /f/ hates these people. Zeitgeist faggots spam here all the time.
>> [_] Anon 1949964 cp up in this shit plz
>> [_] Anon 1949970 >># are you retarded?
>> [_] Anon 1949979 The entire argument in all of these documents boils down to "artificial scarcity is bad". No shit. It's going to continue to be the driving force behind the world economy as long as the profit and power motives exist. What the movement seems to be proposing is taking everyone down to the same level and then rebuilding on the principles of group prosperity. Which is completely retarded. In any society that values rational thought the transition from individual prosperity to group prosperity is a foregone conclusion. You don't need a movement to spread those ideals. You might need a movement to undermine those ideals in an attempt to prolong the ideas of individual wealth and power by making them seem unappealing, fringe and controversial.
>> [_] Anon 1949984 >># >The entire argument in all of these documents boils down to "artificial scarcity is bad". No shit. >implying economic scarcity is somehow "artificial," and not a basic fact of reality
>> [_] Anon 1949986 >># >implying food, water or shelter are scarce in the post-industrial world
>> [_] Anon 1949987 You fags better know to just sage it and leave.
>> [_] Anon 1949989 >107 replies holy shit you idiots.
>> [_] Anon 1949991 Yo, zeit guy. How about you develop some SCIENTIFIC MACHINES first, THEN post these later?
>> [_] Anon 1949992 >># >implying they aren't they cost money for a reason, you know
>> [_] Anon 1949997 >># Food faces scarcity due to distribution. If you perfectly knew exactly how much food was necessary in every part of the world and could transport that amount there constantly you could eliminate food scarcity. Water scarcity is a thing faggot. Clean, drinkable water is not a fact of life and in many areas we still experience regular droughts based on rain fall. Until you can control nature absolutely there will be water scarcity. Shelter is arguable. It's expensive to build and maintain and if done poorly you create a worse problem than before. Creating shelter for everyone is economically feasible. Creating shelter for everyone that isn't going to backfire is less so.
>> [_] Anon 1949999 >># There is maybe 1 homestuck post a week. What are you even talking about?
>> [_] Anon 1950025 >># Exactly, I come back and its just full on shitposting in this thread anyways.
>> [_] Anon 1950027 Wow.
>> [_] Anon 1950029 gratz you have all been defeated by the zeitfag movement, they got exactly what they wanted. Well done /f/
>> [_] Anon 1950033 100+ posts, wtf /f/
>> [_] Anon 1950043 I read all of that shit because 100+ reply's.
>> [_] Anon 1950055 What the actual fuck?