File: Gun-Free zone in Police State.swf-(9.33 MB, 240x176, Other)
[_] Remember GOY! Anon 2693904 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 2693907 >9.33 MB You realize we can't see shit right?
>> [_] Anon 2693911 mah friedums
>> [_] Anon 2693912 >># you realize the info is in the audio, right ?
>> [_] Anon 2693914 >># You realize >>>/pol/ right?
>> [_] Anon 2693915 >># Some guy got high in a camp, better shoot him!
>> [_] Anon 2693917 >># >missing the point by that much jesus. it's about the fact that IF that guy wanted to do anyone harm, you wouldn't be protected by MUH POLICE FORCE. So you would be screwed. >don't disturb a rock
>> [_] Anon 2693939 >># >Some guy wandered into our camp, was entirely incoherent and wouldn't react to normal communication and seems stoned out of his mind. >lets make light of it!
>> [_] Anon 2693945 I wish people like these didn't exist. What the fuck do they expect? A police man guarding them 24/7?
>> [_] Anon 2693949 >gun free zones shouldnt exist they should be allowed anywhere for self defense >continues ranting about a person who could have potentially harmed them if by chance they had a gun on them kek
>> [_] Vocaroofag 2693952 >># Of course they do, they're fucking inbred. >"On private property yadda yadda in my living room" You had a drunk wandering AROUND your tent and you're trying to fucking say he's breaking in. "The scene of the crime" fuck you. What crime? Your OWN story changed from "Outside" to "breaking in"
>> [_] Anon 2693954 Source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dgOsokJ 4kI
>> [_] Anon 2693965 >># Can making flashes from videos like this be a permaban?
>> [_] Anon 2693968 >># Seriously... >appeared incoherent >couldn't express himself >'Didn't appear aggressive' How the fuck did they not even consider the possibility that he legit needed help/had no idea where he was. There so fucking paranoid and convinced that everyone who they don't know is a liberal druggie out to get them or whatever that they can't even summon the idea of 'person who needs help'
>> [_] Anon 2693970 >implying it wasn't actually just a skinwalker waiting to murder and impersonate one of them
>> [_] GrandAmfag !zcOmANChEs 2694025 >># haha thats pretty funny but why worry about it?
>> [_] Anon 2694031 >i could feel his energy oh man
>> [_] Anon 2694035 >># We live in a rough world, Anon. At any point, there could be someone out there plotting to do some harm and you happen to just be at the wrong place at the wrong time. The point is, if you're expected to live in a society where you're told that you can be helped and no such help exists in reality, then wouldn't you rather find a way to help yourself instead if the need arises?
>> [_] Anon 2694038 you're sleeping outside in a public area and you're upset about a dude invading "your" space thinking that having a gun or that police would solve the issue is pretty delusional natural selection fails when these people don't get killed by some random drugee
>> [_] Anon 2694045 >># Yes, that is the completely illogical, egotistical, moronic point they were trying to make. They expect the police to be everywhere, do everything, or else they do nothing. And even if they did, they would probably complain about the police doing so. And they're lucky to not have been shoot by that intoxicated person, but now they're asking for people like him to just be walking around with guns? Yeah, again, that is the completely illogical, egotistical, moronic point they were trying to make.
>> [_] Anon 2694048 >># You're retarded >># You don't listen very well >># The point is if the person wanted to do harm they had no way of deterring him; this doesn't mean shoot him, just even scare him off. >># Skin walker pls go >># A gun would definitely help.
>> [_] Anon 2694051 >># No, they are asking for themselves; law biding citizens, to be able to carry around guns for personal defense. Why do you make the jump that they want to arm drunks and druggies? You think people want that? No, but the fact of the matter is if someone had a knife or gun or hell a bat and they wanted to do harm to you the best way to stop them is as many rounds center mass as possible.
>> [_] Anon 2694054 I'm glad they didn't have a gun. Sounds like that guy would've been killed.
>> [_] Anon 2694056 >># >they don't want to arm drunks and druggies, just themselves! >by allowing anyone to bring guns into the park
>> [_] Anon 2694058 >># What are you planning to do with the gun in such a situation? Shoot him? Now you're an unjustified murderer, then you would have to make up a story about how he attacked you, but it would be believable. Brandish it or point it to scare him? If he meant you harm he could easily pretend to be scared, run off, hide nearby and kill everyone when they're vulnerable. Plus, if he's high, he might not even understand what you're doing. No, what's needed in this situation is common sense. If you're going to sleep somewhere public, you should understand that you're putting yourself at risk and you shouldn't rely on a weapon to defend yourself. Every moment you encounter someone is a chance for you to die, we just assume they wouldn't dare. That trust builds societies, but societies are just that - trust that can be betrayed.
>> [_] Anon 2694062 >># Yes, I know they weren't directly asking for the "offender" to be armed, but they were requesting for it to be legal to be armed in that area and others to be armed in that area, as well. By doing so, they are unintentionally asking potential offenders to also be armed. A gun won't do shit if you're shot first, and looked how it turned out, he was highly out of it, and was barely harmless, and these guys sounded like they would have shot him. Anyway, point I was making is basically summed up by saying a gun won't do shit, if you're the one who is shot first.
