File: nawnco.swf-(84 KB, 688x600, Game)
[_] Big Brain Time Anon 3398497
>> [_] Anon 3398498 The objective is not clear. What're we trying to do?
>> [_] Anon 3398510 >># I'm assuming that the objective is to get all of them to be the same symbol. You choose 8 patterns in each round, if you manage to repeat the same pattern the count goes down but none get added to the list, after that you get as many different pieces as different patterns you found. If you managed to go down to one pattern every piece would be the same and so you would be "stuck" there, which I guess is considered winning.
>> [_] Anon 3398511 >># first you figure out how the system works then you try to do something within the system
>> [_] Anon 3398513 I managed to do it in 2 rounds in what I consider to be a rather reliable way. Counterintuitive though.
>> [_] Anon 3398514 >># yeah if you realize how it works then it's a matter of luck theoretically you can solve it in one turn
>> [_] Anon 3398515 >># >yeah if you realize how it works then it's a matter of luck I've done this 4 times in a row now. Technically I guess some luck is required but yeah this is reliable, only it always takes at least 2 rounds. Just try to grab 8 different shapes in the first round, then in the second round you go for the shape that is 4 different tiles, since you have 8 different kind of tiles it's pretty easy to find them.
>> [_] Anon 3398539 I can't believe how long it took me to figure this shit out...
>> [_] Anon 3398574 >># >get it on my second round Feels good to be smart, bros.
>> [_] Anon 3398587 For all the brain geniuses out there, [spoiler]its a matching game. If a block matches another block a line is drawn between their corners in the resultant shape. At the end of a round all the resultant shapes become the blocks of the next round. The goal is to make the same shape 8 times in a row in one round, granting you the end screen. A good strategy is to split the pool in 4 vertical columns and see which shapes you can repeat the most starting from the top and going down. Best results is 4 of a single shape obviously but if youre getting less than 2 of a single shape check to see if shapes can be made on the 3 imaginary lines spliting the columns. Always remove blocks top to bottom so you dont fuck confirmed shapes below. Be sure to check new blocks being added before removing any lower blocks. Have fun trying to clear it in the first round.[/spoiler]
>> [_] Anon 3398588 >># Yeah good job there on that spoiler tag brain genius

File: NAWNCO.swf-(84 KB, 688x600, Game)
[_] Anon 3388744 Don't ask how to play; it really is best to go in blind. Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3388745 what is this autism
>> [_] Anon 3388746 >># OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I GET IT
>> [_] Anon 3388747 wtf am i a brainlet
>> [_] Anon 3388748 >># yes
>> [_] Anon 3388751 I feel like a big brain lad for working it out by myself
>> [_] Anon 3388752 reminds me of puzzle pirates
>> [_] Anon 3388765 A winrar is me! Fun, thanks OP.
>> [_] Anon 3388770 When you click on a section, you make a new tile in the 'vocab' section. The new tile is defined by having lines connecting all the identical tiles in the original section, e.g. if all the tiles were distinct, it's four dots, if they were all the same, it's the boxed X. You must perform eight clicks per round (this is the vertical indicator between the board and the vocab). Once you've used all eight clicks, a new board is made using only the shapes from the vocab section in the prior round. If you finish a round and have only one shape in the vocab section, you win. Your goal here is to minimize the number of new shapes you make. Most of the time you can win in 2 to 4 rounds.
>> [_] Anon 3388779 >># VICTORY AT LEVEL 1
>> [_] Anon 3388801 >># i am the real deal, fool oh yeah a genius
>> [_] Anon 3388844 wtf so i click some squares and it makes random shapes that's fuckin stupid
>> [_] Anon 3388846 ooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>> [_] Anon 3388848 Just beat it with only patterns which require 3 specific shapes or more on the first turn, my autism is pleased
>> [_] Anon 3388849 >># >beat meant went into turn two, then beat on the second turn
>> [_] Anon 3388850 >># >># And just beat it on round two with only four-of-a-kind squares, nice. Gimmicky runs of this are oddly satisfying

File: NAWNCO.swf-(84 KB, 688x600, Game)
[_] Figuring out the rules is half the fun Anon 3347606
>> [_] Anon 3347608 https://i.imgur.com/4MHAyLA.png Finally figured it out
>> [_] Anon 3347611 gud puzzle game, thanks for posting
>> [_] Anon 3347619 >># Made me feel very stupid and very smart. Good flash, thanks OP.
