File: Caramelldansen_vectorised.swf-(2.89 MB, 1280x720, Other)
[_] Anonymous 01/16/20(Thu)17:20:06 No.

  newfag here. why does this look like ass unless zoomed way in? it's a vector and everything

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 01/16/20(Thu)17:24:32 No.

  the outline is not being drawn properly. properly to thin

>> [_] Anonymous 01/16/20(Thu)17:27:47 No.

  either make the flash larger or add some thicker lines where they "disappear".

>> [_] Anonymous 01/16/20(Thu)17:36:45 No.

  wasn't this just posted the other day
  I'm pretty sure a vectorized version already exists
  http://swfchan.com/46/229971/?caramelldansen.swf

>> [_] Anonymous 01/16/20(Thu)17:57:09 No.

  >>3415224
  that one isn't vectorized.

  i know the flash you're thinking of but it's ALSO not vectorized. the one you're thinking of
  starts by drawing the first frame in vectors but when they move it is no longer vectors. if you
  right-click and zoom in you can see whether a flash is actually vectors or not

  OP's flash is the first time I've actually seen them fully vectorized! nice work OP, it looks
  good, must have taken quite a bit of work. did you do everything by hand or did you use some kind
  of tool? kinda expected the filesize to be even smaller but i guess the audio is in great quality

  (looks like vectorised is an acceptable spelling of vectorized, just used less often)

>> [_] Anonymous 01/16/20(Thu)18:04:18 No.

  >>3415221
  also what this guy is saying is if you make the flash too small the black lines are disappearing

  maybe it could be solved by repeating the vectors twice on top of each other with the repeated
  lines having "hairline" thickness so they are always 1 px regardless of size. that way it looks
  good in both big resolution (where the normal thickness lines are on top of the hairline vectors)
  and in small resolution when the normal sized lines get thinner than 1 px.

  however that adds filesize, it's probably possible to detect dimensions with actionscript and
  loop through the vectors to change thickness between hairline/normal dynamically depending on
  resolution. BUT that sounds like a lot of work...

>> [_] Anonymous 01/16/20(Thu)18:20:31 No.

  >>3415224
  yeah, i posted that, then got pissed off it was just PNGs and made it vectors
  >>3415226
  i used vectormagic, it's why it's so annoying to fix problems, like how some lines arent actually
  connected to eachother.
  >>3415228
  >>3415221
  >>3415218
  thanks, i'll re-vectorise it with smaller source files. the vectors are massive here because i
  did it in 1440p

>> [_] Anonymous 01/17/20(Fri)05:32:24 No.

  >>3415231
  >vectormagic.com
  that's cool! too bad it's not freeware, is there a free alternative?

>> [_] Anonymous 01/17/20(Fri)05:37:49 No.

  tried vectormagic.com's online conversion and they require you to make an account to actually
  download the results but they only tell you that AFTER everything is done and you press the
  download button, i hate when websites does sneaky shit like that

>> [_] Anonymous 01/17/20(Fri)10:58:22 No.

  >>3415269
  >>3415271
  just pirate the desktop version, it's on TPB

>> [_] Anonymous 01/17/20(Fri)11:37:46 No.

  The problem with lines in this case probably can't be fixed. Just as I suspected, the outlines
  are not proper flash "line", but instead a "fill" that mimics a line. A vecorizing tool can't be
  that smart to know where to use actual lines, so they use fills only. Flash internally makes sure
  that lines are always visible at any zoom level, but since our lines are fills, this is not the
  case.
  As for manually adding flash lines instead, I don't think there is acceptable easy way of doing
  it.