File: not_new_pearl.swf-(7.44 MB, 500x700, Hentai)
[_] not new steven edition Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)18:56:58 No.

  Those lines are really annoying and couldn't find a way to get rid of them, so fuck it.

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)19:11:24 No.

  I'd like to offer some feedback, because I'm all for what you're trying to do with these edits.

  I'll be honest. This edit is pretty bad. The angle on the nose is really unnatural, the jewel on
  the forehead is in wrong spot for the angle the character is facing, and the lack of hair over
  the right eye causes some of the faces she makes to look kind of derpy.

  I would suggest correcting the angle of the nose (slightly downward), and also shorten it a bit.

  Move the jewel to the left a little, adjust the angle so it's more straight up and down along the
  ellipse. This will look more natural since the character is looking downwards. Also it may be
  hard to animate, but try to reduce the shakiness of it a bit. At present it jumps around like a
  third tit on her forehead.

  As for the eyes, just try to make both eyes match expressions. It's not often that you should be
  having one eye partially closed and the other fully opened. They should generally be
  symmetrically mirrored, otherwise the expression will look silly, not sexy. The only exception I
  can think of to this rule is having one eye fully closed and the other fully open.

  Hopefully some good feedback, but do with it what you will.

>> [_] G 03/10/16(Thu)19:12:51 No.

  Yeah decompiling SWF is a bitch, other than the pearl and right eye, it's practically beutiful.

>> [_] G 03/10/16(Thu)19:15:30 No.

  >>3039309
  I think I heard this guy was editing it in JPEXS itself, which doesn't leave a lot of room for
  improving, but yeah you are right.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)19:28:55 No.

  >>3039301
  This is still to a somewhat disturbing level of quality

  However this fails to deter my boner

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)19:42:24 No.

  >>3039301
  Really peeved by the difference in sharpness between the two obviously different art styles here.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)20:06:42 No.

  >pearl
  >tits
  pick one

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)20:25:05 No.

  whatever or whoever that thing is, it's ugly as fuck.
  horrible hair, and an ugly ass nose.
  Who would fap to this shit?

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)21:07:55 No.

  what is song?

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)21:15:43 No.

  It's kinda good.

>> [_] OP 03/10/16(Thu)21:18:46 No.

  >>3039309
  >>3039311
  >>3039312
  With no experience in flash and this being my first edit, i knew it would be very good. JPEXS is
  pretty shit and i would use adobe but i have no idea how. BTW the eye thing is straight from the
  original flash, her hair just covered the left one so you could see it
  >>3039324
  Photoshop (CS6) doesn't like sharpness. Its either blurry as fuck or too sharp and looks worse
  >>3039343
  if i make them smaller i have to change some animations, nigga i don't know how to do that

>> [_] OP 03/10/16(Thu)21:19:49 No.

  >>3039374
  >i knew it would be very good
  would NOT be very good

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)21:20:05 No.

  >>3039374
  >>3039368
  what is song

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)21:23:02 No.

  >sex with rocks

>> [_] OP 03/10/16(Thu)21:24:50 No.

  >>3039376
  Use google, found this for you
  filedropper(com)/supermarionotnewremix

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)21:27:47 No.

  I'm a bit confused by the comments. Is this an edit? If so, what is the original (googling "not
  new swf" didn't help).

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)21:28:15 No.

  >>3039368
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Chj2ilXAcMs

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)21:28:32 No.

  >>3039379
  tried google but im clearly not as good as you at it, tyvm /f/riendo

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)21:32:25 No.

  >>3039385
  much better quality than
  >>3039379
  ty anyway 79 anon
  ty 85

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)21:37:54 No.

  >>3039309
  OPyouarereallyadumbass.Firstoff,youassumeeveryoneissobad.Letmepointoutyourflaws.Firs
  t,yousaidyouwereprettymuchperfect.Ifthatwereso,youwouldn'tbragaboutit,youwouldbehumb
  leandnotattempttogainattentionfrom"no-life’swhospendeverysecondoftheirdaylookingatst
  upidasspictures."Second,yousaidwedonothingelsethanlookatthingson4chanandtheinternet.
  Thereagainyouarewrongretard.Iinfactonlygoon4chanwhenihaveabsolutelynothingelsetodo.I
  (andIassumeatleastseveralothersonhere)havefriends.Byassumingthatweareallpeoplewithno
  livesyouonceagainproveyouridiotwaystous-youcannotgraspaconceptthatpeoplewithlivescan
  alsousetheinternet.Third,ifyouaretryingtoproveto4chanthatyouareperfect,atleasttypepr
  operly."butyoualltaketoawholenewlevel."Youforgotafucking2letterword.Fourth,A'sarenot
  thathardtogetinhighschooldumbass.It'snota
  sign of intelligence, but an ability to listen. Good job for using something that everyone can
  do. Go to /sci/ and get your mind raped by some actual intelligence. There you go; I just wanted
  to you about how wrong you really are. With all honesty, I really don't give a shit what you say
  only wrote this because it’s fun as hell to rant to dumbasses. Next time, go tell someone who
  actually cares.
  PS. I saw that pic on Google images and it most definitely isn't you faggot.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)21:38:30 No.

  >>3039301
  The object tracking is really off (things shifting around as they move instead of moving
  together) and she's blinking out of sync for most of the flash which is really offputting.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)22:01:38 No.

  >>3039384
  put an underscore between "not" and "new"

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)22:02:40 No.

  >>3039393
  who the fuck are you replying to? because it's not>>3039309

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)22:20:03 No.

  aren't her tits like much smaller

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)22:21:06 No.

  >>3039415
  im replying to >>3039309

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)22:36:21 No.

  body type is a little too thick for pearl but i can still fap to this

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)22:55:50 No.

  >>3039350
  I would, because I don't go to /f/ looking for quality. I'll go to 7ch or swfchan if I want to
  find some fresh stuff.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)23:03:32 No.

  >>3039446
  i don't get it...

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)23:56:07 No.

  >>3039415
  It's pasta you fuck

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)23:57:12 No.

  >>3039301
  I think this is the first animated SU work I've seen done.
  Certainly the first flash.

  Too bad it's derivative, but hey at least it's something.

  Er, wait. No. Beef curtains. Yeeurh... Well, okay, first semi-enjoyable one if you don't have the
  bizarre fetish of 8inch floppy scrotum labia.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/10/16(Thu)23:59:53 No.

  >>3039393
  is this some fresh new copypasta the kids are using these days? I'm not familiar with it.