File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Other)
[_] Anon 3478800

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Other)
[_] Anon 3476008 i can't even view these in browser anymore, have this .swf file despite that
>> [_] Anon 3476010 Works fine for me in Edge.
>> [_] Anon 3476015 >In the year 3050 >People stopped using radars >People run away from certain death just about as fast as they used to >People stopped attacking things at a distance and just walk up to point blank to fight >People still use fuzzy walky-talkies >Weapons are barely past cold war era >It doesn't even look dystopian it just looks like a regular day in the city >"aaaaaaaaaa" f u t u r e
>> [_] Anon 3476040 >># lol >># flash is purged by all major browser because ... well just cause, ok use an offline player, like the adobe projector, or reinstall flash and use a non-shitty browser that isn't google, microsoft or mozilla
>> [_] Anon 3476051 >># >he doesn't follow battletech lore lmfao

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Other)
[_] Evolution of Flash Anon 3451390 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3451415 2020: flash plugin is bricked 2022: last browser known to man removes support for NPAPI 2023: W3C bans usage of all old browsers globally 2025: flying cars and nobody remembers flash 2026: the china virus kills the last dark-skinned person in africa 2027: pewdiepie brings back knowledge of "lost swf web format" after randoming a page on wikipedia 2028: trump wins his fourth presidency 2030: fueled by 10 years of civil unrest people demand a return to normalcy 2031: trump uses his permanent temporary emergency powers to force adobe into making flash completely open-source 2032: newnewgrounds.com is launched 2033: swf files are now implemented to play natively in 99% of all browsers 2035: apple files for bankruptcy 2037: swfchan.com enters top three most visited sites (daily uniques) 2038: jpg files are now banned because someone got tricked into downloading a virus instead of porn 2039: version 1.0 of ruffle drops out of nowhere (still no AS3 support) 2040: everybody is mandated under penalty of flogging to keep at minimum 1000 individually selected swf files on their quantum pocket blockchain interface
>> [_] Anon 3451416 ANY TIME NOW SIR
>> [_] Anon 3451443 2020: civilization crumbles 1984: everything is fine
>> [_] Anon 3451452 >># If only the future were so bright
>> [_] Anon 3451471 pewdiepie = nazi
>> [_] Anon 3451476 IN THE YEAR 2525...
>> [_] Anon 3451510 IF MAN IS STILL ALIVE...
>> [_] Anon 3451518 IF WOMAN CAN SURVIVE...
>> [_] Anon 3451522 THEY MAY FIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiiiiiind...

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Other)
[_] Anon 3411646 mechwarrior 5 in two days................... its gonna suck
>> [_] Anon 3411649 its already been out for a few days
>> [_] Anon 3411690 >># >># wtf why is nobody talking about it
>> [_] Anon 3411693 >># color me surprised it sucks
>> [_] Anon 3411709 >># All the people who played MWO knew that PGI would fuck it up. They have a good system in place for the core mechanics but are literally incapable of balancing a game well, programming good AI, or writing any sort of story. Alex Iglesias's art is the only reason Battletech is still on the map outside of tabletop.
>> [_] Anon 3411724 >># >># There's still room in hell for PGI's sorry carcass. But look on the bright side, /f/: you get to keep all your money.

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Other)
[_] Anon 3406429
>> [_] Anon 3406432 this better fucking be aybabu

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Other)
[_] Anon 3402986
>> [_] Anon 3402990 In the year 3050, I'll be fuckin' a horse, and I'll drink my own motherfucking piss and blood. JK, I'll just be another dead faggot ~Serveza Kingston
>> [_] Anon 3403025 soul
>> [_] Anon 3403035 One of the most important games from my childhood.

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Game)
[_] Anon 3382345

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Game)
[_] Anon 3371242
>> [_] Anon 3371244 wholesome

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Game)
[_] 27 yrs later... Anon 3369487

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Game)
[_] Anon 3365345 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3365409 Battletech is dead. Killed by Schlomo for a handful of shekels.
>> [_] Anon 3365431 >># DIE CLANNER
>> [_] Anon 3365439 In the 3055... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69zrAphW cTE

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Japanese)
[_] [R]-[7][F] Anon 3359603 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3359663 >># I miss Zipper.
>> [_] Anon 3359775 >># DIE CLANNER
>> [_] Anon 3359787 >># ITS GOT A LOCK ON ME ITS GOT A LOCK ON M--

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Other)
[_] Anon 3344323
>> [_] Procyonidae 3344333 >9595 Was that a FAMAS?
>> [_] Anon 3344334 I really wish I could get this game to run on Windows 10
>> [_] Anon 3344353 >># Thats Weskers voice

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Other)
[_] Anon 3321407
>> [_] Anon 3321421 >># DIE CLANNER
>> [_] Anon 3321425 >># HE'S GOING CRITICAL EJECTIIIING
>> [_] Anon 3321504 Man, I wanna play this shit again.

