/ > /fap/ > Thread 10184 Age: 31.82d Health: 0% Posters: 2 Posts: 2 Replies: 1 Files: 1+3
>> Anon 41487 [IMG] 8f66ddd929b465efcbb25f5e6a3bb737.swf (7.44 MiB) 500x700, Compressed. 2 frames, 30 fps (00:00). Ver10, AS1/AS2. Network access: Text: Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Video: <METADATA> [find in archive]
>> Anon 41489 a pity about the glitchy visuals

/ > /fap/ > Thread 9065 Age: 42.13d Health: 0% Posters: 12 Posts: 16 Replies: 12 Files: 1+3
>> Anon 32683 just stumbled over it by Pedroillusions http://pedroillusions.deviantart.com/art /Pearl-forced-to-undress-Animation-606613 017 [IMG] Pearl forced to undress.swf (56.9 KiB) 1280x720, Compressed. 128 frames, 7 fps (00:18). Ver15, AS3. Network access: Text: Yes. Bitmaps: Audio: Video: <METADATA> [find in archive]
>> Anon 32684 >those feet
>> Anon 32687 >implying gem clothing isn't literally a part of their bodies >implying she doesn't have to shapeshift instead of undressing >implying she actually has naughty bits under there by default fucking TRIGGERED
>> Anon 32690 >># sperglord
>> Anon 32692 >># another piece of stevenfag autism, Jesus Christ
>> Anon 32780 I love how he made it a teaser to lure people to his site even though it's complete garbage and literally nobody apart from severely autistic faggots like >># want to see the rest of it
>> Anon 32788 This is pretty much the second best smut SU flash we have, although it isn't saying much consider there are only 3 of them as far as I'm aware.
>> Anon 32828 >># tbh it's pretty good that there are only 2 pieces for the tremendous amount of followers
>> Anon 32829 >># you can just stumble right back into the hole this shit came from.
>> Anon 32841 >># that's like seal fins or something... then again, the author may have tried to draw a likeness of his hands, similarly fused due to how much he jerks off to STEVEN UNIVERSE
>> Anon 32842 >># I lol'd, well played.
>> Anon 32865 >># What are the other 2?
>> Anon 32871 >># You don't wanna know. Trust me.
>> Anon 32880 >># http://get.swfchan.org/8204/beef%20curta ins.swf.html http://www.hentai-foundry.com/pictures/u ser/Area/405391/Fusion To be fair one of them has decent quality and pretty fappable if you're into size difference space lesbianism, although the better version is behind a pay wall. Let me know if you guys know more.
>> Anon 32881 >># Also there's the Peri bj one on NG and the Garnet ass spread on HF but they aren't worth the time.
>> Anon 32908 >># >># And these two edits of a minus8 flash. http://get.swfchan.org/8754%2FMinus8%20P earl.swf http://swfchan.com/38/189930/?Minus8+sex _with_rocks.swf

File: not_new_pearl.swf-(7.44 MB, 500x700, Porn)
[_] Anon 3075184
>> [_] Anon 3075188 Marvelous
>> [_] Anon 3075236 damn, not bad at all minus8
>> [_] Anon 3075254 >># it's an edit

File: not_new_pearl.swf-(7.44 MB, 500x700, Porn)
[_] More -8 Cida90K 3058255 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3058307 niceeee, who made this?
>> [_] Anon 3058308 What the fuck is wrong with her eyes
>> [_] Anon 3058309 >># I'm guessing she's mega-high
>> [_] Anon 3058316 can't believe how quickly this shit got old. 10r.swf, and suddenly everyone's doing it, and it's boring.
>> [_] Anon 3058319 >># What do you mean "10r.swf"
>> [_] Anon 3058320 >># steven universe shit? thank god this is just a horrible edit and not actually -8's doing. I'd honestly be pretty butthurt if someone did this to my flash. I bet you didn't even fucking get permission.
>> [_] Anon 3058354 >># He still made a homestuck thing tho
>> [_] Anon 3058365 This doesn't work for Pearl and is not well done to begin with
>> [_] Anon 3058371 >># homestuck isn't even 1/10th as autistic as steven universe tho
>> [_] Anon 3058376 >># Steven Universe is a great socially progressive kids show and enforces the idea that gender is performative. Homestuck and its fandom are genuinely awful.
>> [_] Anon 3058398 Can someone extract audio please
>> [_] Anon 3058399 >># seconding request for song sauce
>> [_] Anon 3058402 >># >a great socially progressive kids show >socially progressive kids show >progressive kids show remember when kids show just did things for fun (and money) and wasn't trying to standardize a social norm through children with one of their main sources of entertainment as the medium...
>> [_] Anon 3058408 >># old man yells at sky
>> [_] Anon 3058409 >># I really like the facial expressions on this and now I want the original, whats the name of the original? I checked "10r.swf" but got -8's Rythm Heaven one on swf.chan, not this
>> [_] Anon 3058418 >># I don't know... they're about neck-and-neck desu >># SU is blatantly lesbian-feminazi, and marginalizes male roles. At least Homefuck is simple tripe.

/ > /fap/ > Thread 8754 Age: 80.13d Health: 0% Posters: 54 Posts: 109 Replies: 86 Files: 1+3
>> Anon 30235 [IMG] Minus8 Pearl.swf (7.44 MiB) 500x700, Compressed. 2 frames, 30 fps (00:00). Ver10, AS1/AS2. Network access: Text: Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Video: <METADATA> [find in archive]
>> Anon 30236 Ok this DEFINITELY needs a seeker version. Dayumm.
>> Anon 30237 >># Also the nose should be moved a slight to the left.
>> Anon 30239 Reskins,reskins as far as the eye can see my boy. Although,i was expecting this to be much worse,good job.
>> Anon 30240 >Pearl Aww... I was thinking about the little girl from Phoenix Wright... what a letdown.
>> Anon 30259 Not bad. Could use a seeker version though
>> Anon 30261 >># Fucking lol'd! Great work! Looks good. Femnazis need to see this. On the subject of Steven Universe, I heard they tried to sneak some lesbianism in it (just dancing) but the scene was cut away in UK. Of course the SJW were outraged. They are such hypocrites; everything needs to be censored to not be offensive but don't anyone dare to censor them. UK is just trying to make sure kids have a chance to grow up and be normal, like any responsible parent should. If the kid then actually want to break the norm in the teens it's up to him/her to make that decision.
>> Anon 30293 >># What the fucking shit are you even on about? Being gay is not a choice. Seeing gay people in your youth will not turn you into a gay adult, you fucking faggot.
>> Anon 30296 >># People can be conditioned to be gay. It happens to children who have two mothers/fathers. They lack a parent figure in these families that will cause them to crave that figure A boy growing up with two mothers will become gay. A girl growing up with two fathers will become gay.
>> The guy who made this 30299 >># >seeker version What a that? I'm will be redoing this flash in the future, hopefully by the end of this week. I need a way to get rid of those fucking annoying lines. I have no experience in flash or drawing so it was a bitch to make, fun but a bitch. Any suggestions of what programs i should use? All i used was that free JEPEX decomplier to export and import .pngs and photoshop to edit them, it was a lot of trail and error. Honestly did not expect to see with in the top of the list. Glad some of you like it :^)
>> Anon 30308 >># You've gone full potato friendo.
>> Anon 30312 >># He isn't all wrong... Prostitutes/porn-stars mostly had no father figure as well. That's a well known fact in the industry. Obviously you can't generalize this. It doesn't happen to every single one, but it makes it more likely. I can see this happen this way with gay couples as well. But since this is only allowed recently we have no data on this to prove or disprove it directly.
