/ > /fap/ > Thread 7524
Age: 12.29d Health: 61% Posters: 16 Posts: 21 Replies: 19 Files: 1+3
>> Anonymous 30jul2015(th)06:13 No.21807 OP P1
I wonder when Shumway will be able to display this properly.
[IMG] SyokusyuIRAIRA1.02.swf (198.6 KiB)
1000x1000, Compressed. 1 frame, 30 fps (00:00).
Ver15, AS3. Network access: No. Text: Yes.
Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Yes. Video: No. <METADATA>
[find in archive]
>> Anonymous 30jul2015(th)14:20 No.21815 A P2R1
>>21807
This is the first time I've ever felt a little bit interested in HTML5. Had not heard of Shumway
before. It's probably a long time before it starts being as good as the flash plugin (performance
wise and feature wise) but it's interesting. Anything helping swf survive through these difficult
times is OK with me.
>> Anonymous 30jul2015(th)23:20 No.21828 B P3R2
e-
eww
>> Anonymous 31jul2015(fr)02:00 No.21832 C P4R3
My best time is 20.23, I could beat it, but I'm lazy.
>> Anonymous 31jul2015(fr)03:32 No.21835 D P5R4
I can't get the one with the x-ray vision. The third clickable option on the right specifically.
Not sure what I'm supposed to do.
>> Anonymous 31jul2015(fr)04:11 No.21836 OP P6R5
>>21835
That turns off the guide lines, I think if you beat 15 seconds you get the invincible stomach one.
>> Anonymous 31jul2015(fr)05:44 No.21838 E P7R6
>>21815
doesn't html5 and webm bring about the downfall of swf?
>> Anonymous 31jul2015(fr)09:06 No.21841 F P8R7
that was horrifying and not even a little bit enjoyable
>> Anonymous 31jul2015(fr)09:16 No.21842 G P9R8
>>21807
I feel so scared
>> Anonymous 31jul2015(fr)12:17 No.21844 H P10R9
Doesn't seem to be anything beyond Iron Stomach. Your time in top right only counts without it. Got
it down to like 8.1 seconds, could probably go lower but I doubt anything requires is that low.
>> Anonymous 31jul2015(fr)17:02 No.21845 I P11R10
>>21844
>8.1 seconds
How the fuck did you do that
>> Anonymous 31jul2015(fr)23:42 No.21850 J P12R11
>>21845
I was able to get 7.5, gotta cheeze it by right clicking which pauses the flash then left clicking
where you want it to go which moves the cursor there almost instantly. Lets you take your time
while still getting the best time.
>> tetsujin 2aug2015(su)04:57 No.21886 K P13R12
I got around 8 seconds. My laptop has a Wacom tablet built into the screen, that makes it a lot
easier.
>> Anonymous 2aug2015(su)15:22 No.21893 A P14R13
>>21838
Many people seem to think so but they are thinking flash = video player. I certainly agree that
YouTube etc could use html5 to play their videos but flash is so much more.
Flash allows you to create something that you otherwise would need an exe for (mixture of
scripts/images/video/audio/interactivity). It allows reuse of resources (one audio sample played
100 times in flash requires bytes for 1 audio sample while it would need to be repeated 100 times
in a video).
It's very easy to create animations and interfaces in flash and the files takes very little disk
space (short download time) because of the vector graphics and reuse of resources, as well as heavy
optimizations in the file format itself (storage of rectangle information etc). My favorite plus
with swf files is that everything is also stored in one swf file making it easy to spread a
game/animation/loop/whatever all over the world.
I don't think Adobe should "give up on swf" or something like that, it still has a lot of purpose.
All these people that has grown up making stuff in Flash aren't just going to switch over to
something else either since they are now masters of Flash.
Sadly I've noticed that Adobe sees Flash a bit like a studio now where you create an animation and
then just export it as a video to be uploaded to YouTube. It's very tragic that all these artists
aren't releasing the original swf files since they are several times smaller than the video and has
quality that can't be beaten (scaling vector graphics). When all these artists are locking
themselves in on making just a video they are limiting themselves by not making a swf file instead.