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Game)
[_] Anon 3315073 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3315095 >># DIE CLANNER
>> [_] Anon 3315145 >Look at the bright side, kid. You get to keep all the money.

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Other)
[_] die, clanner Anon 3313498
>> [_] Anon 3313528 The Inner Sphere will defeat those dirty surrats!

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Game)
[_] Anon 3274934 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3274937 how long till i get to play?
>> [_] Anon 3274940 >># travel back in time 19 years
>> [_] Anon 3274948 Die, Clanner.
>> [_] Anon 3274982 wow cool wow
>> [_] Anon 3275081 Fuckkk this brings back so many good memories
>> [_] Anon 3275082 i didnt even know i remembered this. but as soon as i read the text I knew a madcat was about to get dicked by an atlas

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Game)
[_] the inner sphere is shit today Anon 3274435
>> [_] Anon 3274459 it's bizarre to think that any human pilot would be needed in 3050
>> [_] Anon 3274462 >># 3015 is where it's at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONEjoRQ0 Cg8
>> [_] Anon 3274473 >Heh, look at the bright side kid. You get to keep all the money.
>> [_] Anon 3274478 >># Sci-fi. Not future spectectulations.
>> [_] Anon 3274487 >># saying 3050 and having everything else be like reality (with how humans act and so forth) makes you think it's in the same timeline, if they had this but said it was the year 102 i wouldn't assume it's sci-fi about the current future
>> [_] Anon 3274502 The inner sphere is always shit. Try not being freebirth scum.
>> [_] Anon 3274527 >># it's bizarre to think that any human would upload a video and tag it as a game.

File: in the year 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Game)
[_] Anon 3262759
>> [_] Anon 3262775 Some groups just don't get along.
>> [_] Anon 3262795 Oh, this brings back memories. I never had 3, just 2, (and MechAssault 1 and 2 for the original Xbox), but still, memories.
>> [_] Anon 3262825 >># Same, it's really a shame. No matter what I try, I can never get MWII to run and play the BGM when running either in DOSBox or on a Win95 virtual box.
>> [_] Anon 3262836 >># Same. Mechwarrior 2 was the shit was I was a kid. Much later on I played 3, and it was a great game.
>> [_] Anon 3262869 >Mad Cat >jimmies rustled Fucking freebirth scum, it's Timber Wolf! TIMBER WOLF!!!
>> [_] Anon 3262888 MW2 had the better intro.
>> [_] Anon 3262892 >># > [G] tag > not a game > op's a cunt

File: 3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Other)
[_] Anon 3213958
>> [_] Anon 3214041 >># Oh, How I miss playing this game! The Clan always had the better equipment...

File: in_the_year_3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Anime)
[_] Gundam: Ironic Booted Orangutans Anon 3210039
>> [_] Anon 3210042 On behalf of some idiot whose bound to ask it anyway, sauce?
>> [_] Anon 3210045 >># You need sauce? On the video that said MECHWARRIOR in big capital letters at the end? You fucking retard.
>> [_] Anon 3210053 >You will never play Mechwarrior 2 with your clan on a Windows 95 machine using your Sidewinder joystick again feelsbadman.jpg
>> [_] Anon 3210058 if only I could leg lame and lag shoot again.
>> [_] Anon 3210062 Goddamn Im salty whenever this franchise is mentioned but holy fuck if Mercs 1 and 2 didnt make my best memories.
>> [_] Anon 3210065 >># You spoke for all of us.
>> [_] Anon 3210075 >You were born too early to be a mech pilot feelsbadman.jpg
>> [_] Anon 3210100 >># >goddamn space rats
>> [_] Anon 3210119 >># This.

File: in_the_year_3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Anime)
[_] I love a good mecha anime Anon 3149808 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3149860 >implying a group of light and 1 super heavy from the inner sphere could take 2 heavy clanners... this movie is retarded
>> [_] Anon 3149972 MW3, good times >># Didn't they had 1 atlas, 1 vulture (mad dog), 2 lights I don't recognize vs a timber wolf and a summoner? The clip is retarded for multiple reasons, but the outcome is the only thing that makes sense.

