File: nigger.swf-(5.43 MB, 480x272, Other)
[_] :^) Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406487
>> [_] Anon 2406490 'merica, land of the "free"
>> [_] Faggot 2406491 lolamericans
>> [_] Anon 2406494 i dont even understand why that woman is so mad, like, what did that nignog do to her kids
>> [_] Anon 2406497 >># Looked at them whilst being a nigger
>> [_] Anon 2406500 Turns out employees don't like it when public faces of the company spew hate speech, especially while being KNOWINGLY RECORDED. She got her ass fired. The state is also looking into her fitness as a parent. >># He started his car, which accidentally startled her kids. She says he almost hit her kids with her car, but given that he's parked...
>> [_] Anon 2406501 >># Damn that bitch got FUCKING REKT... oh it feels good not to be a racist like most of 4chan
>> [_] Anon 2406503 >># >employees *employers >with her car *with his car i'm dumb
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406504 >># she has some mental issue like most women >># >hate speech >The state is also looking into her fitness as a parent. thanks obamba
>> [_] Anon 2406505 i dont know whether i should cry or laugh. her stupidity and amount of double standards exceeds my imaginations by far
>> [_] Anon 2406507 >># Yeah I'm sure you know all that. Fuck the Nigger and fuck you.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406508 >># see near the end she gets she is losing control and says almost involuntary "just because I called him a racist" She mixes rascist with nigger, and then proceeds to say "a racist fucking nigger" It's a joke really
>> [_] Anon 2406510 >># Well, if you want to ignore the race thing, there's also >Concerned that someone "almost ran over her kids" >keeps then out of sight behind her as they dick around in a parking lot
>> [_] Anon 2406511 >># I'm not sure if it's a joke or a statement i mean she obviously displays how uneducated she is. Which is not suprising since the educational system of the USA works to breed military
>> [_] Anon 2406513 Whats the source of the video? This shit hilarious. Just look at getting so upset over nothing and the dude is just sitting there laughing at her. #rektd
>> [_] Anon 2406515 One of her excuses for calling someone a nigger is "I have a black cousin" Lady, that is the COMPLETE OPPOSITE of that logic should work.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406516 >># I mean, the whole situation is a joke.
>> [_] King !!Ho8YFUnx18C 2406518 >># i would of shot her on general principal
>> [_] Anon 2406519 >># look at her*
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406520 >># Also it looks like she has some amount of nigger blood. So it's definitely not "racial cleansing mindset". She's just calling the nigger a nigger and that's it, I think.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406523 >># https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqdCWpUm P-Y also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACrQHGxx M_I Worth watching
>> [_] Anon 2406525 >># You're right. And she should be allowed to call a nigger a nigger. We don't know what happened before the video cam... so the nigger probably did something niggerish so she is calling the nigger a nigger. I myself love niggers and think that every whitey should own at least 10 niggers.
>> [_] Anon 2406526 Awwwwwwwww ye, Illmatic - Half time 1994 playing
>> [_] Anon 2406528 Is that Lisa Ann?
>> [_] Anon 2406530 >># wow 4m views and no comments? i expected shitstorm
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406532 >># I believe it didn't reach some layers of internet users. I just came in contact with it after watching the second video.
>> [_] Anon 2406533 Stay mad white people
>> [_] Anon 2406534 >># No really... it wasn't worth watching fag!
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406536 >># see >>#
>> [_] Anon 2406537 Stop stealin shit if you don't want to give your people a bad name
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406538 >># sorry m8 :^(
>> [_] Anon 2406540 both sides are bitching around and getting upset because they want to listen to sime black rap and count how often they call themselves niggas. but white people are not allowed to call black people niggas ? that's just as racist as that woman though of course there are always different opinions, some black people dont even call themselves niggas amongst themselves but there are also not racist white people. so this whole incident is about whether people give a fuck or not ... fucking bullshit
>> [_] Anon 2406542 >># This is le ruse
>> [_] Anon 2406544 >># >nigga=/=nigger
>> [_] Anon 2406546 >># > She says he almost hit her kids with her car > with her car So... he stole her car? IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW
>> [_] Anon 2406547 >># only the dumb black people use the word nigga don't feel jealous
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406548 >># Yeah, and she appears to have no car in what is clearly a parking lot! >># seriously nigger
>> [_] Anon 2406552 Think of the poor black people
>> [_] Anon 2406553 >># It's the same thing you fucking retard; "nigga" is just nigger with a ghetto accent the same way whito is just white with an asian accent.
