|STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES|
C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR
|/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/||P0001 · P2030 · P4060|
Since it's exceptionally easy to only block the actual ads on swfchan (no ads are actually served from swfchan's own domain) and because the current ruleset is actually causing visitors to see more ads I thought this matter would be quickly resolved. However, I have been trying to contact EasyList for over three weeks now with no response. Therefore I feel the need to ask my visitors to e-mail them as well to bring attention to this issue and show that regular users of EasyList care about swfchan, not just the guy running the site.
They have two e-mails: firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com. The first one is the primary mail but I've sent mail to both and received a reply from neither. Have sent using different mail accounts as well so I know there was no sending issues on my end. I should have written this announcement earlier but this whole thing felt like such an open-and-shut case that I would never have imagined swfchan still being blocked like this after three weeks. Big thanks to anyone helping out!
Note: I'm not writing this because of money, the site's income is actually the same as before (less visitors but less blockers equal same ad views). I am however worried that in the long run, in a year or so, this may lead to less links leading to swfchan which would sure enough finally kill it off the web, especially with the dwindling flash support these days. I also don't think this is a fair practice by EasyList, there's no reason what-so-ever to block swfchan itself. I don't serve ads and an adblocker should block ad providers, not sites that use ad providers. I also don't limit anyone blocking ads from using the site in any way. It feels like the EasyList authors took just a minute to look at swfchan, said "fuck it" and proceeded to block the whole thing instead of only the ads.
So if you have a moment I'd really appreciate it if you took the time to e-mail them about this. Just be polite and ask EasyList to block only the ads on swfchan, not the actual content on swfchan itself. There's a discussion thread over here.
This is resource MANU859, an Archived Thread.
Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3199548
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 49.
Discovered flash files: 1
File: Meryl Streep is Retarded.swf-(9.75 MB, 432x240, Other) [_] Anonymous 01/09/17(Mon)23:01:18 No.3199548 >> [_] Anonymous 01/09/17(Mon)23:10:48 No.3199554 T A B L E S A B L E S >> [_] Anonymous 01/09/17(Mon)23:29:15 No.3199564 these are so fucking entertaining >> [_] Anonymous 01/09/17(Mon)23:48:44 No.3199579 Does anyone have a link to the video Meryl Streep is even referencing? I'd like to see that. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)00:07:06 No.3199588 >>3199579 I bet you 1 (You) I could find it by looking up "Meryl Streep awards speech 2017" on youtube >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)00:25:17 No.3199599 >>3199588 Eh, I looked up "trump makes fun of retarded reporter" and saw the video. Not even /pol/ but why are people on the left so upset by everything he says and does? >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)00:31:06 No.3199601 >>3199548 >le nu male table cuck /pol/ pls go >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)00:34:33 No.3199602 >>3199599 up·set adjective adjective: upset ˌəpˈset/ 1. unhappy, disappointed, or worried. "she looked pale and upset" I mean you're not wrong by textbook definitions of the term >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)00:38:40 No.3199605 >>3199602 Not him (Should be obvious, and I have no opinion on the matter really) but I don't see the point you are trying to get across >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)00:43:16 No.3199608 >>3199605 Mostly that I can absolutely see and understand why people on the left, middle, and even right could fall under the categories of unhappy, disappointed, or worried watching any of this dude's vids >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)00:45:50 No.3199609 >>3199608 Oh fair enough. I can agree with most of his arguments in this video (though it is the only one I have seen) But I really don't like the way he argues. It is annoying to see his point displayed the way he chooses to. Though I don't into politics so I don't really care that much >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)00:47:56 No.3199612 >>3199609 It's called Yellow Journalism and for whatever reason it's making a resurgeance and why we're referring to the current 'murrican state as "post-fact" >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)00:50:04 No.3199614 >>3199554 This >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)00:53:21 No.3199617 >>3199612 Yeah I can agree with that. I don't think we have it nearly as bad here in Canada but I still see it when I see news, which honestly isn't often.It is weird to say that this guy is appealing to emotion when he is doing something similar. He also called out the straw-man fallacy whiule he blatantly cherrypicked all his argument and displayed them in the fashion he did without allowing consideration for opposing views. It is just poor quality and generally poor arguing. Still slightly more entertaining than some of the crap that gets posted on /f/. Sometimes I wonder why I still come here >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)00:57:12 No.3199620 >>3199612 >and why we're referring to the current 'murrican state as "post-fact" Who is we? I have never heard anyone irl say that. I also really hope you're not defending the msm as being honest or something. The democratization of news thanks to the internet has provided more "facts" to the nation then we've had in many previous decades combined. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)01:01:01 No.3199621 >>3199617 I think you should leave. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)01:01:53 No.3199622 >>3199617 I don't really like what /f/'s become, but I keep coming back, this place has slowly but surely been turned into a cancer hole. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)01:03:02 No.3199625 >>3199622 It's because of all the crossboarding faggots. /f/ was fine when it was all memes from 2005 and prior. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)01:05:11 No.3199626 >>3199601 Back to mom's basement you weaboo degenerate. That's not a cuck lmao >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)01:09:27 No.3199628 >>3199625 I really hate cross boarders, I never thought that I would miss the pregnancy porn, and Zeigtist spam, but it's a lot better than this shit. /f/'s slowly but surely turning into a cancer hole. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)01:10:58 No.3199631 >>3199622 /f/ was always a cancer hole it's just a worse cancer hole than usual lately >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)01:11:48 No.3199632 >>3199626 Don't you know, like all insults hurled on 4chan, and the internet as a whole, a word loses all meaning once it becomes popular. Take "literally" for example. "Literally" literally, no longer means just "actually; without exaggeration or inaccuracy". It can now also mean in effect; in substance; virtually (that meaning, "figuratively"). "Cuck" is now just a generic insult and has no meaning. People are just waiting for the next insult to come along so they can abandon "cuck" to the facebook-masses and the other normalfags. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)01:13:19 No.3199634 >>3199628 There's always been cross boarders. It's the one's who post non-/f/ stuff or mention /f/ a lot outside of /f/. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)01:13:38 No.3199635 >>3199626 >not a cuck sure seems like it >nu-male >wears hipster glasses >angry with impotent rage at the world >obviously a pussy irl >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)01:15:09 No.3199636 >>3199634 Secret club mentality was the only think keeping this place good. >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)01:16:03 No.3199637 >>3199634 yeah but usually they only post 1 or 2 videos at a time, only occasionally is it spammed. Nothing hard about simplying ignoring them and letting those with their same interests speak among themselves really just a common sense rule around here to ignore what you don't like >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)01:19:33 No.3199638 >>3199599 BECAUSE THEY ARE FUCKTARDS Not hard to figure out disingenuous behavior when it presents itself. >>3199609 >can't handle the truth >>3199617 >Canuckistan 'nuff said. BTFO >>3199622 /f/ is what it is, for better or worse >>3199628 >Zeitgeist spammer confirmed >>3199632 >liberals over-thinking and misappropriating intellect pot/kettle >> [_] Anonymous 01/10/17(Tue)01:19:49 No.3199639 >>3199635 >alpha-male >regular glasses >secure and confident in his manliness he can express disappointment in the evils of the world