>> Anon 30317 >># >Being gay is not a choice Remember that when you bash a Pedophile or a Necrophiliac or a Rapist It's not a choice. Being fat isn't a choice either... We're in 2016, we don't have to own up to any responsibility for our own actions anymore.
>> Anon 30320 >># And now you're just intentionally being retarded.
>> Anon 30321 >># Nope. How does Homophilia differ from Pedophilia or Necrophilia then? "It's bad/sick/disgusting" isn't an argument, that's exactly what anti-gay people think about gays. If Homophilia ISN'T a choice, neither are the others. If Necrophilia IS a choice, then so are the others. Nothing wrong with being gay, but stop the fucking "It wasn't my choice" excuses. Just own up to your choice. I chose to be Heterosexual.
>> Anon 30322 >># https://youtu.be/oAKG-kbKeIo
>> Anon 30323 >># >nanananananananananananana Am I being an inconvenience? "I have nothing to do with it it's my genes, there's really nothing I can do" Grow a pair of balls and a sense of self-worth.
>> Anon 30324 >># Yes, you just choose the stuff you are attracted to. I hope everybody gets this, if you have some sexual preference, IT'S YOUR CHOICE. It has nothing to do with genes. You can't be just attracted to boys or girls, you have being CONDITIONED to be attracted to either. >>>>>>NURTURENATURE So is being a fucking loser, as you can see in this thread. I hope all the politic talk adds to your fapping to animated pixels experience, be it male pixels or female pixels.
>> Anon 30325 If you guys want to talk about politics, why don't you do it with friends, foes, and families in real life, or in some dedicated political discussion sites? Do you expect anyone to take your opinion seriously in some animated drawn porn thread? Are you all fucking stupid?
>> Anon 30326 The edit is decent. Anon 1 is right, a seeker ver. would do wonder, because the fucked silly face in the original and this one are the most enjoyable, but doesn't last long. The hair can use some rework, the rugged edge doesn't bind with the rest of dandy line work really well. She can lose that wand for a spear. Also, in all honesty, Pearl is a plank, she can drop some of them big boobs. But again very nice work, the flash works on SU is amazingly scarce, so anything, even beef curtain I would say, is a nice addition to the flash parodies.
>> Anon 30330 >># Cut me some slack I didn't choose to have this discussion on this Mongolian pottery forum. My genes forced me to do it.
>> Anon 30336 Holy shit it turned into stupid town in here.
>> Anon 30340 >># >turned into this isn't worse than the replies to the "color fixed" flashes earlier this month
>> Anon 30352 >># this is nothing compared to Youtube comments, where morons hang out in common section, even worse shit like Tumblr or 4chan
>> Anon 30353 I was thinking of fixing this up and making it have a seekbar, but upon closer inspection I found that the guy who edited this replaced a bunch of vector shapes with shitty aliased bitmaps (which would explain some of the line problems and how this looks bad zoomed in). I ain't really in the mood to fix this unless someone knows how to get the color code from a bitmap fast and easy like #0000FF (blue).
>> Anon 30355 GOD FUCKING DAMMIT PEOPLE! This was gonna be a decent thread, but then someone had to start talking about homosexuality/pedophilia/niggers in a thread that has nothing to do with them. This kind of derailment is what I'd expect of a Youtube comment section, not a fucking Vietnamese comic book imageboard. For fuck's sake, just shut the fuck up and fap you bunch of cunts.
>> Anon 30356 >># shame really. But I guess SWFchan is reserved for trolls and retards.
>> Anon 30359 >Out for 2.5 years, still no good swfs made I lol'd also this version is better than the original by a vast margin
>> Anon 30372 >># What are you using to make the seeker?
>> Anon 30373 >># I would take the seekable version that is up right now, extract the internal SWF using flashbulb, change the assets through swfdecompiler, and reinsert that back into the original flash with flashbulb. That is how you edit the seeker version I might try doing to the pearl one here sometime later, but I only have paint (cant use paint.net because I don't have SP1) so I will have to use the RGB values. Kinda annoying cause I would have to extract each and every bitmap, then open them up in paint and then I would get the colors.
>> Anon 30379 >># I'm the retard that did that. Im redoing the flash and changing all the bitmaps into .svg files with vectors so they dont look so bad when the camera zooms in. Thanks for sharing the programs you use, only thing i used was JPEXS, and the reason i had to use .pngs because i didnt know better.
>> Anon 30381 >># No problem. I was actually in the middle of editing the flash and changing parts I could into pearl. However I have no art skills, nor do I have any way to make vector art so i couldn't replace things like the hair and face (really all I can do is just color and delete things). I will wait on your revised flash before I continue working again (if you can't do the seeker version). As for how you can make the seeker version yourself, you can do the following. 1, Grab and run Flashbulb 2. grab http://swfchan.org/8702/ 3. open the flash in flashbulb 4. A few entries should pop on the left side. 5. Left click "1 DefineBinaryID...." 6. There are two sets of little green buttons. We will only be using the ones of the left side. click on the big green triangle Pointing to the right/the center pane (if you hover your mouse over it, it should say "edit tag"). 7. On the center pane should say "internal swf file". 8. Hit export. It will save the flash with the extention .bin Just rename it to .swf and it will play properly. The flash is about 16 megs 9. You can edit this like the pearl flash you edited. 10. Once you are done editing. Head back into flashbulb 11. If you didn't leave it on, you need to repeat steps 1-7. 12. This time hit import. Select your edited flash. 13. Now this is important. Above the LEFT red X is a big green triangle pointing to the LEFT. on hover it should say "overwrite tag". Click this 14. This is also important. Go to file->SAVE AS 15. Save your new flash. I recommend you don't overwrite the old one in case you broke something. 16. Run your new flash and it should work as long you didn't change frame numbers or anything like that. I hope that helps.
>> Anon 30382 >># Forgot to mention, but I have found that at least one of the messed up lines in the flash is because there is a black outline on one of the clouds you replaced with a bitmap. If you either simply edit the color of the original,or make proper vector art, it should fix those line problems.
>> Anon 30385 There are a metric fuckton of loops in this.
>> Anon 30392 >># I don't bash those people, personally. I think they have a very unfortunate sexual attraction in that they are attracted to things that can never give consent. Corpses and children cannot give consent.
>> Anon 30399 >># >Being gay is not a choice. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAAHAHAHHAHAAH DIE, YOU FUCKING FAGGOT. If homosexuality is comparable to infertility, then it is a disability. If homosexuality is comparable to straight people engaging in oral sex, then it is a fetish. If homosexuality is comparable to friendships with the same gender, why do they have sex? If homosexuality is safe, why do homosexuals spread the most STDs and literally tear apart each others’ sphincters? If homosexuality is a valid means of romantic bonding, why does nature disallow them reproduction? If homosexual “love” is as pure as natural love, why are gays so much more promiscuous? If there is nothing inherently wrong with being a homosexual, why would an entirely homosexual society cease to exist beyond a single generation? Degenerates and liberals will take you on a wild chase through fallacious logic and appeals to emotion, but at the end of the day, the truth has always been our very first thought as children when we saw gays. ERROR. Errors occur in nature all the time, and homosexuality is a perfect example of error. Somewhere in the brain of every homosexual a critical error has occurred. In what other situation is an error encouraged or rewarded as it is in homosexuality in today’s media? You may ask yourself how this error affects you. The answer is simple. Homosexuality, despite what you are told to believe, can be indoctrinated. Why do you think the rate of children who “turn out” gay skyrockets in the presence of gay “parents”?
