/ > /fap/ > Thread 11785
Age: 90.01d Health: 0% Posters: 9 Posts: 11 Replies: 9 Files: 1+2
>> Anonymous 5aug2017(sa)23:32 No.52225 OP P1
[IMG] hentai-girl-3.swf (947.7 KiB)
550x400, Compressed. 1253 frames, 30 fps (00:42).
Ver6, AS1/AS2. Network access: No. Text: Yes.
Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Yes. Video: No.
[find in archive]
>> Anonymous 6aug2017(su)00:37 No.52227 A P2R1
I miss his older style so fucking much.
>> Anonymous 6aug2017(su)03:03 No.52230 B P3R2
classic
>> Anonymous 6aug2017(su)15:40 No.52260 C P4R3
>>52227
same
>> Anonny 7sep2017(th)02:19 No.53074 D P5R4
There was a short-lived flash series, "Nancy's Nest", with almost the same models and some of the
exact same animations. With how different they are from ... *everything else he ever made*, I think
Zone bought them and turned them into these games.
>> Anonny 7sep2017(th)02:19 No.53075 D P6
There was a brief flash series called "Nancy's Nest", apparently not made by Zone, with some of the
exact same model and animations. The hair was different. Usually I'd suspect someone ripped Zone
but, with how different they are from *everything else he ever made*, and the hash he did when
trying to redo the character, and how old they are, I think he bought or ripped them from Nancy's
Nest.
>> Anonymous 7sep2017(th)07:28 No.53085 E P7R5
>>53074
>>53075
Sauce?
>> Anonymous 7sep2017(th)18:26 No.53106 F P8R6
>>53075
It's not like Zone would never rip anything. He had been a dime a dozen too, a fly on the wall, a
long time ago.
Every artist goes through that and Zone is no exception.
>> Anonymous 8sep2017(fr)00:25 No.53118 G P9R7
>>53074
>>53075
And why do you assume it's Zone that ripped it off when it's pretty much always the contrary?
There's a fuckton of Zone edits and ripoffs, and Zone being pretty much the epitome of quality when
it comes to flash porn, I seriously doubt you're not pulling shit out of your ass. Nancy's Nest
looks like an edit, the FPS is low, sounds are bad and it feels much cheaper overall. Zone's HK
Girl is from 2006, when is that one from? Swfchan says it's dated "Before 12/5 -2008".
>> Anonymous 8sep2017(fr)01:12 No.53119 H P10R8
>>53074
terrible bait
>> Anonny 5oct2017(th)03:28 No.53974 D P11R9
I think you're right after all. This thing's site appeared at the *end* of 2006, and the animations
in 07, it didn't predate it.
