|STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES|
C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR
|/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/||P0001 · P2030 · P4059|
Since it's exceptionally easy to only block the actual ads on swfchan (no ads are actually served from swfchan's own domain) and because the current ruleset is actually causing visitors to see more ads I thought this matter would be quickly resolved. However, I have been trying to contact EasyList for over three weeks now with no response. Therefore I feel the need to ask my visitors to e-mail them as well to bring attention to this issue and show that regular users of EasyList care about swfchan, not just the guy running the site.
They have two e-mails: firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com. The first one is the primary mail but I've sent mail to both and received a reply from neither. Have sent using different mail accounts as well so I know there was no sending issues on my end. I should have written this announcement earlier but this whole thing felt like such an open-and-shut case that I would never have imagined swfchan still being blocked like this after three weeks. Big thanks to anyone helping out!
Note: I'm not writing this because of money, the site's income is actually the same as before (less visitors but less blockers equal same ad views). I am however worried that in the long run, in a year or so, this may lead to less links leading to swfchan which would sure enough finally kill it off the web, especially with the dwindling flash support these days. I also don't think this is a fair practice by EasyList, there's no reason what-so-ever to block swfchan itself. I don't serve ads and an adblocker should block ad providers, not sites that use ad providers. I also don't limit anyone blocking ads from using the site in any way. It feels like the EasyList authors took just a minute to look at swfchan, said "fuck it" and proceeded to block the whole thing instead of only the ads.
So if you have a moment I'd really appreciate it if you took the time to e-mail them about this. Just be polite and ask EasyList to block only the ads on swfchan, not the actual content on swfchan itself. There's a discussion thread over here.
This is resource U9E71PB, an Active Thread.
Original location: http://swfchan.org/11274/
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 10.
Discovered flash files: 1 (so far)
/ > /fap/ > Thread 11274 Age: 72.56d Health: 5.67% Posters: 8 Posts: 10 Replies: 7 Files: 1+3 >> Anonymous 9may2017(tu)20:52 No.49281 OP P1 [IMG] No Vacancy Female version V5.swf (1.83 MiB) 1000x560, Compressed. 330 frames, 30 fps (00:11). Ver15, AS1/AS2. Network access: No. Text: Yes. Bitmaps: No. Audio: Yes. Video: No. <METADATA> [find in archive] >> Anonymous 9may2017(tu)22:28 No.49287 A P2R1 Hm... Female version? I wonder if this is converted from a gay flash... >gives a titty-job to a pair of testicles Yep, this was converted from a gay flash. >> Anonymous 10may2017(we)01:08 No.49294 B P3R2 >>49287 Lmao Well, to be honest, the original flash wasn't entirely gay, but most of it sure was. I just wish the bastard would add more to the other "No Vacancy" version or something. Hell, even some more stuff with Noor involved would be nice. :^| >> Anonymous 10may2017(we)05:00 No.49303 C P4R3 Why is there a child sex logo in the bar room >> Anonymous 10may2017(we)05:43 No.49304 D P5R4 >>49303 You mean a triangular spiral? Must be because the author is a Moloch-worshipping pizza pedo and, like all Moloch-worshipping pizza pedos, has a burning need to insert their special "hey guys I'm a pedo" symbol in everything they do. >> Anonymous 10may2017(we)08:46 No.49309 E P6 >>49303 >Furries >Not fucked in the head Pick 1 >> Anonymous 10may2017(we)23:24 No.49328 F P7R5 >>49304 10/10 >> Anonymous 12may2017(fr)15:44 No.49389 B P8R6 Out of all the threads to discuss Pizzagate, which has been debunked a long time ago. But I guess even alt-right cucks need their fun too. >> Anonymous 12may2017(fr)16:18 No.49390 E P9 >>49389 And what are you, the delayed thread discussion police? Fuck off Molesta. >> Anonymous 13may2017(sa)21:36 No.49446 G P10R7 >>49389 >Debunked >No official investigation. Ok bro.