STORY   LOOP   FURRY   PORN   GAMES
• C •   SERVICES [?] [R] RND   POPULAR
Archived flashes:
229595
/disc/ · /res/     /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/P0001 · P2595 · P5190

<div style="position:absolute;top:-99px;left:-99px;"><img src="http://swfchan.com:57475/27883617?noj=FRM27883617-22DN" width="1" height="1"></div>

This is resource AFN3QBP, an Archived Thread.
Discovered:9/7 -2019 21:39:21

Ended:11/7 -2019 04:09:17

Checked:11/7 -2019 04:56:13

Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3395743/does-anyone-ev…
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 70.
Discovered flash files: 1





File: newfag.swf-(3.71 MB, 1280x720, Other)
[_] Does Anyone Even Remember How To Triforce Anymore? Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)15:34:29 No.3395743

  ▲
  ▲▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)15:59:24 No.3395753

  >>3395743
  it doesn't really matter, because the new 4chan Parser removes every non-Standard letter anyway
  no more non-breaking spaces, no more zalgo, no more BOY NEXT DOOR symbols, but yeah, you can
  still shit those emojis, because we are reddit now

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)16:08:29 No.3395754

  >>3395753

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)16:09:53 No.3395755

  >>3395753
  nope the unicode emoticons and smileys were removed in >>3395754

  also i cant help but notice you called them "emojis", which is a VERY mainstream thing to do

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)17:18:23 No.3395759

  >>3395755
  heh, coulda sworn I've seen them before, but yeah, everything just gets removed

  also: yes, they are called emojis, because they are a very mainstream (and in this form) new
  thing that drew its popularity from the japanese equivalents
  emoticons are written smileys like :^) or (´・ω・`) or ;_;7

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)17:19:26 No.3395760

  >>3395759
  ps:
  HAH, even le Lenny face now gets autofiltered for spam XDD

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)17:51:15 No.3395762

  >>3395760

  >XDD
  Can't tell if Ironic or stupid.

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)18:08:46 No.3395764

  >>3395759
  >emoticons are written smileys like :^) or (´・ω・`) or ;_;7
  either you are associating "emoticons" to written smileys yourself and simply believing this is
  some kind of rule, or it is a very recent definition by someone in a position to make word
  definitions that don't have a clue.
  you've been able to use image based smileys or image based representations of a sun or a log or
  whatever else for over 10 years and back then nobody ever used the word "emoji". if it wasn't
  called a smiley it was an emoticon (emote/emotion icon)

  while on the subject what is up with mainstream chat clients having smileys with dark skin
  colors? yellow works for everybody, there's no need for skin tone options. this isn't the
  simpsons.

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)18:12:45 No.3395765

  >>3395764
  >what is up with mainstream chat clients having smileys with dark skin colors
  haven't you heard? we need to suck the dick of anything black or brown now because otherwise
  we're racist
  now get on your knees white boi

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)18:15:55 No.3395766

  >>3395753
  A̘͚͔̩n͍̦̙̟̹̪̹d̟̥̬ ̯̙͙͕h̥̠e͔̣r̠̫̺e̦̼͖͇͉̜͍ ̙͙͖̤͎I̬̪ ̞̪̭̘̠͕̹t͉͎̮̥̼̦̩h̙̙͖o̥͇̠u̥̥̙͕̥̺gh̻t̫̦̭
  ͎̜̭̟̮̗͉m̱̞̤̞ͅo̳̗͓̳͔d̰̟̳̠̮s̠̻ si͈͖͙̬m̱͈͍̘̫̙̟p̯̬̘͕͙̣̫l̫̜̩̭̜y̦͈̼̜̻ ̜̠b͈̠̞ͅa̞̜n̠̤̙̳̫̰͔n̮̹̻͎e̺̱͇͓d̼̯͔̬
  ̪͎̩̥̼e̗v͈͈̺͕̜͔en̗̤̮̳ ̗̳mo̝͙̝͙̟r̜͕̙͎e ͉̺͎̩ͅọ͙̘̠b͚s̩͇̠c̞̖ur͙͇̤̘͉͇e̖͓̟ ̦̦̦ͅe͖͉̦m̬̫̯͍̪p̭̝̭͍t̩̤͎y̞̤
  ̱̹c͍͎̯ha̩̖̰͎̖ra͕̳̭c̗t̝̝e̝r͖̫̜͈̼͉ͅs̰.̞̥̖̯̠ ̺̬̼̺͔W͉h̭y̬̥̤̟͍ ̤͚̬d̞̜̦͕̻̘o͍͙̖ th͕̼̳e͚̬̖̳̘̙̰y͚͚͕͍
  ̙͉̫̺h̺ͅa̙͇̦̰̹̖t͉̯͙e̦̦͍̗ f̩̹̻͖̫u͍̪͕̰n̩͕͖̞ ̟̦̩̫ͅs̩͓̝o̩̻͔̻̫ ̱̤̠m̗̹̱uc͎̥̱̟͉̺h̦̣?

