File: The Inclusion Delusion.swf-(8.53 MB, 432x240, Other)
[_] Reminder that under Obama Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)19:02:20 No.3179274
That under Obama, race relations became worse than under Bush or Reagan
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:02:45 No.3179311
Reminder that race relations got worse under Obama because white people regained awareness of
their whiteness
Reminder that Trumpfags would be just as mad if Hitlary got elected but you'd never see it in the
news because they don't live in big enough cities to riot
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:04:25 No.3179313
>>3179311
>don't live in big enough cities to riot
Well, that's not entirely true. But a lot of the once-big manufacturing cities are basically
deserted now.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:11:12 No.3179322
>>3179311
I think its more that the right (Trumpfag side) doesn't have mobs of paid protesters and networks
to help built riot mobs.
Plus a mainstream media cabal that portrays them as the good guys and endlessly justifys or
sweeps under the rug any violence or crime they commit.
Even if some right wing guys decided to march now in opposition of these people it probably
wouldn't be a good idea since the paid protesters actively try to insight mob violence against
police so imagine what they'd do with you, a civilian.
Scary that the very people funding these rioters and their violent anarachyh promoting behavior
literally had open meetings with the top heads of the Democratic party.
The heads of one of our major parties are actively working with a man who funds what some might
even label as domestic terrorism in our country.
But anyway I only took a peek at politics this year because Trump was so funny but damn I never
knew it was this messed up.
Has it always been this bad?
Meh, think i'll just go back to not worrying about it.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:12:55 No.3179326
At least something like Zeitgeist or Alex Jones is entertaining. O'Reilly is just a GOP
operative, always has been.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:15:12 No.3179330
>>3179311
1. The right never chimped out when Obama got elected the way numales are now.
2. The right isn't supported by George Soros' billion to finance fucking shit up, the way
leftcucks are.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:15:13 No.3179331
>>3179311
>Reminder that race relations got worse under Obama because white people regained awareness of
their whiteness
Is this some form liberal comedy?
Whites voted for him twice and got screwed both times
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:16:43 No.3179332
>>3179331
Eh.
Didn't Whites vote pretty heavily for Romney in, what was it, 2012?
I don't think it was much less then what Donald got.
I think its cuz all the Blacks and what must have been a large percentage of Hispanics too that
got him in.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:17:21 No.3179336
>>3179331
>Whites voted for him twice and got screwed both times
This is what confused me most about the whole "America is a white supremacist country."
Whites turn out to vote for non-whites, at around a 50% rate.
The amount any other race will vote for a non-cuck white candidate is around 20%.
There is an culture of supremacy going on, but it sure as hell isn't about "being white".
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:21:07 No.3179340
>>3179322
Some of this is a little too conspiracy theory for me, but mostly correct.
>>3179330
>1. The right never chimped out when Obama got elected the way numales are now.
>unironically using the word numales
You're just as bad as the pundits who talk about what "millenials" want as if they're a different
species.
>2. The right isn't supported by George Soros' billion to finance fucking shit up, the way
leftcucks are.
You're a fool if you don't think that the right has pockets that are just as deep. My state
completely flipped from blue to red just because some libertarian decided he should spend some
money on us a few years ago.
If you want to complain about media bias, I'm with you, but that's because media types are from
cities.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:21:16 No.3179341
>>3179332
Those were just the regular Republicans.
Republicans are heavily white, though I can say that it's not because they don't welcome
non-whites.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:24:56 No.3179342
>>3179336
McCain won whites in 2008 by 12% (55-43). Romney won whites in 2012 by 20% (59-39). 43% and 39%
are not "around a 50% rate."
Sources:
http://ropercenter.cornell.edu/polls/us-elections/how-groups-voted/how-groups-voted-2008/
http://ropercenter.cornell.edu/polls/us-elections/how-groups-voted/how-groups-voted-2012/
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:28:55 No.3179345
>>3179340
>If you want to complain about media bias, I'm with you,
I think it would be worth considering the same sort of bias that is powerfully expressed in our
pre-adult schooling system and most colleges
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:33:48 No.3179348
>>3179311
No all of us were expecting to get shafted, which we're pretty used to at this point. No one
would have rioted, we would have just sullenly been like, "of course she would win in this day
and age".
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:42:51 No.3179355
>>3179351
>the mainstream media would attack & mock them ruthlessly rather than legitimize and support them
as they do for the left.
this x10
>oh no, all those poor white nationalists didn't get their racist president, boo fucking hoo
Just imagine all this gloating going the other way if you want to know what it'd be like. We're
so polarized that it would probably be just as bad. Except without the gendered undertones.
Probably.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)20:51:30 No.3179364
>>3179311
>they don't live in big enough cities to riot
that's a pretty ignorant thing to say when half the country doesn't agree with you
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)21:17:01 No.3179384
>>3179364
You're right that I don't have the stats to back it up yet. But I'll bet one ass-reaming that
cities voted Hill and the whole fucking rest of the country voted Rump.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)22:12:20 No.3179407
>>3179322
>I think its more that the right (Trumpfag side) doesn't have mobs of paid protesters and
networks to help built riot mobs.