>> Anon 30416 >># tl;dr homosexuality still not a choice
>> Anon 30417 >># you might want to watch out a little and not make him feel too stupid
>> Anon 30418 >it's a bigots bitch about homosexuality while ignoring the cool flash thread shiggy diggy doo
>> Anon 30424 If beeing gay would be a choice I'd be gay by now so I don't have to deal with woman and their bullshit. Since it's not I'm stuck with the bullshit. >># >[...]Why do you think the rate of children who “turn out” gay skyrockets in the presence of gay “parents”? This MIGHT be true, but please show me any kind of statistic concerning this. The thing is: As of now there is no statistic for this, so we don't know if it's true or not. Further disscussions regarding this issue are simply pointless... yet every idiot here is posting his opinion on the matter as if it were an absolute truth. As a matter of fact: Sexuality is something you are either born with or something you 'learn' over the early years of your life. We don't know which of these it is. I think it might be a combination out of the two. But it definitely is not a choice. Same goes for Pedophiles and Necrophiles, but not for Rapists. That's an entirely different thing.
>> Anon 30432 >"People" actually believe that homophilia is not a mental disease
>> Anon 30433 >"People" actually believe that homophilia is not a mental disease/disorder
>> Anon 30436 >># >># Look at you, double posting like a noob. So adorable.
>> Anon 30456 >># >># Look at you, double posting like a noob. So adorable.
>> Anon 30474 Homosexuality isn't a choice, but it is fucking disgusting and wrong. Little kids shouldn't be exposed to that shit.
>> Anon 30475 >monster tits on pearl DELETE THIS
>> Anon 30480 >># Homosexuality is a choice because it has a cure. Saying that homosexuality is not a choice is like saying having syphilis is not a choice while there is a treatment for that (penicillin).
>> Anon 30485 >># >Homosexuality is a choice because it has a cure. Now you went full retard. Never go full retard.
>> Anon 30487 >># Mental disorders can be treated.
>> Anon 30489 >># >># >homosexuality is a disease By that logic, coming into contact with homosexual people would make you homosexual. It is obviously not a physical phenomenon. >homosexuality is a mental disorder This implies that those "suffering" from the homosexual "disorder" are to some level either in pain or at least experience a degree of discomfort, which is not the case. Your discomfort doesn't count, by the way, though the behavioral patterns and symptoms you exhibit would mark you down for a number of psychological disorders. >homosexuality has a cure It doesn't need a cure because it is not a disease. Again, to qualify as a disease, the source has to cause some level of discomfort, pain, or threaten life. It's right there in the word: dis--ease. >homosexuality is a choice How, then, do some members of the 120 odd (mostly mammal) other species choose to be homosexual? Analyzing your surroundings, rather than merely perceiving them, is a skill reserved for human beings. Making choices based on logic, rather than instinct, more so. >homosexuality is a choice because it has a cure Your reasoning is flawed to say the least. Even if it were true, according to your statement, influenza is also a choice because it has a cure. Headaches, you guessed it, are a choice. And cancer? Sure, that's a choice, too. It is well known that only people who want to get cancer actually get cancer. Homosexuality is not learned behavior, nor is there any existing data that would support this point of view. Your likes and dislikes, however, are for all intents and purposes facsimile of the environment you were raised in; i.e. learned behavior. Stating your personal tastes as fact does not make them so. Unless you can provide credible sources that support your statements, stop spouting nonsense.
>> Anon 30495 >># >By that logic, coming into contact with homosexual people would make you homosexual. It increases your likelihood, yes. (But you'll disregard that as anecdotal or unproven research) >This implies that those "suffering" from the homosexual "disorder" are to some level either in pain or at least experience a degree of discomfort, which is not the case. Mental discomfort and "suffering" is pretty common, according to gays. (But you'll disregard that as society's fault for not embracing gays enough) >It doesn't need a cure because it is not a disease. >the source has to cause some level of discomfort, pain, or threaten life. As above. (=||=) >Analyzing your surroundings, rather than merely perceiving them, is a skill reserved for human beings. That is currently and has been, up for debate for a lot of years now. Many mammals do that as an integral part of their daily life. (But you'll disregard with "citation needed") >according to your statement, influenza is also a choice because it has a cure. Yes. Not getting cured is a choice. (But you will disregard this as me attacking the strawman) >Homosexuality is not learned behavior, nor is there any existing data that would support this point of view. That means that children can't learn their sexuality from others, which in turn blows a gaping hole in the side of the "Kids can't give consent, because they don't understand sexuality" debate How can a person with a self-perception/self-understanding deemed low enough that they can't be given the "right" to control and understand their own bodies be gay if it isn't learned/taught behaviour? And no... I'm not saying we should fuck children...
>> sage 30498 sage >># >HURR IT NO CHOICE BECAUSE I SAY SO Except you were proven wrong already, faggot. >># >there is no statistic Every study ever done. http://www.mafamily.org/wp-content/uploa ds/2012/06/Same-sex-statistics.jpg >Sexuality is something you are either born with or something you ‘learn’ over the early years of your life. Oh, so you even admit that you were lying when you said you were born with it. >We don’t know which of these it is. We know exactly which it is. >I think it might be a combination out of the two. Everyone on Earth is born straight but can be turned into a faggot, yes. >But it definitely is not a choice. It’s a choice, you worthless sack of illiterate shit. >Same goes for Pedophiles and Necrophiles, but not for Rapists. That’s an entirely different thing. Now you’re just trolling. >># It’s a choice, you fucking retard. >># >By that logic, coming into contact with homosexual people would make you homosexual. Faggots are generally infected with toxoplasma gondii, so yeah, that’s a valid statement to make. >It is obviously not a physical phenomenon. >HURRRRRR BECAUSE I SAY SO >This implies that those "suffering" from the homosexual "disorder" are to some level either in pain or at least experience a degree of discomfort, which is not the case. >HURRRRRR BECAUSE I SAY SO 73% of psychiatrists say homosexuals are less happy than the average person, and of those psychiatrists, 70% say that the unhappiness is NOT due to social stigmatization. Source: Lief, H. Sexual Survey Number 4: Current Thinking on Homosexuality, Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, 1977, pp. 110-11. Kill yourself, queer apologist. >It doesn’t need a cure So you admit there IS one. >because it is not a disease. It is definitionally a disease. >Again, to qualify as a disease, the source has to cause some level of discomfort, pain, or threaten life. Guess what faggotry does. >members of the 120 odd (mostly mammal) other species choose to be homosexual? Because they’re not faggots. That they engage in faggoty behavior isn’t the same as human faggotry. Animal faggotry is done as a display of dominance. There are no faggot couples. There are no faggot partners. There are no faggot pairings. BECAUSE THAT MEANS THE END OF THE FUCKING GENETIC LINE. There are ZERO faggot animals that don’t then go and impregnate females. >Analyzing your surroundings, rather than merely perceiving them, is a skill reserved for human beings. Making choices based on logic, rather than instinct, more so. And yet you think that faggots are okay, despite claiming that humans are MORE than just their surroundings. >Homosexuality is not learned behavior Explicitly proven to be learned. >nor is there any existing data that would support this point of view. >HURRRRRR BECAUSE I SAY SO Okay.