>> [_] Anon 2406554 >no one notices that she says "oh you think you know cops, do you know how many cops I stripped for? you ain't getting far bitch" So she's an old lady stripper with kids? Gross.
>> [_] Anon 2406555 >># trips get
>> [_] King !!Ho8YFUnx18C 2406558 >># WTF
>> [_] Anon 2406561 >># Um, ok then?
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406563 >># >># s-trips m8
>> [_] Anon 2406564 >># >>The state is also looking into her fitness as a parent. She's a shitter, but that's some 1984 shit right there >say something we don't like? >we'll take your kids away and arrest you for "hate speech"
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406566 >># Yep, LONG LIVE THE ALMIGHTY STATE
>> [_] Anon 2406569 >># >unafraid to release unbridled rage and seething hate over the smallest accidents (the guy accidentally startled her children by starting his car) >role model for the kids swearing and dropping racial slurs and all-around raging in public Clearly this woman has issues, and if she has no inhibitions about being a screaming harpy bitch in public just because someone started their car and it startled her, imagine what she does to her kids if they ever make mistakes? There's definitely a lot of verbal abuse because she's a foul-mouthed shrieking bitch who seems incapable of reasoning and tolerance which are foundations for a person's ability to love. cont.
>> [_] Anon 2406574 >># >inb4 hurr durr she was mad at him because of her kids-- she's a good mama bear! She couldn't give two fucks about the welfare of her children, her back was turned towards them for 90% of the video IN A PARKING LOT WITH MOVING CARS. She's mad that her children were scared by a car starting, how about a car running the hyperactive little fucks over? She's just using them as an excuse for everything-- >HE SCARED MY CHILDREN Except they seemed just fine and dandy about it. Maybe they were startled for two seconds earlier, but obviously they're not scared or traumatized if they're dancing around in the background. >STOP FILMING MY CHILDREN she only says that at the end even though she knows full damn well that he's filming her unjustified psycho freakout-- she's a manipulative bitch who is trying to make him look like a pedo to avoid getting her psychotic behavior exposed. cont
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406575 >># Yeah, this point of view. But clearly the state has nothing to do with it. See, she isn't very old and she's a stripper. She obviously comes from a generation that was already affected by the state intervening in family affairs. State's intervention creates the necessity for itself. If what happened was that the rest of the family tried to intervene with the situation, what would we get? Kids living with their grandparents or with their father, or even with the mother with way more family contact. See, our society is a large experiment with no expected outcome
>> [_] Anon 2406577 >># That is why she fails as a mother. Would you honestly trust a psycho bitch like this to babysit your kids? Racism aside, because I know you all hate niggers anyway, she's fucking nuts. No one that crazy in public deserves custody rights-- even if they can feed and clothe their children, they WILL still lead by example and make their children in to crazy fucks. Do you really want to deal with a generation of little fucking rage-filled brats to deal with in public? Then a generation of psycho adults too?
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406579 >># *our statal society
>> [_] Anon 2406580 >># You're a special type of idiot :)
>> [_] Anon 2406585 >'cause he's a RACIST FUCKING NIGGER That's fucking hilarious
>> [_] Anon 2406588 >># >Racism aside, because I know you all hate niggers anyway I think most people on the decent boards of 4chan just hate ghetto culture and degeneracy. Being black isn't an automatic qualifier, but statistically it puts you into the "at risk of being a nigger" territory more than other races. The black guy in the OP is fine, and there's nobody in this thread saying she was justified. I think you're just seeing what you want to see.
>> [_] Anon 2406589 Why is someone calling someone else a Nigger considered national news? I fucking hate this country.
