STORY   LOOP   FURRY   PORN   GAMES
• C •   SERVICES [?] [R] RND   POPULAR
Archived flashes:
188179
/disc/ · /res/     /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/P0001 · P2035 · P4069

If the site isn't working like it should for you it is because EasyList (a set of filter rules used by your adblocker) has started to block the whole eye.swfchan.com subdomain. This causes captchas to not load and the easy solution is to just disable the adblocker completely. Ironically this causes people using the EasyList ruleset to actually see more ads...

Since it's exceptionally easy to only block the actual ads on swfchan (no ads are actually served from swfchan's own domain) and because the current ruleset is actually causing visitors to see more ads I thought this matter would be quickly resolved. However, I have been trying to contact EasyList for over three weeks now with no response. Therefore I feel the need to ask my visitors to e-mail them as well to bring attention to this issue and show that regular users of EasyList care about swfchan, not just the guy running the site.

They have two e-mails: easylist.subscription@gmail.com and easylist.blog@gmail.com. The first one is the primary mail but I've sent mail to both and received a reply from neither. Have sent using different mail accounts as well so I know there was no sending issues on my end. I should have written this announcement earlier but this whole thing felt like such an open-and-shut case that I would never have imagined swfchan still being blocked like this after three weeks. Big thanks to anyone helping out!

Note: I'm not writing this because of money, the site's income is actually the same as before (less visitors but less blockers equal same ad views). I am however worried that in the long run, in a year or so, this may lead to less links leading to swfchan which would sure enough finally kill it off the web, especially with the dwindling flash support these days. I also don't think this is a fair practice by EasyList, there's no reason what-so-ever to block swfchan itself. I don't serve ads and an adblocker should block ad providers, not sites that use ad providers. I also don't limit anyone blocking ads from using the site in any way. It feels like the EasyList authors took just a minute to look at swfchan, said "fuck it" and proceeded to block the whole thing instead of only the ads.

So if you have a moment I'd really appreciate it if you took the time to e-mail them about this. Just be polite and ask EasyList to block only the ads on swfchan, not the actual content on swfchan itself. There's a discussion thread over here.

Breaking news!
Old Discussion
Discussion

<div style="position:absolute;top:-99px;left:-99px;"><img src="http://eye.swfchan.com:57475/61679558?noj=FRM61679558-21DN" width="1" height="1"></div>

This is resource WVZBKJ5, an Archived Thread.
Discovered:19/6 -2017 08:40:51

Ended:19/6 -2017 20:46:20

Checked:19/6 -2017 22:14:36

Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3254958
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 16.
Discovered flash files: 1


UNRELIABLE.swf
FIRST SIGHT [W] [I] | WIKI



File: UNRELIABLE.swf-(5.79 MB, 640x360, Other)
[_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)02:36:06 No.3254958

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)02:39:41 No.3254960

  i aint /k/ enough to understand

>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)03:29:34 No.3254966

  >>3254960
  IT'S UN-FUCKING-RELIABLE LADIES AND GENTS

>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)03:41:02 No.3254967

  >>3254960
  IT'S NOT A SOLDIER'S GUN!

>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)03:47:21 No.3254968

  >[autistic screeching]
  >allahu akbar

>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)05:47:14 No.3254984

  >>3254960
  A "soldier's gun" needs to be reliable. A full-length guide rod and tight manufacturing
  tolerances are characteristics of a reliable gun. He then demonstrates this by firing, in rapid
  succession, two magazines without a misfire. People like to give their opinions on things that
  they really shouldn't, so the meme is that this gun is unreliable and "not a soldier's gun".
  Would you like to know more?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)07:05:24 No.3254991

  >that fucking shirt

>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)07:21:41 No.3254994

  >>3254984
  This is dumb. This meme is dumb. Anyone who opened this flash is now dumber.

  I remember back when /k/ was about the year of the deagle.

  Man that board is shit.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)08:08:24 No.3255000

  >>3254984
  Full length guide rod and tight tolerances are arguments that its NOT reliable.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)10:37:54 No.3255024

  >>3254994
  >I remember back when /k/ was about the year of the deagle.
  Don't fucking remind me, that meme spilled over into just about every FPS game forum on the web.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)11:18:31 No.3255026

  >>3254984
  thanks! so two magazines is enough to call it reliable? yes, i'd like to know more.

>> [_] John Moses Browning 06/19/17(Mon)11:49:44 No.3255029

  >>3255026
  Cant do this with a Glock yo

>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)12:26:26 No.3255032

  >>3255026
  Pistols aren't designed for "full-auto" slamfiring like that, many would stovepipe.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)12:35:29 No.3255034

  >>3255029
  Don't know shit about guns, but isn't there a little doohickey you can shove into a glock that
  makes it shoot 1,000 rounds pm?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)14:18:46 No.3255056

  >>3255032
  >stovepipe
  >an empty cartridge case gets caught partway out of the ejection port instead of being thrown
  clear
  alright thanks! i'm learning

>> [_] Anonymous 06/19/17(Mon)14:40:12 No.3255058

  >>3255034
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2R9hyTnjzE



http://swfchan.net/37/WVZBKJ5.shtml
Created: 19/6 -2017 08:40:51 Last modified: 19/6 -2017 22:14:51 Server time: 21/08 -2017 08:35:43