|STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES|
C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR
|/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/||P0001 · P2031 · P4061|
Since it's exceptionally easy to only block the actual ads on swfchan (no ads are actually served from swfchan's own domain) and because the current ruleset is actually causing visitors to see more ads I thought this matter would be quickly resolved. However, I have been trying to contact EasyList for over three weeks now with no response. Therefore I feel the need to ask my visitors to e-mail them as well to bring attention to this issue and show that regular users of EasyList care about swfchan, not just the guy running the site.
They have two e-mails: firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com. The first one is the primary mail but I've sent mail to both and received a reply from neither. Have sent using different mail accounts as well so I know there was no sending issues on my end. I should have written this announcement earlier but this whole thing felt like such an open-and-shut case that I would never have imagined swfchan still being blocked like this after three weeks. Big thanks to anyone helping out!
Note: I'm not writing this because of money, the site's income is actually the same as before (less visitors but less blockers equal same ad views). I am however worried that in the long run, in a year or so, this may lead to less links leading to swfchan which would sure enough finally kill it off the web, especially with the dwindling flash support these days. I also don't think this is a fair practice by EasyList, there's no reason what-so-ever to block swfchan itself. I don't serve ads and an adblocker should block ad providers, not sites that use ad providers. I also don't limit anyone blocking ads from using the site in any way. It feels like the EasyList authors took just a minute to look at swfchan, said "fuck it" and proceeded to block the whole thing instead of only the ads.
So if you have a moment I'd really appreciate it if you took the time to e-mail them about this. Just be polite and ask EasyList to block only the ads on swfchan, not the actual content on swfchan itself. There's a discussion thread over here.
This is resource RS1G217, an Archived Thread.
Original location: http://swfchan.org/10756/
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 22.
Discovered flash files: 1
/ > /fap/ > Thread 10756 Age: 43.12d Health: 0% Posters: 16 Posts: 22 Replies: 21 Files: 1+2 >> Anonymous 13feb2017(mo)12:56 No.44120 OP P1 zoey cum harvest sasdasdaadssadw [IMG] zoey cum harvest.swf (63.42 MiB) 1280x720, Compressed. 9632 frames, 60 fps (02:41). Ver27, AS3. Network access: No. Text: Yes. Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Yes. Video: Yes. [find in archive] >> Anonymous 15feb2017(we)03:22 No.44171 A P2R1 Wow, this again, I hoped there'd be more scenes this time, I mean come on its 63 MB >> Anonymous 15feb2017(we)18:00 No.44183 B P3R2 StudioFOW sucks. >> Anonymous 15feb2017(we)20:11 No.44185 C P4R3 >>44171 Raw file from SFM takes more space on hdd >> Anonymous 15feb2017(we)23:40 No.44188 D P5R4 Nice animation... >that scout Lost >> Anonymous 16feb2017(th)01:06 No.44189 E P6R5 it's pretty good but damn, that file size. keep the quality down a bit so you have somewhere to expand when the time comes >> Anonymous 16feb2017(th)06:11 No.44195 F P7R6 >no beasty easter egg >only three fucking scenes >over 60MBs Embarrassing >> Anonymous 16feb2017(th)16:18 No.44209 G P8R7 >>44171 >>44183 >>44195 It amazes me how people can complain that much over free high quality stuff... How is it even possible to be that spoiled? >> Anonymous 16feb2017(th)17:10 No.44210 H P9R8 >>44209 Nothing is safe from scrutiny, critique and plain old bitching, and nothing should be. Lack of bitching creates conceited asshats, fuck back to whatever easily impressed circlejerk you came from. >> Anonymous 16feb2017(th)17:44 No.44212 G P10R9 >>44210 Well, now that comment started good and went to retardistan right at the end. Of course nothing should be safe from critique. Critique in any and all froms is important. But complaining about free stuff despite it having a higher quality then a good chunk of the paid stuff (which REALLY should be the target of critique) is just plain stupid. "Here, have a free Audi." "I wanted a (free) Porsche, you stupid asshat." That's essentially what this is and that's why I'm so amazed by it. >> Anonymous 16feb2017(th)18:14 No.44213 I P11R10 >>44209 >>44212 >Free high quality stuff >StudioFOW Pick one. These guys earn 20,000+ dollars every month. Even at the time this garbage was released they were up to 6000 already. Its hilarious with how little effort and resources they make these