You really think the tens of thousands were all out there after Trump's election because they
were paid?
Not because Trump lost the vote?
Not because they were legitimately afraid of Trump?
>>3179331
Whites benefited disproportionately from Obama.
Minorities are disproportionately working-class, the only income group whose job security and
household income stagnated under Obama.
>>3179355
The problem is that when we have liberal policies, people complain some people are allowed to get
married. Or that SJW are annoying.
When we have conservative policies, people are actually barred from marriage. People lose the
access to abortion. Minorities live in fear that hate crimes won't be investigated.
Both sides try to jam their bullshit down the others' throat; but while SJW were irritating,
Trump and a subset of his supporters are literally terrifying to many people.
>>3179330
The right had the birther movement and pundits talking about how Obama was an islamist manchurian
candidate that idolized soviet russia.
If I got my news from right-wing talk radio, I'd think global warming was a chinese hoax too, and
I'd be stupid not to vote for Trump.
>>3179311
>white people regained awareness of their whiteness
White people always vote republican. This election wasn't particular unique. The difference was
more whites voted in this election, and Trump managed to get the white working-class demographic
out in larger numbers. This doesn't suggest any significant change in peoples' ideas; rather the
difference was driven by a different type of candidate.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)22:16:32 No.3179409
>>3179340
But the right never chimped out, you ape.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)22:19:13 No.3179412
>>3179407
>The right had the birther movement and pundits talking about how Obama was an islamist
manchurian candidate that idolized soviet russia.
This was proven to be a smear campaign by Hillary staffers.
The fact that the accepted millions from Saudia Arabia, the same place that executes women for
being raped, or fags for being gay, is a separate issue.
Hillary got most of her funding from a homophobic islamic shithole, but please defend it for me.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)22:35:10 No.3179418
Bill O'Reilly, Supercuck
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)22:40:04 No.3179422
Man, this guy is a fucking champion. He fucking gets it.
O'reilly is now a plus in my book.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)22:41:16 No.3179423
>>3179407
>terrifying to many people
Are they really terrifying to most of the country? People just want to express their views, and
call out degeneracy. While I don't agree with the extremes like getting rid of abortion and
repealing Court Orders for Gay Marriage, I can still tolerate them, but not agree with them.
When most people say most people, they think of the people only in their community that they talk
to. When you look at a broad range of views, not just limiting yourself to CNN or Fox News or
whatever is the biggest media corporation we have, you'll soon discover that you have been in an
echo chamber. To us Americans, Canada is entirely Liberal, when there is actually some subset of
conservative ideology in their people.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)22:48:33 No.3179425
>>3179412
>This was proven to be a smear campaign by Hillary staffers.
The fact is, there was a rumor and the right took it and ran with it, and hasn't stopped.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)22:50:37 No.3179426
>Inclusive policies arent inclusive to people who hate being inclusive!
Pretty much his entire argument summed up.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)22:53:06 No.3179427
This is true, race relations deteriorated to their lowest in 30 years under Barack "Trayvon could
have been my son" Obama. And no, the Tea Party never rioted or chimped out.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)23:05:17 No.3179432
Where's the get the fuck off my board post?
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)23:18:58 No.3179433
i wish /pol/ would fuck off
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)23:24:39 No.3179435
>>3179423
>Canada...there is actually some subset of conservative ideology in their people
Actually the majority of Canadians seem to be conservative from what I've seen and they are
really upset that a tyranny of the majority in their big cities is calling all the shots that
they don't want.
USA has a bad cold that Canada has let become pneumonia.
When the US invades Canada and saves them from their tyrannical government the day will be
brighter than ever before.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)23:29:33 No.3179439
>>3179342
It's immensely closer to 50% than the 20% per demographic of non-white voters for white nominees.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/20/16(Sun)23:34:15 No.3179442
>>3179407
The fact that people -in the cities- are apparently ``legitimately afraid" of Trump's election is
damning, but not for the reasons you think they are.
Suppose people -in the cities- are legitimately afraid of white oppression. What the fuck do they
think is going to happen? Some sort of Republican death squad is going to sweep through
inner-city gang infested territory and start a ethnic purge?
Or do you think that it's more likely that they're rioting precisely because they know in their
hearts that white people can't actually do anything about their shitty behavior, besides wait for
it to die down?
The fact that there is an entire demographic that is STUPID enough to believe that an ethnic
purge would not be met with extreme public outcry and resistance should be telling you something.
It should tell you exactly how stupid these people are, but more importantly it should tell you
that there is somebody that is trying to convince these stupid people of these stupid ideas.
>> [_] Anonymous 11/21/16(Mon)00:25:04 No.3179482
>>3179432
>>3179433
way to be inclusive :^)
