STORY   LOOP   FURRY   PORN   GAMES
• C •   SERVICES [?] [R] RND   POPULAR
Archived flashes:
228014
/disc/ · /res/     /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/P0001 · P2560 · P5119

<div style="position:absolute;top:-99px;left:-99px;"><img src="http://swfchan.com:57475/84841002?noj=FRM84841002-16DN" width="1" height="1"></div>

This is resource VNRVESE, an Archived Thread.
Discovered:4/6 -2017 23:03:36

Ended:5/6 -2017 06:44:34

Checked:5/6 -2017 07:06:24

Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3250851/resident
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 21.
Discovered flash files: 1





File: PRESIDENT TRUMP [never come down].swf-(9.8 MB, 676x380, Porn)
[_] [R][E][S][I][D][E][N][T] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)16:53:42 No.3250851

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)16:59:54 No.3250853

  I wonder if the hype will still be the same when he wins again in 4 years.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)17:37:15 No.3250858

  >>3250853
  I doubt murika has enough retards to vote for him twice.

  I mean the first vote turnout was pretty close to 50-50 and now everyone has seen the stupid shit
  he does.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)17:39:14 No.3250859

  >>3250858
  name something stupid he's done.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)17:46:37 No.3250862

  >>3250859
  covfefe

>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)17:53:08 No.3250865

  >>3250858
  breathing and has a fetish for coal

>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)17:53:47 No.3250866

  >>3250858
  Try fielding a better candidate than Clinton next time.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)17:58:02 No.3250871

  >>3250859
  It's faster to list the unambiguously good moves he has done during his presidential career: none

>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)20:13:11 No.3250923

  >>3250871
  nice meme
  Go to youtube and watch the weekly addresses.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)20:16:03 No.3250924

  >>3250858
  >doubt murika has enough retards
  top kek

>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)20:47:31 No.3250936

  ok

>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)21:39:46 No.3250955

  >>3250862
  >stupid
  4d chess
  Trolling the left into oblivion.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)21:50:33 No.3250959

  >>3250862
  Tackling the important stuff, I see.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)22:44:16 No.3250972

  he's a jewish shill
  meh better than Hillary

>> [_] Anonymous 06/04/17(Sun)23:46:19 No.3250995

  >>3250859
  Pulled out of the Paris climate agreement

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/17(Mon)00:03:44 No.3251002

  >>3250995
  >implying that the Paris Climate Agreement was a good thing.
  Kek. Trump pulling the US out of the Paris Climate Agreement is the best thing he has done so far.

  Read this: https://www.reddit.com/r/NeutralPolitics/comments/6duvqg/what_is_the_most_politicall
  y_favorable_decision/di6bvby/

  >inb4 Reddit

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/17(Mon)00:10:18 No.3251005

  >>3251002
  l2screencap you nigger

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/17(Mon)00:13:33 No.3251006

  >>3251005
  >l2screencap you nigger
  ok

  https://prnt.sc/ffzolk

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/17(Mon)00:26:00 No.3251009

  >>3251002
  His argument seems to rest on Australia's 10 year carbon tax plan costing $160B, which is where
  he gets his ridiculous figure of 3.2 quadrillion dollars to reduce global temperatures by 1
  degree. His source of this is the 244 page Garnaut Report - a quick search through it for "IPCC",
  "160", "11.2" (the supposed per-year tax) and "billion" all come up with nothing to match this
  claim. The closest I can find is a statement claiming that the carbon tax would raise 11.6
  billion dollars a year for the Australian government - but 11.6 billion dollar in federal revenue
  is not the same thing as 11.6 billion dollars *lost*.

  On top of this, his general premise is flawed - he extrapolates that because a proposed
  Australian carbon tax which was repealed after only a couple years in effect was projected to be
  inefficient, all hopes at reducing greenhouse gas emissions are a waste of time. This discounts
  technological innovations making such reductions more efficient, investment in renewable energy
  being a huge gain for the economy (see China's multi-hundred-billion-dollar renewable investment
  plan), and the fact that virtually no country uses carbon taxes in the first place precisely
  because they're economically inefficient - emissions trading schemes are far more popular.

  Overall, I'd say he's talking out his ass.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/17(Mon)00:37:29 No.3251018

  >>3251009
  Regardless of whether or not the US is part of the climate deal voluntary reduction is going to
  happen. We may not hit the target number, but that was not guaranteed anyway. The only definite
  consequence of reneging is that the US government won't pay out billions of dollars that it
  doesn't have to foreign governments in hopes that they maybe spend some of it on reducing carbon
  emissions instead of funding regional warfare. I have voted in favor of local green energy
  initiatives and I donate to environmental causes, I suggest you do the same if the issue is
  important to you.

  He needs to can the FCC head and get back to work on muslim immigration; then we'll be on track
  for a good eight years again.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/17(Mon)00:43:31 No.3251019

  >>3251002
  Reddit



http://swfchan.net/37/VNRVESE.shtml
Created: 4/6 -2017 23:03:36 Last modified: 5/6 -2017 07:06:26 Server time: 16/04 -2024 11:36:38