and how people buy into it. Any idiot can dick around in SFM and learn how to do this if given enough time as SFM is entry level porn making. >> Anonymous 16feb2017(th)19:49 No.44216 H P12R11 >>44212 "Here, have a free Audi" "Nah I hate Audi, it's garbage" "REEEEEEEEE YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO HATE IT, IT'S FREE!!!" >> Anonymous 16feb2017(th)23:34 No.44219 G P13R12 >>44213 >Any idiot can dick around in SFM and learn how to do this if given enough time as SFM is entry level porn making. Well, then do it better you tard and earn the money yourself... And yes, they do earn money from donations. Donations! Their stuff is still free for everyone. What is so fucking hard to grasp about that? >>44216 Is that you? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qU49IGeGBtc >> Anonymous 17feb2017(fr)11:59 No.44237 H P14R13 >>44219 I'm not clicking your youtube video. >Well, then do it better you tard and earn the money yourself... Yes, let's all become SFM "artists" and see where that will lead us in 10 years. People have real jobs, you know. >You should totally love this it's FREE, if you don't, you're a spoiled brat. >You should totally eat this dogshit it's FREE, if you don't, you're a spoiled brat The label "FREE" adds no fucking value to a product, mate. >> Anonymous 17feb2017(fr)12:25 No.44238 F P15R14 >>44209 >high quality I'm literally saying that it isn't high quality. That is my complaint here. >> Anonymous 17feb2017(fr)19:54 No.44260 J P16R15 >>44219 comparing random works of porn for the random internet to a gift from a loving and caring family member is insane! the guy in the video should have been at least somewhat respectful and hide his dissappointment behind some dismissing polite phrases. but for some "thing" on the net, you wouldn't this shouldn't even be posted here in the first place, because it's most likely pirated >> Anonymous 17feb2017(fr)21:29 No.44274 K P17R16 StudioFow > Not your average smut Gives less than average smut >> Anonymous 18feb2017(sa)08:28 No.44299 A P18R17 >>44209 I appreciate the quality, but I've seen this flash so often and for the size there is simply nearly no content, 2 scenes and the fucking scout easteregg. >> Anonymous 11mar2017(sa)06:53 No.45019 L P19R18 With the resource Studio Fow has, they could've made their flash much sexier and fappable. They really don't need to spend so much time and energy on cool intro, villain introduction (and all filler involving them), and ending/credit with special effect and what not. Also, their only voice actress sounds way too intelligible most of time for what the FC is going through. >> Anonymous 11mar2017(sa)20:11 No.45041 M P20R19 >cheesy cheap voice actress half-laughing half-absent >low quality animation full of clipping >arrogance as "professional artistry" and much ado for nothing >default render and free models like every amateur; not a single original effect, post-processing or texture >retarded easter eggs which nobody finds funny >not even fappable or hot I could guess the creator even without the horse logo. I can name a dozen all the way better SFM creators who aren't patreonbait and do it for free. It's really funny how delusional StudioFOW is, these guys think they are the pinnacle of porn for using default SFM without innovating or doing anything better than below-average SFM porn. >> Anonymous 12mar2017(su)14:12 No.45081 N P21R20 Not to mention the fact that anything half fappable they make is rarely, if barely near 10 minutes, if not five or three. >> Anonymous 21mar2017(tu)23:59 No.46474 O P22R21 >>45041 I don't really like Studiofow but the delusional one here is you. What you said is akin to saying "How can X company possibly sell Y movie at all, all they did was use Z movie editing software that any idiot can learn to use!" like that argument makes any sense. Editing isn't the hard part, hell it isn't hard at all. Learning to use any tool isn't hard. Are you some dipshit who complains that the local electrician dares charge you for work they did which anyone can learn to do? You can't do what they do, or more apt to say you won't. Editing especially in SFM is tedious as fuck, the best free/no donation guys release shit that is seconds long because it takes hours to make those seconds look good. This isn't even about you're opinion nor is it saying you can't criticize or not like something that is free. This is about your argument making little to no sense. You are mad they are making money for something you deem takes little skill without realizing that's not the point. Not even using this as an example, 5-20 minute long videos can take hundreds of hours in SFM and that shouldn't surprise you. Whether you believe they deserve that money is a moot point, you're just an idiot in the end.