|STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES|
C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR
|/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/||P0001 · P2030 · P4059|
Since it's exceptionally easy to only block the actual ads on swfchan (no ads are actually served from swfchan's own domain) and because the current ruleset is actually causing visitors to see more ads I thought this matter would be quickly resolved. However, I have been trying to contact EasyList for over three weeks now with no response. Therefore I feel the need to ask my visitors to e-mail them as well to bring attention to this issue and show that regular users of EasyList care about swfchan, not just the guy running the site.
They have two e-mails: firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com. The first one is the primary mail but I've sent mail to both and received a reply from neither. Have sent using different mail accounts as well so I know there was no sending issues on my end. I should have written this announcement earlier but this whole thing felt like such an open-and-shut case that I would never have imagined swfchan still being blocked like this after three weeks. Big thanks to anyone helping out!
Note: I'm not writing this because of money, the site's income is actually the same as before (less visitors but less blockers equal same ad views). I am however worried that in the long run, in a year or so, this may lead to less links leading to swfchan which would sure enough finally kill it off the web, especially with the dwindling flash support these days. I also don't think this is a fair practice by EasyList, there's no reason what-so-ever to block swfchan itself. I don't serve ads and an adblocker should block ad providers, not sites that use ad providers. I also don't limit anyone blocking ads from using the site in any way. It feels like the EasyList authors took just a minute to look at swfchan, said "fuck it" and proceeded to block the whole thing instead of only the ads.
So if you have a moment I'd really appreciate it if you took the time to e-mail them about this. Just be polite and ask EasyList to block only the ads on swfchan, not the actual content on swfchan itself. There's a discussion thread over here.
This is resource BLBOCOB, an Active Thread.
Original location: http://swfchan.org/11168/
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 26.
Discovered flash files: 1 (so far)
/ > /fap/ > Thread 11168 Age: 87.41d Health: 36.41% Posters: 16 Posts: 26 Replies: 25 Files: 1+3 >> Anonymous 25apr2017(tu)00:29 No.48700 OP P1 you know it's bad when the maker of the flash urges you to not watch it [IMG] dragoness puppy fun 2.0.swf (1.19 MiB) 1000x800, Compressed. 1241 frames, 24 fps (00:52). Ver15, AS3. Network access: No. Text: Yes. Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Yes. Video: No. <METADATA> [find in archive] >> Anonymous 25apr2017(tu)01:52 No.48708 A P2R1 Then why did you upload it? >> Anonymous 25apr2017(tu)03:04 No.48712 OP P3R2 >>48708 for shits and giggles, these things are great >> Anonymous 25apr2017(tu)03:08 No.48713 B P4R3 OP makes a valid point. :^) >> Anonymous 25apr2017(tu)03:53 No.48715 C P5R4 WTF is this shit. Its awful. >> Anonymous 25apr2017(tu)03:57 No.48716 B P6R5 >>48715 Come for the metaphorical shit, stay for the literal shit, and then contemplate why you even came here in the first place. That's life for ya. >> Anonymous 25apr2017(tu)05:47 No.48718 D P7R6 Well this was def not fappable, so why is it even in here? unless you like your poop and blood covered fury dicks. I realize some people find that interesting but i would vague that is a rather small crowd. >> Anonymous 25apr2017(tu)09:42 No.48722 E P8R7 >>48718 it's the crowd you're in right now, fella >> Anonymous 25apr2017(tu)21:57 No.48758 F P9R8 First, there are topics that graphically you see all over the internet, but there are others that one would not want to touch or see in a casual way. Internet has its good and bad things. MR. >>48716 >> Anonymous 25apr2017(tu)22:23 No.48759 B P10R9 >>48758 That's true actually. I was just ｓｈｉｔposting however. (Get it? Gee, tough crowd.) >> Shrek 26apr2017(we)04:14 No.48767 G P11R10 By the looks of it, even hardcore furries wouldn't fap to raped puppy dogs. That's just nasty >> Anonymous 26apr2017(we)06:07 No.48769 H P12R11 Furfags will defend this. >> Anonymous 26apr2017(we)15:50 No.48790 B P13R12 >>48769 Because making generalizations about people we don't know about is still as dank as it was before. :^) Feel free to crawl back to /pol/ while you're at it, cuck. >>48767 Well, yeah. This is too extreme, even for me. >> Anonymous 26apr2017(we)16:41 No.48794 I P14R13 >>48790 >:^)Proving:^)his:^)point:^) :^) >> Anonymous 28apr2017(fr)07:23 No.48883 H P15R14 >>48790 >>48794 >>48767 Like I said, furfags will defend this. https://e621.net/post/show/1194298/age_difference-anal-anal_penetration-animated-bdsm >> Anonymous 29apr2017(sa)19:01 No.48957 J P16R15 My biggest problem with this is the sole testicle on an outer side of the leg. >> Anonymous 3may2017(we)06:41 No.49078 K P17R16 >>48883 True, you never gave a specific number. No doubt, people think you're clever. >> Dusty_Wings 9may2017(tu)22:03 No.49283 L P18R17 credit where it's due. Feel free to give the owner credit: Plus they have a warning because of the downvotes from faggots that can't handle this stuff. https://e621.net/post/index/1/wyrmly >> Anonymous 17may2017(we)19:17 No.49576 M P19R18 >>48769 furfag here, this shit is fucking disgusting. >> Anonymous 30jun2017(fr)22:56 No.50818 N P20R19 Whoever thought this was hot has clearly never had shitdick before. >> Anonymous 19jul2017(we)00:17 No.51450 K P21R20 >>50818 Let's be honest here: whoever thought this was hot has most likely only ever had lotiondick and/or smegmadick. >> Anonymous 19jul2017(we)00:52 No.51454 O P22R21 >>51450 Apparently you did too if you decided to necromancer this thread. >> Anonymous 19jul2017(we)05:16 No.51464 K P23R22 >>51454 Impeccable logic, sir. Practically all flash today is utterly fucking tepid. Hey, here's another schlocky 'Meet & Fuck' game. Oh, and here we have some tween-animated scribbles that are supposed to be sexy. And here's a low quality clip of a trite porn scene which is indistinguishable from the millions of other clips on any of the tens of thousands of sites that are actually made for that express purpose. Heeeey, is this one of those static pictures where you can look at a character's norty bits one square inch at a time by moving the mouse around? Fabulous! And here we have a dozen cookie cutter music loops, and here we have a 30Mb exercise in "what does optimization mean?", and here we have... Oh, it's Piccolo fucking Vegeta. Again. Just as shocking today as it was eight years ago. This atrocity, at least, is exceptional in its wrongness, and I revel in your dismay. >> Anonymous 19jul2017(we)05:24 No.51465 O P24R23 >>51464 Whatever autist. At least I'm not the one that brought this months old thread back from the grave. >> Anonymous 19jul2017(we)05:32 No.51466 K P25R24 >>51465 Yes you are. >> Anonymous 20jul2017(th)19:44 No.51546 E P26R25 >>51464 >>51466 I must say old bean, I'm quite astonished of your claim.