>> Anon 30502 >># Holy fuck! So much bullshit in this wall of text... I'll just pick the most obvious bullshit adressed at me and leave it at it. >Oh, so you even admit that you were lying when you said you were born with it. I'm not the same poster. Or you read me wrong. I don't really care which. >Everyone on Earth is born straight but can be turned into a faggot, yes. Actually it's proven that the latest boy born in a big family is more likely to be gay because of antibodies released during pregnancy. The more boys the mother had before, the more likely it is he'll be gay because of this. In other words: It's hormones. Since you can't control your hormones, it's not a choice... >That they engage in faggoty behavior isn’t the same as human faggotry. Animal faggotry is done as a display of dominance. There are no faggot couples. There ARE gay animal couples, most prominent storks and penguins. The only valuable thing you posted was the statistic jpg. I honestly didn't know something like that was done. Everything else you wrote was simply homophobe bullcrap and insulting gibberish.
>> Anon 30503 >># Statistics are fun, particularly if you don't read up on the details. In the one you quote, the sample size entails 15.000 adults, 250 of whom reported that, at some point in their upbringing, they had one parent in a same-sex relationship. Suddenly, those percentages don't seem at all impressive. The creator of the study also has this to say: >People gay or straight should stick with their partners. I think the study provides evidence of that. Furthermore, if you believe you can counter my points with "hurr because I say so" and then do exactly that, you are more deranged than I initially assumed. Btw >Current Thinking on Homosexuality >1977 pick one
>> Anon 30506 >Homosexuality is NOT a mental disorder >implying
>> Anon 30507 >># Silly anon SJWs would have outraged anyway because of what the little I know about of this Tumblr infected cartoon and their reaction it would be that they'd rage over anything that doesn't support the idea of these gem characters being genderqueer or trannys or whatever the fuck which means cis lesbians are problematic to their cause and very triggering.
>> Anon 30520 >># Well, at the very least, you're being civil about it, so I don't feel like talking to a potato. >It increases your likelihood, yes. Again, based on the assumption that it is a disease. Which, in turn, would imply, that there is some kind of agent or pathogen enabling transmission. Also, if you state something as factual, you should have solid proof. >Mental discomfort and "suffering" is pretty common, according to gays. I was speaking of the discomfort as a direct result of homosexuality, which you believe is a disorder or disease (they are not synonyms, btw.) I was not alluding to the discomfort and suffering caused by social ostracism and stigmata; which, though related, is a different subject. >That is currently and has been, up for debate for a lot of years now. That is quite true, and it is also quite true that you've completely ignored the sentence that followed: >Making choices based on logic, rather than instinct, more so. This statement refocuses the previous argument. I do believe that logic is not only reserved for but also invented by human beings. Though some mammal species analyze their surroundings to some degree, it is not clear whether this form of pattern recognition, retaining, and re-application is instinctual or not. Logic, as is the point here, is not born of instinctual behavior. >Yes. Not getting cured is a choice. The problem here is not a strawman fallacy but the application of circular logic. You assume homosexuality is a disease/diseases can be cured/receiving treatment is a choice (talk to me again if you ever suffer from a life-threatening disease about choice, but I digress)/hence homosexuality is a choice. You did not prove anything but rather worked around the burden of proof. And, I'll say it again, you have yet to conclusively prove that homosexuality is a disease. Moreover, I find it very interesting that you think becoming infected with influenza is a choice. >That means that children can't learn their sexuality from others [...] This is where it gets interesting. We can either assume that children are basically blanks that become infused with a copy of whichever environment is present during infant and later learning stages or that the general direction of their development is pre-ordained by their genetic imprint. The truth is likely found somewhere in the middle of the two extremes; some forms of behavior, particularly social adjustment, personal tastes, likes and dislikes, religious and political alignment ... the list goes on ... are certainly learned and taught through action or inaction, i.e. some areas will receive more attention than others (consider liberalism v. conservatism, for example.) Sexual alignment, if you will, and behavior are more difficult to teach, learn, and copy by and from parents due to the fact that, even in very liberal households, sexuality is often a topic of taboo and discomfort if it has to be discussed. Hence, the direct peers in your developmental group are a more likely source of sexual experience and experimenting than your antecedents. Think back to your highschool days and see if you cannot agree a little. Moreover, if we assume that sexual behavior is definitely learned, then, following that strain of logic, only children of same-sex parents would become homosexual, only children of pedophiliac parents would become pedophiles, and only children of necrophiliac parents would become necrophiles. There are, of course, magnitudes of difference there, and I do not wish to put all of them in the same basket, but they are sexual alignments, after all, as is heterosexuality. If we assume that sexual behavior is learned through other sources, besides parents, modern forms of media come to mind. But, that would also entail that homosexuality is a modern phenomenon, which it is clearly not. It is merely discussed today to a greater extent than in the centuries prior. Developmentally speaking, the biggest source for learned and copied sexual behavior are the direct peers of a child. Consider for example how children "play house" or "play doctor." Those pastimes, if you will, are forms of exploration and confirmation vis-à-vis, though of course not exclusively, sexuality, nor is the first time you fingerbang a girl in highschool anything less or anything else. If we speak of sexuality, we should not disregard the strength of behavioral auto-replication, or learning by doing, if you will. After all, the process of analysis, comparison, experimentation, and re-evaluation seems to be at the core of human singularity, genetically even. So, in conclusion, keeping the points above in mind, sexuality is not exactly learned (in the sense of taught) behavior but rather auto-replicated through experimentation, observation, and re-affirmation (i.e. communicating sexual experiences to peers.) That last point is also one of the major issues leading to "sexual confusion" exploited by the people who promise a so-called "cure." The pressure to fit in is often greater than the freedom to express individuality (unless you were a jock, the feeling should be familiar,) and affirmation and confirmation by peers thusly a one-track experience. Now, it is still early in the morning, and I do hope I didn't ramble too much. My brain is still booting up in a sense, so forgive me if I digress at times.
>> Anon 30523 >># You seem to be quite educated in that field. I'm impressed, especially by the last paragraph you wrote. You don't happen to study psychology or magisterium, do you?
>> Anon 30524 >># ugh... my ip changed again... I'm anon Y and AD.
>> Anon 30526 >># I can't seem to post my reply. I apologize in advance for any double/triple/quintupleposts I'll make.
>> Anon 30541 >># >since schizophrenia, Alzheimer, Parkinson has no pathogen then it means is not a mental disease Also homophilia enters in the definition of mental disorder. "A mental disorder, also called a mental illness, is a diagnosis of a behavioral or mental pattern that causes either suffering or a poor ability to function in ordinary life." Are you going to say that homophiles are mental sane and stable human beings?
>> Anon 30542 Seriously, when did Tumblr take over this site? All of these whiny faggots in here crying because they got their gay feelings hurt. I bet you cucks also support Muslim immigration in Europe.
>> Anon 30552 >># >gay feelings >cucks >Muslim immigration You forgot to mention that we are also against populating mars and for the regulation of garden watering equipment... Seriously, what has one thing to do with the other? It's like saying you are a french vegan and therefore know kung-fu, it makes no sense whatsoever. Also the only ones whining here are the homophobe idiots with their circular 'hurr durr' arguments, mainly Anon W, and speaking about 'gay feelings' is childish at best. How you manage to throw cucks(?) and muslims in there baffles me. If you mean 'feminazis': These people are the worst and apparently actively trying to destroy society. I actually think most 'feminazis' should be thrown in jail for sedition. -I'm perfectly straight and I didn't choose to be that either. In fact I think beeing gay would be much easier, but I can't just snap my fingers and be gay, that's not how it works. Could it be because it's not a choice? No, impossible, that would clash with your world views.. get a grip, man. And just because I'm not gay doesn't mean I should look down on people who are. I can still treat gay people like any other human. What they do in private doesn't affect me at all. How sexually insecure do you need to be to attack these people just to feel better about yourself? -A quick search on 'cuck' makes me wish I didn't... weirdest shit I've seen in quite some time. Other people might call this a fetish... I think it's disgusting. However, that's just my opinion and I'm not pointing at people who do this. Why should I? And why would you use this as an insult? What is wrong with you? -A good chunk of mulsims doesn't want to be integrated and therefore should go fuck themselves. A lot of problems we have in europe comes from the difference in culture (not religion) between europeans and muslim immigrants. Politics refuses to do something about this because they don't want to appear as racists and, ironically, that's why right wing political partys gain so much votes. Politics was too far left for too long and now the population is simply fed up with this crap. Sadly politics these days only know extremes. Left or Right. Any other bullshit?