>> [_] Anon 3347621 Great fucking flash. Took me a while.
>> [_] Anon 3347652 >># Very nice game
>> [_] Anon 3347656 >># hmmm two ways to play: slowly lower entropy and hope to get lucky in rounds with 2 colours or make entropy highest and easily win in 2. round 2. option is probably a flaw
>> [_] Anon 3347657 >># there is a third way Just make 1 single combination on first round, i managed to do AB CB and won in 1 round
>> [_] Anon 3347661 if you get lucky and get complete jibberish (no combinations) you can do it in one round, but otherwise you need to be real lucky to get it. its a simple but good puzzle.
>> [_] Anon 3347662 oh fuck me I get it now on the right side the lines represent tiles with the same color/symbol and the dots represent different colors/symbols
>> [_] Anon 3347665 Great puzzle
>> [_] Anon 3347720 This is made by the same guy who made Stephen's Sausage Roll.
>> [_] Anon 3347738 It's only hard because you have no idea what to do. https://i.imgur.com/RLEqlo1.png

File: nawnco.swf-(84 KB, 688x600, Game)
[_] Anon 2999805 I don't think you gethounds understand how slow this board is
>> [_] Anon 2999820 I wish there was a harder version of this
>> [_] Anon 2999826 >># the fun is in figuring out how it works
>> [_] Anon 2999878 >># dude.. this game sucks. no yay, you got it, when it is finished.. just.. meh.. heres another one..

File: nawnco.swf-(84 KB, 688x600, Game)
[_] /f/ is shit this century Anon 2953160 Can you beat it, anon? Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 2953169 >># I won It was quite entertaining, but towards the final parts it relied a lot on luck, but the trick is not to aim for symmetrical forms where the panels are in the same proportion
>> [_] Anon 2953170 Hard mode is doing a logic progression from more tiles to less different tiles to work with The easiest way to win is to make all different 8 tiles and aim to make them all the same by choosing 4 different every time
>> [_] Anon 2953181 >># What the actual fuck is my objective?
>> [_] Anon 2953183 >># There are several strategies, mine is literally the middle ground one. I can win consistently on the first or second round with it. >># Try to find it, lazy ass
>> [_] Anon 2953192 Heh, that was an interesting game. I thought the goal first was to choose 8 different combinations.
>> [_] Anon 2953198 >># >># >># How many tries did you guys take to figure it out?
>> [_] Anon 2953202 >># 3 tries until I realized the blocks I send out become the mini blocks instead. Then it was smooth sailing.
>> [_] Anon 2953205 i get it now. that's the puzzle. to figure out what the hell you're supposed to do.
>> [_] Anon 2953222 ayy lmao so that's how it's done. Nice.
>> [_] Anon 2953226 either people are getting smarter or dumb people are not posting any more this file used to attract a lot of attention
>> [_] Anon 2953248 Haram, when I click set of 4, some random shit pops up. I thought there is some pattern, like the tile that appears after click on the 4-set is sum of overlaps of 4 tiles. Fuck it.
>> [_] Anon 2953253 >># Think of the boxes on the left in terms of their colors instead of their dots/lines. They're each unique and don't affect what vocabulary you make from them.
>> [_] Anon 2953254 >># u glitch't m8? what the hell are you trying to say
>> [_] Anon 2953256 >># Yea. I think this is one of those troll games like steam shovel larry. There is no objective. It's just bullshit flash to troll people. Thank me later new/f/ags. - new/f/ag
>> [_] Anon 2953258 >># Challenging game, pretty good.
