File: we_built_this.swf-(686 KB, 295x135, Loop)
[_] /f/ meta thread, goal is for Hiro to reply or some change to take place Anonymous
09/17/16(Sat)19:49:16 No.

  Hiro said this should happen until there is some sort of consensus on what would make it better

  Please voice your opinion and reasons thereof to make your point clearer to Hiro

  >>>/qa/677151

  Previous 1st thread: http://archive.4plebs.org/f/thread/3149760

  Issues discussed previously

  Captcha bug: For people with slower Internet they can't post flashes over a certain limit because
  the verification times out on them. This should be fixed, you can write something in
  https://www.4chan.org/feedback if you wish. If enough people write something it will get fixed.
  Previous fixes due to the feedback page are swfchan no longer on the spam filter and filesize
  limit was lowered on accident.

  Some people wanted a rules change so that any mods that come won't unfairly delete threads / do
  bad moderation based upon the current and outdated rules.

  Others want the filesize increased so that larger swf, be they animations, games or other can be
  posted. Some are worried that this would encourage too many more youtuberips.

  [M] tag: some people want this and in the past have posted with [M] in the subject line since
  it's not a valid tag. One guy said that the addition might encourage people posting swfs with a
  static/no-image and only music as if that was commonplace here, which it isn't, [L] is more
  common.

  My suggestion was adding a sorting option based upon the column headers.

  Another one was adding more possible OP flashes.

  A few people wanted a longer cooldown on flashes, instead of the current 24 hour one.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)19:56:09 No.

  Please refer to >>3149938 (http://archive.4plebs.org/f/thread/3149938) until it's 404'd

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)20:12:29 No.

  >>3149947
  >One guy said
  nah there were at least 2 of us plus one in the /qa/ thread too

  >sorting option based upon the column headers
  Really good idea actually

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)20:13:21 No.

  >48 hours cooldown on flashes
  >[m] tag
  >tripcodes no longer allowed
  Who agrees?
  Btw the only positive side I see on >10mb file size limit is for thursgay flashes. Other than
  that, while I believe people support this of good reasons, it would only encourage shitty youtube
  rips.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)20:13:49 No.

  >>3149947
  >sorting option based upon the column headers
  what does that mean?

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)20:17:05 No.

  Got one very good idea.
  >there are 5 thread which are the next five to be deleted(already is)
  >the other last 5 before the actual five are stored but not linked anywhere on /f/ so you don't
  suffer with random 404s when lurking
  >if you reply to them they won't be bumped or anything like that

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)20:21:54 No.

  wrong thread y'all

  get in
  >>3149938

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)20:23:55 No.

  >>3149979
  Since there here I'll post this anyway and link later.

  >>3149970
  That's because you've been in the limit of /f/ check out http://eye.swfchan.com/search/?min=20&m
  ax=10&xcats=irlvideo+flvclip

  >>3149970
  I'd say that tripcodes should stay, while some people do misuse them they can be ignored. If we
  remove them it would me difficult for people like Zone to prove their identity, if they ever did
  post here again.

  I'm wary about the [M] tag due to some of those reasons listed in the previous thread.

  >>3149971
  Default on the main /f/ page is bump order.

  I want it to work as follows:
  Clicking on a header sorts by what it contains, clicking again does reverse.

  So clicking on the File header would sort in alphabetical order and then again would sort in
  reverse alphabetical.

  Blank headers default to bump and reverse-bump orders.

  >>3149973
  So you want the archive that other boards have (such as http://boards.4chan.org/qa/archive) but
  limited to 5 threads?

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)20:30:33 No.

  >>3149980
  Yes, so we don't have to go on 4plebs and look up the flash that we got 404'd.
  Also,
  >That's because you've been in the limit of /f/ check out http://eye.swfchan.com/search/?min=20&m
  ax=10&xcats=irlvideo+flvclip
  I can assure you that the /f/ userbase isn't that good.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)20:34:39 No.

  >>3149988
  >>3149991

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)21:07:11 No.

  There is FAR too much youtube on this board. Filesize limit should be drastically reduced.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)21:11:33 No.

  >>3150009
  nah. 10mb is good. any lower and a ton of proper good flashes would be unusable.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)21:19:37 No.

  >>3149992
  What is the sense in that? That's a liberal tier ""argument"". People who are against 10mb+
  flashes haven't seen bad flashes over 10mb too. Genius.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)21:26:19 No.

  >>3149947

  Hiro isnt listening.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)21:28:18 No.

  How bout no change
  because this board is fantastic as is.

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)21:38:28 No.

  >>3150024
  Okay mr./pol/ they are pointing out the possible bad flashes over 10mb, and have only provided
  youtuberips as their argument against the change.

  >>3150027
  The changes don't really get rid of anything fantastic about the board. One even fixes a bug for
  people with slow Internet. Anything specific that you didn't like?

>> [_] Anonymous 09/17/16(Sat)21:52:00 No.

  >>3150024
  >I don't know how complain but I want complain for no reason
  >>3150038
  How about just ban .swf which not contain interactive actual actionscript or contain only simple
  video player inside?
  Most radical ban everything which not made in vector.