File: Danzorz_HD_SWE_LOOP.swf-(7.08 MB, 1280x720, Other)
[_] newfag testing loops Anon 3405600 i made a thing! sort of. isnt it neat? Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 3405605 this is the most HQ version of this gif i've seen nice job newfag, you've made my day.
>> [_] Anon 3405607 I recognize these visuals, you took it from Caramelldansen HD.swf, right? In that case I guess the only problem here is having an even larger filesize than that flash (7.08mb vs 6.86mb), despite the visuals only being a couple frames looped vs the other one being essentially a video. Maybe the song file is in .wav? Those are pretty big. That and not naming it Caramelldansen as tradition dictates but that's okay since this is just a test. >># Caramelldansen HD.swf has them too, it's vectorized hence why it looks so clean. Problem is that flash's only been posted 5 times since 2011...
>> [_] Anon 3405612 >># you're talking about this? http://swfchan.com/20/99755/?Caramelldan sen+HD.swf it's NOT vectorized. that flash draws vectors on the first frame while the music builds up but then when they start moving it's just images. the first clue is in the filesize, no way it would be over 6 MiB with vectors unless the music is stored in way too high quality. but you can verify it yourself by right clicking and zooming in when they dance, you'll see it becomes blurry and pixly, hence not vectors OP's flash is actually much better because it doesn't use an intro with derpy text ("hd ready" / "made by" / "presented in"), it doesn't show the newgrounds tank logo and above all else it uses the correct swedish music plus it doesn't show unnecessary subtitles for lyrics sung in english. the english lyrics aren't even the same as the swedish lyrics
>> [_] Anon 3405616 >># >># >># thanks lads. yes, i used the caramelldansen hd assets. the music is 128kbps mp3. I dont know why my file's even bigger, must be something i did.
>> [_] Anon 3405682 hehe, nice post.>>#