>> [_] Anon 2953267 >># This is bait
>> [_] Anon 2953284 Pretty good. Easy to reach 2 types, one is kinda reliant on luck.
>> [_] Anon 2953286 In the end I feel it's more down to luck than skill. It just takes time and you have to hope the gods of RNG smiles upon you.
>> [_] Anon 2953310 U make it harder on yourself the more combinations you create in the vocab box. you want as few as possible because the less types you have in that right hand box the less types youll have on the left- u win when theyre all the same

File: NAWNCO.swf-(84 KB, 688x600, Game)
[_] Anon 2596727 tag your uploads right don't label things [H] if i can't jerk off to it
>> [_] Anon 2596744 so what is this? there doesnt seem to be an objective or any instructions really wat do?
>> [_] Anon 2596766 >># Yeah, I have to second this. What the fuck is the point?
>> [_] Anon 2596808 just make it so there's only one tile it's really easy when you get the right strategy
>> [_] Anon 2596817 Trying simplify the tileset is amusing enough.
>> [_] Anon 2596831 >># select four tiles on the left hand side. If, for example, the bottom two were the same but the upper two were different (and different from each other) then you'll get a tile on the right hand side with the bottom dots connected by a line, while the top dots are not connected to any other. Then, try to find similar sets of tiles on the left hand side, to get as few tiles on the right hand side as possible, because that will be the number of different kinds of tiles in the next round. e.g.: I select a b c c so I get * * --- on the right. Then, I select c d e e This has the same structure, so there will still only be one * * --- tile on the right side. Lets say I can't find another one like this right now, but I see two sets of tiles with the same structure a b c b b a,b c when I select one of them I get X on the right side.

File: NAWNCO.swf-(84 KB, 688x600, Game)
[_] We need more [G] Anon 2551807
>> [_] Anon 2551833 so... what are you supposed to do?
>> [_] Anon 2551835 >># The game is figuring it out. I did. We all did.
>> [_] Anon 2551837 >># screw it, seems to be no actual pattern to anything.
>> [_] Anon 2551840 >># There is.
>> [_] Anon 2551844 >># >outing yourself as never having learned inductive reasoning >practically stating that you've never been to elementary school
>> [_] Anon 2551845 The patterns you find will be added to the "vocabulary" on the right. The next board you get will be made up of pieces from that vocabulary. You need to gradually narrow your vocabulary until you can make 8 moves all using the same pattern (X, all the same, etc.)
>> [_] Anon 2551852 Easy as shit. Just fill out the vocabulary, then go for four dots.
>> [_] Dr. Anon 2551904 I must say, this was a stunning game. Just as I was about to concede and retire to my bed, I solved it.
>> [_] Anon 2551914 Literally: "The End"
>> [_] John Moses Browning 2551942 >># This

File: NAWNCO.swf-(84 KB, 688x600, Game)
[_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355311 sup niggeurs Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 2355324 >># Took me a bit to get, but once I did, I won it like nothing was up. 3 rounds, tops.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355327 >># Yeah, the best part is getting how it works
>> [_] Anon 2355332 man what the fuck even is this
>> [_] Anon 2355333 I can't tell if I won or lost.
>> [_] Anon 2355334 swfchan.net/15/RCRU5IW.shtml for spoilers and discussion of why games should have feedback the player can understand.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355336 >># Lol, I posted this that time I still advocate that it's better to discover it by yourself
>> [_] Anon 2355338 so i get that the next board is only made of the words you found in the previous board but i don't see what the fuck the goal is, maybe fill the left board with one shape? i think at that point it becomes a fixed point so there's no advancing past that
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355343 >># The game ends when you reach the goal
>> [_] Anon 2355344 >># Maybe so, but I have to agree that the game gives no indication whatsoever whether you're doing well or badly, until you've already won.
>> [_] Anon 2355348 >># way to be not helpful it would seem to me that the game's goal might be to find a fixed point is that not the case
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355350 >># But the game is so simple there would be no challenge in finishing it once you already know the rules; it's possible to finish it on the first board a good a good percent of the tries.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355352 >># Try to keep the vocabulary as simple as possible
>> [_] Anon 2355353 So... I won?
