File: PRESIDENT TRUMP [never come down].swf-(9.8 MB, 676x380, Other)
[_] Anon 3323927
>> [_] Anon 3323928 >># I'm not sick of the winning, by a long shot.

File: PRESIDENT TRUMP [never come down].swf-(9.8 MB, 676x380, Porn)
[_] [R][E][S][I][D][E][N][T] Anon 3250851 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3250853 I wonder if the hype will still be the same when he wins again in 4 years.
>> [_] Anon 3250858 >># I doubt murika has enough retards to vote for him twice. I mean the first vote turnout was pretty close to 50-50 and now everyone has seen the stupid shit he does.
>> [_] Anon 3250859 >># name something stupid he's done.
>> [_] Anon 3250862 >># covfefe
>> [_] Anon 3250865 >># breathing and has a fetish for coal
>> [_] Anon 3250866 >># Try fielding a better candidate than Clinton next time.
>> [_] Anon 3250871 >># It's faster to list the unambiguously good moves he has done during his presidential career: none
>> [_] Anon 3250923 >># nice meme Go to youtube and watch the weekly addresses.
>> [_] Anon 3250924 >># >doubt murika has enough retards top kek
>> [_] Anon 3250936 ok
>> [_] Anon 3250955 >># >stupid 4d chess Trolling the left into oblivion.
>> [_] Anon 3250959 >># Tackling the important stuff, I see.
>> [_] Anon 3250972 he's a jewish shill meh better than Hillary
>> [_] Anon 3250995 >># Pulled out of the Paris climate agreement
>> [_] Anon 3251002 >># >implying that the Paris Climate Agreement was a good thing. Kek. Trump pulling the US out of the Paris Climate Agreement is the best thing he has done so far. Read this: https://www.reddit.com/r/NeutralPolitics /comments/6duvqg/what_is_the_most_politic ally_favorable_decision/di6bvby/ >inb4 Reddit
>> [_] Anon 3251005 >># l2screencap you nigger
>> [_] Anon 3251006 >># >l2screencap you nigger ok https://prnt.sc/ffzolk
>> [_] Anon 3251009 >># His argument seems to rest on Australia's 10 year carbon tax plan costing $160B, which is where he gets his ridiculous figure of 3.2 quadrillion dollars to reduce global temperatures by 1 degree. His source of this is the 244 page Garnaut Report - a quick search through it for "IPCC", "160", "11.2" (the supposed per-year tax) and "billion" all come up with nothing to match this claim. The closest I can find is a statement claiming that the carbon tax would raise 11.6 billion dollars a year for the Australian government - but 11.6 billion dollar in federal revenue is not the same thing as 11.6 billion dollars *lost*. On top of this, his general premise is flawed - he extrapolates that because a proposed Australian carbon tax which was repealed after only a couple years in effect was projected to be inefficient, all hopes at reducing greenhouse gas emissions are a waste of time. This discounts technological innovations making such reductions more efficient, investment in renewable energy being a huge gain for the economy (see China's multi-hundred-billion-dollar renewable investment plan), and the fact that virtually no country uses carbon taxes in the first place precisely because they're economically inefficient - emissions trading schemes are far more popular. Overall, I'd say he's talking out his ass.
>> [_] Anon 3251018 >># Regardless of whether or not the US is part of the climate deal voluntary reduction is going to happen. We may not hit the target number, but that was not guaranteed anyway. The only definite consequence of reneging is that the US government won't pay out billions of dollars that it doesn't have to foreign governments in hopes that they maybe spend some of it on reducing carbon emissions instead of funding regional warfare. I have voted in favor of local green energy initiatives and I donate to environmental causes, I suggest you do the same if the issue is important to you. He needs to can the FCC head and get back to work on muslim immigration; then we'll be on track for a good eight years again.
>> [_] Anon 3251019 >># Reddit