File: The Inclusion Delusion.swf-(8.53 MB, 432x240, Other)
[_] Reminder that under Obama Anon 3179274 That under Obama, race relations became worse than under Bush or Reagan Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3179311 Reminder that race relations got worse under Obama because white people regained awareness of their whiteness Reminder that Trumpfags would be just as mad if Hitlary got elected but you'd never see it in the news because they don't live in big enough cities to riot
>> [_] Anon 3179313 >># >don't live in big enough cities to riot Well, that's not entirely true. But a lot of the once-big manufacturing cities are basically deserted now.
>> [_] Anon 3179322 >># I think its more that the right (Trumpfag side) doesn't have mobs of paid protesters and networks to help built riot mobs. Plus a mainstream media cabal that portrays them as the good guys and endlessly justifys or sweeps under the rug any violence or crime they commit. Even if some right wing guys decided to march now in opposition of these people it probably wouldn't be a good idea since the paid protesters actively try to insight mob violence against police so imagine what they'd do with you, a civilian. Scary that the very people funding these rioters and their violent anarachyh promoting behavior literally had open meetings with the top heads of the Democratic party. The heads of one of our major parties are actively working with a man who funds what some might even label as domestic terrorism in our country. But anyway I only took a peek at politics this year because Trump was so funny but damn I never knew it was this messed up. Has it always been this bad? Meh, think i'll just go back to not worrying about it.
>> [_] Anon 3179326 At least something like Zeitgeist or Alex Jones is entertaining. O'Reilly is just a GOP operative, always has been.
>> [_] Anon 3179330 >># 1. The right never chimped out when Obama got elected the way numales are now. 2. The right isn't supported by George Soros' billion to finance fucking shit up, the way leftcucks are.
>> [_] Anon 3179331 >># >Reminder that race relations got worse under Obama because white people regained awareness of their whiteness Is this some form liberal comedy? Whites voted for him twice and got screwed both times
>> [_] Anon 3179332 >># Eh. Didn't Whites vote pretty heavily for Romney in, what was it, 2012? I don't think it was much less then what Donald got. I think its cuz all the Blacks and what must have been a large percentage of Hispanics too that got him in.
>> [_] Anon 3179336 >># >Whites voted for him twice and got screwed both times This is what confused me most about the whole "America is a white supremacist country." Whites turn out to vote for non-whites, at around a 50% rate. The amount any other race will vote for a non-cuck white candidate is around 20%. There is an culture of supremacy going on, but it sure as hell isn't about "being white".
>> [_] Anon 3179340 >># Some of this is a little too conspiracy theory for me, but mostly correct. >># >1. The right never chimped out when Obama got elected the way numales are now. >unironically using the word numales You're just as bad as the pundits who talk about what "millenials" want as if they're a different species. >2. The right isn't supported by George Soros' billion to finance fucking shit up, the way leftcucks are. You're a fool if you don't think that the right has pockets that are just as deep. My state completely flipped from blue to red just because some libertarian decided he should spend some money on us a few years ago. If you want to complain about media bias, I'm with you, but that's because media types are from cities.
>> [_] Anon 3179341 >># Those were just the regular Republicans. Republicans are heavily white, though I can say that it's not because they don't welcome non-whites.
>> [_] Anon 3179342 >># McCain won whites in 2008 by 12% (55-43). Romney won whites in 2012 by 20% (59-39). 43% and 39% are not "around a 50% rate." Sources: http://ropercenter.cornell.edu/polls/us- elections/how-groups-voted/how-groups-vot ed-2008/ http://ropercenter.cornell.edu/polls/us- elections/how-groups-voted/how-groups-vot ed-2012/
>> [_] Anon 3179345 >># >If you want to complain about media bias, I'm with you, I think it would be worth considering the same sort of bias that is powerfully expressed in our pre-adult schooling system and most colleges
>> [_] Anon 3179348 >># No all of us were expecting to get shafted, which we're pretty used to at this point. No one would have rioted, we would have just sullenly been like, "of course she would win in this day and age".
>> [_] Anon 3179355 >># >the mainstream media would attack & mock them ruthlessly rather than legitimize and support them as they do for the left. this x10 >oh no, all those poor white nationalists didn't get their racist president, boo fucking hoo Just imagine all this gloating going the other way if you want to know what it'd be like. We're so polarized that it would probably be just as bad. Except without the gendered undertones. Probably.
>> [_] Anon 3179364 >># >they don't live in big enough cities to riot that's a pretty ignorant thing to say when half the country doesn't agree with you
>> [_] Anon 3179384 >># You're right that I don't have the stats to back it up yet. But I'll bet one ass-reaming that cities voted Hill and the whole fucking rest of the country voted Rump.