>> [_] Anon 2355358 The "goal" is to discover the actual goal yourself First off, don't expect the game to hand-feed you every detail. Experiment and observe
>> [_] Anon 2355362 >># I'm not saying that it should provide the rules, but it should provide some kind of stimulus that you did something bad when you do something bad. Check >># out -- it doesn't provide rules, but it does let you know when you did something wrong, in a universally understandable way.
>> [_] Anon 2355363 >># if you won't tell me what the goal of this game is i won't explain what a fixed point is el oh el you gotta figure it out for yourself quit being a dick
>> [_] Anon 2355366 meh, it wasn't hard to grasp the basic concept after a few round but it wasn't particularly entertaining, that's for sure. I didn't realize what the goal was though, so that finding that out made the game more of a puzzle, which was nice.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355372 >># I get your point but I'd say the premises are different I didn't finish the game you posted yet, but just by seeing it I'd say it's some sort of sudoku. This game I posted is somewhat a new concept to puzzling, a basic concept that could be worked on. But it's so simple the challenge actually comes in finding it out yourself. The stimulus can be gotten on the first board exchange. You see the symbols, you understand what creates them, and you can basicaly understand how to make your job easir since it's the only actual thing you can do.
>> [_] Anon 2355382 I have to say I liked this, it may seem like the game is lacking directions but I think that any sort of clues would cheapen the fun of figuring out what you are supposed to be doing.
>> [_] Anon 2355403 you're trying to simplify the board by using the least number of combinations of 4 squares as possible very stupid it's not like a clever game that takes you a while to "get it". there's nothing to really get, it's just silly.
>> [_] Anon 2355408 Pretentious.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355409 >># People in this >># archived thread didn't think the same way Nor people in this thread to be honest. Are you sure you aren't the odd one out?
>> [_] Anon 2355415 Good game.
>> [_] Anon 2355423 WE BE SPOILIN' Bretty good. For a while, it seemed like it might be about getting as many different shapes as possible, but it looks like the opposite was true. The former does make it easier to achieve the latter, though. When you have eight possible tiles, it's a lot easier to pick out the same combination in all of them.
>> [_] Anon 2355436 I think I might have been here for the original thread. I definitely remember this .swf.
>> [_] Anun 2355440 >># everything you post is shit. go back to newgrounds
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355443 >># thanks
>> [_] Anon 2355446 >># So you're adverse to praise, then?
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355449 >># I'd consider that praise since most of what people post here is shit. If what I post stands out, it must be at least considerable.
>> [_] Anun 2355450 >># nope, there is "why do you even bother posting this" shit, and "actually don't post anymore" shit. just don't post anymore. 0/10 try harder kid.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355451 >># 3/10 could be less obvious
>> [_] Anon 2355455 >># Yeah, I thought I was supposed to find 8 different shapes and didn't figure it out until glancing here.
>> [_] Anon 2355457 http://www.increpare.com/ Dude makes all kind of weird, trippy shit. Maybe a schitzo?
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355458 >># Yeah, I bet he has some mental issues
>> [_] Anon 2355459 needs levels with 3x3, 2x4, 4x2, etc. would be sick
>> [_] Anon 2355466 >># Holy shit, the dude made Appalachian Nights, too! The one with the inexplicable nazi blowjob at the end!
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355467 >># He has some awesome stuff, som... all of his executable games are insane (really insane)
>> [_] Anon 2355473 wow posting in epic thread you guys are really going for the gold this time!
>> [_] Anon 2355478 >># I think it's safe to say that "Spiders and Cubes" is of at least masterwork quality.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2355481 >># But I like most his non post-modernist stuff, most of his puzzles are total innovations
>> [_] Anon 2355497 >># I am a fan too. MMMMM was actually a great puzzle reimagining of VVVVVV. More directions, too.