>> Anon 30555 >># You are correct; they are mental disorders. Well, schizophrenia is, but more on that later. Disorder and disease are not synonyms. I have emphasized this. They are not synonyms for good reasons, a disease requires some sort of pathogen, agent, or physiological degredation causing distress, illness, or even death in the host as part of the pathogen's reproductive cycle (or the degeneration of tissue, naturally,) which is disruptive to the normal functioning of the host or host systems. Homophilia is not the same as homosexuality though the etymological roots might betray differently. Homophilia has Greek roots. Homo meaning "of one and the same" and philia "of brotherly love." One could say this is a case of composite tautology. The word homosexuality has both Greek and Latin roots: Homo as above and sexuality from Latin sexus, which means either male or female, or simply gender. In both cases, the etymological roots, linguistically, point to an attraction towards the same gender; however, today homophilia commonly refers to the attraction towards homosexuality or the attractiveness of the idea of homosexuality (among others; there are several groups, who prefer different definitions) whereas homosexuality means sexual orientation towards the same gender. So far to clear up any linguistic confusion. The DSM-5 lists neither homophilia nor homosexuality as a mental disorder. I believe the American Psychological Association, as one of the largest, if not the largest period, organizations in the field of psychology should have pretty good insight into the issue. That is not to say that they didn't come a long way as well. As a matter of fact, homosexuality had been included in the DSM until 1973. It goes to show that even persons of great learning are not warded from ignorance. Last but not least, your definition is flawed as it does not consider the source of functioning or distress, which is external rather than internal with respect to homosexuality. To use your examples, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, they are neurological dysfunctions caused by a degeneration of affected cerebral matter. The distress these horrific diseases cause is internal, and we--as an educated and empathetic society--try to help alleviate the pain of those suffering (Alzheimer's, contrary to popular believe, causes more than just memory loss, btw) so as not to add external pressures on top of the internal. In this case, psychological and physiological pain are the direct result of the disease affecting the brain (both matter and function) of affected individuals. [Notice how they are called diseases because they have neurological, i.e. physical, causes. I am reiterating this point just in case.] The distress or discomfort that emerges due to dealing with the bias, aggression, and stigmata generated and exhibited by certain parts of the population towards homosexual or homophiliac people is first external; and then--as a psychological extension in a system of positive reinforcement (i.e. "the more x, the more y")--internalized. Particularly, during critical developmental stages, such as puberty, the psychological ramifications can be great. Depending on the willpower, social adjustment, and support of and received by the individual in question, certain mental disorders (such as social anxiety disorders or depression) may--yes, that means perhaps they will, perhaps they won't--surface or resurface during (later) developmental stages (diagnostics during puberty are often more difficult due to the already present hormonal upheaval.) Again, the aforementioned is not a direct result of the sexual orientation (i.e. homosexuality as a state of being or as integral sexual identity) of the individual, but the outcome of societal, familial, religious, etc. pressures, ostracism, and hostility experienced during the critical stages--if they are experienced, naturally. A person, no matter the sexual orientation, who grows up in a stable environment is by magnitudes less likely to develop any sort of mental disorder (hereditary transmission of certain disorders notwithstanding, but that, as per usual, is a different subject.) In this regard, homosexual persons are no different from persons, who suffer through similar experiences due to their ethnicity, gender, intelligence, chromosomal disadvantages, body types, class and station, etc. Nor is the resulting distress in any way unique. To give but one example, a very affluent businessman, who loses his job, bank account, and house over night may consider suicide caused by the drastic psychological (and maybe even physiological) turbulence. >># Thank you. You would probably be surprised upon hearing that I have studied Anglistics or English Language and Literature (and failed to graduate rather spectacularly.) Psychology, psychological development, and basically the brain, however, have always been areas of fascination for me. Fortunately, any number of sources on any subject, today, are readily available at your fingertips. I could ramble on, but the wall of text is large enough as it is.
>> Anon 30566 Personally, all I want is a recolour of the original so it's not a futa. (Removing the tits, ofc.) Maybe keep pearl's tits small, too.
>> Anon 30567 Can't we all just talk about Pearl's ass instead of all this fierce debate on homosexuality?
>> Anon 30585 >># I cannot concur with your opinion about how homophiliacs experience their mental distress by the exterior instead of the interior.
>> Anon 30592 >># you are on the internet, on a flash board, and want to discuss the actual post? Blasphemy!
>> Anon 30847 But what if his... Penis... gets in the way?
>> Anon 30853 >/pol/ shitting even here on /fap/ Seriously, these fuckos are even worse, more annoying and more bigoted than SWJs. At least, SWJs stay on tumblr or whereelse they don't botter me. I don't find them preaching about 'muh morals, social degeneracy' in my fucking porn.
>> Anon 30890 >># Steven's PEEEEENIS
>> Anon 30893 >># >Actually it’s proven that the latest boy born in a big family is more likely to be gay because of antibodies released during pregnancy. Look at all those sources... >Since you can’t control your hormones, it’s not a choice... Holy shit, you’re a complete retard. >homophobe I don’t fear faggots. I hate them. I insult them because they are mentally defective. Something isn’t gibberish because you don’t understand it. Try again. >># >LOL IT’S OLD THAT MEANS IT’S WRONG >LOL THE SAMPLE SIZE IS SMALL THAT MEANS IT’S WRONG >LOL I DON’T LIKE THE SOURCE THAT MEANS IT’S WRONG Have an actual argument, queerlover. >># >The DSM-5 lists neither homophilia nor homosexuality as a mental disorder. I believe the American Psychological Association, as one of the largest, if not the largest period, organizations in the field of psychology should have pretty good insight into the issue. 1. HURR DURR APPEAL TO AUTHORITY. 2. The APA was threatened with the death of their family members if they didn’t remove faggotry from the list in the 1970s, you useless sack of historical illiteracy. DSM-I is the only medically valid book.
>> Anon 30918 >># You must be tired moving those goalposts around so much.
>> Anon 30938 >># That’s my line, queer. You’ve yet to have an argument. I’ve blown you the fuck out every time you came up with something new.
>> Anon 30954 >># >Look at all those sources... fine.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfBOGXFk C8c I don't really like this one because it shows a rather negative image of christians, who have absolutley nothing to do with the matter, in a ridiculous passive aggressive way, but it's the quickest I could find. >>Since you can’t control your hormones, it’s not a choice... >Holy shit, you’re a complete retard. Did you skip biology in class or didn't you go to school at all? The only way you can influence your hormones is by working out which will trigger an increased production of testosterone and that's pretty much it. If we want to be super nit-picky: You can increase the amount of adrenaline in your blood by putting yourself in danger... woohoo... >I don’t fear faggots. I hate them. I insult them because they are mentally defective. Insult yourself then. >LOL IT’S OLD THAT MEANS IT’S WRONG We once thought the sun orbits the earth. But hey, just because it's old doesn't mean it' wrong, right? You better avoid taking the train as well. When locomotives were first developed renowned scientists said that the high speed (about 60 km/h) would drain the air out of the cabins so everyone inside would suffocate. I think you had not enough oxygen as an embryo... >LOL THE SAMPLE SIZE IS SMALL THAT MEANS IT’S WRONG The sample size was small and handpicked. If I go to a ghetto and make a statistic about wealth, suddenly 100% of the population is poor... >LOL I DON’T LIKE THE SOURCE THAT MEANS IT’S WRONG I don't like you because you are an idiot. >The APA was threatened with the death of their family members if they didn’t remove faggotry from the list in the 1970s, you useless sack of historical illiteracy. Oh goody! Look at all these sources! Oh.. wait.. You are literally the most stupid person I've ever had a conversation with.
