File: Danzorz_HD_SWE_LOOP.swf-(7.08 MB, 1280x720, Other)
[_] newfag testing loops Anonymous 10/18/19(Fri)19:47:45 No.3405600
i made a thing! sort of. isnt it neat?
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 10/18/19(Fri)20:41:08 No.3405605
this is the most HQ version of this gif i've seen
nice job newfag, you've made my day.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/18/19(Fri)20:51:13 No.3405607
I recognize these visuals, you took it from Caramelldansen HD.swf, right? In that case I guess
the only problem here is having an even larger filesize than that flash (7.08mb vs 6.86mb),
despite the visuals only being a couple frames looped vs the other one being essentially a video.
Maybe the song file is in .wav? Those are pretty big.
That and not naming it Caramelldansen as tradition dictates but that's okay since this is just a
test.
>>3405605
Caramelldansen HD.swf has them too, it's vectorized hence why it looks so clean. Problem is that
flash's only been posted 5 times since 2011...
>> [_] Anonymous 10/18/19(Fri)21:26:38 No.3405612
>>3405607
you're talking about this?
http://swfchan.com/20/99755/?Caramelldansen+HD.swf
it's NOT vectorized. that flash draws vectors on the first frame while the music builds up but
then when they start moving it's just images.
the first clue is in the filesize, no way it would be over 6 MiB with vectors unless the music is
stored in way too high quality.
but you can verify it yourself by right clicking and zooming in when they dance, you'll see it
becomes blurry and pixly, hence not vectors
OP's flash is actually much better because it doesn't use an intro with derpy text ("hd ready" /
"made by" / "presented in"), it doesn't show the newgrounds tank logo and above all else it uses
the correct swedish music
plus it doesn't show unnecessary subtitles for lyrics sung in english. the english lyrics aren't
even the same as the swedish lyrics
>> [_] Anonymous 10/18/19(Fri)21:54:46 No.3405616
>>3405605
>>3405607
>>3405612
thanks lads. yes, i used the caramelldansen hd assets. the music is 128kbps mp3. I dont know why
my file's even bigger, must be something i did.
>> [_] Anonymous 10/19/19(Sat)17:55:18 No.3405682
hehe, nice post.>>3405600