File: in_the_year_3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Porn)
[_] The best year Anon 2995155 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 2995177 u wut m8?
>> [_] Anon 2995188 >># Anon confirmed for great taste. MW3 kicks so much ass. It's a shame MWO sucks.
>> [_] Anon 2995190 >># Why would people pilot these things from inside of them? Seems like it would be a lot more efficient to pilot from a separate location, like a drone Also why would you send ground troops to a battle like this
>> [_] Anon 2995195 >># Ask anyone who's ever played a fighting game- latency matters a ton. An onboard pilot can react instantly while a drone operator will always be faced with some level of delay. Plus if the signal is cut off your multimillion dollar mech becomes useless. Infantry is needed for things like securing positions, infiltrating compounds, interfacing with human-size things. Though no idea why they'd deploy them like they did.
>> [_] Anon 2995213 > He's got lock on me! > HE'S GOT LOCK ON M...
>> [_] Anon 2995226 Classic Mechwarrior was the shit, I still have my MW2 disk.
>> [_] Anon 2995227 >># MWO is no where near as good, but its still fun to play
>> [_] Anon 2995229 >># >year 3050 >war machines >not remote control from a safe place fucking crap
>> [_] Anon 2995233 I remember my feels when I finished the MW3 campaign: > Well, OK, that was sort of fun, I guess the next chapter will be better > mffw there is no next chapter, the game is over > wut
>> [_] Anon 2995238 >># Drones are lost every now and then. They can be jammed, and some have been successfully hacked. These are just modern drones, too. As one anon said before, latency is a bit of an issue also. Expert tank crews have pretty damn good reflexes. The difference in reaction time that separates them from intermediate crews , is very minute. Complete battlefield awareness is vital. I can't imagine an expert pilot being content controlling from the sidelines. There is simply no comparison between controlling a drone on a screen (or even with VR) and being in the field. Lastly, even very skilled elite soldiers are only valuable when theyre used. They're used carefully, but there is no reason not to field them when their skills are needed. /autism
>> [_] Anon 2995240 >># >"safe place" Oh shit we've got a transgender
>> [_] Anon 2995244 >># you're exactly the kind of pussy that would say no to piloting a 75 ton thermonuclear walking weapons platform. You disgust me.
>> [_] Anon 2995246 >># Oh wait , I forgot to take my meds so my autism is just running rampant today. Mechs are expensive to produce , and take (presumably) a long time to master. For example, lets take a high dollar piece of effective multipurpose hardware, but only ever use that particular weapon for everything. You cant take an objective with only apaches and abrams. Boots on the ground play a vital role in any conflict, in any arena, regardless of when it takes place. I hear people talking about robots fighting future wars and whatnot, and to some extent , i beleive it has merit. Though, when another fighting force destroys your hardware, are you just going to roll over and present ass? You might, but most others won't. It would break down to the fight that has existed since the dawn of time. Proxy battles would be the beginning, but its the blood of those to be subjugated that would always be spilled for either victory or defeat.
>> [_] Anon 2995249 In 1997.....
>> [_] Anon 2995255 >># Everything has to be analog otherwise it will get hacked.
>> [_] Anon 2995257 >># FUCK YOU FUCK YEAH ROBOTS AMERICA
>> [_] Anon 2995270 >># U fucking retarded m8? >># >headshotting with missiles Fucking IS asspulls. Like the Joestars of BT On another note anyone down for 1v1s?
>> [_] Anon 2995289 did you guys play this in virtual reality pods? this game was sick
>> [_] Anon 2995341 brb reinstalling mw3