>> Anon 31004 >># Listen here cumslut, I'm not even the guy you've been trying to argue with. I wouldn't waste my time trying to correct some retard on the internet that can't even notice the letters next to the post numbers that act as a pseudo ID for posters. Unless mine has changed for some reason, I've been "I". Furthermore, you haven't blown anything but a lot of hot air. But please, do keep thinking you have some sort of moral high ground. It helps show you for the subhuman scumbag you actually are.
>> Anon 31021 >># If homosexuality is comparable to infertility, then it is a disability. If homosexuality is comparable to straight people engaging in oral sex, then it is a fetish. If homosexuality is comparable to friendships with the same gender, why do they have sex? If homosexuality is safe, why do homosexuals spread the most STDs and literally tear apart each others’ sphincters? If homosexuality is a valid means of romantic bonding, why does nature disallow them reproduction? If homosexual “love” is as pure as natural love, why are gays so much more promiscuous? If there is nothing inherently wrong with being a homosexual, why would an entirely homosexual society cease to exist beyond a single generation? Degenerates and liberals will take you on a wild chase through fallacious logic and appeals to emotion, but at the end of the day, the truth has always been our very first thought as children when we saw gays. ERROR. Errors occur in nature all the time, and homosexuality is a perfect example of error. Somewhere in the brain of every homosexual a critical error has occurred. In what other situation is an error encouraged or rewarded as it is in homosexuality in today’s media? You may ask yourself how this error affects you. The answer is simple. Homosexuality, despite what you are told to believe, can be indoctrinated. Why do you think the rate of children who “turn out” gay skyrockets in the presence of gay “parents”? >Did you skip biology in class or didn’t you go to school at all? Either you can control your hormones and faggotry (and trannies) can be cured or you can’t control them and trannies don’t exist. Which is it, you fucking retard? >Insult yourself then. Sick burn, man. I am blown the fuck out now. >But hey, just because it’s old doesn’t mean it' wrong, right? >LOL I’LL SUPPORT MY FALLACY BY USING THE INVERSE OF THE FALLACY THAT WILL SHOW HIM lol >The sample size was small and handpicked. A study about faggots only studied faggots, which make up 0.8% of the population, and you’re surprised it’s a small study? >If I go to a ghetto and make a statistic about wealth, suddenly 100% of the population is poor... If you’re specifically doing a study OF THE GHETTO, yeah, they probably are. You seem to miss the point of a study about faggots. >I don’t like you because you are an idiot. And yet you have zero evidence of this, as well as zero evidence to back your claim that queers are normal or acceptable.
>> Anon 31022 >># Continued because of invisible character limit. >Oh.. wait.. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, also known as the DSM, is the official list of mental disorders to which all mental health professionals refer when diagnosing patient. The first version, released in 1952, listed homosexuality as a sociopathic personality disturbance. In 1968, the second version (DSM II) reclassified homosexuality as a sexual deviancy. Soon afterward, gay protesters began picketing at the APA's annual conventions, demanding that homosexuality be removed from the list completely. In 1973, after intensive debate and numerous disturbances by gay activist, the APA decided to remove homosexuality from its next manual (DSM III). What followed was a swarm of outrage from psychiatrists within the APA who disagreed with the decision and demanded that the issue be reconsidered. In 1974, a referendum was called and approximately 40% percent of the APA’s membership voted to put homosexuality back into the DSM. Since a majority was not achieved to reverse the decision, homosexuality remains omitted from the APA’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. To the LGBT community, this omission from the DSM was a logical move. They felt that, absent from any unbiased social-science research to prove that homosexuality is inherently pathological, the only thing that had been keeping homosexuality in the DSM was societal prejudice. However, many in the scientific community have criticized the APA’s decision to remove homosexuality from the DSM, claiming its motives were more political than scientific. Dr. Ronald Bayer, author of the book Homosexuality and American Psychiatry, writes: “The entire process, from the first confrontation organized by gay demonstrators to the referendum demanded by the orthodox psychiatrists, seemed to violate the most basic expectations about how questions of science should be resolved. Instead of being engaged in sober discussion of data, psychiatrists were swept up in a political controversy. The result was not a conclusion based on an approximation of the scientific truth as dictated by reason, but was instead an action demanded by the ideological temper of the times.” Along these same lines, a recent radio documentary on the subject of homosexuality revealed that the president-elect of the APA in 1973, Dr. John P. Speigel, was a “closeted homosexual with a very particular agenda.” Another of the reasons APA members were so quick to vote in favor of homosexuality’s removal from the DSM, according to Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, is that many in the psychiatric profession had “failed to identify, with certainty, the psychodynamic causes of homosexuality, and consequently to devise a reasonably successful treatment for it.” It should be noted that although the psychiatric profession as a whole has failed in treating homosexuals, there are still many psychotherapists who report great personal success in such treatment. While the medical profession in general has done much to advance our knowledge of human functioning, in some cases it seems that modern medicine seeks to recognize or diagnose only those problems that it believes it can remedy. I found this out a few years ago when I experienced an unexplained twitching in my eye. (The medical term is “blesphorospasm.”) I visited a general practitioner, two optometrists, an ophthalmologist, and a neurologist and underwent a thirteen-hundred-dollar MRI only to be told I had no problem. Although a few of the physicians were able to name my symptom, none could tell me, with certainty, what was causing it. It wasn't until I visited a doctor friend of my dad’s (whose alternative methods were not recognized as legitimate by my insurance company) that my problem was diagnosed and corrected. And, I might add, he charged me only forty-five dollars. Gordon Dalbey writes, “I am convinced that the American Psychiatric Society [sic] removed homosexuality from its list of mental illnesses simply because the psychiatrists were tired of failing in their human efforts to heal it.” He suggests that the reason much of secular psychiatry has failed in treating those with unwanted homosexual desires is that it has ignored the spiritual component of this process. Dalbey points out that homosexuality is something that “only the Father God can heal.” Another factor in the APA’s decision to remove homosexuality from its list may have been the perception that there were not many homosexuals who desired therapy to change their orientation. This perception may have been fueled by the fact that ex-gays were not nearly as vocal in 1973 as we are now. I take issue with the fact that the APA and many other professional organizations have moved far beyond just saying that homosexuality is not an illness, and instead are now saying that reorientation therapy could potentially “harm” someone tying to change from gay to straight. Groups like the American Psychological Association, the National Association of Social Workers, and the American Academy of Pediatrics have upset a large portion of their membership by rejecting the idea that homosexuals can change. In doing this, most of the major psychological associations have turned their backs on people like me. But there are still hundreds of mental health experts successfully treating homosexuals; they just aren't advertising it. This is because doing so could get them into trouble, if some gay activists have their way. There has been a move in the APA to make treatment of homosexuality a violation of professional conduct for a psychiatrist, even if it’s done at the patient's request. Drown yourself, you cocksucking queer. >># >I’m not even the guy you’ve been trying to argue with. So your argument–that you posted–didn’t exist, then. >Furthermore, you haven’t blown anything but a lot of hot air. >LOL YOU NO DO THING I SAY SO THAT MAKE IT TRUE LOL This is the best argument I’ve ever seen a queer come up with. >But please, do keep thinking you have some sort of moral high ground. Definitionally am, and you’ve yet to show otherwise. >subhuman scumbag No, that’d be the queers.