>> [_] Anon 3179407 >># >I think its more that the right (Trumpfag side) doesn't have mobs of paid protesters and networks to help built riot mobs. You really think the tens of thousands were all out there after Trump's election because they were paid? Not because Trump lost the vote? Not because they were legitimately afraid of Trump? >># Whites benefited disproportionately from Obama. Minorities are disproportionately working-class, the only income group whose job security and household income stagnated under Obama. >># The problem is that when we have liberal policies, people complain some people are allowed to get married. Or that SJW are annoying. When we have conservative policies, people are actually barred from marriage. People lose the access to abortion. Minorities live in fear that hate crimes won't be investigated. Both sides try to jam their bullshit down the others' throat; but while SJW were irritating, Trump and a subset of his supporters are literally terrifying to many people. >># The right had the birther movement and pundits talking about how Obama was an islamist manchurian candidate that idolized soviet russia. If I got my news from right-wing talk radio, I'd think global warming was a chinese hoax too, and I'd be stupid not to vote for Trump. >># >white people regained awareness of their whiteness White people always vote republican. This election wasn't particular unique. The difference was more whites voted in this election, and Trump managed to get the white working-class demographic out in larger numbers. This doesn't suggest any significant change in peoples' ideas; rather the difference was driven by a different type of candidate.
>> [_] Anon 3179409 >># But the right never chimped out, you ape.
>> [_] Anon 3179412 >># >The right had the birther movement and pundits talking about how Obama was an islamist manchurian candidate that idolized soviet russia. This was proven to be a smear campaign by Hillary staffers. The fact that the accepted millions from Saudia Arabia, the same place that executes women for being raped, or fags for being gay, is a separate issue. Hillary got most of her funding from a homophobic islamic shithole, but please defend it for me.
>> [_] Anon 3179418 Bill O'Reilly, Supercuck
>> [_] Anon 3179422 Man, this guy is a fucking champion. He fucking gets it. O'reilly is now a plus in my book.
>> [_] Anon 3179423 >># >terrifying to many people Are they really terrifying to most of the country? People just want to express their views, and call out degeneracy. While I don't agree with the extremes like getting rid of abortion and repealing Court Orders for Gay Marriage, I can still tolerate them, but not agree with them. When most people say most people, they think of the people only in their community that they talk to. When you look at a broad range of views, not just limiting yourself to CNN or Fox News or whatever is the biggest media corporation we have, you'll soon discover that you have been in an echo chamber. To us Americans, Canada is entirely Liberal, when there is actually some subset of conservative ideology in their people.
>> [_] Anon 3179425 >># >This was proven to be a smear campaign by Hillary staffers. The fact is, there was a rumor and the right took it and ran with it, and hasn't stopped.
>> [_] Anon 3179426 >Inclusive policies arent inclusive to people who hate being inclusive! Pretty much his entire argument summed up.
>> [_] Anon 3179427 This is true, race relations deteriorated to their lowest in 30 years under Barack "Trayvon could have been my son" Obama. And no, the Tea Party never rioted or chimped out.
>> [_] Anon 3179432 Where's the get the fuck off my board post?
>> [_] Anon 3179433 i wish /pol/ would fuck off
>> [_] Anon 3179435 >># >Canada...there is actually some subset of conservative ideology in their people Actually the majority of Canadians seem to be conservative from what I've seen and they are really upset that a tyranny of the majority in their big cities is calling all the shots that they don't want. USA has a bad cold that Canada has let become pneumonia. When the US invades Canada and saves them from their tyrannical government the day will be brighter than ever before.
>> [_] Anon 3179439 >># It's immensely closer to 50% than the 20% per demographic of non-white voters for white nominees.
>> [_] Anon 3179442 >># The fact that people -in the cities- are apparently ``legitimately afraid" of Trump's election is damning, but not for the reasons you think they are. Suppose people -in the cities- are legitimately afraid of white oppression. What the fuck do they think is going to happen? Some sort of Republican death squad is going to sweep through inner-city gang infested territory and start a ethnic purge? Or do you think that it's more likely that they're rioting precisely because they know in their hearts that white people can't actually do anything about their shitty behavior, besides wait for it to die down? The fact that there is an entire demographic that is STUPID enough to believe that an ethnic purge would not be met with extreme public outcry and resistance should be telling you something. It should tell you exactly how stupid these people are, but more importantly it should tell you that there is somebody that is trying to convince these stupid people of these stupid ideas.