>> [_] Anon 2406590 >># >She obviously comes from a generation that was already affected by the state intervening in family affairs. [citation needed] Because obviously people always make good financial decisions on their own and the only time people fall on hard times is when custody battles are involved right? Every stripper and drug-addict is actually a brilliant, independent, hard-working individual who is only the scum of society because the state took them away from their criminal/negligent parents (who are also actually virtuous, perfect beings, despite the evil state) and put them with screened foster care families (who are required to be financially, legally, and mentally sound, unlike their previous parents). cont.
>> [_] Anon 2406591 >># cont. >State's intervention creates the necessity for itself. If what happened was that the rest of the family tried to intervene with the situation, what would we get? This right here is why I know you have no fucking clue how custody works. THE STATE ALWAYS TRIES TO GET RELIABLE RELATIVES INVOLVED AS THE FIRST OPTION. The state recognizes the emotional value of keeping families together-- despite what your radical and delusional voices in your head tell you, the state is run by human beings, not emotionless androids. You're completely ignorant about how any of the legal matters involving custody, you're trying way too hard to be edgy and anti-government without knowing any of the basic facts about these alleged trespasses of the state.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406594 >># This right here is the problem. You see the state as an equivalent (if not even more) entity and not as a tool, a secondary choice. All problems the state has to intervene with nowadays could be solved by the family and the community. People with this mindset, that the state should intervene with everything before trying the more natural approach, should really think this through and see where this is getting our generations as a whole. >trying way too hard to be edgy and anti-government no, you're not assessing my point of view with the abrangency that would be necessary for us both to carry a good discussion.
>> [_] Anon 2406597 have you seen her attempt in damage control? It's absolutely hilarious!
>> [_] Anon 2406599 >># I think she needs the D. And not a black one, an asian one would be fine.
>> [_] BismuthVectoring !FRESHtYylA 2406603 >># >LIbertarian logic. The state has no way to affect generations like that, idiot. Stupid parents have existed since the dawn of time. Caring about how children are raised is a very modern concept. And if the state didn't do it, the people themselves would complain. You have no right to fuck up a kids future because you are a shithead.
>> [_] Anon 2406604 >># >no, you're not assessing my point of view with the abrangency that would be necessary for us both to carry a good discussion. The reason I made that assessment is because you keep spouting foundation-less claims. Starting with your assertion that this mother "obviously" was the result of state intervention in her family. It's extremely arrogant to assert that you know exactly when the state was involved at any point in a person's life just by watching two minutes of them on video. cont.
>> [_] Anon 2406605 >># cont. In addition, you not only made an assumption but a complete falsification of facts when you asserted that the state doesn't allow the "rest of the family" to intervene in the situation. That is one of the state's main goals when it comes to child custody-- the government KNOWS it can't raise hundreds of children en mass as effectively as a family could provide individual focus and love for a child. That is why there are specific laws that allow next-of-kin (grandmothers, grandfathers, aunts, uncles, etc.) to be the legal guardians and allows the original parents visiting rights and the potential to regain custody if proven to be a reliable caregiver. You make up facts to support your radical arguments, that's why I gave you those (accurate) labels.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406607 >># >Libertarian not really m8 >The state has no way to affect generations like that, idiot. Coudn't it be the case that YOU are not able to see HOW the "cult of the state" affects entire generations like that? Or you are the politically enlightened one that has everything right and knows how it's best for the state and the families to act? >Stupid parents have existed since the dawn of time. Caring about how children are raised is a very modern concept. Indeed, it's a very modern concept. And only today we see this kind of situation where it seems like the state is a necessity. Stupid parents have also always been dealt with by other means. cont.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406608 >># >># cont. >And if the state didn't do it, the people themselves would complain. Before that, if there wasn't the possibility for the state to intervene, people instead of complaining would act. >You have no right to fuck up a kids future because you are a shithead. Indeed you don't. But how can you possibly know what would be the kid's future with something as "modern" (as you said it) as the statal family concept? Just saying, you're trapped inside your own state limited views.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406610 >># >># wrong reply, replying shortly
