STORY   LOOP   FURRY   PORN   GAMES
• C •   SERVICES [?] [R] RND   POPULAR
Archived flashes:
228056
/disc/ · /res/     /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/P0001 · P2560 · P5120

<div style="position:absolute;top:-99px;left:-99px;"><img src="http://swfchan.com:57475/34813056?noj=FRM34813056-26DN" width="1" height="1"></div>

This is the wiki page for Flash #212942
Visit the flash's index page for basic data and a list of seen names.


Fandel Tales Scene Viewer.swf
16,6 MiB, 01:13 | [W] [I]

Threads (2):

[YIZ7G3J]http://boards.swfchan.net/27227/
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 14/9 -2022 22:17:54 Ended: 25/12 -2022 17:29:48Flashes: 1 Posts: 1
/ > /fap/ > Thread 27227 Age: 94.79d Health: 0% Posters: 1 Posts: 1 Replies: 0 Files: 1+3
>> typeZ 91870 [IMG] [Derpixon]fandeltales-scene-viewer (1).swf (16.6 MiB) 1280x720, Compressed (Deflate). 1752 frames, 24 fps (01:13). Ver15, AS1/AS2. Network access: Text: Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Yes. Video: <METADATA> [find in archive]


[F7B1A6Q]F ! http://swfchan.org/13871/
ARCHIVEDDiscovered: 28/9 -2018 00:15:03 Ended: 5/2 -2019 04:51:14Flashes: 1 Posts: 16
/ > /fap/ > Thread 13871 Age: 123.2d Health: 0% Posters: 13 Posts: 16 Replies: 14 Files: 2+3
>> green anon 63726 Found this the other place might be interesting at least ._. (i dunno where it origins... but it is made by Derpixon tho) [IMG] Fandel Tales Scene Viewer.swf (16.6 MiB) 1280x720, Compressed (Deflate). 1752 frames, 24 fps (01:13). Ver15, AS1/AS2. Network access: Text: Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Yes. Video: <METADATA> [find in archive]
>> Anon 63727 VERY good, thanks for uploading! Annoys me that it says "watch the full 12-minute animation" and when you go to https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/7 13920 it's a damn movie and not a flash animation. There's no alternative swf source either... WHHYYY???? It was clearly made in flash!
>> Anon 63741 >># Something being an animation does not mean it has to be a flash file. What is wrong with swfchan lately.
>> Anon 63748 Holy, Derpdixon is one of the best animators I've ever seen, hands down. Reminds me of how buttery smooth Brackenwood was animated.
>> Anon 63749 >># If you make an animation in flash you might as well post the swf file and make the movie render as an alternative. Releasing the swf as well as the movie does no harm and swf beats the movie in quality every time as long as you have a decent CPU.
>> Anon 63753 >># Some creators probably don't like the idea of people editing their stuff or stealing assets.
>> Anon 63794 >># That's a terrible reason that only hurts the fans or paying supporters. Sure maybe it can sting a little but how about feeling flattered instead? We'll all be dead in 100 years anyway, if releasing in swf format means someone god forbid produces more swf content then so be it. [IMG]shouldersofgiants.jpg
>> ???? ???? 63800 >># Unless it's a -8 reskin.
>> Anon 63836 >># A gentleman and scholar.
>> Anon 63883 >># >5min animated movie Okay it's official. Derpixon has surpassed New Zone in every regard. Kylie was a hugely quality project, but the fapability even in the Xtra Edition was shit compared to this. >Voices OolayTiger Why am I not surprised, lol.
>> Anon 65242 >># Unless it's a -8 reskin with a patreon link, i think you mean; i don't recall anyone complaining about all the ppppu.swf edits.
>> Anon 65243 Oolay is everywhere nowadays huh?
>> w7-890 65459 this sucks Anon >># too bad she is not on Y1ff-party oh well
>> Anon 65598 >># ...So, Channers complain about PC culture and how everyone's pandering to these snowflakes, yet you autistic virgins are here screaming about how it's unfair that someone is able to create something (for your viewing pleasure) and doesn't want people editing/claiming/ruining it with black hand edits. You guys are fucking hilarious!
>> Anon 65615 >># >doesn't want people editing/claiming/ruining it with black hand edits. those "fixed" edits are usually satire/trolls or actual retards. Also why do you assume that those vocal people speak for everyone? You might as well say something as generalized as "all of country X believes Y". I just want to view the flash because it's usually great quality and has the possibility of interactive portions. Furthermore the video's file sizes are ridiculous: I'm using youtube-dl on the link from >># and the file is 410 mb! For my connection it's estimating around 2 hours to download the video. If there were a flash for the complete work, it certainly would be no larger than 100mb.
>> Anon 65617 >># >politically correct culture demands self-censorship >swf enables new content at the cost of some copied bytes >your stupid ass thinking this is somehow remotely correlated >># By the looks of the video the .swf file would be below 40 mb, still below 50 if done poorly. Static background with foreground characters, doesn't seem to be that many keyframes. Lines wiggle but that is movieclipable or even actionscriptable, doesn't need repeated bytes. Let's not forget that the visuals would be perfect at any resolution in the swf while the 400 mb video will always have codec artifacts even at just 1080p - a resolution that a lot of people are still stuck on, it's surprising that 4K isn't more widespread by now. The 4K video version of the 40 mb flash would be around 1500 mb and still have codec artifacts. 8K becomes over 6 gb in video format, or 40 mb in swf format.



http://swfchan.net/43/212942.shtml
Created: 28/9 -2018 00:45:31 Last modified: 25/12 -2022 17:34:46 Server time: 26/04 -2024 04:48:56