>> Anon 31034 What is going on in here? Why are there walls of texts that nobody will read everywhere?
>> Anon 31042 literally nobody is going to read any of that shit. nobody gives a shit about your opinions and your perceived insights are worth less than actual garbage, which is something people pay for other people to take. the same applies to you as a "person". and also this flash, because why the fuck does Pearl have any tits or ass.
>> Anon 31045 >># holy fuck the amount of intellectual dishonesty is staggering. If its a choice how about you go suck some cock, its just a choice right?
>> Anon 31046 >># >it is because it doesn't fit my narrative
>> Anon 31063 >># Why did you spend time typing this?
>> Anon 31064 >># I love how you copy paste a whole article instead of linking to it and don't bother to give a source either. Not to mention that the article in question is written by Chad W.Thompson and I doubt that you actually looked him up. Books he wrote include "Loving Homosexuals as Jesus Would" and "The Homophobia Stops Here". So basically the opposite of what you propagate here. In other words: Your giant wall of text there only shows, once again, how incredibly stupid you are... It's like arguing with people that say vaccines cause autism...
>> Anon 31068 >># He also cites as DSM-I (1952) as the only medically valid book but then he doesnt realize that homosexuality was added to that book for political reasons. At the same time Hysteria (and specifically hysteria being a female only condition) was a (sexist) mental condition that wasn't removed until DSM-III (1980) Nobody now would argue that hysteria (which has been redefined into several other disorders) is a female only disorder yet this guy is clinging to an even older inaccurate book to make the claim that homosexuality is a disorder. Like holy shit dude he doesnt get that people get things wrong. Darwin got a buttfuck ton of things wrong with his first theory of evolution by netural selection and we improved on it. Nobody now is saying or propogating that his original theory is right. I dont get the hatred towards homosexuality and as long as the people who are homosexuals are doing their sexual activities with consent why should you give a fuck?
>> Anon 31069 >># Didn't even see that one because of the wall of text >Why do you think the rate of children who “turn out” gay skyrockets in the presence of gay “parents”? Once again, no credible source. You are repeating yourself and even if you say/write it another 100 times it won't change how true or false it is. What matters are facts, not your personal opinion. >Either you can control your hormones and faggotry (and trannies) can be cured or you can’t control them and trannies don’t exist. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Your body is producing hormones autonomously. At this point I can only assume that you are talking about artifically produced and dispensed hormones to make any sense out of this. They were never part of this discussion though. You still can't control your hormones by sheer force of will and this won't change. If you can do that: Use this power to grow yourself a brain. >LOL I’LL SUPPORT MY FALLACY BY USING THE INVERSE OF THE FALLACY THAT WILL SHOW HIM Did you even READ that? Apparently not. >A study about faggots only studied faggots, which make up 0.8% of the population, and you’re surprised it’s a small study? >You seem to miss the point of a study about faggots. I actually found the study you brought up here before without providing an actual source: http://www.baylorisr.org/wp-content/uplo ads/Regnerus.pdf In short, it says what another Anon said before: It's better for children if the parents stay married and don't separat, or in other words: It's better for children to grow up in an intact family. This has nothing to do with gender. Also children of gay parents suffered more from the social stigma (ergo: people like you) than the actual fact of having same sex parents. here's an excerpt: >though the findings reported herein may be explicable in part by a variety of forces uniquely problematic for child development in lesbian and gay families—including a lack of social support for parents, stress exposure resulting from per- sistent stigma, and modest or absent legal security for their parental and romantic relationship statuses—the empirical claim that no notable differences exist must go. They also mention how many studies done on the subject were "non-random, non-representative data often employing small samples that do not allow for gener- alization to the larger population of gay and lesbian families." >And yet you have zero evidence of this, as well as zero evidence to back your claim that queers are normal or acceptable. Good thing that I'm not in obligation to provide the evidence in this case. You've proven your lack of intelligence and inability to provide any sources for your claims yourself over and over again. And neither me nor you are in any position to say that homosexuals are 'normal' or not. That they are 'acceptable' however is coverd by basic human rights. Hating on people just because they are 'different' is the most stupid thing I can think of. >Errors occur in nature all the time, and homosexuality is a perfect example of error. Dude, you are a perfect example for an error... Like I said: It's like arguing with people that say vaccines cause autism. No matter how much you contradict yourself and ignore sources and scientific facts: You'll still live in your own world were your bullshit is the truth.
>> Anon 31070 >># >Nobody now would argue that hysteria (which has been redefined into several other disorders) is a female only disorder yet this guy is clinging to an even older inaccurate book to make the claim that homosexuality is a disorder. That's exaclty why I brought up the examples of "sun orbiting the earth" and "suffocating in trains due to speed". And he still doesn't get it.
>> Anon 31083 >Implying fags don't deserve to die
>> Anon 31091 tl;dr
>> sage 31235 sage >># >lol you’re dishonest because i say so >lol i don’t need an actual argument you’re just wrong >i said so that makes it true >># >why bother being correct? This is why you fail. >># >lol you quoted someone that makes you wrong >because i say so Faggots have the choice to stop and get treatment or be killed. End of story. Mental illness and the spread of disease are not acceptable. >># You’re thinking of DSM-II. >Like holy shit dude he doesn’t get that people get things wrong Says the person who says that faggots are normal, sane, and acceptable and can never ever be anything else but that. >># >Once again, no credible source. lol, kill yourself: http://i.imgur.com/M4rPMuq.jpg >Your body is producing hormones autonomously. Which magically precludes the ability to change those hormones and their expression, of course. Oh, wait, no, you’re a fucking idiot. >It’s better for children if the parents stay married and don't separat, or in other words: It's better for children to grow up in an intact family. This has nothing to do with gender. And yet I proved the following 1. faggots are statistically unfit to be parents 2. mental illness precludes a person’s ability to raise a child 3. it is legally child abuse under the UN Convention for the Rights of the Child for faggots to have children >Also children of gay parents suffered more from the social stigma HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH So the fact that faggots sell their children into sexual slavery and mutilate their bodies doesn’t have any effect, huh. Great going. >Good thing that I’m not in obligation to provide the evidence in this case. You don’t seem to understand how arguments work, queerlover. >inability to provide any sources for your claims Anyone literate knows you’re lying. >Hating on people just because they are ‘different’ is the most stupid thing I can think of. I’ve proven that faggots are mentally ill, a threat to civilization, spread hundreds of diseases, rape and abuse children, and are incapable of operating in society. So yeah, not only will I continue hating them, they’re all going to be rounded up and killed in the VERY near future. Enjoy, queerlover! >ignore sources and scientific facts That’s my line. You’ve refuted zero of the facts I’ve posted. >># >lol he doesn’t get it because i say so lol >i can’t possibly be wrong about queers being normal lol ignore every statistic that proves otherwise those statistics are just wrong >HIV is a lie invented by the drug companies that’s the only explanation for why faggots have it more than sane people lol >i win now I’d also be fine with killing the people like you who support them.
>> Anon 31475 Is it just me or the original is nowhere to be found
>> Anon 31479 >># You are fucking insane.