>> [_] Anon 2355501 >># he always teases with innovative ideas that have potential but then he moves on to the next thing. I think Puzzlescript was a way to allow fans to pursue these concepts on their own. Knowing him, it's probably because making a full-fledged game out of a clever concept is not trivial, and requires care in designing that he doesn't have time to invest, to ensure that the concept isn't ruined or lost.

File: nawnco.swf-(84 KB, Game)
[_] Beat my 1 round record Anon 1987178 I dare you tu beat my 1 round record Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 1987186 what are you supposed to do?
>> [_] Anon 1987187 >># Compress data Fiddle a bit with it and you'll get how things work
>> [_] Anon 1987193 I don't get it
>> [_] Anon 1987195 >># And what does that mean? You can literally just mash crap and it never does anything. I thought it was like those games of matching blocks by what's connected or at least by 3s and 4s, but that's not doing anything.
>> [_] Anon 1987196 >># One tip: It does not matter what symbol is on each square on the "data to analyze" field. Pay attention to the constructed vocabulary part
>> [_] Anon 1987198 >># see >>#
>> [_] Anon 1987202 C'mon guys, the fun part is to get what you're supposed to do
>> [_] Anon 1987203 >># Thatsnotfun.jpg
>> [_] Anon 1987204 >># I personally don't understand what that mean. And it seems like I'm not the only one.
>> [_] Anon 1987206 >># Tip 2: Try to keep your vocabulary as simple as possible each time the board is rebuild
>> [_] Anon 1987207 >># rebuilt*
>> [_] Anon 1987208 i dont get it. i guess all of you that do just have fun. vocabulary part?
>> [_] Anon 1987211 >># May I ask what does "vocabulary" mean for this game?
>> [_] Anon 1987212 >># The number of possible 4-tile combinations. Each one of them is a "word" on this vocabulary. Whenever you click the grid, you make a "word"
>> [_] Anon 1987213 I get it... hmm is the goal to compress everything into one in a round? Difficult...
>> [_] Anon 1987216 Done. Still a fun game.
>> [_] Anon 1987219 >># Now try to do it on a single round :v
>> [_] Anon 1987220 I give up understanding this game. The rest of you have fun.
>> [_] Anon 1987222 Okay So I'm gonna write instructions for everyone here. Lines connecting under constructed vocabulary means that the tiles were THE SAME. So a triangle with a hypotenuse going from bottom left to top right means the bottom left, top left, and top right symbols were the same. Same goes for lines up and down on the right or left side, sideways, or all 4 of the same symbol (a box with an x in the middle). Dots mean individual symbols not connected to anything. The goal is to get all of the symbols to match with ONE PATTERN formed in constructed vocabulary. This is where the game offers you choice, and it becomes easier the less constructed vocabulary you have made per round.
>> [_] Anon 1987225 >># Single round was easy for me
>> [_] Anon 1987226 >># You spoiling bastard!
>> [_] Anon 1987229 >># Not difficult tbh I wanted to see how people would react when having to learn what to do
>> [_] Anon 1987230 The easiest way to finish it in one round is to choose 1line/2dots patterns I guess
>> [_] Anon 1987245 >vocabulary >data >random lines and dots ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ??? ?? nope.avi
>> [_] Anon 1987255 No instructions No end goal No feedback on good/bad moves Bad game is bad
>> [_] Anon 1987257 >># I beat it and had fun Maybe you're just mad because you're dumb
>> [_] Anon 1987258 >># You did a fucking piss poor job of describing it, because that's not how compression works.
>> [_] Anon 1987259 The only thing I see is that when you pick blocks of the same color, they connect somehow in the "vocabulary". But I don't know what the point of this is, and I don't know why some combinations don't show up at all. What the fuck is the Vocabulary anyway? Is this some sort of proto-machine language?
>> [_] Anon 1987265 >># Well, that's how compression works in this game
>> [_] Anon 1987267 Is this some sort of RAR visual compression algorithm?
>> [_] Anon 1987269 WHAT DOO I DOOOOO
>> [_] Anon 1987270 >># Now every game has to give it all chewed? Oh, yep, true. Totally forgot about that.. Sorry...
