File: ᴮᵃᶜᵏᵚᵒᵒᵈ.swf-(10 MB, 640x360, Other)
[_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)12:19:09 No.

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)14:21:02 No.

  >>3313324
  >10MB
  >cancer preloader hidden in bottom corner
  >that aspect ratio
  >that overall video size
  It's like you didn't even try. You just tossed it into the converter and shat this out on the
  first go.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)14:51:58 No.

  >>3313339
  >should I have made the file smaller so the quality could have been worse?
  >who really cares? do you enjoy watching the pre-loader? Not a totally invalid criticism but I
  don't know how to fix it and I didn't think it was a big enough issue to spend like an hour or
  two figuring out how to fix it in an editor or some shit.
  >blame the video creator not me
  >see above
  I actually did try and I did not just shit it out with a converter nor did I use an automatic
  converter.
  I used a manual self-input converter that requires some real work to set up for a new video and
  after cropping out excess parts from the beginning and end of the video I ran numerous encoding
  sessions before I got the best quality I could because I actually care about what I post here
  even if its a dumb video and want the best quality possible for people here.
  Sure someone more knowledgeable then me could have maybe produced something even better but I put
  in the max amount of effort to make it as high quality as it could be given the base video I had
  to work with.
  So yeah fuck your bullshit untrue criticisms.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)14:53:46 No.

  >>3313344
  then i guess you suck at video conversion. try to have some standards of quality before you start
  forcing your shit on others.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)15:04:49 No.

  >>3313346
  No one is forcing shit.
  Many people have enjoyed it when its been posted a few times before.
  Some have also disliked it but the board is not a hivemind and no specific individual (yourself
  included) represents its interests.

  Also the video wasn't high quality in the first place and has some length to it so with the
  limits this is probably as close to the best quality you can get out of it barring maybe 1% of
  people who have really high level knowledge when it comes to encoding video and other related
  shit.
  its hardly some HD but its clear enough that if you enjoy the content it shouldn't be a big issue.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)16:21:56 No.

  >>3313339
  It's funny. Are you on ICE mate?

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)17:17:08 No.

  >>3313344
  >I used a manual self-input converter that requires some real work
  HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)17:18:12 No.

  >>3313344
  Link me to the original video.
  I get home in a couple hours and want to show you just how much you fucking suck.
  >muh bitrate
  If you actually crop the video properly this is less of an issue.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)17:20:27 No.

  >>3313360
  No. I just want people to not shit up /f/.
  Youtube rips belong on /wsg/.
  If filesize is an issue, at least convert it properly.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)17:22:00 No.

  >>3313371
  please don't
  we trust you on this one

  I mean it's a fucking 7 minute long video, this shit doesn't belong on /f/

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)17:52:48 No.

  >>3313371
  Would cropping out the black side panels improve the quality?

  >>3313372
  Video is allowed on /f/ and this video was converted pretty well.

  >>3313373
  /f/ is essentially a 'random' board where people can post video, games or animations in an .swf
  container.
  So yeah it actually does belong here.
  You might prefer that video was not allowed and we could only post "pure" flash animations or
  games but that isn't what the board is or it certainly isn't what its been since basically
  forever.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)18:07:56 No.

  >>3313381
  >/f/ is essentially a 'random' board
  It fucking isn't
  >All uploaded files should be uniquely Japanese (pertain to Japanese culture). "Run of the mill"
  content is to be had elsewhere.
  >Posting retail Flash files or Flash exploits is prohibited.
  >The tagging of uploaded files is mandatory. Improperly tagged items may be removed without
  notice. >Abuse of the tagging system may result in temporary ban.
  >If your file is to be tagged as "[?] Other", re-examine the first rule before submission.
  source: >>>/f/rules

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)18:26:57 No.

  >>3313384
  stfu weeaboo faggot

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)18:33:38 No.

  >>3313384
  I mean sure.. but that one thing hasn't been even remotely followed in years.
  Kinda hard to say that it describes what the board has actually been in recent memory.
  You might think it'd be better that way and like the video thing I think its a discussion worth
  having (with pro's and con's on both sides) but its still not the greatest argument.
  Should I respect the wishes of this outdated handbook and the perhaps minority percentage of /f/
  user's who wish to narrow down the allowed forms of content to only include this fairly specific
  culture or should I enjoy /f/ unrestrained as most users do and post any kind of content I find
  interesting and think others could enjoy or be stimulated by?
  I tend to think the majority of users ruled for the latter and so thats what the board became and
  has been for years.
  So forgive me if I don't feel a deep guilt about it especially when I think the board is better
  off for including a wider potential array of content which has included an endless list of
  flashes the community has enjoyed and been stimulated by.

  anyway I regret getting baited into this conversation as I am in no mood for what it developed
  into.
  I actually haven't posted in abit as ive been busy but I guess ill take another break.
  Sorry my one video post temporarily ruined the otherwise pristine, perfect, shitpostless quality
  of the board.
  peace.

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)18:40:28 No.

  >>3313384
  Absolute autism

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)18:54:51 No.

  Please stop posting this man

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)18:57:18 No.

  >>3313390
  tl;dr

>> [_] Anonymous 02/05/18(Mon)21:04:55 No.

  >>3313390
  don't let >>3313384 get ya down, he's got nothing better to do than to criticize other people's
  taste. keep posting, the more the merrier I say.