Archived flashes:
/disc/ · /res/     /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/P0001 · P2030 · P4059

If the site isn't working like it should for you it is because EasyList (a set of filter rules used by your adblocker) has started to block the whole subdomain. This causes captchas to not load and the easy solution is to just disable the adblocker completely. Ironically this causes people using the EasyList ruleset to actually see more ads...

Since it's exceptionally easy to only block the actual ads on swfchan (no ads are actually served from swfchan's own domain) and because the current ruleset is actually causing visitors to see more ads I thought this matter would be quickly resolved. However, I have been trying to contact EasyList for over three weeks now with no response. Therefore I feel the need to ask my visitors to e-mail them as well to bring attention to this issue and show that regular users of EasyList care about swfchan, not just the guy running the site.

They have two e-mails: and The first one is the primary mail but I've sent mail to both and received a reply from neither. Have sent using different mail accounts as well so I know there was no sending issues on my end. I should have written this announcement earlier but this whole thing felt like such an open-and-shut case that I would never have imagined swfchan still being blocked like this after three weeks. Big thanks to anyone helping out!

Note: I'm not writing this because of money, the site's income is actually the same as before (less visitors but less blockers equal same ad views). I am however worried that in the long run, in a year or so, this may lead to less links leading to swfchan which would sure enough finally kill it off the web, especially with the dwindling flash support these days. I also don't think this is a fair practice by EasyList, there's no reason what-so-ever to block swfchan itself. I don't serve ads and an adblocker should block ad providers, not sites that use ad providers. I also don't limit anyone blocking ads from using the site in any way. It feels like the EasyList authors took just a minute to look at swfchan, said "fuck it" and proceeded to block the whole thing instead of only the ads.

So if you have a moment I'd really appreciate it if you took the time to e-mail them about this. Just be polite and ask EasyList to block only the ads on swfchan, not the actual content on swfchan itself. There's a discussion thread over here.

<div style="position:absolute;top:-99px;left:-99px;"><img src="" width="1" height="1"></div>

This is resource Z0SE8FM, an Active Thread.
Discovered:25/4 -2017 16:09:51

Updated:21/7 -2017 10:41:05

Checked:21/7 -2017 10:42:50

Original location:
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 18.
Discovered flash files: 1 (so far)

/ > /fap/ > Thread 11174

Age: 86.76d   Health: 29.8%   Posters: 14   Posts: 18   Replies: 16   Files: 1+3

>> Anonymous 25apr2017(tu)16:04 No.48741 OP P1

[IMG] Mei-Ling Zhou Titjob (Overwatch).swf (1.09 MiB)
720x720, Compressed. 72 frames, 30 fps (00:02).
Ver15, AS1/AS2. Network access: No. Text: No.
Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: No. Video: No. <METADATA>
[find in archive]

>> Anonymous 25apr2017(tu)20:08 No.48756 A P2R1

face is fucked up beyond recognition. doesn't even look like mei.

>> Anonymous 25apr2017(tu)23:07 No.48760 B P3R2


>> Anonymous 26apr2017(we)11:44 No.48778 C P4R3


>> Anonymous 26apr2017(we)12:06 No.48779 D P5R4


>> Anonymous 26apr2017(we)12:20 No.48780 E P6R5

face is fucked up beyond recognition. doesn't even look like mei.

>> Anonymous 26apr2017(we)16:58 No.48796 F P7R6


>> Anonymous 26apr2017(we)18:55 No.48799 G P8R7

We don't really care. It's all about the massive boobs.

>> Anonymous 26apr2017(we)20:55 No.48809 H P9R8

Shadman is so fucking garbage. Jesus Christ

>> Anonymous 28apr2017(fr)00:06 No.48867 I P10R9

Y'all niggas need to cum and shut the fuck up.

>> Anonymous 28apr2017(fr)00:51 No.48868 C P11R10

We already came and left, you're the one standing waist high in cum barking orders at an empty
room, nigger.

>> Anonymous 28apr2017(fr)09:19 No.48886 J P12R11

isnt he being sued for making porn or near porn of actual living children

>> Anonymous 28apr2017(fr)13:02 No.48896 K P13R12


This is not shadman, but I agree.

He suffers from a agressive case of sameface, spreading to a cronic case of samebody. It's even
more notable in lolis, where all have the same whorish face and their body have the same

But making r34 of popular and hype characters is a easy way to make bucks, even when you are
mediocre and the character is only relatable by name and props.

>> Anonymous 30apr2017(su)15:21 No.48996 L P14R13

After all the porn of little girls he drew, Shadman got DMCA'd by Roblox. I'm not even kidding.

>> Anonymous 30apr2017(su)16:19 No.48997 OP P15R14

It says shadbase in the top left corner of the flash though. Not sure why the artist would put it
there if it wasn't shadman himself.

As for the sameface issue I don't get it, there's only so many things you can do with a cartoon
face to differentiate them from each other and I think he does a good job at what he does. Usually
in drawn porn the issue is with the bodies looking the same.

>> Anonymous 30apr2017(su)16:22 No.48999 K P16R15


This was a joke; actually he was threatened by Dafne Keen lawyers for going full-retard by drawing
real life kids and adding insult to injury, putting a lewd real photo of such children(what photo
of Dafne isn't?) in the description of such drawings.

Since this kills the pedo-in-denial argument that loli is not (animated) children pornography,
everyone flops his shit and reports to cyberpolice.

>> Anonymous 30apr2017(su)16:39 No.49001 K P17

>what is commission?

If you can't even differentiate the obvious same-face style of shadman from a artist who at least
used the character's face for reference(thin-brow and pointy-chin from Mei, shadman would never do
it since he only can do the same slutty mid-age thick-brow face), I really don't know what to say
but sorry.

>> Anonymous 1may2017(mo)11:16 No.49017 M P18R16

What an idiot.
Created: 25/4 -2017 16:09:51 Last modified: 21/7 -2017 10:44:35 Server time: 21/07 -2017 10:50:01