File: in_the_year_3050.swf-(8.66 MB, 480x360, Game)
[_] 2525 was a boring year anyway Anon 2977084 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 2977089 back in the day this badly rendered cut scene would have got everyone wet
>> [_] Anon 2977093 >># I still get a little moist when I watch it.
>> [_] Anon 2977095 >men and women >women women does not belong on the battlefield, no matter how much mainstream media keeps enforcing it
>> [_] Anon 2977097 >31st century >still driving around in human operated bulky war machines If we haven't already exterminated ourselves by that time, we'd have things like swarms of nanomachines, a much more effective weapon than a hulking suit of armor. Mech armor doesn't even seem to be like an amazing advancement in battle tech. We can already obliterate things like that with computer guided rockets from thousands of miles away. I think military hardware is scaling down in size, not up.
>> [_] Anon 2977101 >># >peasants insisting on the widespread use of Lostech that even the Clans didn't figure out
>> [_] Anon 2977107 >># Eh, they don't make for good infantry, but as pilots and other vehicular positions they're fine, being somewhat short is an advantage in that context.
>> [_] Anon 2977121 >># no, because men want to protect women and that can fuck up whole missions since many men will gladly disobey orders and/or sacrifice themselves to save their female team mates. even if it goes against the greater good (the mission). 30 years of feminist propaganda isn't going to change how men have worked since thousands of years. we want to protect women, it's instinct. and honestly, do we really want this to change?
>> [_] Anon 2977124 >># What? Anyone knows that it is best to die in battle honorably so that your genes may be used again in the Clan Eugenics program.
>> [_] Anon 2977125 >># >"Men want to protect women" That's not how it works mate. Women who go to war aren't useless and they're not super models either. You won't be distracted by them because they all act the same as men do. Only difference is the vagina they have instead of a penis.
>> [_] Anon 2977155 >># That's not how it works. Regardless if they are weak or not, whether they are beautiful or not, males are programmed to protect them. That will create problems that just simply wouldn't be there if she had been a guy and I think it's ridiculous that we humor girls so much in the military even though anyone that actually know a little about soldiering know that it's a bad idea for them to be there.
>> [_] Anon 2977156 someone /r/ing the song OP refers to
>> [_] Anon 2977162 >># >># >I've never actually served, but let me spout my ignorant opinions Statistically, less women are suitable for military service than men, but there are plenty of women who ARE suitable, just like there are plenty men who aren't.
>> [_] Anon 2977169 >># >men want to protect women and that can fuck up whole missions since many men will gladly disobey orders and/or sacrifice themselves to save their female team mates mem sacrifice themselves for other men all the time. but if it were me we gotta be talking about a preeetty banging female soldier to make my dick want to run through bullets to get some poosy
>> [_] Anon 2977171 >># You know, there's a lot of very valid reasons to keep a large majority of women out of combat arms positions, but this isn't one of them. It's stupid and pointless. People said the exact same thing about black people when they were discussing mixed regiments.
>> [_] Anon 2977172 >># Don't you know that men generally wants to protect their women or are you just chosing to ignore facts because of how you want the world to be? If you are ignoring facts you may be one of those feminists I mentioned earlier. >># I'm having trouble getting through here but I have a image that might reach you guys, I'll see if I can find it. >># Hardly. I hope I find that image, give me a minute.
>> [_] Anon 2977174 >># Oh, but I'm not wrong. While there are suggestions that females present in what used to be all male occupations will cause some social friction, that's true of any social situation. This urge to protect you're talking about is something that soldiers already deal with and train against, adding women to the mix isn't going to make it any worse. Soldiers already get themselves killed risking their lives for their fellow soldiers, sometimes stupidly. It's an instinct that combat soldiers learn to deal with already. Why would it be any different for women besides your baseless idea that men lose all ability to reason in the presence in a hurt woman?
>> [_] Anon 2977176 I found the original article instead: http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/27/so me-advice-on-women-in-combat-from-a-femal e-veteran/ So basically here we have a female vetaran making very good arguments for why female soldiers are a bad idea. Honestly I don't expect you to read all of that but I've at least tried to back up my opinion now. >># I don't get how "men want to protect women" is baseless when a simple glance at human nature should be enough. Just imagine some guy kicking a girl's butt on a train, several white knights will spring into action without any knowledge of the situation simply because they want to protect her. (It would happen even if she was 20 years older than the knights and hella ugly.)
>> [_] Anon 2977180 ITT: Pleebs who have never served in the military and watch too many white knight anime spout ignorant rhetoric of gender making you unqualified for combat piloting or combat tactics.
>> [_] Anon 2977181 >># Guess I'm just a bit old fashioned in thinking that you shouldn't send a woman to do a man's job. Usually women wouldn't even be able to get the job if they don't lower the demands for it in woman's cases. Firemen is a good example. I pity the man passed out in a burning building if a woman comes to his aid. Yeah in some cases she will be able to get him out of there but in any case a man would have been able to do it quicker. Not that that happen often anyway, we as a society, usually don't give women dangerous jobs (because we want to protect women, as is our instincts). Luckily most women don't really seek out these dangerous jobs anyway because most women are sane enough to know their own limitations.
