File: ShaunOfTheDead.swf-(8.73 MB, 128x54, Other)
[_] AMM !AMM.FiWTOc 01/25/15(Sun)06:29 No.2668458
>> [_] Friendly-Neighbourhood-Rapeman 01/25/15(Sun)06:32 No.2668462
why waste your time doing it, if you want to do something awesome find a way to compress a movie
so small it can fit on /f/ but is still watchable
>> [_] Friendly-Neighbourhood-Rapeman 01/25/15(Sun)06:34 No.2668465
>>2668462
this however i must commend is really good work and the best quality ive seen, please try to get
it higher quality but keep small size.
10/10 effort
>> [_] Friendly-Neighbourhood-Rapeman 01/25/15(Sun)06:35 No.2668466
>>2668465
also saved this flash so i can look back and say "this was the first step to flash sized movies"
>> [_] Anonymous 01/25/15(Sun)06:38 No.2668468
Woooow, that's impressive. How did he do that?
>> [_] Friendly-Neighbourhood-Rapeman 01/25/15(Sun)06:40 No.2668471
>>2668468
this is how
>>2668459
"Looking back to the archives, it's:
>- Video: 128 x 54 h.264 @ 4Kbp/s and a whopping 3 frames per second
>- Audio: 32Khz Mono AAC-HE @ 1Kbps (I think? There might be a lot of overhead)
Later I've found, there is a lot of overhead in AAC, it's about 6-8Kbps. I could've dropped the
freq lower but it didn't do anything for filesize.
This was all inspired by someone fitting the Monty Python movies in 10Mb swfs."
>> [_] Anonymous 01/25/15(Sun)06:42 No.2668472
It's pretty impressive when you think about it. I mean, a full length movie in under 9 MB, you
can still tell what it is AND it has sound. Allowing even triple the filesize would go a long way
toward improving the quality while keeping it "bite-sized".
I would totally start actively collecting such media just for the hell of it, and it would be
cheap as fuck to do (in terms of space usage - you could easily fit a decade's worth of movies on
a single blu-ray).
>> [_] Friendly-Neighbourhood-Rapeman 01/25/15(Sun)06:45 No.2668474
>>2668472
we keep trying to make bigger storage but by shrinking file size like this movie, and how a 10 gb
file can be compressed to 2 gb, we won't need so much space.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/25/15(Sun)09:45 No.2668568
Sweet, I can watch this on my watch TV.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/25/15(Sun)09:48 No.2668571
>>2668458
is there a way to use this frame-to-frame compression (don't know how it's called) where e.g.
frame 2 is stored as simply the changes to frame 1 and not as a whole image
while not using that small resolution and blur compression
because it looks like their faces get mashed around in a funny way and i'd like to see it in a
bit higher quality
>> [_] AMM !AMM.FiWTOc 01/25/15(Sun)09:58 No.2668574
>>2668571
They're called I-frames and P-frames. Try encoding a video with a large keyframe interval (say,
x264 and keyint=250:min-keyint=200) and low bitrate. I suggest ffmpeg, some sort of encoding
guide for H.264 here: https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/H.264
You can also amuse yourself with reddit's brokengifs if that's your thing.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/25/15(Sun)10:41 No.2668597
Rather just watch it hurr. http://www.free-tv-video-online.me/player/vodlocker.php?id=g54jdftrhmrk
>> [_] The Admiral !a3Xv6FRGN2 01/25/15(Sun)10:48 No.2668602
Sup AMM :D
>> [_] Anonymous 01/25/15(Sun)11:02 No.2668610
>>2668597
you don't understand, please stop posting
>> [_] AMM !AMM.FiWTOc 01/25/15(Sun)11:13 No.2668615
>>2668602
Sup Admiral
>> [_] Anonymous 01/25/15(Sun)11:13 No.2668616
Setting quality to low makes it even better.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/25/15(Sun)11:30 No.2668622
what is this, a YIFY encode?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/25/15(Sun)11:32 No.2668624
>>2668616
>a true 8-bit experience
worth every pixel
>> [_] Anonymous 01/25/15(Sun)11:49 No.2668630
A: 10 V: 10 THANKS YIFY