>> [_] Anon 2406611 >># >You see the state as an equivalent (if not even more) entity and not as a tool, a secondary choice. No, you obviously didn't read my post. The state tries to keep the family together while also considering the well-being of the child. The state doesn't try to take the children away and raise them in a government facility-- if they NEED to be taken from unfit parents then attempts are made to set them up with next-of-kin and, if that fails, foster parents. The state does not purposely raise children away from families. >All problems the state has to intervene with nowadays could be solved by the family and the community. In a perfect world. You're completely delusional about human beings in general. That's like saying we should remove prisons and abolish all law enforcement because people should all be law-abiding citizens without fear of consequences. That will definitely work out, according to your logic.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406615 >># >># >The reason I made that assessment is because you keep spouting foundation-less claims if this discussion were to go down to semantics none of us would have an edge, just saying I say she was affected by the state simply because everyone that lived in the society after the insertion of this "state-based thinking" was affected by it, one way or another. >In addition, you not only made an assumption but a complete falsification of facts when you asserted that the state doesn't allow the "rest of the family" to intervene in the situation. I never said that the "state doesn't allow the 'rest of the family' to intervene in the situation". What I said is, the state is seen as an apparatus that comes naturally first in this kind of problem solving for regular people nowadays. It, besides neutralizing one natural trait of our social abilities, inserts one new kind of necessity for itself with it's insertion.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406617 >># >In a perfect world. You're completely delusional about human beings in general. That's like saying we should remove prisons and abolish all law enforcement because people should all be law-abiding citizens without fear of consequences. That will definitely work out, according to your logic. Scarecrowing. This two issues are completely different. If you are resorting to this kind of shit I don't see any point in continuing this discussion.
>> [_] BismuthVectoring !FRESHtYylA 2406618 >># I live on a country where the state is by all accounts and purposes way too fucking big and even here we know how badly bad parents can affect children. >But how can you possibly know what would be the kid's future Pedagogy and the thousand studies on how children learn behaviour. Shitty parents will pass on their shitty traits to their children. Hell a great example is my mother that ended up being damaged goods just like her mother before her. >># > people instead of complaining would act. >Stupid parents have also always been dealt with by other means. Not at all. The family affairs stayed at the house. Nobody could afford to care about waht the neighbor was doing. Read about the 50s America a little. And if it was in the ancient times the people was too busy surviving to give two shits about their kids or even understand how raising children works. Was the child misbehaving? To the strap with them.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406620 >># Yeah, this state mindset started around the 50s. A bit before it was like I'm describing. But yeah, it happened.
>> [_] BismuthVectoring !FRESHtYylA 2406622 >># So if you understand that idiots shouldn't have children, why oppose it?
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406625 >># Well, idiots will continue having children, and I believe they should deal with it by their own means. State-care, in a way will only prolong idiots having children since they have the state apparatus to feed from. It's really a sort of unnatural selection, like welfare.
>> [_] BismuthVectoring !FRESHtYylA 2406627 >># >and I believe they should deal with it by their own means. What will they even deal with if they don't realize they are idiots? This phrase sums up why state intervention in this topic is important "Your rights end when other's rights begin". You can do what you want with your life, but if you have a child you better be fucking ready to accept the responsibilities. Otherwise don't be surprised when the state takes the child. Children are not an object you can do what you want with, the persons. I think you are conflating several other things with raising children just because it involves the state. On top of that, state intervention does not mean helping the parents not be idiot. It's about stopping the parent's idiocy from affecting the children. We don't fix them, we just make sure they don't hurt anyone else. (cont.)
>> [_] Anon 2406628 >># >Scarecrowing You don't understand what scarecrowing is. I didn't say that was your argument, I said that is following the same premise and outcome that you're arguing. Your argument is that the family and community, on its own, is always capable of raising children effectively without any intervention from the state or government. Saying people are perfect on their own at raising children (with family and community involvement) without state intervention, that's LIKE saying people are perfect at being law-abiding citizens (with family and community involvement) so we don't need law enforcement. That's not scarecrowing, here's your words exactly: > All problems the state has to intervene with nowadays could be solved by the family and the community. cont.