>> [_] Anon 2977183 >># And plenty of men would stand by and watch. Same way of a guy was kicking the shit out a another guy people would go to help. Either provide some real evidence of what you're suggesting or realize that you're making shit up. And there's plenty of good reasons for women to not be in combat, this just isn't one of them. Issues related to physical ability and long term health in field related situations, never mind problems with pregency. So talk about real problems, not bullshit
>> [_] Anon 2977187 >># that sentence isn't making sense, you seem to be contradicting yourself >># yeah, some would stand by and watch because either they are cowards (doesnt mean that they wouldnt want to step in) or because someone else is already stepping in. or they get aroused from it... im not making anything up. are there really people out there that have not noticed the basic nature of men wanting to protect women? you're asking me to prove that the sky is blue, just look outside buddy.
>> [_] Anon 2977188 >># The thing is, it's not a "man's job". It's a "whoever is qualified for the job." Using your example, if a woman is buff enough to lift 200lbs while wearing 75lbs of gear, why wouldn't you hire her for a firefighter position if she wants it? This woman just as physically (and PRESUMABLY mentally) capable as a man.
>> [_] Anon 2977190 >># >im not making anything up. are there really people out there that have not noticed the basic nature of men wanting to protect women? you're asking me to prove that the sky is blue, just look outside buddy. There's nothing basic about human nature in terms of social interaction. Provide sources, studies, evidence. Don't make huge generalizations about the nature of human beings universally without any evidence to back you up, because it means less than nothing. All you're doing to prove you point is going "Everyone knows this" "It's obvious" and "Here's a hypothetical situation that I've designed to prove my point without considering any alternate explanations." Even the source you cited, while certainly having a lot of good points, provides almost nothing to your claim. At least she talks about real numbers(that of mixed units having 3 times the causalities of male only units), but even that needs to be investigated to account for other variables(women, for example, are more prone to injuries related to combat arms style actions. Certainly a valid reason for them to not be in the role, but nothing to do with male vs female interactions).
>> [_] Anon 2977194 >># That's just the thing, they lower physical requirements to meet their female quota. >># Jesus man, I don't intend to waste my time Googling for studies that proves that the sky is blue. You seem like the kind of guy that wouldn't read it anyway. You'd just find something else to point out. >as you can clearly see this ball is round >oh yeah? provide sources, studies, evidence. this clearly obvious fact of life means nothing to me unless a long bearded man wrote a paper on it.
>> [_] Anon 2977198 >># >That's just the thing, they lower physical requirements to meet their female quota. Source?
>> [_] Anon 2977200 >># https://www.google.com/search?q=male+vs+ female+firefighter+requirements >LIES, ALL LIES
>> [_] Anon 2977201 more lies here as well https://www.google.com/search?q=male+vs+ female+soldier+requirements
>> [_] Anon 2977202 >># Seems it's been uploaded rather recently. Here. http://swfchan.com/27/132870/?in+the+yea r+2525.swf Can work it out from there.
>> [_] Anon 2977203 >># Virgin detected.
>> [_] Anon 2977207 >># Motherfucker, I'm asking you to provide the studies because I know they don't exist. I did the research on this topic, and did quite a bit of it. I know the subject pretty damn well, and all the various issues and points of view. And now I'm challenging you to not sprout bullshit and do the research yourself, and you're refusing too, because you like being ignorant, I guess?
>> [_] Anon 2977209 >># Just to be clear: We are talking about the fact that men want to protect women, right? I mean, the supposedly "fact"?
>> [_] Anon 2977214 How do you faggots actually fall for that kind of bait? Please kill yourselves.
>> [_] Anon 2977216 >># >31st century >still speaking American English
>> [_] Anon 2977217 >># 7/10, your biggest mistake was to generalize your comment so that both sides of the argument would feel that it was directed to them. made it too obvious.
>> [_] Anon 2977222 >># >https://www.google.com/search?q=male+vs +female+firefighter+requirements Instead of citing sources, you just to a "let me google that for you" link. Everything on that page was about inequality of gender for SEXUAL HARRASSMENT. The one I DID find was lowering the requirements for EVERYONE. "Fire chiefs have made the 'ladder lifting' tests that all new recruits must go through easier to allow more women and less-strong men into the service." and that was for the goddamn U.K. you lack of research and preconceived notion that women are getting special treatment is a big fucking joke, perpetrated by people like you. "A lot of people say it, so it must be true".
>> [_] Anon 2977226 >># Google is different for everybody so maybe they felt like giving you links that were more pleasing for your feelings. If you can't see that women gets special treatment you are the joke, my friend.
>> [_] Anon 2977230 >># The fact that you typed that first line, thought it was okay, even as a joke, and hit post.... Google doesn't work that way. I'm done. You're far too stupid to have a meaningful argument with. You win.
>> [_] Anon 2977232 >># Wait, did we have an argument? Oh yeah, I was for reality and you were for stronk womyn. Google do work that way, they personalize search results to who they believe makes the search (especially if you're logged in).
>> [_] Anon 2977237 >># We're talking about the specific concept of men having an instinct to protect women that will overwrite military training specifically designed to prevent that sort of situation(in general, not for women specifically, yes). I've done the wider research on the idea of women in combat positions, and the data shows it to be a bad idea. But there's nothing to be fucking gained arguing the position with bullshit facts that you can't prove when there's tons and tons of legitimate and researched reasons and data to use instead.