File: pleaseunderstand.swf-(772 KB, 960x960, Loop)
[_] the firefox death list has begun Anonymous 08/02/17(Wed)22:31:48 No.3268999
keep an eye on this list, once 4chan is on there, unless you have esl (or nightly for some
reason, I have 57 and have no problems) versions, you wont be able to use flash.
https://github.com/mozilla-services/shavar-plugin-blocklist/blob/master/flash.txt
proof:
"August 2017
Starting with Firefox 55 in August 2017, users must choose which sites are allowed to activate
the Flash plugin. Users will have the choice to remember the Flash setting per-site. This change
will be rolled out progressively during August and September 2017.
In order to improve security and performance, Mozilla will maintain a list of sites which cannot
use any plugins."
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 08/02/17(Wed)22:34:11 No.3269002
>>3268999
sorry ESR not esl
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/17(Thu)00:37:40 No.3269056
>>3268999
What if I use superior chrome technology?
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/17(Thu)00:58:15 No.3269064
>>3269056
Your "superior" piece of shit hasn't had true flash in a long time.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/17(Thu)01:58:40 No.3269082
>>3269056
https://www.chromium.org/flash-roadmap#TOC-Upcoming-Changes
more imminent death in 2019
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/17(Thu)02:47:07 No.3269096
is this music from Red Dwarf?
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/17(Thu)02:58:15 No.3269099
That's only if you update Firefox. Do you have autoupdate enabled or something? I'm still on v45
here.
>>3269056
That ram hog? My computer probably will last longer now that I don't use chrome anymore.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/17(Thu)03:19:15 No.3269105
>>3269099
>I have 57
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/57.0a1/releasenotes
>57 is tonight's latest nightly build
god I miss 45, I still have a copy of ESR 45.0.1 and it just runs well without any config of
addons and plugin support, none of the e10s bullshit.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/17(Thu)03:33:24 No.3269110
Honestly this is like one big witch hunt.
>see this technology you like
>you cant use it anymore
>we decided it
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/17(Thu)04:06:15 No.3269117
>>3269110
Jews at it again trying to ruin the white man
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/17(Thu)06:51:43 No.3269142
>>3269099
>That's only if you update Firefox. Do you have autoupdate enabled or something? I'm still on v45
here.
That's a really bad idea. Web browsers are one of the most security-critical programs on a modern
computer, and regular updates are nessisary to have any chance of being secure.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/03/17(Thu)07:27:49 No.3269149
>>3268999
I think you folks might be getting over exited about this - it's not some global deathlist to
force Flash off the internet.
From https://support.mozilla.org/id/kb/flash-blocklists
>What kind of websites are on Firefox's blocklist?
>Firefox blocks Flash on the following sites:
> * Websites that are embedded in other websites.
> * Sites that use plugins unnecessarily. If a popular website does not need Flash to work
properly, Flash will be automatically blocked in order to give you a faster and better browsing
experience.
/f/ would obviously be broken by turning flash off, and is therefore is ineligible for blocking.
Also, there's a checkbox to disable the blocklist if it actually does cause problems. (Though
that would be a bug, and should probably be reported to Mozilla)
