File: SAW Review.swf-(9.42 MB, 240x176, Other)
[_] Anon 3014764

File: SAW Review.swf-(9.42 MB, 240x176, Other)
[_] Anon 2218975
>> [_] Anon 2218978 Stop posting your youtube playlist, retard. ANYONE can go see them there for free in better quality. This board was meant for actual things made in flash, not FLV shit converted into 10mb mosaics with pixels the size of a frying pan.
>> [_] Anon 2218986 source?
>> [_] Anon 2218988 >># http://www.confusedmatthew.com/
>> [_] Anon 2218996 thanks
>> [_] Anon 2218998 why would i want to see a "neckbeard critic" critize an old film i saw and enjoyed? and why would i come to /f/ for that? This feels like pure advertising and nothing else. shame on you
>> [_] Anon 2219093 I could also go to youtube and watch anything SWF that's posted on /f/ I didn't know about this video series before I saw it here and I enjoyed it more that potato knishes so baww
>> [_] Anon 2219096 >># >I could also go to youtube and watch anything SWF that's posted on /f/ you ever heard about that "cancer" thing /b/'s always bitching about? shit you can find on youtube is /f/'s equivalent of that, this includes potato knishes

File: SAW Review.swf-(9.42 MB, 240x176, Other)
[_] Anon 2138879
>> [_] Anon 2138981 agreed
>> [_] Anon 2138988 Who is this?
>> [_] Anon 2138989 >># nvm, youtube searched matthew saw review and it was the first result.
>> [_] Anon 2139009 >># Cannot believe I sat through this whole flash. Anyways he does have some good points. Movie had many holes in it.

File: SAW Review.swf-(9.42 MB, 240x176, Other)
[_] Anon 2132734
>> [_] Anon 2132766 Forms an opinion about a movie he refuses to watch. Fuck this guy. Fucking idiot.
>> [_] Anon 2132775 i was scared shitless of E.T aswell as a kid haha
>> [_] Anon 2132777 who is this?
>> [_] Anon 2132779 >># >Forms an opinion about a movie he refuses to watch. >Fucking idiot. I do agree, though i find this a good review
>> [_] Anon 2132780 I kindly disagree
>> [_] Anon 2132797 >># While I do not agree with your opinion, sir, I will defend to the death your right to state it.
>> [_] Anon 2132831 I agree with this guy, but he's a total faggot.
>> [_] Anon 2132840 >># >># Wait, what? The reviewer didn't watch it?
>> [_] Anon 2132854 OH MY FUCKING GOD this is a REVIEW not a detailed summary of the ENTIRE FUCKING MOVIE
>> [_] Anon 2132879 He's seriously complaining about "character development" in a horror movie. "Characters" in horror movies are made to be killed. The fact that the two in the bathroom live til the very final moments of the film speaks quite a bit for the longevity of these people. (With the doctor actually living and the second person only confirmed dead in a later film, and only died after the point in time when credits start to roll)
>> [_] Anon 2132885 Are you people really defending saw? Those are the most boring and unscary "horror" films ever made.
>> [_] Anon 2132886 i thought the ending to SAW was really good at the time but the rest of the series after it was shit
>> [_] Anon 2132887 >># I remember liking SAW as a kid cause I thought it was deep for a horror film. It's really retarded when you've grown some taste though.
>> [_] Anon 2132892 >># The first one was the second worst, after the second one in my opinion. The only good one was 5, because that one was actually funny. The plot was shit though
>> [_] Anon 2132902 >># But he watched the movie. Unless you're talking about Hostel, then you're just being ridiculous.