File: Life Lessons With DWARF.swf-(2.89 MB, 700x300, Other)
[_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)04:27 No.2678294
woman logic
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)04:39 No.2678303
>woman logic
Woman have no logic... only emotion.
This is why you very rarely see woman in careers such as army generals, politics... anything
requiring leadership and a level head to make rationale decisions.
It sucks really, because I would like to see more woman going against their emotional hard wiring
and doing something more than just breed offspring with an alpha male.
Am I sexist? Yes probably... but I'm also a realist.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)04:42 No.2678307
>>2678303
thank you, I never thought about this
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)04:49 No.2678310
>>2678307
Don't get me wrong... woman have some logic, just not as much as men do. It is hard wired into
their brain from thousands of years of child rearing and selecting the best possible mates to
mate with and spread the healthiest genes with.
I personally believe that emotion is only good for art and the bedroom. Anywhere else it is just
a hindrance.
Alot of woman do the most stupidest things imaginable because their emotional brain convinces
them that its the right thing to do... like date a douche bag Chad that treats her like shit...
because he makes her "feel" something inside her.
Woman are all about emotion... and emotion is a weakness.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)05:07 No.2678321
>>2678307
It's circular though.
>women are bad at X; it is proven because there are none in jobs that require X.
>Therefore let's not hire her for this job.
Don't listen to a 13-yo Nietzsche wannabe about reality. How much of your or his belief that
women are less likely than men to be rational is based on an echo chamber of media that says
women are less likely to be rational, and how much from real experience?
Delusional people are MORE likely to believe their beliefs are realistic than realists, because a
realist has a greater awareness of the fact that their view of the world is based on an image, a
map, a network of concepts that exists only in their head, and is warped and manipulated by
social and biological factors that real reality is not.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)05:44 No.2678337
>>2678321
The reason I know all of this is because Pickup artists get woman to sleep with them by
manipulating their emotions. Not their minds.
Woman are drawn to emotional porn like 50 shades of gray... because it spikes their emotions.
Just because you claim that my claims are delusional doesn't make them so. They are fact and
multiple scientific outlets support that woman use their emotional brain over their logical one.
Little girl, the grown men are trying to have an adult conversation here... go back to gossiping
with your girlfriends or doing your hair or something while us men go achieve something
worthwhile.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)06:02 No.2678355
Wome are not worth it. Fuck a dude instead.
>> [_] Hot2Trotsky 02/03/15(Tue)07:18 No.2678381
>>2678337
So, your scientific reasoning behind your assertion that women have no logic is because naughty
men can get them in bed?
Well then, so it follows, men are infinitely more logical, because ANY woman can get them in
bed...
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)07:42 No.2678399
>>2678381
Not him but make a real argument, not "it's not science enough!" without offering anything
science-based yourself.
If you want to know what science says about whether women are more logically or emotionally
driven, go look it up.
>> [_] Hot2Trotsky 02/03/15(Tue)07:45 No.2678400
>>2678399
(For the record, that was satire, not argument.)
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)07:58 No.2678408
>>2678400
The "satire" is errant anyway.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)08:17 No.2678415
>clock crew
>2006 newgrounds wants their flash animations back
Closed
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)08:18 No.2678416
>>2678381
Just because it "sounds wrong/politically incorrect" doesn't make his argument invalid.
Insensitive or disgusting, sure, but it's not invalid. If you go about your arguments in such a
sarcastic and illogical manner, you're gonna lose every science-based argument you enter and make
yourself look stupid.
On the other hand you'll win all your political arguments and that's what runs this world...
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)09:12 No.2678425
I think this emotional - rational talk is cultural, not biological. There are different types of
people, and they may (normally under pressure or just because they don't feel like using their
own heads) try hard to fit into their roles, including gender roles. I do, however, love the
arguments, because they are real, although used in a debate full of insecure men and women. Want
something true? Women try to defeat a man in his strong points, his weakness is not so relevant.
That's why women are easy prey for liars, not warriors.
>> [_] Hot2Trotsky 02/03/15(Tue)09:16 No.2678428
>>2678416
AAH! But you have failed to take into account one fundamental factor, and that is this:
/f/ is not /pol/
I don't argue merits of gender/race/religion here. I, like many others, critique and share flash
animations here. When /pol/ks get silly, I lampoon 'em, because that's the kind of place /f/ is.
That's why there's an /f/, and a /pol/, and they're in different places.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)09:18 No.2678430
So true.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)09:23 No.2678432
lots of femanons here getting their panties in a bunch over this.
Face it, woman make stupid decisions based n their emotions. There are so many instances of it
that it cannot be denied. Woman don't want to admit this however because they don't want to loose
the power that they perceive they have in a society.
Shoo sorry for hurting your feelings ladies, but it is a fact. Get over it and accept it.
>> [_] Hot2Trotsky 02/03/15(Tue)09:30 No.2678439
Seriously, guys. Take it back to /pol/
...or is this a raid?
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)09:41 No.2678442
>>2678439
Neither, it's just generic redpillers.
I've given up trying to work out if they're trolling or they take this stuff seriously, and I
doubt it makes any difference anyway.
Just move on, trying to argue will only encourage them.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)09:56 No.2678446
>>2678439
>1 flash
>raid
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)11:19 No.2678499
>>2678337
And men can't be tricked/seduced/duped via someone trying to manipulating their emotions?
excuse me if I choose not to drink your kool-aid
truth is, PEOPLE ARE DUMB MONKEYS, not men, not women, PEOPLE.
All people desire some sort of affirmation and identity. Some people seek it in love, which some
times results in them getting used by bad people. Others seek it in community, some interest,
hobby, or cause that they share with others. This sometimes leads to mis-attributing any critique
as an attack to not only the thing it self, but a personal attack against you. This leads the
irrational denial of anything contrary to that worldview,echochambering(groupwanking), and
radicalization.
TL;DR fuck off you wanker, everyone is shit
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)11:58 No.2678515
>>2678425
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5LRdW8xw70
Gender roles. Cultural Upbringing.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/03/15(Tue)14:33 No.2678594
>>2678499
You had a decent criticism there and then quickly took a turn into being sourly asinine.
Have you ever considered that 'women are emotional' is the only perspective you have because
you've never dated a man?
Trust me. It's not one way.
>>2678442
Going to follow this anon's advice and move on now. Later.