>> [_] Anon 3179482 >># >># way to be inclusive :^)

File: The Inclusion Delusion.swf-(8.53 MB, 432x240, Other)
[_] Reminder that under Obama Anon 3176833 That under Obama, race relations have gotten worse than under the Bush administration. Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3176841 >fox news
>> [_] Anon 3176844 >muh fear mongering
>> [_] Anon 3176845 >># Don't flood.
>> [_] Anon 3176866 >># checked
>> [_] Anon 3176872 >># lol when did her fearmonger once, libcuck?
>> [_] Anon 3176873 beautiful strawman Bill, you poor retard
>> [_] Anon 3176881 [citation needed]
>> [_] Anon 3176883 >># >># >># I'm neither a fan of fox or billy, but what did he say that was wrong here? Let's have a discussion
>> [_] Anon 3176885 >># While I have a feeling the data is biased, I like the way he provided current events for riots was fair and I also agree with him that the current President was mistaken to believe that our America is unified.
>> [_] Anon 3176887 >># >># actually yeah, as much as /f/ isn't a bastion for conversation, he makes some points and he misses some marks here. some of the concerns he points out that people have could be argued as illegitimate, but at the same time that doesn't change the fact that people still hold those concerns. the mindset of the last 8 years has been a lot of handwaving and just calling people silly for being worried about something because "they don't know real oppression". this doesn't change the fact that they are a citizen with a concern. even if you take the stance that their concern is fucking stupid to dismiss it like that can't be called inclusive can it? I know it's fox news here but just humor me a little.
>> [_] Anon 3176889 bill o'reilly is such a badass :)
>> [_] Anon 3176893 >># >strawman don't throw out words you heard others use, speak plain about what you mean and don't make people guess. you never appear smarter by making vague statements.
>> [_] Anon 3176894 >># This isnt what /f/ is for, anon. This is the kind of thing that belongs on YouTube. Please keep it there. And if you want to share it with someone, /pol/ would appreciate it a lot more.
>> [_] Anon 3176900 >># even if you're not into politics, bill o'reilly makes great points that what a person perceives as the minority opinion should not always be ignored, as there exists a silent majority. This logic can be applied to not just politics, but arguments and other things in general. I implore that /f/ watches this flash so content-creators who are afraid that their opinion is under-represented will be encouraged and confident enough to make their own spin on stuff.
>> [_] Anon 3176903 >># the idea that religious groups are above the law, implied with the whole 'forcing nuns' thing - the use of 'nun' and not 'religious groups' is supposed to make you feel bad for them. the "hard-drug epidemic". What is a "hard" drug here? I'm 95% certain he's including weed here. "all sane people". I hate shit like this. >chicago is representative of the rest of the country he's not saying trump will be good but rather that Obama was horrible, never addressing the concerns he claims to have debunked. It's a fucking beautiful spin, really. his fucking tone of voice makes me want to punch him I'm willing to give him that illegal immigrants are a problem, and a voucher system for schools could potentially bring benefits. But I cannot agree with the rest of his argument.
>> [_] Anon 3176904 >># Or you could just link the YouTube video like someone that has some damn sense.
>> [_] Anon 3176913 >># >ergo hoc propter hoc Try checking you're fallicys before speaking.
>> [_] Anon 3176922 >># http://i.4cdn.org/f/weekend%20inside%20j oke.swf
>> [_] Anon 3176923 >># >the idea that religious groups are above the law, implied with the whole 'forcing nuns' thing So a group that actually believes funding abortion can potentially send them to hell should be forced to pony up anyways? Guess I can go my local muslim baker and demand a cake of Mohammed getting fucked by a pig too
>> [_] Anon 3176929 >># >bill o'reilly is such an ass :) FTFY
>> [_] Anon 3176930 Hey guys, what's up?
>> [_] Anon 3176934 >># >throws out more incorrect buzzwords >you're >fallicys
>> [_] Anon 3176947 >># Religious groups should not be exempt from the laws of the lands they practice their religion in. If they do not like having to comply with the law then they can take their religious services to another country that has laws more in line with their religious views. This is akin to saying (albeit an extreme example) that an Muslim can be above the law and practice things from their religion that are otherwise illegal. This is true for any religion, not just Christians and Muslim. There is no reason that those that choose to practice a religion should be exempt from the law.
>> [_] Anon 3176950 >># >the "hard-drug epidemic". What is a "hard" drug here? I'm 95% certain he's including weed here. how are you gonna criticize him when you make assumptions like this lmao thousands of people do in fact die of cocaine and heroin OD in the USA every year
>> [_] Anon 3176955 >># (that's the joke.swf)
>> [_] Anon 3176957 Please get off /f/ with your political bullshit. That or do the usual and kill yourself.
>> [_] Anon 3176968 >># I concur. I'd rather see maddox shit posted than this stuff.