>> [_] Anon 2406630 >># With that ultimate term, you're asserting that they will have a perfect success rate if the state were not involved. That's ridiculous, and you are not worth arguing with. You're just too blatantly ignorant and radical. You don't even understand the terms you use (i.e. scarecrowing). I've proven my points and you have nothing left but being easily offended and arguing in circles based on made-up facts. You're just a misinformed tryhard 2edgy anarchist and this argument is over.
>> [_] BismuthVectoring !FRESHtYylA 2406631 >># You've clearly been indoctrinated into an ideology, but if it's not libertarianism I don't know what it is. But alas, it doens't matter. Ideology in general is shit. Stop giving value to concepts and ideas and start to care care about the outcomes. Just because the state is involved it doesn't mean it's bad. But anyways, I gotta go, uni calls me.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406635 >># >># Thanks
>> [_] Anon 2406636 >># >># rekt. that's one tripfag i wouldn't mind leaving /f/ forever.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406638 >># >># >What will they even deal with if they don't realize they are idiots? They don't need to. Dealing by your own means is that. You fuck up, you fuck up. >You've clearly been indoctrinated into an ideology Haven't us all? >Stop giving value to concepts and ideas and start to care care about the outcomes. That's what I'm trying to do. >Just because the state is involved it doesn't mean it's bad. Yes, it doesn't mean it. But what does it mean? >But anyways, I gotta go, uni calls me. bye
>> [_] Anon 2406639 >># Damn man I thought you were cool but you just got fucking sautéed.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406641 >># >># Not really. This one anon uses what's clearly demoralizing and sensationalism to convey his points. Even though he doesn't believe what he did is scarecrowing, it is. You grab your opponents line of thought and put it in practice in a completely different context, like it's what I would think. Attacking the image of the person instead of responding to arguments. He tries to go down to semantics even when clear points are stated with context defining scenarios. Indeed, not worth to continue arguing.
>> [_] Anon 2406647 >># You're not wrong, he just warped your point of view until it was convenient for him in that it made you seem off your rocker I feel your notion that people should have a chance to solve their own problems before the state gets involved is both with merit and not always applicable Unfortunately it's not easy to gauge how dangerously bonkers a lady is from a racist sperg-out like this
>> [_] Anon 2406648 >># >Caring about how children are raised is a very modern concept. >Raise your child in the way he should go, and when he is old he shall not part from it. >laughing prophets.jpg
>> [_] Anon 2406650 >># Nope, he just made you point out how your own argument was completely fucking stupid, which it is. You got turbowned son.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406652 >># Well, it depends on the viewer too. If your methods are more like his, you'll go with his point. have a good life
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406654 >># Thanks. Clearly demoralizing tatics, like when kids are arguing.
>> [_] Anon 2406657 Usually posts on /f/ have 0-3 comments and this one going over 70 already, people be mad. Honestly though, putting the nigger-word aside, the way she acts does indicate she should not be allowed to take care of kids... ever. Poor kids
>> [_] Anon 2406659 This lady gives us racists with reason a bad name.
>> [_] Anon 2406665 >># Why argue seriously when you are quite open to ripping your own hilarious argument to pieces? That is called "people don't even fully understand their own reasoning", not childish. Of course, you are so ignorant that even them pointing out how stupid your argument is, even YOU, you still ignore that fact. Hilarious.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406666 >># >proving my point
>> [_] Anon 2406667 >># You're a special kind of delusional. You should write stories. Seriously. Make a blogspot and write down rants, I'd seriously read them.
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406668 >># Quit the point proving m8
>> [_] Anon 2406677 when did /f/ become /pol/
>> [_] Anon 2406683 >># mah nigga
>> [_] Anon 2406684 >># Nah, my uncle is literally a ward of the state. He don't have a job and he forty something. The government needs to stop helping people like him, he keeps getting government money because his whole life has been a sting of depressive episodes. The whole reason he stays depressed is because he doesn't do shit with his life.
