|STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES|
C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR
|/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/||P0001 · P2035 · P4070|
Since it's exceptionally easy to only block the actual ads on swfchan (no ads are actually served from swfchan's own domain) and because the current ruleset is actually causing visitors to see more ads I thought this matter would be quickly resolved. However, I have been trying to contact EasyList for over three weeks now with no response. Therefore I feel the need to ask my visitors to e-mail them as well to bring attention to this issue and show that regular users of EasyList care about swfchan, not just the guy running the site.
They have two e-mails: email@example.com and firstname.lastname@example.org. The first one is the primary mail but I've sent mail to both and received a reply from neither. Have sent using different mail accounts as well so I know there was no sending issues on my end. I should have written this announcement earlier but this whole thing felt like such an open-and-shut case that I would never have imagined swfchan still being blocked like this after three weeks. Big thanks to anyone helping out!
Note: I'm not writing this because of money, the site's income is actually the same as before (less visitors but less blockers equal same ad views). I am however worried that in the long run, in a year or so, this may lead to less links leading to swfchan which would sure enough finally kill it off the web, especially with the dwindling flash support these days. I also don't think this is a fair practice by EasyList, there's no reason what-so-ever to block swfchan itself. I don't serve ads and an adblocker should block ad providers, not sites that use ad providers. I also don't limit anyone blocking ads from using the site in any way. It feels like the EasyList authors took just a minute to look at swfchan, said "fuck it" and proceeded to block the whole thing instead of only the ads.
So if you have a moment I'd really appreciate it if you took the time to e-mail them about this. Just be polite and ask EasyList to block only the ads on swfchan, not the actual content on swfchan itself. There's a discussion thread over here.
Breaking news!Old Discussion
This is resource EIVJLUU, an Archived Thread.
Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3199687
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 16.
Discovered flash files: 1
File: Ladyboy dream.swf-(9.87 MB, 784x480, Loop) [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)03:28:19 No.3199687 Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)03:30:12 No.3199688 whats a ladyboy? anyway cute girls. I wanna lick their pussies :3 >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)03:52:02 No.3199695 >>3199687 >It's from Thailand wew >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)03:56:11 No.3199698 >>3199688 Anon.. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)07:08:57 No.3199739 >>3199698 are you pretending to be autistic you better be >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)07:28:05 No.3199742 >>3199739 w...what? >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)07:28:14 No.3199743 >man faces everywhere Even the shitty video quality can't hide how ugly these things are. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)10:21:41 No.3199774 >>3199743 Don't lie, anon. You'd bang anything if it moves. We all would. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)11:21:29 No.3199787 So what is it? >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)11:33:34 No.3199788 >>3199787 4 NAKED MEN >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)11:59:27 No.3199795 at least they tried to be convincing in tucking and covering. unfortunately manly men can see right through this kind of shenanigans. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)12:03:03 No.3199797 >>3199774 Only if it is arousing and most traps look like man with boobs and makeup... >> [_] Fagg (with 2 g's) 01/10/17(Tue)12:33:57 No.3199807 >>3199788 Someone should post that. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)13:24:11 No.3199820 >>3199788 I've never seen one before, no one has, but I'm guessing it's a white hole >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)14:38:13 No.3199842 Pattaya is fukt, but still 10x better than Subic, and 100x better than Tijuana. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)14:49:38 No.3199850 >>3199774 sure, if it's female. a shame ladyboys aren't