>> [_] Anon 1987274 MFW people have no comprehensive ability, when I picked up on it on the first round Basically, for the lazy: Clicking on tile sets will add that to your vocabulary, based on matching tiles Try to complete a round using only one tile-set ie: finishing a round using only groups of 4 where, say, the top two tiles match, and the bottom two are different from the rest (represented by a horizontal line over two dots, because vocabulary matches the two and forms a line, the others do not match and are represented by individual dots) What people mean is that the vocabulary is not specific to certain tiles - a set of 4 green tiles is the same as a set of 4 blue tiles, since they both form the same diagram
>> [_] Anon 1987275 >># >telling them how to play That's like spoiling a movie man You would delete your post if you really cared
>> [_] Anon 1987277 >># Yeah, right? I thought people would like the challenge, but it seems that they don't even see the challenge - just some random collors and lines But the guy has a point - >># For the ones wo are really interested, learning is the fun part, so you shouldn't spoil the fun
>> [_] Anon 1987279 >># >Now every game has to give it all chewed? >Oh, yep, true. Totally forgot about that.. Other games pull this off just fine without throwing shit in your face like a baby. You press a button, you see a response on the screen (movement, jumping). You associate button presses with this response in the future. It's feedback the player uses in the future to become better at the game. You could even use a sound to indicate a good or a bad move. Or even to just indicate that the board is resetting after you use up all your moves (which is what I assume they are). When I click a box with 3 of the same block, and see a vocabulary with 3 lines, this is a positive feedback to the player. When I click another similar combination, and that doesn't appear as a vocabulary, it is a negative feedback. Why did this one not work when the first did? It creates confusion.
>> [_] Anon 1987284 >># There's no good and bad vocabulary. The feedback about good and bad comes after you finish some 8-move rounds. The point is to keep it simple, it does not matter what words you use, but how many of them. The learning curve here is just different from the norm, and there's people who appreciate it.
>> [_] Anon 1987286 >># >># I know, but it was already explained, so I tried to make it more child-friendly I was hoping, that by discovering how it worked, it would help them be more observant in the future Otherwise, they would play it, not understand it, check the comments for a solution, not find one, leave a hateful comment due to their own stupidity, and leave... end of story, nothing accomplished at least this way they can hate with some understanding of what they are hating in the first place
>> [_] Anon 1987288 >># There's a point
>> [_] Anon 1987290 >># LELELELELELELE
>> [_] Anon 1987294 >># That's because you have completely misunderstood the entire goal of the game - which is to minimize your vocabulary, you win when you complete a round with only one pattern If you had understood this, then after the appearance of the first pattern, the lack of additional vocabulary IS the positive feedback, rather than negative as you have misinterpreted.
>> [_] Anon 1987295 >see interesting challenge on /f/ >open game >wtf is this >don't know if i'm winning or losing >close game >move on with life
>> [_] Anon 1987297 >># day in the life of a tool
>> [_] Anon 1987298 So I take it there's no win animation, it just keeps repeating?
>> [_] Anon 1987300 >># There is a win animation. You probably didn't win
>> [_] Anon 1987304 >># Constructing vocabulary in this context appears as a goal of the game. Clearly you intended for it to be the opposite, since you win by using the smallest vocabulary. This is what I meant by feedback. The game isn't a bad game, quite the opposite. But you trick players into thinking they need to do one thing, when in fact you win by doing the opposite. It's like if you played GTA and when you go to the end of the game, you were thrown in prison and executed for all the people you killed, and then telling the player that "lol, you weren't supposed to be a bad person!"
>> [_] Anon 1987305 >># Huh. You can't repeat symbols on the right, yeah? I guess you have to use all the same blocks on the left to construct the symbols on the right?