They could make a "video" with interactivity (hidden scenes, optional endings) or one that has
random elements in it (different backgrounds, spark effects). Just being able to include clickable
links in their stuff would be a big plus.
Sadly the fault of this development is mostly YouTube's, that's where the money is and their
refusal to make it possible to upload swf files borders on retardness (they could easily scan
uploaded files to remove troll ActionScript or just deny it to be published if it looks fishy). But
that's no excuse for the artists not also releasing their flashes as swf files (as well as upload
them to YouTube as movies).
At the moment the biggest competition to flash is SVG files, which are still graphics in vector
format. But flash offers so much more than just a still image so the comparison is laughable when
you think about it.
For now at least swf is guaranteed to survive due to all these porn artists.
>> Anonymous 2aug2015(su)20:33 No.21899 L P15R14
>>21893
>wall of text
"Ain't nobody got time for that!"
>> Anonymous 2aug2015(su)20:52 No.21901 A P16R15
>>21899
Just the reply I was looking for!
>> Anonymous 2aug2015(su)21:57 No.21909 E P17R16
>>21899
>Not reading about flash on a flash board
U dun goofed!
>>21893
That's all true, but the huge security risks are ubiquitous as well and Adobe gives two shits about
that, only ever releasing hotfixes when mayor vulnerabilities have been shoven into their faces by
third parties.
People could just use better programs for animation.
It just became too unstable and unsecure over the years to be that widely spread, it bears nearly
the same risks as opening an exe file from the internet.
It's a shame, but there's lots of voices as of late to even bring down the format compeletely from
what I've heard. Even some people I knew didn't even install flash plugin anymore on their new
computers.
I fear to cannot see swf file format for anything other than an obscure relic of the past in the
near future.
Sidenote: Board culture also went down A LOT, seeing every other flash on /f/ is just a baad
youtube rip (though there's been some h264 increase).
Tbo, the best thing here I've seen as of late was that one [H] visual novel.
The era of flash games lurking on every past time webpage is long gone... Because that too got
sourced over to these smug smartphoner apps.
>> Anonymous 3aug2015(mo)00:27 No.21912 A P18R17
>>21909
I understand that swf is serving a good video use less and less as bandwidth is becoming less and
less of an issue but I really don't understand why some people are throwing their arms in the air
and screaming that flash is bad. Flash is awesome at what it does, there's nothing like it.
Feels like people are just jumping on the bandwagon without thinking for themselves. "Sekurity
issue are baaad." Bah. That HTML5 code lives within a browser that also have new security issues
appear from time to time, and they get patched just like those inside Flash, just that the browser
applies the patch quietly without anyone noticing.
I still think Adobe shouldn't give up on the format. Of course there's less need for it but people
are still going to install the plugin to be able to for example play all these great flash games
that have been released for 15 years now, there are huge sites that are dedicated to nothing else
so people still play them. Many developers are releasing for nothing except flash (also, flash can
be exported as Air applications which are cell phone apps). Not reacting to security concerns or
evolve the format would be a bad move by them, there's no reason to think HTML5 and Flash can't get
a long side-by-side on the Internet.
What are those better programs for animation that you mentioned? Do they also support vector
graphics?
Also, now that I think about it I don't even know what these recent security issues in Flash were.
How much were they exploited? Maybe Adobe were the ones that discovered them and just pulled the
flash plugin until the fix had been done? If anyone have read an article that actually goes into
details on this I'd appreciate a link.
>> Anonymous 3aug2015(mo)05:56 No.21918 M P19R18
I really hate how you faggots comment on the garbage so it stays on the front longer than anything
at least marginally decent
inb4 faggots stating the obvious that i commented on it too
>> Anonymous 3aug2015(mo)09:04 No.21920 N P20R19
>>21899
>i have adhd please rape my face
>> Anonymous 3aug2015(mo)14:10 No.21924 O P21
>>21918
>No conversation, only MLP pr0nz allowed here!!!
Go fuck yourself.