>> sage 31525 sage >># Nah, you just have no argument and your feelings are hurt by facts you can’t explain away. Faggots are mentally defective and need to be executed.
>> Anon 32011 >># >Sage is a downvote Seems the only one needing to be executed here is this newfag
>> Anon 32013 >># Sage is a statement, everybody here knows that it has no power on SWFchan. Also, you accuse someone else of being a newfag, while bumping a dead thread. Mission complete, now go back to eating your own shit, faggot.
>> Anon 32014 >># sage actually does have an effect on swfchan tho
>> Anon 32015 >># Yes. It has the original effect of sage, which can be countered by 1 guy and a proxy.
>> Anon 32016 actually thyme does that sage does that but also hurts the thread's health, more if more people sage too
>> Anon 32017 >># SWFchan explanation of Email fields: Thyme = It does nothing Sage = It does nothing Noko = We're too slow for this to be necessary. Etc. Etc. Etc. Sure the mechanics are there, but our userbase is retarded. This means that every Sage and Thyme is countered instantly = No reason to do it, other than as a statement. I.E my Sage does nothing at this point, I know, but I keep it anyway.
>> Anon 32020 The music used for anyone interested: Pascal And Pearce - Disko Biskit (Original Mix)
>> Anon 32021 >># A sage wont bump a thread.
>> Anon 32022 >># Stop, you're not being funny.
>> sage 32034 sage sage >># Not bumping but remember, sage goes in all fields.
>> sage 32068 sage >># You can always tell the retards by the fact that they project their concept of “downvotes” onto others.
>> Anon 32345 When the fuck is OP going to upload the next one?
>> OP 32514 >># Nigga idk what to do next
>> Anon 32592 Why did I check to see why this flash had 80+ replies? You guys really are something...
>> Anon 33003 meh
>> Anon 33264 >># I thought the idea was: >Seeker >Clean up white spots >Improve head >Shrink tits

File: not_new_pearl.swf-(7.44 MB, 500x700, Hentai)
[_] not new steven edition Anon 3039301 Those lines are really annoying and couldn't find a way to get rid of them, so fuck it. Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3039309 I'd like to offer some feedback, because I'm all for what you're trying to do with these edits. I'll be honest. This edit is pretty bad. The angle on the nose is really unnatural, the jewel on the forehead is in wrong spot for the angle the character is facing, and the lack of hair over the right eye causes some of the faces she makes to look kind of derpy. I would suggest correcting the angle of the nose (slightly downward), and also shorten it a bit. Move the jewel to the left a little, adjust the angle so it's more straight up and down along the ellipse. This will look more natural since the character is looking downwards. Also it may be hard to animate, but try to reduce the shakiness of it a bit. At present it jumps around like a third tit on her forehead. As for the eyes, just try to make both eyes match expressions. It's not often that you should be having one eye partially closed and the other fully opened. They should generally be symmetrically mirrored, otherwise the expression will look silly, not sexy. The only exception I can think of to this rule is having one eye fully closed and the other fully open. Hopefully some good feedback, but do with it what you will.
>> [_] G 3039311 Yeah decompiling SWF is a bitch, other than the pearl and right eye, it's practically beutiful.
>> [_] G 3039312 >># I think I heard this guy was editing it in JPEXS itself, which doesn't leave a lot of room for improving, but yeah you are right.
>> [_] Anon 3039318 >># This is still to a somewhat disturbing level of quality However this fails to deter my boner
>> [_] Anon 3039324 >># Really peeved by the difference in sharpness between the two obviously different art styles here.
>> [_] Anon 3039343 >pearl >tits pick one
>> [_] Anon 3039350 whatever or whoever that thing is, it's ugly as fuck. horrible hair, and an ugly ass nose. Who would fap to this shit?
>> [_] Anon 3039368 what is song?
>> [_] Anon 3039370 It's kinda good.
>> [_] OP 3039374 >># >># >># With no experience in flash and this being my first edit, i knew it would be very good. JPEXS is pretty shit and i would use adobe but i have no idea how. BTW the eye thing is straight from the original flash, her hair just covered the left one so you could see it >># Photoshop (CS6) doesn't like sharpness. Its either blurry as fuck or too sharp and looks worse >># if i make them smaller i have to change some animations, nigga i don't know how to do that
>> [_] OP 3039375 >># >i knew it would be very good would NOT be very good
>> [_] Anon 3039376 >># >># what is song
>> [_] Anon 3039377 >sex with rocks
>> [_] OP 3039379 >># Use google, found this for you filedropper(com)/supermarionotnewremix
>> [_] Anon 3039384 I'm a bit confused by the comments. Is this an edit? If so, what is the original (googling "not new swf" didn't help).
>> [_] Anon 3039385 >># https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Chj2ilXA cMs
>> [_] Anon 3039386 >># tried google but im clearly not as good as you at it, tyvm /f/riendo
>> [_] Anon 3039389 >># much better quality than >># ty anyway 79 anon ty 85
>> [_] Anon 3039393 >># OPyouarereallyadumbass.Firstoff,youassum eeveryoneissobad.Letmepointoutyourflaws.F irst,yousaidyouwereprettymuchperfect.Ifth atwereso,youwouldn'tbragaboutit,youwouldb ehumbleandnotattempttogainattentionfrom"n o-life’swhospendeverysecondoftheirdaylook ingatstupidasspictures."Second,yousaidwed onothingelsethanlookatthingson4chanandthe internet.Thereagainyouarewrongretard.Iinf actonlygoon4chanwhenihaveabsolutelynothin gelsetodo.I(andIassumeatleastseveralother sonhere)havefriends.Byassumingthatweareal lpeoplewithnolivesyouonceagainproveyourid iotwaystous-youcannotgraspaconceptthatpeo plewithlivescanalsousetheinternet.Third,i fyouaretryingtoproveto4chanthatyouareperf ect,atleasttypeproperly."butyoualltaketoa wholenewlevel."Youforgotafucking2letterwo rd.Fourth,A'sarenotthathardtogetinhighsch ooldumbass.It'snota sign of intelligence, but an ability to listen. Good job for using something that everyone can do. Go to /sci/ and get your mind raped by some actual intelligence. There you go; I just wanted to you about how wrong you really are. With all honesty, I really don't give a shit what you say only wrote this because it’s fun as hell to rant to dumbasses. Next time, go tell someone who actually cares. PS. I saw that pic on Google images and it most definitely isn't you faggot.
>> [_] Anon 3039395 >># The object tracking is really off (things shifting around as they move instead of moving together) and she's blinking out of sync for most of the flash which is really offputting.
>> [_] Anon 3039413 >># put an underscore between "not" and "new"
>> [_] Anon 3039415 >># who the fuck are you replying to? because it's not>>#
>> [_] Anon 3039444 aren't her tits like much smaller
>> [_] Anon 3039446 >># im replying to >>#
>> [_] Anon 3039461 body type is a little too thick for pearl but i can still fap to this
>> [_] Anon 3039476 >># I would, because I don't go to /f/ looking for quality. I'll go to 7ch or swfchan if I want to find some fresh stuff.
>> [_] Anon 3039486 >># i don't get it...
>> [_] Anon 3039532 >># It's pasta you fuck
>> [_] Anon 3039534 >># I think this is the first animated SU work I've seen done. Certainly the first flash. Too bad it's derivative, but hey at least it's something. Er, wait. Beef curtains. Yeeurh... Well, okay, first semi-enjoyable one if you don't have the bizarre fetish of 8inch floppy scrotum labia.
>> [_] Anon 3039537 >># is this some fresh new copypasta the kids are using these days? I'm not familiar with it.