>> [_] Anon 1987307 >># rather the opposite
>> [_] Anon 1987310 >># But there's a moment when you get that it won't lead to anything - that's the point on your life when you have to decide between hating on the game or keep playing until you get the real purpose Actually, if the game was only about doing what you should to win, it would be no fun at all. The fun part is cracking the methods and actually getting to a point where you win, disregarding all process inbetween
>> [_] Anon 1987312 Fill your constructed vocab in your first round with as much as you can, then second round get 4 dots. That was the easiest method
>> [_] Anon 1987315 i understand it now but the game itself is rather unintuitive. the symbols are misleading because they coincide with the patterns you could form yet the image itself has no meaning. it's more logical to assume that the images on both sides would correlate with each other and i wouldn't blame anyone for being tricked from following that line of reasoning.
>> [_] Anon 1987316 >># But that takes 2 rounds
>> [_] Anon 1987318 >># also, bragging about winning on the 1st round is ridiculous because for a game based on "logic", it's not always possible to win on the first round. that's like bragging about winning a game of solitaire on your first try (3 draw).
>> [_] Anon 1987319 >># For 1 round then everything has to line up and drop into place just right, on your first panel. So it's down to mainly luck
>> [_] Anon 1987320 >># There's a bit of skill into it when it comes to perceiving what pattern will be the most common given your choices
>> [_] Anon 1987322 You know what, I'm done being angry at this game Congrats OP, you have created one of the only threads on /f/ to get this many posts. I'm sure this was your intention the whole time. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
>> [_] Anon 1987323 >># of course, there's strategies to increase your winning odds, but like solitaire it's impossible to know what's coming next.
>> [_] Anon 1987327 >># I'm glad that people, even the hating ones, are still willing to engage in a discussion about gaming, it's objectives, logic and much more
>> [_] Anon 1987329 >># So if you have the skill, you should be able to master it after a few tries, getting 1 or 2 rounds every time
>> [_] Anon 1987331 Guys I'm not the dev, I should credit him since there's is people reffering to me as if I was. http://www.increpare.com/
>> [_] Anon 1987332 >># possibly, if anyone dares to care enough about this game.
>> [_] Anon 1987333 >># lel idc
>> [_] Anon 1987335 >># If you fill the construed vocab on the first round, there is a good chance of winning on round two, by just getting 4 dots as your constructed. That's the only way i can seem to win in 2 rounds
>> [_] Anon 1987337 OK, that ending animation was right on par with beating 1942. At least it was grammatically correct.
>> [_] Anon 1987339 >># And then I beat it in a single round. Huh.
>> [_] Anon 1987341 Replace vocabulary with "stack" or something to make it less confusing
>> [_] Anon 1987345 >># >># >># >># SEE >>#
>> [_] Anon 1987346 I DID IT IN 1 ROUND MOTHERFUCKERS AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA HHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH AHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHA HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHH AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH AHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHH AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAH AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH AHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAH AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA HHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH AHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH
>> [_] Anon 1987348 i understood it by round 12ish
>> [_] Anon 1987350 70th post
>> [_] Anon 1987352 >># Why so manny replies
>> [_] Anon 1987355 >># I could say that it was as succesfull as Mister T in the way it exists in the same universe
>> [_] Anon 1987357 >># I don't get the reference
>> [_] Anon 1987361 >># No troll H neither shitty newgrounds game
>> [_] Anon 1987363 IT'S WORKING! Not sure how many rounds I took (many), but this newspeak is looking good.
>> [_] Anon 1987365 >># okay, so after attempting it for about 20 rounds, 5 of them were won on the 1st round by looking for the most likely 2-1-1 pattern, scanning for and clearing the squares from top to bottom.
>> [_] Anon 1987367 >># >># It actually offers a challenge
>> [_] Anon 1987375 >># Haha! Got it at the end of the second round. I won't bother the first. 2hard4me.
>> [_] Anon 1987384 >Marked for deletion (old). And there goes the big thread. From dust to dust they say
>> [_] Anon 1987385 This seems like something from Ender's Game
>> [_] Anon 1987388 EVERYONE Don't forget to czeck: >>#
>> [_] Anon 1987390 MONKEYS!
>> [_] Anon 1987391 >># nigger
>> [_] Anon 1987392 >># n