File: Killing In The Name.swf-(4.41 MB, 680x383, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 12/22/16(Thu)23:26:53 No.

  /c/ute

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)00:38:40 No.

  Song? It's not in resize.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)00:39:52 No.

  >>3192647
  swfchan

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)00:50:34 No.

  http://swfchan.com/32/156898/?Now+This+is+Killing+in+the+Name+of.swf

  Doesn't say shiiit man. Also I'm autistic.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)00:54:02 No.

  Nevermind its Lavren mayberry

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)00:57:01 No.

  >>3192651

  got u senpai

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5wLpQkmQIY

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)01:19:13 No.

  this song is liberal propaganda

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)03:49:26 No.

  >>3192651
  >>3192654
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWXazVhlyxQ

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)04:37:31 No.

  >>3192705
  Gold.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)06:27:35 No.

  >>3192664
  this

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)06:38:55 No.

  >>3192735
  >>3192664
  Not everything that has a message is propaganda.
  Don't want to start a shitstorm I know a lot of liberals make the same mistake with rightist shit.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)06:40:53 No.

  >>3192739
  rage against the machine is pretty much made for edgy teen kids, so yes this is supposed to be
  very fucking liberal, and therefore it's propaganda if not indoctrination of those ideas.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)06:48:27 No.

  >>3192742
  The song has nothing particularly misinformative and there is no real difference between
  indoctrination and education other than what side you're on.
  The most you can say is something like they're overplaying their hand or that they're using music
  to substitute for argument, but both are somewhat tenious imo.
  >so yes this is supposed to be very fucking liberal
  That is completely irrelevant to whether or not it is propaganda. Most propaganda is in fact
  centrist in nature for obvious reasons.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)06:51:30 No.

  >>3192746
  I think you have the wrong idea here.
  >other than what side you're on.
  This is the very idea of it. Society has shifted so much that this has become the norm.
  >The song has nothing particularly misinformative
  It's not about that, it's the message it conveys even if it doesn't want to convey it.
  "Fuck you I won't do what they tell me" forms the basis of hating authority and denying it.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)07:03:01 No.

  >>3192747
  >"Fuck you I won't do what they tell me" forms the basis of hating authority and denying it.
  Yes, it does clearly convey such a message, my point was that that isn't really criticism in and
  of itself. Either you can say the argument itself is presented unethically (which is what I'd
  call propaganda) or you can say the message is wrong, but so far you've done neither.
  >Society has shifted so much that this has become the norm.
  What has become the norm? Having sides? That was always the case. It's not like before the
  current political polarization people weren't on sides, they were just either on the same side or
  at least were more 'civil' about it. You can't have a position and not have something you're
  advocating for. I wasn't suggesting there were only 2 positions to take or anything.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)07:06:41 No.

  >>3192752
  >What has become the norm? Having sides?
  No, denying authority and music like this.
  >Either you can say the argument itself is presented unethically (which is what I'd call
  propaganda) or you can say the message is wrong, but so far you've done neither.
  It doesn't have to be wrong or unethical to be propaganda. That's just what you think because in
  your eyes the only propaganda which was explained to you to be propaganda was unethical in your
  eyes because you had already taken up different norms and values.
  People still aren't on "sides" Politics is a huge mess of differing opinions.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)07:12:45 No.

  >ranaming
  >ranaming
  >ranaming
  >ranaming
  >ranaming
  >ranaming
  >ranaming

>> [_] polite sage 12/23/16(Fri)07:14:34 No.

  >>3192753
  >No, denying authority and music like this.
  Is that just criticizing them for being cliche?
  >That's just what you think because in your eyes the only propaganda which was explained to you
  to be propaganda was unethical in your eyes because you had already taken up different norms and
  values.
  That's just what I was using as an aspect of the definition of propaganda. If it isn't unethical
  than what are you criticizing by calling it propaganda?
  >People still aren't on "sides" Politics is a huge mess of differing opinions.
  You misunderstand me semantically, I used 'sides' in a way that does not contradict this.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/23/16(Fri)08:10:15 No.

  >>3192739
  >Don't want to start a shitstorm
  >>3192746 >>3192747 >>3192752 >>3192753 >>3192755

  never fails I see