>> [_] Anon 2406685 >># Holy shit I typed too fast, *doesn't *hes
>> [_] Anon 2406691 When Keeping It Real Goes Wrong
>> [_] Anon 2406694 Lockwert your posts almost always seem to be provoking unwanted debate, please stop. I specifically come here to avoid current events, cant you just post normal things like everyone else? John Moses Browning is cool, be like him.
>> [_] Anon 2406699 >># post anime :^)
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406700 >># Sorry mate, this is what I like to do. Sometimes I post only songs and other shit. It's fun really
>> [_] (ID: Heaven) 2406702 >100 replies srsly /f/?
>> [_] Anon 2406703 So, what's the deal with those retarded christians?
>> [_] Anon 2406708 >># is this a first? I feel like it is
>> [_] Anon 2406709 >># there was a game of thrones swf not even 2 hours ago with 100+ replies
>> [_] Anon 2406712 >Female /pol/
>> [_] Anon 2406713 >100 posts Holy fucking shit is this tumblr?
>> [_] Anon 2406716 >># that's what happens when you get trip fags filling the comments with inane garbage
>> [_] Lockwert !nnIgGerRZ. 2406718 >># :¬)
>> [_] Anon 2406722 >># Nana nana nana nana batmaaaaaaaaaaan
>> [_] Anon 2406726 Fuck niggers
>> [_] John Moses Browning 2406733 >All this happened in New York A pretty shitty state but I tought people would be at least a little more tolerant there. But that black man was pretty boss. Just sitting there calmly.. very nice >># >ITT: white people trying to teach me the difference between a nigger and a nigga Go fuck yourself, cracker
>> [_] Anon 2406736 Is it just me or did she sound like Cartman or any other Southpark character when she shouted "GET THE CAMERA OFF MY KIDS!"?
>> [_] Anon 2406738 >># >niggers with personality disorders calling sjw racial slurs Whoever loses the jews still win.
>> [_] Anon 2406739 >How many cops have I *slur* stripped for? Wow, this is hilarious.
>> [_] Anon 2406742 >># It's probably on 'approval mode', where a comment has to be moderated before it can be posted.
>> [_] Tomo the /co/nadian porn bro !TOMO/mraQk 2406743 >># It sounded like he was just qualifying it more, not that he was assuming the thread was claiming the woman as in the wrong.
>> [_] Anon 2406748 >># >># And flashes with spoken word poetry about bullying seem to get 100+ replies pretty consistently
>> [_] Anon 2406751 Oh great, it's another Lockderp thread. Alright, check it: >Just saying, you're trapped inside your own state limited views. >"state-based thinking" First, gotta love the delicious irony here. Not even a few days ago he was on some rant about how feminism is exclusively left-wing. And now he is mirroring their own logic, dismissing arguments by labelling it with the libertarian equivalent of "patriarchy" or "mansplaining." And despite being critical of others' debate tactics, he has no problem ignoring his own standards, even in the very same thread. This whole discussion derailed because this armchair libertarian immediately assumed to know her entire sitution - as many conservatives do - because of some anecdotal experience, and uses it as a substitute for factual statistics to bolster his charge against the state in some weird cycle of circular reasoning.
>> [_] Anon 2406752 Hey guys can I post in this thread too? Thanks So how bout that flash huh? Pretty wild! I know right?
>> [_] Anon 2406754 >># The icing on the cake is when it all falls apart when you examine the claim >All problems the state has to intervene with nowadays could be solved by the family and the community. Nevermind that if such organizations provided a valid alternative, there would be no need for state intervention.. The conditioning and upbringing of the racist mother is the responsibility of the family and community by default. And by default, this is what it has produced. No state bungling necessary
>> [_] Anon 2406757 >You think you know cops? >Do you know how many cops I've stripped for? What the fuck
>> [_] Fagmaster 2406760 why
>> [_] Anon 2406762 Needs moar jpeg.
>> [_] Anon 2406763 fuck yeah 120 comments it reminds me of the papers please flash good times
>> [_] Anon 2406767 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqdIvVLr 6wU
>> [_] Anon 2406769 >># 10/10 best thing of the day