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)19:03:57 No.3395772

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)19:55:41 No.3395774

  >>3395766
  he comes

  >>3395772
  are you a wizard?

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)20:43:05 No.3395777

  >>3395753
  FUCKYOU

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)20:44:47 No.3395778

  >>3395777
  oh fuck, it did remove it

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)20:46:46 No.3395779

  >>3395772
  tell me your secrets oldfag

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)21:17:51 No.3395780

  >>3395779
  Just copy it into notepad, you should see some square characters appearing in the first line.

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)21:34:03 No.3395783

  >>3395780
  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲
  test1

  ▲
  ▲▲
  test2

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)21:37:31 No.3395784

  >>3395780
  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)21:41:19 No.3395785

  >>3395779
  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/19(Tue)22:10:53 No.3395786

  >>3395772
  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)01:33:12 No.3395795

  Test 1
  󠛠 󠛠 ▲
  ▲ ▲
  Test 2
  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)01:47:56 No.3395796

  >>3395795
  So I'm guessing no one ever thought to make the parser filter out characters this stupidly deep
  into Unicode. Test 1 uses u+e06e0, with regular spaces in between (u+0020). Test 2, and all the
  other ones in this thread use u+e06e1 (also with u+0020). Both code points aren't actually
  assigned to anything, which is why the regular spaces still need to be in there. The unassigned
  characters just make sure the spaces don't get deleted by the filter.

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)01:50:48 No.3395797

  ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)01:52:10 No.3395798

  ▲
  ▲▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)01:56:55 No.3395799

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲󠛡▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)02:04:29 No.3395800

  󠛡󠛡󠛡󠛡󠛡󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] beef 07/10/19(Wed)02:24:03 No.3395801

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)02:25:47 No.3395802

  ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)02:27:11 No.3395803

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)02:30:39 No.3395804

  ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)04:27:15 No.3395806

  󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)05:04:13 No.3395809

  ▲
  ▲▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)07:01:36 No.3395811

  >>3395743
  >󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  >▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)07:12:28 No.3395813

  ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)07:28:42 No.3395815

  󠛠 󠛠 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)07:56:07 No.3395816

  Hell, OK I'll try copying it too.

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)07:58:47 No.3395817

  fa b 󠛡 u 󠛡 󠛡 l 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 o 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 u 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 s

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)08:05:13 No.3395818

  it's not as fun as the old way though because you couldn't simply copy and paste that one, which
  revealed newfags

  i suspect >>3395806 might be the old way, though it doesn't look properly. let's see:
  󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)08:07:21 No.3395819

  >>3395818
  nah that was also copyable, guess he just did it wrong

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)08:10:08 No.3395820

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)08:13:07 No.3395821

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)08:17:48 No.3395822

  󠛡󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
  ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)08:24:21 No.3395823

  >>3395822
  Ooh, so close.

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)08:37:15 No.3395824

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)08:41:36 No.3395825

  >>3395822
  Test 2
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡
  ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
  ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 󠛡 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)09:00:49 No.3395826

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)09:10:16 No.3395827

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)09:10:25 No.3395828

  󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

  ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)09:11:27 No.3395829

  >>3395828
  ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)09:13:20 No.3395830

  Cut it out losers, triforcing has never proven anything.

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)09:16:34 No.3395831

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)09:29:46 No.3395832

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)10:13:22 No.3395833

  >>3395832
  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)10:17:36 No.3395834

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)10:36:39 No.3395835

  >>3395772
  󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)11:11:35 No.3395837

  ▲
  ▲▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)11:12:54 No.3395838

  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲
  ▼ ▼ 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▼ ▼
  󠛡 󠛡 ▼ 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▼
  󠛡 󠛡 ▲ 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲ 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▲ ▲
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▼ ▼
  󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 󠛡 ▼

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)11:41:49 No.3395840

  >>3395838
  heresy

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)12:04:18 No.3395842

  >>3395743
  So what is it?

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)14:23:40 No.3395844

  ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)17:23:05 No.3395853

  epic bread

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)17:39:33 No.3395855

  >>3395842
  I've never seen one before, no one has, but I'm guessing its a white hole.

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)17:51:20 No.3395856

  ▲
  ▲▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)17:53:05 No.3395857

  ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)17:54:43 No.3395858

  ▲
  ▲▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)21:04:19 No.3395861

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)21:34:34 No.3395862

  >>3395743
  becuase we have a new wave of lazy idiots that save a stupid pepe/wojack image and spam it for
  low effort shitposting

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)21:41:02 No.3395864

  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)21:42:13 No.3395865

  ?? ?? ?
  ? ?

>> [_] Anonymous 07/10/19(Wed)21:57:02 No.3395867

  >>3395772
  󠛡 󠛡 ▲
  ▲ ▲



http://swfchan.net/41/AFN3QBP.shtml
Created: 9/7 -2019 21:39:21 Last modified: 11/7 -2019 04:58:17 Server time: 22/12 -2024 08:15:35