>> [_] Anon 2694064 >># >Thomas Hobbes plz go
>> [_] Anon 2694068 >># >let us see your papers citizen >we have to make sure you're not drunk like the other people >you can't protect yourself citizen >># Yes anon, because there are no evil and violent people in this world; WE JUST ALL GOTTA GET ALONG. Why are you defending a druggie/drunkard? "HES HIGH! WHY YOU PICKING ON HIM! WHY YOU HELP HIM!" Because hes the scum of the earth. >># Dude, people who want to be armed illegally are going to do it no matter what, there isn't magical fucking forcefeild if you put up a no guns sign that somehow stops people from entering. You might as well allow LAW BIDING CITIZENS TO CARRY LEGALLY TO STOP THOSE WITH POOR INTENTIONS.
>> [_] Anon 2694077 >># >Dude, people who want to be armed illegally are going to do it no matter what, there isn't magical fucking forcefeild if you put up a no guns sign that somehow stops people from entering. You might as well allow LAW BIDING CITIZENS TO CARRY LEGALLY TO STOP THOSE WITH POOR INTENTIONS. So you're saying we should just say "Yeah, whatever. Let the risk of gun violence in this specified area increasingly rise, because why not? Some people are going to do it anyway!" I guess you think it's a good idea to supply kids who get bullied by people who could potentially bring a knife or even a gun with AK-47's and allow them to go to school.
>> [_] Anon 2694087 >># Wow, my point just flew right over you so fast you read it upside down. Homicidal people are quite abundant, more so than you would guess. Guns don't grant infallible protection from people who mean you harm. Staying out of harm's way will save your life way more often than any weapon, because you are still an single human being. That was the point, they are making themselves vulnerable. Whether the druggee dies or lives is no consequence to me, it would be ultimately his fault for walking around fucking with other peoples shit. But you have to have a sense of balance in a society, the idea of punishment equal to a crime; if he was killed and didn't do anything to deserve death, that makes the one who killed him more dangerous and detrimental to society.
>> [_] Anon 2694089 >># >risk of gun violence If you didn't know, here in Texas we have the most guns, and the lowest crime. Your risk of "gun violence" is by those with illegal weapons. Not law biding citizens. If you make something illegal, only criminals will have them. The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun. No I don't believe in arming children, I believe in arming trained teachers and staff if they so please. You are being ridiculous and illogical; like every statist liberal I know.
>> [_] Anon 2694098 >># I hope the latter of your post was exclusively for the school topic, if not, these people aren't remotely trained or professional in any single way. They are redneck trash, who would have probably opened fire on the person, who was clearly intoxicated with a substance, and probably couldn't even comprehend what was happening. And the "good guys" with a gun would ideally be the authority in that area, not some inbred soccer mom. Quite honestly, if I were to pick the circumstances of this situation, I'd rather it be a kid than these fucks.
>> [_] Anon 2694119 >># >What the fuck do they expect? A police man guarding them 24/7? no, thats why we want to keep our guns
>> [_] Anon 2694124 >># >likely be yes because cops are everywhere and there all the time. You are retarded.
>> [_] Anon 2694132 Everyone in this thread is fucking retarded. The situation could have been handled with zero violence, which it was. The people are complaining about something that could of happened, and you're arguing about it. Gun are here, they're not just going to magically disappear, but there's no need to reform their usage everywhere for protection, because that protection can be easily turned into unprovoked hostile activity. America has already fucked up, and there's no fixing it in a couple days, but there's no use just giving up completely and allowing the problem to get even worse.
>> [_] Anon 2694143 >he could have been violent >if only I was allowed to kill him
>> [_] Anon 2694147 >># I know, she phrased that like a hippy, but you know what she meant. Like when someone's just sketchy as all shit and you don't feel right about them? Or do you mean when he's still outside and she can sense him? Still that makes sense. You can't hear or see them but you still know they're there. Like when you feel you're being watched.
>> [_] Anon 2694148 >># So you're saying that if he WAS violent, they should have just been a victim instead of had a chance of fighting back? Okay.
>> [_] Anon 2694149 >35 replies why is every board /pol/?
>> [_] Anon 2694155 >># Gun laws in America are very divisive. Everyone seems to think everyone else is either a redneck that shoots their guns in the air in celebration over something completely mild and commonplace, or a gun grabbing socialist-liberal-communist. I have no idea why people take such polarized views of this shit, but they're the loudest opinions every time it gets brought up.
>> [_] Anon 2694158 >># >2012 >+3 >Not knowing what a skinwalker is
>> [_] Anon 2694161 >># >the most mild skinwalker encounter ever Please.
>> [_] Anon 2694169 People who need guns to protect themselves should steer clear of Australia. We don't tolerate pussies, and our wildlife is even less forgiving of your weak resolve you piss-pantied little bitches.
>> [_] Anon 2694179 >># >Australians >knowing anything HAH! You illiterate faggots should be banned from all chans.
>> [_] Anon 2694180 An armed society is a polite society. Better to be a winner than to be a victim. Your government will not protect you when you need it the most, because they spend all their time and resources safeguarding the Illuminati and other secret societies. You are nothing but a statistic to them. If everybody had a gun, we would not be seeing mass shootings with many people dead. People would be able to fight back and defend themselves, and prevent other people from being killed. As a citizen, it is your duty to defend yourself and others from homicidal assholes.