File: Cardcaptor Sakura OP HD.swf-(9.79 MB, 960x720, Other)
[_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)13:07:22 No.

  Encode Test

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)13:13:03 No.

  Any criticism is appreciated
  Well, besides complaining about swfh264, that's unavoidable.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)13:35:56 No.

  >>3099625
  Looks great,
  Music sounds muffled but but might be the age.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)13:38:25 No.

  >>3099629
  The audio is 5.1 channel HE-AAC.

  I can't tell any difference from the source (FLAC), but it might cause problems when downmixing
  to stereo.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)14:15:52 No.

  cute, flash looks nice

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)14:22:01 No.

  >>3099629
  >>3099630
  https://a.pomf.cat/ybyvwc.swf

  Try that and see if its sounds better.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)15:10:34 No.

  I dont know how your source looks like, but i have this feeling that the denoise filter(s) used
  are a tad bit too agressive.

  less denoise and maybe a very light sharpening filter?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)15:12:13 No.

  >>3099620
  Looks pretty amazing to me. Of course, I watched most anime in 320x240 tiny ass streaming screens
  back in 2008, so my standards are pretty rock bottom.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)15:13:57 No.

  >>3099662
  If I recall, that's actually what the artwork looks like.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)15:15:02 No.

  >>3099662
  The source is 1440p blu ray rip, its pretty much perfect.

  Anything else was caused by me setting the most aggressive deblocking in the encoding, which
  removes some detail and softens the lines a bit. Otherwise, the pixels become annoyingly visible
  at this relatively low bitrate.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)15:18:54 No.

  >>3099665
  All raw sources have a certain amount of noise and artefacts that may or may not make certain
  things look better. things like film grain are useful to preserve, and to an extent, give the
  illusion of more detail, but is incredibly heavy on digital formats duie to the nature of digital
  encodes.

  imho, a slight amount of grain/noise and very relaxed/light sharppening filters are the way to go
  for almost all animation out there.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)15:21:03 No.

  >>3099666
  can you post the flv.bat code you used?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)15:54:33 No.

  well...

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)16:22:03 No.

  >>3099669
  I used ffmpeg:

  >ffmpeg -i OP_rip.mkv -b:a 192k -c:a libfdk_aac -profile:a aac_he -bf 16 -preset placebo -g 240
  -keyint_min 24 -vcodec libx264 -threads 1 -qmin 25 -qmax 34 -qcomp 0 -force_key_frames
  "0:10.740,0:29.865,0:53.240,1:04.460,1:04.920,1:05.420,1:05.921,1:06.463,1:14.012,1:18.225" -refs
  16 -me_method full -trellis 2 -x264opts partitions=all:8x8dct:subq=12:me=tesa:aq-m
  ode=3:merange=100:direct=auto:b-adapt=2:subme=11:b-pyramid=2:mixed-refs=1:weightb:de
  block=-2,-2:psy-rd=0.4,0.0:aq-strength=.6:chroma_qp_offset=-1:qpstep=16 -b:v 840k -fastfirstpass
  1 -profile:v high -level 5.1 -sws_flags lanczos -vf scale=-1:720 -pass [X] -y
  test11_720_pass[X].flv

  Replace [X] with the number of the pass

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)16:25:41 No.

  >>3099668
  The grain is already present in the source: https://ln.steamy.moe/tvwsqr.mkv

  Though I will take your note for sharpening. LFSmod() should do the job for that.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)16:27:21 No.

  just posting to say i want to fug sakura-chan!

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)17:04:07 No.

  Danganronpa-The-Animation-

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)17:31:46 No.

  >>3099724
  And I'm just posting to say, its nice to see /f/ working together.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)18:12:41 No.

  I'm just posting to say OP is best guy for putting quality *anything* on the board instead of
  Xiao Mei Mei for the millionth time processed through a potato.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)18:16:40 No.

  I remember watching this as a kid and got bored of it real quick.
  I also remember some of my friends would have a ton of hentai with her in it. I never could've
  gotten off on it.
  I think sakura is the only loli that can't get my dick hard.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)18:28:15 No.

  for /f/ this is sum bretty gud qualityito friend

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)19:03:08 No.

  >>3099764
  What are you? Gay?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)19:34:53 No.

  >>3099720
  >>3099722

  comparing it both, the dowscaling went pretty well. especially considering the bitrate et shite.

  the sound quality seems fine, may sound dull and off for poeople simply because its much softer.
  there's like 15 dB LESS gain on it compared to the mkb. no obvious artifacting either, DR seems
  fine. idk

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)19:37:03 No.

  >>3099786
  wouldn't it be actually better to have 720p as a raw material?
  would definitely save a lot of space for higher bitrates

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)20:29:10 No.

  >>3099787
  OP Here:

  Running it through a spatial-denoiser would accomplish a similar effect, while a better
  pre-downscale in Avisynth (RGB downscale with linear light and spline36 or nnedi) would have a
  positive but insignificant effect.

  A denoiser would allow the encoder to better focus on details that can be easily preserved. As
  far as I know, a lower resolution would have less of these details, but these details would not
  have been removed, as much as they would have been scaled out, which would still retain artifacts
  which could trip the encoder.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)20:37:18 No.

  >-b:v 840k

  Its all good when your dealing with a minute and a half of video. things get a bit more
  constrained when dealing with 3 and 4 minute videos. HD isn't always optimal.

  btw how is the blueray source 1440p? There is no 4k edition of the series. -_-

>> [_] Anonymous 06/16/16(Thu)20:45:47 No.

  >>3099801
  1080p sorry.

  The nice thing with cell animation is that the left over material is analog, so deriving larger
  resolution and detail is possible even if it predates the existence of those capabilities.